Clinical and surgical characteristics of infected diabetic foot ulcers in a tertiary hospital of Mexico

Predictors of surgical management in diabetic foot infections

OBJECTIVE

Early recognition of the need for surgical intervention is crucial in terms of limiting amputation level and decreasing mortality. We aimed to determine the risk factors for limb loss in patients with diabetic foot infection (DFI).

METHOD

Data of hospitalised patients with a DFI between 2010 and 2019 were collected retrospectively from their hospital records. Clinical and laboratory findings were analysed according to the type of treatment.

RESULTS

Data were collected for 401 patients, 280 (69.8%) of whom were male. The mean age was 59.6±11.1 years. Treatment modalities included: medical treatment (36.4%); debridement/drainage (21.9%); minor amputation (17.7%); and major amputation (23.9%). Forefoot infection (odds ratio (OR): 3.347; 95% confidence interval (Cl): 1.408-7.956) and peripheral arterial disease (OR: 4.990; 95% Cl: 1.225-20.324) were found to be significant in predicting limb loss, while duration of diabetes (≥20 years) and absence of forefoot infection were significant predictors of debridement/drainage. Subgroup analysis showed that high leukocyte levels (>16.4K/μl) and forefoot infections were independent predictors for major and minor amputation, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The clinical parameters used in this study are simple, broadly available, cost-effective and promising for predicting limb loss in patients with DFI.

Prevalence and risk factors of wound complications after transtibial amputation in patients with diabetic foot

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot (DMF) complications are common and are increasing in incidence. Risk factors related to wound complications are yet to be established after trans-tibial amputation under the diagnosis of DMF infection.

AIM

To analyze the prognosis and risk factors related to wound complications after transtibial amputation in patients with diabetes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included seventy-two patients with DMF complications who underwent transtibial amputation between April 2014 and March 2023. The groups were categorized based on the occurrence of wound complications, and we compared demographic data between the complication group and the non-complication group to analyze risk factors. Moreover, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors.

RESULTS

The average follow-up period was 36.2 months. Among the 72 cases, 31 (43.1%) had wound complications. Of these, 12 cases (16.7%) received further treatment, such as debridement, soft tissue stump revision, and re-amputation at the proximal level. In a group that required further management due to wound complications after transtibial amputation, the hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level was 9.32, while the other group that did not require any treatment had a 7.54 HbA1c level. The prevalence of a history of kidney transplantation with wound complications after transtibial amputation surgery in DMF patients was significantly greater than in cases without wound complications (P = 0.02). Other factors did not show significant differences.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 43.1% of the patients with transtibial amputation surgery experienced wound complications, and 16.7% required additional surgical treatment. High HbA1c levels and kidney transplant history are risk factors for postoperative wound complications.

The effects of education on foot care behaviors and self-efficacy in type 2 diabetes patients

Background

Diabetic foot significantly affects the quality of life of patients with diabetes. It leads to loss of labor force, psychosocial trauma, and high treatment costs due to serious morbidity and mortality. Nurses have an important responsibility to improve the metabolic status of individuals with diabetes, to protect them from foot complications, and to teach patients foot care skills.

Aim

This study investigated the effects of education on type 2 diabetes patients regarding diabetic foot care and self-efficacy.

Materials and Methods

This quasi-experimental study was conducted from February to July 2016 in hospitals located in the city of Balıkesir in Turkey with type 2 diabetes patients who were admitted to the internal medicine clinic and monitored by the endocrinology and internal medicine outpatient clinics. G*power 3.1.9.2 software was used to calculate the sample size of 94 people with a 5% type 1 error, and 90% power. The study was carried out with stratified randomization, and a questionnaire was administered to the experimental and control groups. The experimental group received training, and both groups' scores on the Diabetic Foot Behavior Questionnaire [Appendix 1] and the Diabetic Foot Care Self-Efficacy Scale [Appendix 2] were compared after three months. The t-test, the paired t-test, and the Chi-square test were used.

Results

While the self-efficacy and the foot care behavior scores of the control group did not show any differences (P > 0.05), the experimental group's scores were significantly higher (P < 0.05). The control group's self-efficacy and foot care behavior scores on the pre-test and final test were similar, while the experimental group's scores increased (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Starting from the diagnosis of diabetes, it is advisable to carry out foot assessments and to follow up with diabetics who received foot care education to increase their self-efficacy, to make foot care a habit, and to re-evaluate missing or incorrect practices during check-ups.

Diabetic wounds and artificial intelligence: A mini-review

Diabetic wound takes longer time to heal due to micro and macro-vascular ailment. This longer healing time can lead to infections and other health complications. Foot ulcers are one of the most common diabetic wounds. These are one of the leading cause of amputations. Medical science is continuously striving for improving quality of human life. A recent trend of amalgamation of knowledge, efforts and technological advancement of medical science experts and artificial intelligence researchers, has made tremendous success in diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of a variety of diseases. Diabetic wounds are no exception, as artificial intelligence experts are putting their research efforts to apply latest technological advancements in the field to help medical care personnel to deal with diabetic wounds in more effective manner. The presented study reviews the diagnostic and treatment research under the umbrella of Artificial Intelligence and computational science, for diabetic wound healing. Framework for diabetic wound assessment using artificial intelligence is presented. Moreover, this review is focused on existing and potential contribution of artificial intelligence to improve medical services for diabetic wound patients. The article also discusses the future directions for the betterment of the field that can lead to facilitate both, clinician and patients.

Predictive factors and nomogram to evaluate the risk of below-ankle re-amputation in patients with diabetic foot

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus, as the most common metabolic disease, is common worldwide and represents a crucial global health concern. The purpose of this research was to investigate the related risk factors and to develop a re-amputation risk nomogram in diabetic patients who have undergone an amputation.

METHODS

A observational analysis was performed on 459 patients who have underwent amputation for diabetic foot from January 2014 through December 2019 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and stepwise regression methods were implemented to determine risk selection for the re-amputation risk model, and the predictive nomogram was established with these features. Calibration curve, receiver operating characteristic curve, and decision curve analysis of this re-amputation nomogram were assessed.

RESULTS

Predictors contained in this predictive model included smoking, glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), ankle-brachial index (ABI) and C-reactive protein (CRP). Good discrimination with a C-index of 0.725 (95% CI, 0.6624-0.7876) and good calibration were displayed with this predictive model. The decision curve analysis showed that this re-amputation nomogram predicting risk adds more benefit than none strategy if the threshold probability of a patient was >6% and <59%.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel re-amputation nomogram incorporating smoking, glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), ankle-brachial index (ABI), C-reactive protein (CRP), and smoking could be easily used to predict individual re-amputation risk prediction in diabetic foot patients who have undergone an amputation. In the future, further analysis and external testing will be needed as much as possible to reconfirm that this new Nomogram can accurately predict the risk of toe re-amputation.

Amputation as a First Treatment is Highly Associated With Late Presentation: An Underestimated Modifiable Major Risk Factor for Diabetic Foot Ulcer

PURPOSE

Several risk factors for lower extremity amputation in diabetic patients have been identified; however, late presentation has been poorly investigated. Very few studies looked at the impact of such risk factor. As none has investigated the link between admission to amputation and late presentation in this population, we investigated such association.

METHODS

The study is a retrospective comparative cohort of continuous series of patients admitted for amputation related to diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) as a first treatment. A late presentation was defined as a period of 3 weeks or more from the onset of the ulcer.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients admitted for amputation and all wounds were infected and located on the plantar forefoot in 32 cases (69.5%), on the toes in 10 cases (21.7%), and in the heel area in 4 cases (8.8%). The mean duration to admission was 5.2 ±1.8 weeks (range 4-10 weeks). Late presentation was recorded in 42 (91.3%) patients.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that amputation due to DFU is highly associated with late presentation. Educational campaigns targeting patient and first-line health care providers and highlighting the urgency of diabetic ulcers are needed to impact this major modifiable risk factor.Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level III: Retrospective Comparative.

Non-vascular contributing factors of diabetic foot ulcer severity in national referral hospital of Indonesia

PURPOSE

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a common chronic complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Indonesia, with a prevalence of 7.3%. However, the characteristics of these patients remain unclear. We investigated the characteristics of patients with DFU without peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and analyzed non-vascular factors related to severity of DFU in a tertiary care national referral hospital in Indonesia.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study including 123 hemodynamically stable DFU patients without PAD recruited from Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia from 2010-2015.

RESULTS

DFU patients were predominantly over 50 years old (75.6%) and diagnosed with T2DM for 5 years with poor glycemic control (82.7%) and peripheral neuropathy (91.3%). Most patients had anemia (86.7%), leukocytosis (84.6%), and were undernourished, as characterized by a low lipid profile (90.8%) and hypoalbuminemia (83.7%). Most had extensive size of ulcer at the initial visit, with a median size of 16.23 (2.92-60.16) cm2. Ulcers were mostly located of the forefoot (62.5%) and were caused by mechanical trauma (46.2%). Bivariate analysis revealed that significant factors for the development of DFU were related to DFU size, including duration of T2DM (p = 0.04), leukocyte levels (p =  < 0.01), and thrombocyte levels (p =  < 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed leucocyte (p = 0.03) and thrombocyte (p = 0.023) had significantly correlated with DFU severity.

CONCLUSION

Leucocyte and thrombocyte may be the greatest contributing non-vascular factors for severity of DFU in Indonesia.

Microbial profile, antimicrobial resistance, and molecular characterization of diabetic foot infections in a university hospital

Introduction

Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) are among the most severe complications of diabetes. The aim of this study was to determine the etiological pathogens of DFIs in different Wagner's and IDSA/IWGDF grades, and to assess their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern together with molecular characterization of antibiotic resistance genes.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted on 120 DFI patients at Main Alexandria University Hospital, Egypt. The aerobic and anaerobic etiological pathogens were determined using semi-quantitative culture and PCR respectively. The antimicrobial susceptibility pattern was done according to Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Detection of carbapenemases and class-1 integron genes was carried out by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

Results

A total of 178 (124 aerobic, 54 anaerobic) pathogens were identified from patients with DFI, with an average of 1.82 isolates/subject. Among aerobic pathogens, Gram-negative predominated (98/124; 79%), of which Pseudomonas spp. and Proteus spp. were the most common. MRSA constituted more than 50% of Gram-positive isolates. Polymicrobial infection was found in 42 (42.9%) subjects. The proportion of Gram-negative bacteria and anaerobes increased with increased DFI grades and severity. Multidrug and extensively drug resistant isolates were observed in 86 patients (87.7%). PCR identified carbapenemases genes in 14 (11.7%) and class 1 integron in 28 (23.3%) DFI cases. Vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid were the most effective antimicrobial agents against Gram-positive pathogens, while colistin, imipenem, meropenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam were effective against Gram-negative pathogens.

Conclusions

Multidrug and extensively drug resistant Gram-negative bacteria were the dominant pathogens among all DFI severity grades. However, the proportion of Gram-positive bacteria decreased with the severity of infection. The clinical role of our relatively high rate of anaerobes should be investigated. The results found in this study could be beneficial for designing future empiric antimicrobial protocols in relation to the severity of DFIs.

Sex difference for the risk of amputation in diabetic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The risk of amputation is a sequelae of diabetic foot ulceration, which are significantly increased in diabetic patients and caused huge morbidly and mortality. However, whether the risk amputation in diabetic patients are differing in male and female remains inconclusive. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the sex difference for the risk of amputation in diabetic patients. We systematically searched PubMed, EmBase, and the Cochrane library to identify eligible study from their inception up to November 2020. The diagnostic value of male patients on subsequent amputation risk were assessed by using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (PLR and NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Twenty-two studies recruited a total of 33,686,171 diabetic patients were selected for quantitative analysis. The risk of amputation in male diabetic patients was greater than female diabetic patients (DOR: 1.38; 95%CI: 1.13–1.70; P<0.001). The sensitivity and specificity for male diabetic patients on the risk of amputation were 0.72 (95%CI: 0.72–0.73), and 0.51 (95%CI: 0.51–0.51), respectively. Moreover, the PLR and NLR of male diabetic patients for predicting amputation were 1.13 (95%CI: 1.05–1.22), and 0.82 (0.72–0.94), respectively. Furthermore, the AUC for male diabetic patients on amputation risk was 0.56 (95%CI: 0.48–0.63). This study found male diabetic patients was associated with an increased risk of amputation than female diabetic patients, and the predictive value of sex difference on amputation risk in diabetic patients was mild.

Treatment Strategies Against Diabetic Foot Ulcer: Success so Far and the Road Ahead

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is one of the leading complications of type-2 diabetes mellitus. It is associated with neuropathy and peripheral arterial disease of the lower limb in patients with diabetes. There are four stages of wound healing, namely hemostasis phase, inflammatory phase, proliferative phase and maturation phase. In the case of DFU, all these stages are disturbed which lead to delay in healing and consequently to lower limb amputation. Conventional dosage forms like tablets, creams, ointments, gels and capsules have been used for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer for many years.

INTRODUCTION

In this review, the global prevalence as well as etiopathogenesis related to diabetic foot ulcer have been discussed. The potential role of various synthetic and herbal drugs, as well as their conventional dosage forms in the effective management of DFU have been discussed in detail.

METHODS

Structured search of bibliographic databases from previously published peer-reviewed research papers was explored and data has been represented in terms of various approaches that are used for the treatment of DFU.

RESULTS

About 148 papers, including both research and review articles, were included in this review to produce a comprehensive as well as a readily understandable article. A series of herbal and synthetic drugs have been discussed along with their current status of treatment in terms of dose and mechanism of action.

CONCLUSION

DFU has become one of the most common complications in patients having diabetes for more than ten years. Hence, understanding the root cause and its successful treatment is a big challenge because it depends upon multiple factors such as the judicious selection of drugs as well as proper control of blood sugar level. Most of the drugs that have been used so far either belong to the category of antibiotics, antihyperglycaemic or they have been repositioned. In clinical practice, much focus has been given to dressings that have been used to cover the ulcer. The complete treatment of DFU is still a farfetched dream to be achieved and it is expected that combination therapy of herbal and synthetic drugs with multiple treatment pathways could be able to offer better management of DFU.

Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Current Advances in Antimicrobial Therapies and Emerging Treatments

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are very important diabetes-related lesions that can lead to serious physical consequences like amputations of limbs and equally severe social, psychological, and economic outcomes. It is reported that up to 25% of patients with diabetes develop a DFU in their lifetime, and more than half of them become infected. Therefore, it is essential to manage infection and ulcer recovery to prevent negatives outcomes. The available information plays a significant role in keeping both physicians and patients aware of the emerging therapies against DFUs. The purpose of this review is to compile the currently available approaches in the managing and treatment of DFUs, including molecular and regenerative medicine, antimicrobial and energy-based therapies, and the use of plant extracts, antimicrobial peptides, growth factors, ozone, devices, and nano-medicine, to offer an overview of the assessment of this condition.

Meta-analysis of risk factors for amputation in diabetic foot infections

BACKGROUND

Knowledge of risk factors is crucial to develop management and treatment protocols for the prevention of lower extremity amputation for patients with diabetic foot infections (DFIs).

METHODS

We searched the research literature for studies reporting risk factors for lower extremity amputation in patients with DFI. The main outcome variables included both minor and major amputations. This study was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018118543).

RESULTS

A total of 2471 potential articles from the database search met the inclusion criteria. After reviewing the titles, abstracts, and full texts, remaining 25 articles were included in the final analysis. We identified 6132 patients with DFI in the 25 included articles. Of these, 1873 patients who underwent amputation were investigated. Male gender (odds ratio [OR]: 1.31), smoking (OR: 1.38), history of amputation (OR: 1.47), history of osteomyelitis (OR: 1.94), peripheral arterial disease (OR: 2.35), retinopathy (OR: 1.32), International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) grades 3 and 4 (OR: 1.7 and 2.5), Wagner grades 4 and 5 (OR: 4.3 and 6.4), gangrene/necrosis (OR: 9.9), osteomyelitis (OR: 4.5), neuroischaemic DFI (OR: 3.06), severe infection (OR: 3.12), length of hospitalization (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.7), leukocytosis (OR: 1.76), mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (SMD: 0.5), mean C-reactive protein (CRP) (SMD: 0.8), tissue culture positivity (OR: 1.61), and isolation of Gram-negative bacteria from tissue culture (OR: 1.5) were found as predictors of amputation in DFI.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study highlighted some differences in diabetic foot ulcers and DFIs in terms of risk factors for lower extremity amputation. These data provide detailed information about risk factors for amputations among patients with DFI, thus contributing to the creation of new classification systems for assessment of high-risk patients.