GPR120 promotes neutrophil control of intestinal bacterial infection

Sensitivity to antimicrobial peptide A (SapA) contributes to the survival of Salmonella typhimurium against antimicrobial peptides, neutrophils and virulence in mice

Host-generated antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) play a pivotal role in defense against bacterial pathogens. AMPs kill invading bacteria majorly by disrupting the bacterial cell walls. AMPs are actively synthesized and released into the lumen of the gastrointestinal tract to limit colonization of enteric pathogens like Salmonella typhimurium (S. typhimurium). However, S. typhimurium has evolved several resistance mechanisms to defend AMPs. The multicomponent SapABCDF uptake transporter is one such system that helps in resisting AMPs. In the current study, we analyzed the role of S. typhimurium SapA against stress survival and virulence of this bacterium. ∆sapA mutant strain showed hypersensitivity to AMPs, like melittin and mastoparan. Further, ∆sapA mutant showed more than 22 folds (p = 0.019) hypersensitivity to neutrophils as compared to the WT strain of S. typhimurium. In addition, ∆sapA strain showed defective survival in mice. In conclusion, the results of the current study suggest that the SapA is essential for survival against AMPs and virulence of S. typhimurium.

Comprehensive analysis reveals key genes and environmental toxin exposures underlying treatment response in ulcerative colitis based on in-silico analysis and Mendelian randomization

BACKGROUND

UC is increasingly prevalent worldwide and represents a significant global disease burden. Although medical therapeutics are employed, they often fall short of being optimal, leaving patients struggling with treatment non-responsiveness and many related complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study utilized gene microarray data and clinical information from GEO. Gene enrichment and differential expression analyses were conducted using Metascape and Limma, respectively. Lasso Regression Algorithm was constructed using glmnet and heat maps were generated using pheatmap. ROC curves were used to assess diagnostic parameter capability, while XSum was employed to screen for small-molecule drugs exacerbating UC. Molecular docking was carried out using Autodock Vina. The study also performed Mendelian randomization analysis based on TwoSampleMR and used CTD to investigate the relationship between exposure to environmental chemical toxicants and UC therapy responsiveness.

RESULTS

Six genes (ELL2, DAPP1, SAMD9L, CD38, IGSF6, and LYN) were found to be significantly overexpressed in UC patient samples that did not respond to multiple therapies. Lasso analysis identified ELL2 and DAPP1 as key genes influencing UC treatment response. Both genes accurately predicted intestinal inflammation in UC and impacted the immunological infiltration status. Clofibrate showed therapeutic potential for UC by binding to ELL2 and DAPP1 proteins. The study also reviews environmental toxins and drug exposures that could impact UC progression.

CONCLUSIONS

We used microarray technology to identify DAPP1 and ELL2 as key genes that impact UC treatment response and inflammatory progression. Clofibrate was identified as a promising UC treatment. Our review also highlights the impact of environmental toxins on UC treatment response, providing valuable insights for personalized clinical management.