Treatment of anal dysplasia in HIV-positive men who have sex with men in a large AIDS reference centre

Anal Dysplasia Screening in People Living with HIV: Long-Term Follow-Up in a Large Cohort from Northwest Spain

Anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is not a common disease in the general population, although its incidence is higher in people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH). Anal SCC is caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and arises from premalignant lesions termed squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs). SIL surveillance programs are based on the early detection and treatment of SILs, especially those with a higher risk of transforming into cancer. An anal surveillance program has been under development in our institution since 2011. In this context, we performed a retrospective cohort study at the anal dysplasia unit of Álvaro-Cunqueiro Hospital (Spain). Epidemiological and clinical data were gathered from our Infectious Diseases Sample Collection (an open sample cohort including PLWH) from January 2011 to January 2022. A total of 493 PLWH were considered, 122 (24.7%) of whom were diagnosed with anal dysplasia at baseline, including 2 cases of anal SCC. Briefly, most of individuals were young men (median age, 38 years old) born in Spain (76%), whose vaccination rate before their inclusion in the program was scarce (<3%). Throughout the study period, 81 (16.4%) cases were diagnosed with high-grade squamous-intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) and 3 with anal SCC. At the baseline, severe immunosuppression (i.e., nadir CD4+ lymphocyte count below 200 cell/μL), and prior diagnosis of condyloma acuminata were more frequent within the group with SILs. Conversely, the baseline CD4+ lymphocyte count was similar among both groups. HPV-16 was related to a higher risk of HSILs (odds ratio: 2.76). At the end of the follow-up, 385 PLWH had been retained in care; one patient had died of anal cancer. Anal dysplasia was common (25% of cases), especially among patients infected by HPV-16, diagnosed with condyloma acuminata, and who were severely immunosuppressed. HPV-16 was the main risk factor for the presentation of HSILs.

Anal Cancer Screening and Prevention: Summary of Evidence Reviewed for the 2021 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Sexually Transmitted Infection Guidelines

In June 2019 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) convened an advisory group to assist in development of the 2021 CDC sexually transmitted infections (STI) guidelines. The advisory group on anal cancer screening and prevention met to formulate key questions in this field. The group examined published literature and abstracts to assess evidence and give recommendations for development of the CDC guidelines. This article summarizes key questions, evidence, recommendations, and areas for further research for the screening, diagnosis, and prevention of anal cancer.

Evaluating the efficacy of treatment options for anal intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) is the accepted precursor of anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). There has long been a hypothesis that treating AIN may prevent ASCC. Many different treatment modalities have been suggested and studied. We conducted this systematic review to evaluate their efficacy and the evidence as to whether we can prevent ASCC by treating AIN.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were electronically searched using relevant search terms. All studies investigating the use of a single treatment for AIN that reported at least one end outcome such as partial or complete response to treatment, recurrence after treatment and/or ASCC diagnosis after treatment were included.

RESULTS

Thirty studies were included in the systematic review investigating 10 treatment modalities: 5% imiquimod, 5-fluorouracil, cidofovir, trichloroacetic acid, electrocautery, surgical excision, infrared coagulation, radiofrequency ablation, photodynamic therapy and HPV vaccination. All treatment modalities demonstrated some initial regression of AIN after treatment; however, recurrence rates were high especially in HIV-positive patients. Many of the studies suffered from significant bias which prevented direct comparison.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the theory persists that by inducing the regression of AIN, we may be able to reduce the risk of ASCC, there was no clinical evidence within the literature advocating that treating AIN does prevent ASCC.

Management of anal intraepithelial neoplasia and anal squamous cell carcinoma at a tertiary referral centre with a dedicated infectious diseases unit: an 18-year review

INTRODUCTION

Anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) is a rare malignancy with rising incidence rates. Risk factors include human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, high-risk sexual activity and HPV-related genitourinary dysplasia/neoplasia. There is an overlap between high-risk patients and those attending HIV Medicine/Sexual Health (HMSH) services. We hypothesised that HMSH involvement may facilitate earlier referral to colorectal surgeons, with better outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective review of all ASCC and anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) treated at a tertiary-referral hospital with a dedicated HMSH clinic between 2000 and 2018. Comparative analysis was performed of demographics, management and outcomes between HMSH and non-HMSH patients.

RESULTS

One hundred and nine patients had anal pathology, eighty-five with ASCC (78%) and twenty-four with AIN (22%). Seventy (64%) were male. Median (range) age at ASCC diagnosis was 51 years (26-88). Thirty-six percent of all patients attended HMSH services, 28% were HIV positive, and 41% of males were men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM). Eighty-one ASCC patients (97.5%) were treated with curative intent. Sixty-seven (80%) had primary chemoradiation therapy. Fifteen (17.5%) had primary surgical excision. Twelve (14%) developed recurrent disease. Ultimately, seven required salvage APR. Overall 3-year survival (3YS) was 76%. HMSH patients were significantly younger at ASCC diagnosis (p < 0.001), with a higher prevalence of HIV, HPV and MSM. HMSH attenders also tended to be diagnosed at earlier stages, were less likely to develop recurrence and achieved better overall outcomes, with a superior overall 3YS than non-HMSH patients (92% vs 72%, p = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

ASCC incidence is increasing worldwide. The HMSH cohort has emerged as a distinct subpopulation of younger, high-risk, male patients. Collaboration between HMSH and colorectal surgeons offers an opportunity for risk reduction strategies and earlier intervention.

The effectiveness and tolerability of imiquimod suppositories to treat extensive intra-anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions/warts in HIV-infected individuals

Topical imiquimod is a potential treatment for intra-anal condyloma and squamous intraepithelial lesions caused by human papillomavirus (HPV). We aimed to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of imiquimod suppositories for the treatment of anal high-grade intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) and condylomas in HIV-infected patients. We conducted a retrospective analysis in a prospectively followed cohort. High-resolution anoscopy was used for diagnosis and assessment following treatment. Patients’ tolerability was assessed with a self-administered survey. Ninety-five patients (94.7% men) were analyzed. All were on combination antiretroviral therapy. Median CD4 T-cell count was 690 cells/µL, 89% had undetectable plasma viral load. Response to imiquimod was seen in 46.3% (complete: 12.5%, partial: 33.8%) in the intent-to-treat analysis, and in 55.2% (complete: 14.9%, partial: 40.3%) in the on-treatment analysis. Higher response rates were observed for anal condyloma compared with HSIL. A significantly poorer response rate was observed in smokers and in individuals with lower nadir CD4 T-cell counts. Imiquimod tolerability was “good” in 57.1% (n = 36), “acceptable” in 33.3% (n = 21), and “poor” in 9.5% (n = 6). Systemic side effects were reported in 20.7% (n = 13). There was no association between treatment effect and tolerability. In conclusion, imiquimod stands as a well-tolerated option for the treatment of HPV-associated intra-anal pathology in HIV-infected individuals.

Intra-anal use of imiquimod: what is the clinical evidence?

Imiquimod has been demonstrated to be rather effective in patients with anal as well as perianal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs). Nevertheless, until now the intra-anal use of imiquimod has been considered off-label. The aim of this study is to review the clinical evidence related to the intra-anal use of imiquimod in the treatment of human papillomavirus-related anal lesions. A systematic search in PubMed and Scopus was performed. In total, 422 patients were included. The most common referred comorbidity was HIV infection (281 patients, 66.6%). The principal clinical entities, which were treated with intra-anal imiquimod, were HSILs. The most frequent formulation was self-applied imiquimod cream. In the HSIL group, there was complete healing in 74 patients (35%) and partial in 44 patients (20.9%), while in the wart group, there was complete healing in 128 patients (67%). Recurrence of HSIL was present in 19 patients (15%), while in cases with warts recurrence was present in 38 patients (19.8%). The most common adverse events were pain, itching, and burning sensation. In conclusion, the adverse effects associated with the intra-anal use of imiquimod seem to be minor. The present clinical evidence suggests that imiquimod may be proposed as effective, safe, and relatively well tolerated treatment.