Novel regulation of the transcription factor ZHX2 by N-terminal methylation

Spinal-Specific Super Enhancer in Neuropathic Pain

Dysfunctional gene expression in nociceptive pathways plays a critical role in the development and maintenance of neuropathic pain. Super enhancers (SEs), composed of a large cluster of transcriptional enhancers, are emerging as new players in the regulation of gene expression. However, whether SEs participate in nociceptive responses remains unknown. Here, we report a spinal-specific SE (SS-SE) that regulates chronic constriction injury (CCI)-induced neuropathic pain by driving Ntmt1 and Prrx2 transcription in dorsal horn neurons. Peripheral nerve injury significantly enhanced the activity of SS-SE and increased the expression of NTMT1 and PRRX2 in the dorsal horn of male mice in a bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4)-dependent manner. Both intrathecal administration of a pharmacological BRD4 inhibitor JQ1 and CRISPR-Cas9-mediated SE deletion abolished the increased NTMT1 and PRRX2 in CCI mice and attenuated their nociceptive hypersensitivities. Furthermore, knocking down Ntmt1 or Prrx2 with siRNA suppressed the injury-induced elevation of phosphorylated extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (p-ERK) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) expression in the dorsal horn and alleviated neuropathic pain behaviors. Mimicking the increase in spinal Ntmt1 or Prrx2 in naive mice increased p-ERK and GFAP expression and led to the genesis of neuropathic pain-like behavior. These results redefine our understanding of the regulation of pain-related genes and demonstrate that BRD4-driven increases in SS-SE activity is responsible for the genesis of neuropathic pain through the governance of NTMT1 and PRRX2 expression in dorsal horn neurons. Our findings highlight the therapeutic potential of BRD4 inhibitors for the treatment of neuropathic pain.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT SEs drive gene expression by recruiting master transcription factors, cofactors, and RNA polymerase, but their role in the development of neuropathic pain remains unknown. Here, we report that the activity of an SS-SE, located upstream of the genes Ntmt1 and Prrx2, was elevated in the dorsal horn of mice with neuropathic pain. SS-SE contributes to the genesis of neuropathic pain by driving expression of Ntmt1 and Prrx2 Both inhibition of SS-SE with a pharmacological BRD4 inhibitor and genetic deletion of SS-SE attenuated pain hypersensitivities. This study suggests an effective and novel therapeutic strategy for neuropathic pain.

The comprehensive analysis of the prognostic and functional role of N-terminal methyltransferases 1 in pan-cancer

Background

NTMT1, a transfer methylase that adds methyl groups to the N-terminus of proteins, has been identified as a critical player in tumor development and progression. However, its precise function in pan-cancer is still unclear. To gain a more comprehensive understanding of its role in cancer, we performed a thorough bioinformatics analysis.

Methods

To conduct our analysis, we gathered data from multiple sources, including RNA sequencing and clinical data from the TCGA database, protein expression data from the UALCAN and HPA databases, and single-cell expression data from the CancerSEA database. Additionally, we utilized TISIDB to investigate the interaction between the tumor and the immune system. To assess the impact of NTMT1 on the proliferation of SNU1076 cells, we performed a CCK8 assay. We also employed cellular immunofluorescence to detect DNA damage and used flow cytometry to measure tumor cell apoptosis.

Results

Our analysis revealed that NTMT1 was significantly overexpressed in various types of tumors and that high levels of NTMT1 were associated with poor survival outcomes. Functional enrichment analysis indicated that NTMT1 may contribute to tumor development and progression by regulating pathways involved in cell proliferation and immune response. In addition, we found that knockdown of NTMT1 expression led to reduced cell proliferation, increased DNA damage, and enhanced apoptosis in HNSCC cells.

Conclusion

High expression of NTMT1 in tumors is associated with poor prognosis. The underlying regulatory mechanism of NTMT1 in cancer is complex, and it may be involved in both the promotion of tumor development and the inhibition of the tumor immune microenvironment.

Unlocking the Mysteries of Alpha-N-Terminal Methylation and its Diverse Regulatory Functions

Protein post-translation modifications (PTMs) are a critical regulatory mechanism of protein function. Protein α-N-terminal (Nα) methylation is a conserved PTM across prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Studies of the Nα methyltransferases responsible for Να methylation and their substrate proteins have shown that the PTM involves diverse biological processes, including protein synthesis and degradation, cell division, DNA damage response, and transcription regulation. This review provides an overview of the progress toward the regulatory function of Να methyltransferases and their substrate landscape. More than 200 proteins in humans and 45 in yeast are potential substrates for protein Nα methylation based on the canonical recognition motif, XP[KR]. Based on recent evidence for a less stringent motif requirement, the number of substrates might be increased, but further validation is needed to solidify this concept. A comparison of the motif in substrate orthologs in selected eukaryotic species indicates intriguing gain and loss of the motif across the evolutionary landscape. We discuss the state of knowledge in the field that has provided insights into the regulation of protein Να methyltransferases and their role in cellular physiology and disease. We also outline the current research tools that are key to understanding Να methylation. Finally, challenges are identified and discussed that would aid in unlocking a system-level view of the roles of Να methylation in diverse cellular pathways.

Opposing regulation of the Nα-trimethylase METTL11A by its family members METTL11B and METTL13

N-terminal protein methylation (Nα-methylation) is a posttranslational modification that influences numerous biological processes by regulating protein stability, protein-DNA interactions, and protein-protein interactions. Although significant progress has been made in understanding the biological roles of Nα-methylation, we still do not completely understand how the modifying methyltransferases are regulated. A common mode of methyltransferase regulation is through complex formation with close family members, and we have previously shown that the Nα-trimethylase METTL11A (NRMT1/NTMT1) is activated through binding of its close homolog METTL11B (NRMT2/NTMT2). Other recent reports indicate that METTL11A co-fractionates with a third METTL family member METTL13, which methylates both the N-terminus and lysine 55 (K55) of eukaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha. Here, using co-immunoprecipitations, mass spectrometry, and in vitro methylation assays, we confirm a regulatory interaction between METTL11A and METTL13 and show that while METTL11B is an activator of METTL11A, METTL13 inhibits METTL11A activity. This is the first example of a methyltransferase being opposingly regulated by different family members. Similarly, we find that METTL11A promotes the K55 methylation activity of METTL13 but inhibits its Nα-methylation activity. We also find that catalytic activity is not needed for these regulatory effects, demonstrating new, noncatalytic functions for METTL11A and METTL13. Finally, we show METTL11A, METTL11B, and METTL13 can complex together, and when all three are present, the regulatory effects of METTL13 take precedence over those of METTL11B. These findings provide a better understanding of Nα-methylation regulation and suggest a model where these methyltransferases can serve in both catalytic and noncatalytic roles.

Site-specific methylation on α-N-terminus of peptides through chemical and enzymatic methods

Protein α-N-terminal (Nα) methylation is a post-translational modification catalyzed by N-terminal methyltransferase 1/2 (NTMT1/2) and METTL13. Nα methylation affects protein stability, protein-protein interaction, and protein-DNA interaction. Thus, Nα methylated peptides are essential tools to study the function of Nα methylation, generate specific antibodies for different states of Nα methylation, and characterize the enzyme kinetics and activity. Here, we describe chemical methods of site-specific synthesis of Nα mono-, di-, and trimethylated peptides in the solid phase. In addition, we describethe preparation of trimethylation peptides by recombinant NTMT1 catalysis.

Optimizing purification and activity assays of N-terminal methyltransferase complexes

In vitro methyltransferase assays have traditionally been carried out with tritiated S-adenosyl-methionine (SAM) as the methyl donor, as site-specific methylation antibodies are not always available for Western or dot blots and structural requirements of many methyltransferases prohibit the use of peptide substrates in luminescent or colorimetric assays. The discovery of the first N-terminal methyltransferase, METTL11A, has allowed for a second look at non-radioactive in vitro methyltransferase assays, as N-terminal methylation is amenable to antibody production and the limited structural requirements of METTL11A allow for its methylation of peptide substrates. We have used a combination of Western blots and luminescent assays to verify substrates of METTL11A and the two other known N-terminal methyltransferases, METTL11B and METTL13. We have also developed these assays for use beyond substrate identification, showing that METTL11A activity is opposingly regulated by METTL11B and METTL13. Here we provide two methods for non-radioactive characterization of N-terminal methylation, Western blots with full-length recombinant protein substrates and luminescent assays with peptide substrates, and describe how each can be additionally adapted to look at regulatory complexes. We will review the advantages and disadvantages of each method in context with the other types of in vitro methyltransferase assays and discuss why these types of assays could be of general use to the N-terminal modification field.

Three's a crowd - why did three N-terminal methyltransferases evolve for one job?

N-terminal methylation of the α-amine group (Nα-methylation) is a post-translational modification (PTM) that was discovered over 40 years ago. Although it is not the most abundant of the Nα-PTMs, there are more than 300 predicted substrates of the three known mammalian Nα-methyltransferases, METTL11A and METTL11B (also known as NTMT1 and NTMT2, respectively) and METTL13. Of these ∼300 targets, the bulk are acted upon by METTL11A. Only one substrate is known to be Nα-methylated by METTL13, and METTL11B has no proven in vivo targets or predicted targets that are not also methylated by METTL11A. Given that METTL11A could clearly handle the entire substrate burden of Nα-methylation, it is unclear why three distinct Nα-methyltransferases have evolved. However, recent evidence suggests that many methyltransferases perform important biological functions outside of their catalytic activity, and the Nα-methyltransferases might be part of this emerging group. Here, we describe the distinct expression, localization and physiological roles of each Nα-methyltransferase, and compare these characteristics to other methyltransferases with non-catalytic functions, as well as to methyltransferases with both catalytic and non-catalytic functions, to give a better understanding of the global roles of these proteins. Based on these comparisons, we hypothesize that these three enzymes do not just have one common function but are actually performing three unique jobs in the cell.

METTLing in Stem Cell and Cancer Biology

The methyltransferase-like (METTL) family is a diverse group of methyltransferases that can methylate nucleotides, proteins, and small molecules. Despite this diverse array of substrates, they all share a characteristic seven-beta-strand catalytic domain, and recent evidence suggests many also share an important role in stem cell biology. The most well characterized family members METTL3 and METTL14 dimerize to form an N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA methyltransferase with established roles in cancer progression. However, new mouse models indicate that METTL3/METTL14 are also important for embryonic stem cell (ESC) development and postnatal hematopoietic and neural stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. METTL1, METTL5, METTL6, METTL8, and METTL17 also have recently identified roles in ESC pluripotency and differentiation, while METTL11A/11B, METTL4, METTL7A, and METTL22 have been shown to play roles in neural, mesenchymal, bone, and hematopoietic stem cell development, respectively. Additionally, a variety of other METTL family members are translational regulators, a role that could place them as important players in the transition from stem cell quiescence to differentiation. Here we will summarize what is known about the role of METTL proteins in stem cell differentiation and highlight the connection between their growing importance in development and their established roles in oncogenesis.

ZHX2 in health and disease

As a transcriptional factor and the negative regulator of alpha fetal protein (AFP), Zinc fingers and homeoboxes 2 (ZHX2) has a well-established role in protection against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, recent studies have suggested ZHX2 as an oncogene in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Moreover, mounting evidence has illustrated a much broader role of ZHX2 in multiple cellular processes, including cell proliferation, cell differentiation, lipid metabolism, and immunoregulation. This comprehensive review emphasizes the role of ZHX2 in health and diseases which have been more recently uncovered.