Palmaris longus interposition in revision surgery for recurrent and persistent carpal tunnel syndrome: a case series

Treatment of Recurrent Carpal Tunnel Syndrome with the Abductor Digiti Minimi Flap: A Case Series

Background: Approximately 5% of patients experience recurrent symptoms after carpal tunnel release (CTR) and need revision surgery. Several surgical techniques have been described for recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) flap is one of them. Literature concerning clinical results of the ADM flap for recurrent CTS is lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of the ADM flap for recurrent CTS.

Methods: We treated seven patients with the ADM flap (eight hands) between July 2016 and February 2019. Patient characteristics were assessed, and patients were asked about their symptoms (pain, sensation and paresthesia) before and after surgery. Postoperatively, we administered CTS symptoms, satisfaction with the surgery, patient-reported outcome measurements (BCTQ and QuickDASH) and whether they would undergo the same surgery again. Complications were also recorded

Results: The median follow-up was 14 months. The success rate measured by CTS symptoms was 88%. Seven out of eight patients were satisfied with the results and two patients would not elect to undergo the same procedure again. Two patients reported having a weaker grip at the donor site. The median BCTQ symptom and function scores were 2.9 (1.7–3.5) and 2.6 (1.8–3.0) respectively. The median QuickDASH score was 41 (IQR 22–52). Complications reported were wound dehiscence (n = 1) and hypertrophic scar (n = 1).

Conclusions: The outcomes of the ADM flap in patients with recurrent CTS were like other commonly used procedures in recurrent CTS.

Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic)

Management of Recurrent Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Few comparisons have been performed between the outcomes of surgical techniques for recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome. Using a meta-analysis, this study aimed to compare the outcomes of different surgical techniques using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain as outcomes.

METHODS

The following categories were used to define the study's inclusion criteria: population, intervention, comparator, outcomes, and study design. Studies were examined by 2 reviewers, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. The studies were assigned to 1 of the following treatment groups: decompression with or without neurolysis, autologous fat transfer, hypothenar fat pad, pedicled or free flap, and "other." For our primary outcome, we compared improvement using the BCTQ and VAS for pain between the treatment groups. For our secondary outcome, postoperative BCTQ and VAS pain values were compared.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included: 5 case series with postoperative data only and 9 pre-post studies without a control group. With regard to our primary outcome, the studies reported an average improvement of 1.2 points (95% confidence interval [CI][1.5, 0.9]) on a scale of 1-5 on the symptoms severity scale (SSS) of the BCTQ, 1.9 points (95% CI [1.37, 0.79]) on a scale of 1-5 on the function severity scale of the BCTQ, and 3.8 points (95% CI [4.9, 2.6]) on a scale of 1-10 on the VAS for pain. We only found significantly lesser improvement in the "other" treatment group than in the hypothenar fat pad group and autologous fat transfer group using the SSS. The hypothenar fat pad group had the best reported postoperative SSS score of 1.75 (95% CI [1.24, 2.25]), function severity scale score of 1.55 (95% CI [1.20, 1.90]), and VAS pain score of 1.45 (95% CI [0.83, 2.07]).

CONCLUSIONS

All the techniques showed clinically important improvements in all the outcomes. We found lesser improvement in the "other" treatment group than in the hypothenar fat pad group and autologous fat transfer group using the SSS. We found that the hypothenar fat pad group had the best reported postoperative values in our secondary analysis.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Sonographic Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Diagnostic ultrasound in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome is firmly established. Preoperative evaluation is based on quantitative parameters such as measurement of the pathologically enlarged cross-sectional area of the nerve. The value of postoperative ultrasound lies in the visualization of the anatomy and the conclusions that can be drawn from it. It focuses on the semiquantitative sonographic parameters of nerve compression. Nerve lesions and persistent strictures can be visualized and clearly localized. In recurrent disease, the primary focus is to dynamically exclude postoperative scarring, which results in a reduction of nerve gliding.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical options for recurrent or persistent carpal tunnel syndrome: simple decompression versus coverage of the median nerve

We performed a systematic review on the success of different surgical techniques for the management of recurrent and persistent carpal tunnel syndrome. Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria and were grouped by the type of revision carpal tunnel release, which were simple open release, open release with flap coverage or open release with implant coverage. Meta-analysis showed no difference, and pooled success proportions were 0.89, 0.89 and 0.85 for simple open carpal tunnel release, additional flap coverage and implant groups, respectively. No added value for coverage of the nerve was seen. Our review indicates that simple carpal tunnel release without additional coverage of the median nerve seems preferable as it is less invasive and without additional donor site morbidity. We found that the included studies were of low quality with moderate risk of bias and did not differentiate between persistent and recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome.