Lessons Learned From Talking With Parents About the Role of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in the Treatment of Children With Sickle Cell Disease

A scoping review exploring cure definitions and language for inherited hemoglobinopathies

Purpose

Sickle cell disease and beta thalassemia are some of the first targets for potentially curative cell-based therapies. Currently, bone marrow transplants, stem cell transplants, and gene therapy are being researched and utilized for people living with these hemoglobinopathies. Although these therapies are often described as curative, there is not a clear definition of what cure means for these hemoglobinopathies.

Methods

Five databases were searched for this scoping review. Two reviewers screened each article at the title/abstract and full text levels using Covidence. Articles were included if they were (1) about bone marrow transplants, stem cell transplants, or gene therapy; (2) conditions of focus were sickle cell disease or beta thalassemia; and (3) reported original data on clinical outcomes, psychosocial outcomes, or key stakeholder perspectives and opinions. Data were collected by 2 reviewers also using Covidence, and analyses were conducted in Excel and R.

Results

We found that, although cure is widely and indiscriminately used, it is not often defined, and when cure is defined, there is no clear convergence or consensus on the definition. Furthermore, cure is often qualified and undefined euphemisms for cure are often used. We also report the major ways in which the success and complications of these treatment modalities are described.

Conclusion

We frame the significance of our findings by discussing their scientific, ethical, and social implications and focus on the need for precise and clear terminology that centers lived experience and acknowledges the interplay between scientific and lay expertise and perceptions.

Comparative analysis of opioid use in sickle cell crisis in an urban facility in Ghana

Vaso-occlusive crises (VOC) is common and opioids are the treatment of choice.This study compared parenteral pethidine and morphine in the elimination/reduction of pain in acute VOC to tolerable levels. This open-label randomized study compared intravenous morphine 5 mg 4 hourly to intramuscular pethidine 75 mg 4 hourly. Eighty-two consenting adult sickle cell disease participants were recruited from the Korle-Bu Polyclinic. (Forty-one participants in each arm). There were 42 male and 40 female participants. Median age was 25 years. Pethidine participants totalling 31.7% (13/41) and 53.7% (22/41) in the morphine arm had a sustained response within 6 h, p = 0.027. In the pethidine and morphine arms 60.0% (24/40) and 62.5% (25/40) of participants respectively achieved adequate pain control within 72 h of initiating therapy, p = 0.296. Most participants, 96.3% (79/82) had no side effects to opioids. The commonest side effects were generalized pruritus, nausea and vomiting, and headaches. More pethidine than morphine participants experienced side effects 29.3% and 22.0% respectively; p = 0.448. In conclusion, more morphine participants achieved a sustained pain response compared to the pethidine participants. There was no difference in the tolerability and side effect profile of the opioids. No participant experienced respiratory suppression.

Navigating decisional conflict as a family when facing the decision of stem cell transplant for a child or adolescent with sickle cell disease

OBJECTIVE

Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) face unpredictable disease, with stem cell transplant being a curative treatment option with risks. The aim of this study was to describe the level and source of decisional conflict in families of children/adolescents with SCD facing a transplant decision.

METHODS

A multiple-case study approach described decisional conflict in various SCD severity/donor risk decisional contexts. Cases included parents, child/adolescent with SCD, and sibling donor. The level and source of conflict was measured via O'Connor's Decisional Conflict Scale and analyzed using pattern-matching and cross-case synthesis. In-depth descriptions of conflict sources were obtained through thematic analysis of observation and interview data.

RESULTS

Among 11 participants in four cases (i.e. family units) decisional conflict was not unique not to the decisional context. Conflict levels represented a level that can be linked with feeling unsure and decisional delay. The theme, 'navigating decisional conflict together', described how family units discussed uncertainties.

CONCLUSION

Varying levels and sources of decisional conflict exist in pediatric patients with SCD and their families considering transplant.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

In our cases, decisional conflict and the transplant decision occurred at the family-level. Clinicians should encourage all family members to participate in discussions concerning transplant.

Decision making in pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation: Influential factors vary among diseases

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is not a trivial treatment decision in pediatrics. We sought to understand what influences this decision-making process from the perspectives of the pediatric patients, their family, and physicians. Using integrative review methods, we identified 19 relevant studies: six qualitative, ten quantitative, and three mixed methods. Synthesis of the results revealed six themes describing patient, family, and provider decision-making processes with distinct subthemes contrasting influential factors among malignant and nonmalignant diseases. Identification of what influences HCT decision making will aid in development of decision support, education, and communication strategies. The child/adolescent voice and provider perspective warrant more attention.