Same same but different: The evolution of TBP in archaea and their eukaryotic offspring

Explainable artificial intelligence as a reliable annotator of archaeal promoter regions

Archaea are a vast and unexplored cellular domain that thrive in a high diversity of environments, having central roles in processes mediating global carbon and nutrient fluxes. For these organisms to balance their metabolism, the appropriate regulation of their gene expression is essential. A key momentum in regulating genes responsible for the life maintenance of archaea is when transcription factor proteins bind to the promoter element. This DNA segment is conserved, which enables its exploration by machine learning techniques. Here, we trained and tested a support vector machine with 3935 known archaeal promoter sequences. All promoter sequences were coded into DNA Duplex Stability. After, we performed a model interpretation task to map the decision pattern of the classification procedure. We also used a dataset of known-promoter sequences for validation. Our results showed that an AT rich region around position - 27 upstream (relative to the start TSS) is the most conserved in the analyzed organisms. In addition, we were able to identify the BRE element (- 33), the PPE (at - 10) and a position at + 3, that provides a more understandable picture of how promoters are organized in all the archaeal organisms. Finally, we used the interpreted model to identify potential promoter sequences of 135 unannotated organisms, delivering regulatory regions annotation of archaea in a scale never accomplished before ( https://pcyt.unam.mx/gene-regulation/ ). We consider that this approach will be useful to understand how gene regulation is achieved in other organisms apart from the already established transcription factor binding sites.

Structural basis of the complete poxvirus transcription initiation process

Poxviruses express their genes in the cytoplasm of infected cells using a virus-encoded multi-subunit polymerase (vRNAP) and unique transcription factors. We present cryo-EM structures that uncover the complete transcription initiation phase of the poxvirus vaccinia. In the pre-initiation complex, the heterodimeric early transcription factor VETFs/l adopts an arc-like shape spanning the polymerase cleft and anchoring upstream and downstream promoter elements. VETFI emerges as a TBP-like protein that inserts asymmetrically into the DNA major groove, triggers DNA melting, ensures promoter recognition and enforces transcription directionality. The helicase VETFs fosters promoter melting and the phospho-peptide domain (PPD) of vRNAP subunit Rpo30 enables transcription initiation. An unprecedented upstream promoter scrunching mechanism assisted by the helicase NPH-I probably fosters promoter escape and transition into elongation. Our structures shed light on unique mechanisms of poxviral gene expression and aid the understanding of thus far unexplained universal principles in transcription.

Characterization of promoters in archaeal genomes based on DNA structural parameters

The transcription machinery of archaea can be roughly classified as a simplified version of eukaryotic organisms. The basal transcription factor machinery binds to the TATA box found around 28 nucleotides upstream of the transcription start site; however, some transcription units lack a clear TATA box and still have TBP/TFB binding over them. This apparent absence of conserved sequences could be a consequence of sequence divergence associated with the upstream region, operon, and gene organization. Furthermore, earlier studies have found that a structural analysis gains more information compared with a simple sequence inspection. In this work, we evaluated and coded 3630 archaeal promoter sequences of three organisms, Haloferax volcanii, Thermococcus kodakarensis, and Sulfolobus solfataricus into DNA duplex stability, enthalpy, curvature, and bendability parameters. We also split our dataset into conserved TATA and degenerated TATA promoters to identify differences among these two classes of promoters. The structural analysis reveals variations in archaeal promoter architecture, that is, a distinctive signal is observed in the TFB, TBP, and TFE binding sites independently of these being TATA-conserved or TATA-degenerated. In addition, the promoter encountering method was validated with upstream regions of 13 other archaea, suggesting that there might be promoter sequences among them. Therefore, we suggest a novel method for locating promoters within the genome of archaea based on DNA energetic/structural features.

Promoter-proximal elongation regulates transcription in archaea

Recruitment of RNA polymerase and initiation factors to the promoter is the only known target for transcription activation and repression in archaea. Whether any of the subsequent steps towards productive transcription elongation are involved in regulation is not known. We characterised how the basal transcription machinery is distributed along genes in the archaeon Saccharolobus solfataricus. We discovered a distinct early elongation phase where RNA polymerases sequentially recruit the elongation factors Spt4/5 and Elf1 to form the transcription elongation complex (TEC) before the TEC escapes into productive transcription. TEC escape is rate-limiting for transcription output during exponential growth. Oxidative stress causes changes in TEC escape that correlate with changes in the transcriptome. Our results thus establish that TEC escape contributes to the basal promoter strength and facilitates transcription regulation. Impaired TEC escape coincides with the accumulation of initiation factors at the promoter and recruitment of termination factor aCPSF1 to the early TEC. This suggests two possible mechanisms for how TEC escape limits transcription, physically blocking upstream RNA polymerases during transcription initiation and premature termination of early TECs.

Archaeal transcription

Increasingly sophisticated biochemical and genetic techniques are unraveling the regulatory factors and mechanisms that control gene expression in the Archaea. While some similarities in regulatory strategies are universal, archaeal-specific regulatory strategies are emerging to complement a complex patchwork of shared archaeal-bacterial and archaeal-eukaryotic regulatory mechanisms employed in the archaeal domain. The prokaryotic archaea encode core transcription components with homology to the eukaryotic transcription apparatus and also share a simplified eukaryotic-like initiation mechanism, but also deploy tactics common to bacterial systems to regulate promoter usage and influence elongation-termination decisions. We review the recently established complete archaeal transcription cycle, highlight recent findings of the archaeal transcription community and detail the expanding post-initiation regulation imposed on archaeal transcription.

Old cogs, new tricks: the evolution of gene expression in a chromatin context

Sophisticated gene-regulatory mechanisms probably evolved in prokaryotes billions of years before the emergence of modern eukaryotes, which inherited the same basic enzymatic machineries. However, the epigenomic landscapes of eukaryotes are dominated by nucleosomes, which have acquired roles in genome packaging, mitotic condensation and silencing parasitic genomic elements. Although the molecular mechanisms by which nucleosomes are displaced and modified have been described, just how transcription factors, histone variants and modifications and chromatin regulators act on nucleosomes to regulate transcription is the subject of considerable ongoing study. We explore the extent to which these transcriptional regulatory components function in the context of the evolutionarily ancient role of chromatin as a barrier to processes acting on DNA and how chromatin proteins have diversified to carry out evolutionarily recent functions that accompanied the emergence of differentiation and development in multicellular eukaryotes.

A Single-Molecule View of Archaeal Transcription

The discovery of the archaeal domain of life is tightly connected to an in-depth analysis of the prokaryotic RNA world. In addition to Carl Woese's approach to use the sequence of the 16S rRNA gene as phylogenetic marker, the finding of Karl Stetter and Wolfram Zillig that archaeal RNA polymerases (RNAPs) were nothing like the bacterial RNAP but are more complex enzymes that resemble the eukaryotic RNAPII was one of the key findings supporting the idea that archaea constitute the third major branch on the tree of life. This breakthrough in transcriptional research 40years ago paved the way for in-depth studies of the transcription machinery in archaea. However, although the archaeal RNAP and the basal transcription factors that fine-tune the activity of the RNAP during the transcription cycle are long known, we still lack information concerning the architecture and dynamics of archaeal transcription complexes. In this context, single-molecule measurements were instrumental as they provided crucial insights into the process of transcription initiation, the architecture of the initiation complex and the dynamics of mobile elements of the RNAP. In this review, we discuss single-molecule approaches suitable to examine molecular mechanisms of transcription and highlight findings that shaped our understanding of the archaeal transcription apparatus. We furthermore explore the possibilities and challenges of next-generation single-molecule techniques, for example, super-resolution microscopy and single-molecule tracking, and ask whether these approaches will ultimately allow us to investigate archaeal transcription in vivo.