Predicting the COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Clinical Trial Recruitment

Overcoming Pandemic-Related Challenges in Recruitment and Screening: Strategies and Representation of Older Women With Cardiovascular Disease for a Multidomain Lifestyle Trial to Prevent Cognitive Decline

BACKGROUND

Recruiting participants with cardiovascular disease into research during the COVID-19 pandemic was challenging, particularly those at risk of health disparities.

OBJECTIVE

During the pandemic, 12 cohorts of older women with cardiovascular disease were recruited from cardiology clinics into a lifestyle intervention trial to prevent cognitive decline. Objectives were to ( a ) describe the results of modified recruitment/screening strategies to overcome pandemic-related challenges and ( b ) evaluate differences in age, race, and ethnicity between patients recruited/randomized, recruited/not randomized (entered recruitment but not randomized because of being ineligible or not interested), and not recruited (clinic patients who met preliminary criteria but did not enter recruitment).

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional descriptive analysis. In-person study strategies proposed before the COVID-19 pandemic were modified before study onset (September 2020). Women 65 years or older with cardiovascular disease were recruited from cardiology clinics by clinicians, posted flyers, and letters mailed to patients randomly selected from electronic health record data extractions. Patients were classified as recruited/randomized, recruited/not randomized, and not recruited.

RESULTS

Of 5719 patients potentially eligible, 1689 patients entered recruitment via referral (49.1%), posted flyers (0.5%), or mailed letters (50.3%), and 253 patients were successfully recruited/randomized. Recruited/randomized participants were, on average, 72.4 years old (range, 65-90 years old), non-Hispanic White (54.2%), non-Hispanic Black (38.3%), Hispanic/Latinx (1.6%), and other/not reported (5.1%). The recruited/randomized group was significantly younger with fewer patients of Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity compared with those not recruited.

CONCLUSIONS

During the pandemic, all recruitment/screening goals were met using modified strategies. Differences in sociodemographic representation indicate a need for tailored strategies.

Intravaginal Combination Therapy of Acetic and Lactic Acid in premenopausal women with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: A randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled feasibility trial

BACKGROUND

Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis management primarily entails azole therapy used as required or as an extended daily or weekly maintenance therapy for 6 months or more. Unfortunately, relapse within 3-6 months of ceasing maintenance therapy is experienced for more than half the patients, for whom indefinite treatment is required.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the feasibility of trial design examining a prophylaxis treatment to prevent recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis symptomatic episodes and reduce adverse effects.

STUDY DESIGN

A double-blinded randomized controlled feasibility trial was conducted in Australia. Women with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis were enrolled.

METHODS

An intravaginal prophylaxis application of lactic acid and acetic acid (Intravaginal Combination Therapy of Acetic and Lactic Acid) was compared with placebo. Primary outcomes comprised recruitment and retention, compliance to study medications and study assessments. Secondary outcomes included the reduction of symptomatic recurrence over the trial period and the acceptability, satisfaction, safety and tolerability of the intervention. The feasibility of quality-of-life measures was also explored.

RESULTS

Fifteen participants were enrolled and randomized (active = 9, placebo = 6). Consent rate was 23.4%. Eight participants were lost to follow-up (active = 5, placebo = 3). Forty-seven per cent of participants (n = 7) were 100% compliant with the intervention, six of which completed the trial with good assessment compliance. The blinding process was effective. The study demonstrated a reduction in relapse in both active and placebo groups with only four participants across both groups reporting symptomatic episodes while enrolled. The intervention demonstrated good tolerability. Quality-of-life data showed minimal variance with a high quality-of-life measure.

CONCLUSION

This trial assesses the feasibility of conducting a large-scale study exploring the efficacy of the Intravaginal Combination Therapy of Acetic and Lactic Acid intravaginal intervention and hints on the importance of psychological support through appropriate disease-specific communication and clinical attention. Consideration of the reported recruitment challenges, the inclusion of suitable quality-of-life measures and digital data collection is warranted for adaptation to a fully powered trial.