1
|
Hobayan CGP, Bates NA, Heyniger J, Alzouhayli K, Piscitani F, Haider CR, Felton C, Groth AT, Martin KD. Stability of One-Step Spray-on Splint for Lower Extremity Fractures During Splinting, MEDEVAC, and Impact. Mil Med 2024; 189:1947-1954. [PMID: 38294066 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usae001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Military transport can induce whole-body vibrations, and combat almost always involves high impact between lower extremities and the ground. Therefore, robust splinting technology is necessary for lower extremity fractures in these settings. Our team compared a novel one-step spray-on foam splint (FastCast) to the current military standard structured aluminum malleable (SAM) splint. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ten cadaveric specimens were subjected to complete tibia/fibula osteotomy. Specimens were fitted with custom accelerometer and gyroscope sensors superior and inferior to the fracture line. Each specimen underwent fracture and splinting from a standard of care SAM splint and an experimental FastCast spray foam splint in a randomized order. Each specimen was manually transported to an ambulance and then released from a 1 meter height to simulate impact. The custom sensors recorded accelerations and rotations throughout each event. Repeated-measures Friedman tests were used to assess differences between splint method within each event and between sensors within each splint method. RESULTS During splinting, overall summation of change and difference of change between sensors for accelerations and rotations were greater for SAM splints than FastCast across all axes (P ≤ 0.03). During transport, the range of acceleration along the linear superior/inferior axis was greater for SAM splint than FastCast (P = 0.02), as was the range of rotation along the transverse plane (P < 0.01). On impact, the summation of change observed was greater for SAM splint than FastCast with respect to acceleration and rotation on the posterior/anterior and superior/inferior axes (P ≤ 0.03), and the cumulative difference between superior and inferior sensors was greater for SAM than FastCast with respect to anterior-axis rotation (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION FastCast maintains stabilization of fractured lower extremities during transport and impacts to a significantly greater extent than SAM splints. Therefore, FastCast can potentially reduce the risk of fracture complications following physical stressors associated with combat and extraction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Grace P Hobayan
- College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Nathaniel A Bates
- College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43201, USA
| | - John Heyniger
- College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Kenan Alzouhayli
- College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Franco Piscitani
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43201, USA
| | - Clifton R Haider
- Special Purpose Processor Development Group, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Christopher Felton
- Special Purpose Processor Development Group, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Adam T Groth
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43201, USA
| | - Kevin D Martin
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43201, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ullman CJ, Hengst D, Rolfson O, Myers S, Robinson Y. Systematic Review of Injuries and Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Among High-speed Boat Operators. Mil Med 2024; 189:e573-e580. [PMID: 37837204 PMCID: PMC10898931 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usad377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION High-speed boat operators constitute a population at risk of work-related injuries and disabilities. This review aimed to summarize the available knowledge on workplace-related injuries and chronic musculoskeletal pain among high-speed boat operators. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this systematic review, we searched Medline, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library Database for studies, published from 1980 to 2022, on occupational health and hazards onboard high-speed boats. Studies and reports were eligible for inclusion if they evaluated, compared, used, or described harms associated with impact exposure onboard high-speed boats. Studies focusing on recreational injuries and operators of non-planing boats were excluded. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of acute injuries. The secondary outcome measures comprised the presence of chronic musculoskeletal disorders, pain medication use, and days off work. RESULTS Of the 163 search results, 5 (2 prospective longitudinal and 3 cross-sectional cohort studies) were included in this systematic review. A total of 804 cases with 3,312 injuries sustained during 3,467 person-years onboard high-speed boats were included in the synthesis of the results. The pooled incidence rate was 1.0 per person-year. The most common injuries were related to the lower back (26%), followed by neck (16%) and head (12%) injuries. The pooled prevalence of chronic pain was 74% (95% CI: 73-75%) and 60% (95% CI: 59-62%) of the cohort consumed analgesics. CONCLUSIONS Despite very limited data, this review found evidence that high-speed boat operators have a higher rate of injuries and a higher prevalence of chronic pain than other naval service operators and the general workforce. Given the low certainty of these findings, further prospective research is required to verify the injury incidence and chronic pain prevalence among high-speed boat operators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cpt Johan Ullman
- Centre for Disaster Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Box 426, Göteborg 413 45, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborgsvägen 31, Mölndal 431 80, Sweden
- Centre for Defence Medicine, Swedish Armed Forces, Göta Älvsgatan 20, Västra Frölunda 426 05, Sweden
| | - David Hengst
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborgsvägen 31, Mölndal 431 80, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Länsmansgatan 28, Mölndal 431 30, Sweden
| | - Ola Rolfson
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborgsvägen 31, Mölndal 431 80, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Länsmansgatan 28, Mölndal 431 30, Sweden
| | - Stephen Myers
- Occupational Performance Research Group, Institute of Applied Sciences, University of Chichester, College Lane, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 6PE, Great Britain
| | - Yohan Robinson
- Centre for Disaster Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Box 426, Göteborg 413 45, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborgsvägen 31, Mölndal 431 80, Sweden
- Centre for Defence Medicine, Swedish Armed Forces, Göta Älvsgatan 20, Västra Frölunda 426 05, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
May AT, Bailly N, Sellier A, Avinens V, Huneidi M, Meyer M, Troude L, Roche PH, Dufour H, Dagain A, Arnoux PJ, Farah K, Fuentes S. Spinal Fractures during Touristic Motorboat Sea Cruises: An Underestimated and Avoidable Phenomenon. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12041426. [PMID: 36835959 PMCID: PMC9967971 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Each summer, many vacationers enjoy the Mediterranean Sea shores. Among the recreational nautical activities, motorboat cruise is a popular choice that leads to a significant number of thoracolumbar spine fractures at our clinic. This phenomenon seems to be underreported, and its injury mechanism remains unclear. Here, we aim to describe the fracture pattern and propose a possible mechanism of injury. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the clinical, radiological, and contextual parameters of all motorboat-related spinal fracture cases during a 14-year period (2006-2020) in three French neurosurgical level I centers bordering the Mediterranean Sea. Fractures were classified according to the AOSpine thoracolumbar classification system. RESULTS A total of 79 patients presented 90 fractures altogether. Women presented more commonly than men (61/18). Most of the lesions occurred at the thoracolumbar transition region between T10 and L2 (88.9% of the levels fractured). Compression A type fractures were seen in all cases (100%). Only one case of posterior spinal element injury was observed. The occurrence of neurological deficit was rare (7.6%). The most commonly encountered context was a patient sitting at the boat's bow, without anticipating the trauma, when the ship's bow suddenly elevated while crossing another wave, resulting in a "deck-slap" mechanism hitting and propelling the patient in the air. CONCLUSIONS Thoracolumbar compression fractures are a frequent finding in nautical tourism. Passengers seated at the boat's bow are the typical victims. Some specific biomechanical patterns are involved with the boat's deck suddenly elevating across the waves. More data with biomechanical studies are necessary to understand the phenomenon. Prevention and safety recommendations should be given before motorboat use to fight against these avoidable fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrien Thomas May
- Service de Neurochirurgie, Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France
- Service de Neurochirurgie, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France
- Correspondence:
| | - Nicolas Bailly
- Laboratoire de Biomécanique Appliquée, UMRT24 IFSTTAR—Université de la Méditerranée, 13005 Marseille, France
| | | | - Valentin Avinens
- Service de Neurochirurgie, Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - Maxime Huneidi
- Service de Neurochirurgie, Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - Mikael Meyer
- Service de Neurochirurgie, Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - Lucas Troude
- Service de Neurochirurgie, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - Pierre-Hugues Roche
- Service de Neurochirurgie, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - Henry Dufour
- Service de Neurochirurgie, Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - Arnaud Dagain
- Hôpital d’Instruction des Armées, 83000 Toulon, France
| | - Pierre-Jean Arnoux
- Laboratoire de Biomécanique Appliquée, UMRT24 IFSTTAR—Université de la Méditerranée, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - Kaissar Farah
- Service de Neurochirurgie, Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - Stéphane Fuentes
- Service de Neurochirurgie, Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ullman J, Hengst D, Carpenter R, Robinson Y. Does Military High-speed Boat Slamming Cause Severe Injuries and Disability? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2022; 480:2163-2173. [PMID: 36190503 PMCID: PMC9556009 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many operators of professional high-speed boats suffer severe, acute, and permanent injuries caused by slamming-induced hull impacts. As the number of professional high-speed boats and their speed capabilities increase, operators are reporting increasing numbers and severity of injuries. However, the actual incidence rate of acute injuries and the prevalence of chronic musculoskeletal disorders are still unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES We sought to investigate, among professional high-speed boat operators, (1) the self-reported incidence rate of impact-induced injuries, (2) the most common types of injuries or injury locations, (3) what impact characteristics were reported, and (4) the prevalence of self-reported sick leave, disability, and medical or orthopaedic treatment. METHODS This study was an internet-based survey among retired military high-speed boat operators. The survey was given to members of the Combatant Craft Crewman Association online user group (360 members). Participants answered questions on demographics, service branch, service years and capacity, boat type, types of events, injury location, severity, pain, disability, and need for treatment. Values are presented as the mean ± SD and proportions. Incidence rates are presented as injuries per person-year. A total of 214 members of the Combatant Craft Crewman Association participated in the survey (213 men, mean age 50 ± 9 years, mean BMI 29 ± 4 kg/m 2 ). A total of 59% (214 of 360) of those we surveyed provided responses; all provided complete survey responses. RESULTS The self-reported incidence rate of impact-induced injuries was 1.1 injuries per person-year served onboard. A total of 32% (775 of 2460) of respondents reported injuries that affected the back, and 21% (509 of 2460) reported injuries that affected the neck. Among those who responded, 33% (70 of 214) reported loss of consciousness onboard, and 70% (149 of 214) reported having experienced impaired capacity to perform their job onboard because of impact exposure. A total of 49% (889 of 1827) of the reported injuries were attributed to impacts containing lateral forces, 18% (333 of 1827) to frontal impacts, and 12% (218 of 1827) were attributed to purely vertical impacts. Finally, 67% (144 of 214) of respondents reported at least one occasion of sick leave from training or missions. Seventy-two percent (155 of 214) applied for a Veterans Affairs disability rating, and 68% (105 of 155) of these had a rating of 50% or higher. Additionally, 39% (84 of 214) reported having had surgery during active duty, and 34% (72 of 214) reported surgery after leaving active service. CONCLUSION The results suggest that in the investigated military population, exposure to slamming-induced impacts onboard high-speed boats may cause more injuries than previously reported. Most reported injuries are musculoskeletal, but the high number of reported slamming-induced events of unconsciousness is concerning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, prognostic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan Ullman
- Swedish Armed Forces, Joint Centre for Defence Medicine, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - David Hengst
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ronald Carpenter
- Train Maintain Sustain Group, TMS Group LLC, Saint Petersburg, FL, USA
| | - Yohan Robinson
- Swedish Armed Forces, Joint Centre for Defence Medicine, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Eitzen I, Renberg J, Færevik H. The Use of Wearable Sensor Technology to Detect Shock Impacts in Sports and Occupational Settings: A Scoping Review. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2021; 21:4962. [PMID: 34372198 PMCID: PMC8348544 DOI: 10.3390/s21154962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Shock impacts during activity may cause damage to the joints, muscles, bones, or inner organs. To define thresholds for tolerable impacts, there is a need for methods that can accurately monitor shock impacts in real-life settings. Therefore, the main aim of this scoping review was to present an overview of existing methods for assessments of shock impacts using wearable sensor technology within two domains: sports and occupational settings. Online databases were used to identify papers published in 2010-2020, from which we selected 34 papers that used wearable sensor technology to measure shock impacts. No studies were found on occupational settings. For the sports domain, accelerometry was the dominant type of wearable sensor technology utilized, interpreting peak acceleration as a proxy for impact. Of the included studies, 28 assessed foot strike in running, head impacts in invasion and team sports, or different forms of jump landings or plyometric movements. The included studies revealed a lack of consensus regarding sensor placement and interpretation of the results. Furthermore, the identified high proportion of validation studies support previous concerns that wearable sensors at present are inadequate as a stand-alone method for valid and accurate data on shock impacts in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid Eitzen
- Department of Smart Sensor Systems, SINTEF Digital, 0373 Oslo, Norway
| | - Julie Renberg
- Department of Health Research, SINTEF Digital, 7034 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Hilde Færevik
- Department of Health Research, SINTEF Digital, 7034 Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|