1
|
Hersi M, Corace K, Hamel C, Esmaeilisaraji L, Rice D, Dryburgh N, Skidmore B, Garber G, Porath A, Willows M, MacPherson P, Sproule B, Flores-Aranda J, Dickey C, Hutton B. Psychosocial and pharmacologic interventions for problematic methamphetamine use: Findings from a scoping review of the literature. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0292745. [PMID: 37819931 PMCID: PMC10566716 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE Methamphetamine use and related harms have risen at alarming rates. While several psychosocial and pharmacologic interventions have been described in the literature, there is uncertainty regarding the best approach for the management of methamphetamine use disorder (MUD) and problematic methamphetamine use (PMU). We conducted a scoping review of recent systematic reviews (SR), clinical practice guidelines (CPG), and primary controlled studies of psychosocial and pharmacologic treatments for MUD/PMU. METHODS Guided by an a priori protocol, electronic database search updates (e.g., MEDLINE, Embase) were performed in February 2022. Screening was performed following a two-stage process, leveraging artificial intelligence to increase efficiency of title and abstract screening. Studies involving individuals who use methamphetamine, including key subgroups (e.g. those with mental health comorbidities; adolescents/youths; gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men) were sought. We examined evidence related to methamphetamine use, relapse, use of other substances, risk behaviors, mental health, harms, and retention. Figures, tables and descriptive synthesis were used to present findings from the identified literature. RESULTS We identified 2 SRs, one CPG, and 54 primary studies reported in 69 publications that met our eligibility criteria. Amongst SRs, one concluded that psychostimulants had no effect on methamphetamine abstinence or treatment retention while the other reported no effect of topiramate on cravings. The CPG strongly recommended psychosocial interventions as well as self-help and family support groups for post-acute management of methamphetamine-related disorders. Amongst primary studies, many interventions were assessed by only single studies; contingency management was the therapy most commonly associated with evidence of potential effectiveness, while bupropion and modafinil were analogously the most common pharmacologic interventions. Nearly all interventions showed signs of potential benefit on at least one methamphetamine-related outcome measure. DISCUSSION This scoping review provides an overview of available interventions for the treatment of MUD/PMU. As most interventions were reported by a single study, the effectiveness of available interventions remains uncertain. Primary studies with longer durations of treatment and follow-up, larger sample sizes, and of special populations are required for conclusive recommendations of best approaches for the treatment of MUD/PMU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Hersi
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Kim Corace
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- Substance Use and Concurrent Disorders Program, The Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre, Ottawa, Ontario Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Mental Health Research, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Danielle Rice
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Nicole Dryburgh
- Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Gary Garber
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Division of Infectious Diseases, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Amy Porath
- Knowledge Institute on Child and Youth Mental Health and Addictions, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Melanie Willows
- Substance Use and Concurrent Disorders Program, The Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre, Ottawa, Ontario Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Mental Health Research, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Paul MacPherson
- Division of Infectious Diseases, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Beth Sproule
- Department of Pharmacy, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy and Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Chandlee Dickey
- Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Brian Hutton
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Casal B, Rodríguez-Míguez E, Rivera B. Measuring intangible cost-of-morbidity due to substance dependence: implications of using alternative preference-based instruments. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2020; 21:1039-1048. [PMID: 32419059 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-020-01196-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2019] [Accepted: 04/25/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Drug and/or alcohol dependence (DAD) generates substantial costs to society. One of the main consequences of DAD is its negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The main objective of this study is to analyse the impact of using EQ-5D-5L, SF-6DSG (SF-6D using standard-gamble as the preference-eliciting method) and SF-6DPG (SF-6D using a paired-gamble method), to estimate the HRQoL burden, attributable to DAD, within the cost-of-illness framework. METHODS A convenience sample of 109 patients with a diagnosis of substance use disorder was recruited. SF-6D and EQ-5D-5L were administered and then the utility scores were computed. The impact of employing different instruments to estimate the HRQoL burden was assessed by comparing the utility scores of patients and general population after controlling for sex and age through regression analysis. The analysis was reproduced for two subgroups of severity. RESULTS All instruments detect that DAD significantly affects the HRQoL. However, the estimated impact changes, according to the instrument used, whose pattern varies by severity group. Nonetheless, regardless of severity, SF-6DPG always estimates a higher or equal DAD burden than the other instruments considered. These results are compatible with the presence of the floor effect in SF-6DSG, the ceiling effect in EQ-ED-5L, and a smaller presence of both biases in SF-6DPG. CONCLUSIONS The SF-6DPG instrument emerges as a good candidate to avoid under-estimating intangible costs within the cost-of-illness framework. However, further research is needed to assess the validity of our results in the context of other health problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Casal
- Department of Economics, University of A Coruña, Campus de Elviña, 15071, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Eva Rodríguez-Míguez
- Department of Applied Economics, University of Vigo, Campus As Lagoas-Marcosende, 36310, Vigo, Spain
| | - Berta Rivera
- Department of Economics, University of A Coruña, Campus de Elviña, 15071, A Coruña, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McKetin R, Voce A, Burns R, Shanahan M. Health-related quality of life among people who use methamphetamine. Drug Alcohol Rev 2019; 38:503-509. [PMID: 31144396 DOI: 10.1111/dar.12934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2018] [Revised: 04/01/2019] [Accepted: 04/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS We assessed health-related quality of life amongst people who use methamphetamine, examined how this related to different patterns of methamphetamine use and what other factors were associated with decrements in quality of life in this sample. DESIGN AND METHODS A cross-sectional survey of 169 at least monthly methamphetamine users. Health utility scores were derived using the Assessment of Quality of Life - 4D for the past month (0 reflects death and 1 represents full health; the population mean Assessment of Quality of Life score in Australia is 0.81). Dependence on methamphetamine was a score of 4+ on the Severity of Dependence Scale. Other measures included days of methamphetamine use and other substance use in the past month, injecting methamphetamine, demographics, psychiatric symptoms (score of 4+ on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale items) and a lifetime DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia. RESULTS The mean utility score was 0.52 (95% confidence interval 0.48-0.56). Methamphetamine dependence was associated with lower utility (-0.10, P = 0.003) after adjustment for other univariate correlates of utility. Other factors independently associated with lower utility were being a woman (-0.14, P < 0.001), depression (-0.10, P = 0.008), self-neglect (-0.08, P = 0.035), schizophrenia (-0.17, P = 0.003) and fewer years of schooling (0.02 per year, P = 0.037). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS We found poor quality of life in this sample of methamphetamine users relative to the general population, this being associated with both dependence on methamphetamine and other factors, particularly poor mental health. We also found poorer health amongst women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca McKetin
- National Drug Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.,Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.,National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexandra Voce
- Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Richard Burns
- Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Marian Shanahan
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|