Aided communication, mind understanding and co-construction of meaning

Environmental factors influencing choice of spelling and graphic symbols in communicative interactions of adolescents who use communication aids

This exploratory interpretative qualitative study aimed to investigate environmental factors influencing "in the moment" decisions about use of graphic symbols or spelling in face-to-face communicative interactions, by adolescents who use communication aids and are learning how to spell. The participants were six adolescents who used speech generating devices and their mothers. Data collection consisted of seven to eight communicative interactions between adolescents and their mothers and follow up interviews with the participants. Each dyad took part in three Zoom sessions. Researchers identified the communication mode shifts between graphic symbols and spelling during interactions and subsequently discussed with participants the reasons for these shifts. The interview data were analyzed using Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory approach to coding. The analysis revealed three themes explaining environmental factors relevant to choosing spelling or graphic symbols in communicative interactions, which were: (a) features of the communication aid; (b) communication partner's skills and their knowledge of the shared experience; and (c) opportunities to practice and use spelling. The findings provide insights into the importance of providing opportunities to practice and use spelling, communication partner's skills and knowledge of shared experience and communication aid technology design which can help to facilitate spelling during communicative interactions.

Environmental factors contributing to using spelling in communication: Perceptions of literate aided communicators

The aim of this interpretive qualitative study was to explore how environmental factors influence the transition from relying solely on graphic symbols to using spelling in face-to-face communicative interactions, from the perspective of literate adults with speech and motor impairments who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Fourteen adults either chose to submit a written story with weekly email follow-up, took part in interviews conducted via Zoom1, or chose to communicate solely by email. Researchers analyzed data using Charmaz's (2014) constructivist grounded theory approach. The analysis yielded three themes explaining environmental factors relevant to the transition from using graphic symbols to spelling in communication: (a) access to AAC systems and services; (b) knowledgeable and supportive communication partners who have high expectations; and (c) opportunities to learn reading, writing, and spelling. Supportive factors included providing sufficient time for spelling in communicative interactions, structured learning opportunities for practice and independence, opportunities to learn through socially meaningful interactions and having print-rich and language-rich activity settings. Slow speed in navigating graphic symbols and lack of ability to express an exact message were motivational reasons for participants to use spelling in communicative interactions. The interaction among environmental factors and person-related characteristics warrants further investigation.

Communication partner strategies in negotiation for meaning in interactions involving aided communication

Co-constructing meaning is acommon feature of all conversationsbut may have amore specific role in interactions where one of the participants uses aided communication. The present study applies qualitative descriptive analysis supported by quantitative measures in exploring meaning-negotiation strategies of speaking communication partners in task-related aided conversations. The study focuses on identifying and exploring strategies that the communication partners utilise when attempting to interpret the meaning and resolve potential ambiguities of aided utterances in the context of event descriptions. The participants of the study were three aided communicators (age 8 to 11 years), who used graphic communication systems as their main means of communication, and familiar adult communication partners. The results demonstrate that the communication partners employed several strategies in attempting to comprehend, interpret and co-construct the meaning of aided utterances at various phases of interaction. The primary strategy involved clarifying the lexical properties of the aided constructions, reflecting the multidimensional and polysemous nature of graphic communication systems. Structural and referential complexities affected how the elements produced were understood as part of the ongoing context. The study highlights the participants´ shared responsibility in developing and utilising effective meaning-negotiation and repair strategies to support successful communication.