Comparison between stromal vascular fraction and adipose derived stem cells in a mouse lymphedema model

A Single Injection of ADRCs Does Not Prevent AAA Formation in Rats in a Randomized Blinded Design

There is a pressing need for alternative medical treatments for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Mesenchymal regenerative cells derived from adipose tissue (ADRCs) have shown potential in modulating the inflammation and immune responses that drive AAA progression. We hypothesized that ADRCs could reduce inflammation and preserve vascular integrity, potentially slowing the progression of AAA. In our study, subcutaneous adipose tissue was harvested from male Sprague Dawley rats, from which ADRCs were isolated. AAA was induced in these rats using intraluminal porcine pancreatic elastase, followed by intravenous administration of either ADRCs (106 cells) or saline (0.1 mL). We monitored the progression of AAA through weekly ultrasound, and the rats were sacrificed on day 28 for histological analysis. Our results showed no significant difference in the inner abdominal aortic diameter at day 28 between the control group (172% ± 73%, n = 17) and the ADRC-treated group (181% ± 75%, n = 15). Histological analyses of AAA cross-sections also revealed no significant difference in the infiltration of neutrophils or macrophages between the two groups. Furthermore, the integrity and content of elastin in the tunica media were similar between groups. These findings indicate that a single injection of ADRCs does not inhibit the development of AAA in rats in a randomized blinded study.

Surgical lymphedema models in the mice hindlimb-A systematic review and quality assessment

BACKGROUND

Lymphedema constitutes a major unsolved problem in plastic surgery. To identify novel lymphedema treatments, preclinical studies are vital. The surgical mouse lymphedema model is popular and cost-effective; nonetheless, a synthesis and overview of the literature with evidence-based guidelines is needed. The aim of this review was to perform a systematic review to establish best practice and support future high-quality animal studies exploring lymphedema treatments.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, searching four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus) from inception-September 2022. The Animals in Research Reporting In Vivo Experiments 2.0 (ARRIVE 2.0) guidelines were used to evaluate reporting quality. Studies claiming to surgically induce lymphedema in the hindlimb of mice were included.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven studies were included. Four main models were used. (1) Irradiation+surgery. (2) A variation of the surgery used by (1) + irradiation. (3) Surgery only (SPDF-model). (4) Surgery only (PLND-model). Remaining studies used other techniques. The most common measurement modality was the caliper. Mean quality coefficient was 0.57. Eighteen studies (49%) successfully induced sustained lymphedema. Combination of methods seemed to yield the best results, with an overrepresentation of irradiation, the removal of two lymph nodes, and the disruption of both the deep and superficial lymph vessels in the 18 studies.

CONCLUSION

Surgical mouse hindlimb lymphedema models are challenged by two related problems: (1) retaining lymphedema for an extended period, that is, establishing a (chronic) lymphedema model (2) distinguishing lymphedema from post-operative edema. Most studies failed to induce lymphedema and used error-prone measurements. We provide an overview of studies claiming to induce lymphedema and advocate improved research via five evidence-based recommendations to use: (1) a proven lymphedema model; (2) sufficient follow-up time, (3) validated measurement methods; (4) ARRIVE-guidelines; (5) contralateral hindlimb as control.

CD31 defines a subpopulation of human adipose-derived regenerative cells with potent angiogenic effects

Cellular heterogeneity represents a major challenge for regenerative treatment using freshly isolated Adipose Derived Regenerative Cells (ADRCs). Emerging data suggest superior efficacy of ADRCs as compared to the ex vivo expanded and more homogeneous ADRCs (= ASCs) for indications involving (micro)vascular deficiency, however, it remains unknown which ADRC cell subtypes account for the improvement. Surprisingly, we found regarding erectile dysfunction (ED) that the number of injected CD31+  ADRCs correlated positively with erectile function 12 months after one bolus of autologous ADRCs. Comprehensive in vitro and ex vivo analyses confirmed superior pro-angiogenic and paracrine effects of human CD31+ enriched ADRCs compared to the corresponding CD31- and parent ADRCs. When CD31+, CD31- and ADRCs were co-cultured in aortic ring- and corpus cavernous tube formation assays, the CD31+  ADRCs induced significantly higher tube development. This effect was corroborated using conditioned medium (CM), while quantitative mass spectrometric analysis suggested that this is likely explained by secretory pro-angiogenic proteins including DKK3, ANGPT2, ANAX2 and VIM, all enriched in CD31+  ADRC CM. Single-cell RNA sequencing showed that transcripts of the upregulated and secreted proteins were present in 9 endothelial ADRC subsets including endothelial progenitor cells in the heterogenous non-cultured ADRCs. Our data suggest that the vascular benefit of using ADRCs in regenerative medicine is dictated by CD31+  ADRCs.

Microcomputed tomography versus plethysmometer and electronic caliper in the measurements of lymphedema in the hindlimb of mice

Lymphedema affects 20% of women diagnosed with breast cancer. It is a pathology with no known cure. Animal models are essential to explore possible treatments to understand and potentially cure lymphedema. The rodent hindlimb lymphedema model is one of the most widely used. Different modalities have been used to measure lymphedema in the hindlimb of mice, and these are generally poorly assessed in terms of the interrater agreement; thus, there could be a risk of measuring bias and poor reproducibility. We examined the interrater agreement of µCT-scans, electronic caliper thickness of the paw and plethysmometer in the measurement of lymphedema in the hindlimb of mice. Three independent raters assessed 24 C57BL6 mice using these three modalities four times (week 1, 2, 4 and 8) with a total of 96 samples. The mean interrater differences were then calculated. The interrater agreement was highest in the µCT-scans, with an extremely low risk of measurement bias. The interrater agreement in the plethysmometer and electronic caliper was comparable with a low to moderate risk of measurement bias. The µCT-scanner should be used whenever possible. The electronic caliper should only be used if there is no µCT-scanner available. The plethysmometer should not be used in rodents of this size.

Emerging Anti-Inflammatory Pharmacotherapy and Cell-Based Therapy for Lymphedema

Secondary lymphedema is a common complication of lymph node dissection or radiation therapy for cancer treatment. Conventional therapies such as compression sleeve therapy, complete decongestive physiotherapy, and surgical therapies decrease edema; however, they are not curative because they cannot modulate the pathophysiology of lymphedema. Recent advances reveal that the activation and accumulation of CD4+ T cells are key in the development of lymphedema. Based on this pathophysiology, the efficacy of pharmacotherapy (tacrolimus, anti-IL-4/IL-13 antibody, or fingolimod) and cell-based therapy for lymphedema has been demonstrated in animal models and pilot studies. In addition, mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) have attracted attention as candidates for cell-based lymphedema therapy because they improve symptoms and decrease edema volume in the long term with no serious adverse effects in pilot studies. Furthermore, MSC transplantation promotes functional lymphatic regeneration and improves the microenvironment in animal models. In this review, we focus on inflammatory cells involved in the pathogenesis of lymphedema and discuss the efficacy and challenges of pharmacotherapy and cell-based therapies for lymphedema.

Cell therapy as a treatment of secondary lymphedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Lymphedema, the accumulation of interstitial fluid caused by poor lymphatic drainage, is a progressive and permanent disease with no curative treatment. Several studies have evaluated cell-based therapies in secondary lymphedema, but no meta-analysis has been performed to assess their efficacy.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all available preclinical and clinical studies, with assessment of their quality and risk of bias.

Results

A total of 20 articles using diverse cell types were selected for analysis, including six clinical trials and 14 pre-clinical studies in three species. The meta-analysis showed a positive effect of cell-based therapies on relevant disease outcomes (quantification of edema, density of lymphatic capillaries, evaluation of the lymphatic flow, and tissue fibrosis). No significant publication bias was observed.

Conclusion

Cell-based therapies have the potential to improve secondary lymphedema. The underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Due to relevant heterogeneity between studies, further randomized controlled and blinded studies are required to substantiate the use of these novel therapies in clinical practice.