The role of psychologists in multi-disciplinary teams for intersex/diverse sex development: interviews with British and Swedish clinical specialists

Why do parents recommend clitoral surgery? Parental perception of the necessity, benefit, and cost of early childhood clitoral surgery for congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH)

Historically, medical management of Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH) in girls typically involved feminising surgery, which meant reducing the size and/or visibility of the enlarged clitoris. This practice may have become less routine but remains a common response to genital differences associated with CAH. Parents typically give permission for the child to undergo surgery in early childhood and recommend other parents facing a similar situation do the same. The current report is based on a qualitative content analysis of interviews with sixteen parents whose daughters with CAH had undergone one of two forms of clitoral surgery. We observed that: (i) some parents were initially unconcerned about their child's genital presentation; (ii) in general, clitoral surgery was considered as a readily available and natural response to the child's bodily difference; (iii) the parents acknowledged that there would be some risk but anticipated various benefits; and (iv) there was an absence of ethical considerations when the parents evaluated the various effects of surgery afterwards. We conclude from our analysis that parents of girls with CAH may not receive psychologically and ethically informed counselling to encourage critical reflections prior to authorizing genital surgery.

Hypospadias surgery: understanding parental emotions, decisions and regrets

This paper builds an argument about genital surgery in the context of medical treatment of children and young people with variations in sex characteristics. First, I set out what is known from existing research including psychological research, surgical follow-up studies and parental regret studies. Second, I present an analysis of surgeons' talk about children, young people and parents in relation to genital surgery. This paper focuses most specifically on hypospadias surgery, but the argumentation is relevant for other kinds of genital surgery carried out in the context of genital variations. The questions guiding this paper are: what research evidence supports hypospadias surgery and what research evidence brings this surgery into question? How might a new interpretation of the evidence, in light of psychosocial research and human rights concerns, contribute to a new perspective on elective genital surgery on minors with variations in sex characteristics? I draw out implications for clinicians supporting parents to decide whether a surgical pathway is the best option for their child.

Delivery of multidisciplinary care in the field of differences and disorders of sex development (DSD)

INTRODUCTION

Differences and disorders of sex development (DSD) are a diverse group of conditions, which often present in early childhood and may require input from a group of experts in a wide range of clinical fields. Clinical guidance in this field recommends that these experts function as a multidisciplinary team (MDT) within which each expert has a defined role, which ensures an integrated and streamlined approach to the care of affected individuals.

AREAS COVERED

This review will focus on the benefits of multidisciplinary care for people with DSD, as well as the challenges that may be faced.

EXPERT OPINION

Core members of the MDT for people with DSD include endocrinologists, surgeons, psychologists, geneticists, specialist nurses, radiologists, and gynecologists, although many other health-care professionals may also be pertinent, at different stages of the patient's life. With greater acceptance of remote and digital health-care technology, there is a need to review the traditional concepts of the clinical MDT so that new care models can be explored for effective and efficient delivery of complex care.

Psychosocial approaches and discursive gaps in intersex healthcare: findings from an Israeli-German action research study

In the past several decades, conflicting discourses have coexisted in the field of intersex studies, including the pathologising discourse of the biomedical disciplines and the affirmative, subjective psychosocial discourse of people born with intersex bodies and their advocates. Intersex activists call for a positive discourse on intersex bodies and a humanistic healthcare approach that accepts and protects intersex bodily autonomy to replace continuing harmful, traumatic treatments aimed at normalising variations of sex characteristics (VSC). Our awareness of the biomedical discursive dominance prompted us to initiate Inter-Care and Awareness, an intercultural German-Israeli action research project. This paper introduces the project and explores intercultural approaches to psychosocial intersex care using an action research framework. We describe how the project's goals, processes and outcomes created educational material on intersex which uses positive language, explores intersex in the Jewish tradition, improves the support offered to parents of intersex children, and examines cross-cultural differences that arose in the encounters between the Israeli and German participants. The analysis points to sociocultural themes that reflect intersex people's current status in Israel and Germany. Implications regarding the implementation of similar projects in other countries are discussed.

Towards an agency-based model of intersex, variations of sex characteristics (VSC) and DSD/dsd health

Agency-based approaches to the health of intersex people and those with DSD focus on bodily autonomy and the cessation of normalising medical interventions until an under-age person can exercise fully informed choice regarding treatment. Discussions regarding intersex agency and health care can be inspired by the social model of health that emerged from disability theory. However, a purely social model is insufficient to address the harms that has been caused by DSD medical interventions, and the healthcare needs that some intersex people have. Drawing on original empirical research conducted in Italy, Switzerland and the UK, this article explores agency-based approaches to intersex and DSD, incorporating the social model's critique of the pathologisation of bodily diversities, whilst supporting the provision of effective healthcare where needed. The article addresses healthcare deficits and their cultural underpinnings. It identifies key impediments to intersex agency, including body normativity and sex and gender binarism. While there has been slight movement towards an agency-based approach to intersex in some national medical settings in the last ten years, there is still a need for change to the conceptualisation of intersex/DSD and subsequent revisions to healthcare provision.