When pericardial effusion complicates cancer

Pericardial sclerosis as the primary management of malignant pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade

OBJECTIVES

The management of malignant pericardial effusion remains controversial. We present our experience with 93 patients referred for drainage and sclerosing procedures between 1979 and 1994.

METHODS

With continuous electrocardiographic monitoring, a Kifa catheter was inserted percutaneously into the pericardial sac and allowed to drain. A 100 mg dose of lidocaine hydrochloride was instilled intrapericardially, followed by 500 to 1000 mg tetracycline or doxycycline hydrochloride in 20 to 50 ml normal saline solution. The catheter was clamped for 1 to 2 hours and then reopened, and the procedure was repeated daily until the net drainage was less than 25 ml in 24 hours.

RESULTS

Subjects included 53 women and 40 men (median age 58 years). Eight patients could not undergo sclerosis because of technical failure. Eighty-five patients underwent sclerosis and required a median dose of 1500 mg of the sclerosing agent (range 500 to 700 mg), given in a median of three injections (range one to eight). Complications included pain (17 patients), atrial arrhythmias (eight patients), fever with temperature greater than 38.5 degrees C (seven patients), and infection (one patient). Two patients had cardiac arrest before sclerosis could be attempted. Sixty-eight patients (73%) had the effusion controlled for longer than 30 days, for an overall control rate of 81%. Seven other patients had control of the effusion but died of progressive malignant disease in less than 30 days. The overall median survival was 98 days (range 1 to 1724 days). Comparison of these results with outcomes reported for patients with malignant pericardial effusion who underwent surgical drainage indicates that drainage and sclerosis provide similar survivals but sclerosis carries lower morbidity, mortality, and recurrence rates.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous drainage and sclerosis constitutes a safe and effective treatment for malignant pericardial effusion. Surgical management should be reserved for the small percentage of cases that cannot be controlled by this method.

Management of dyspnea and cough in patients with cancer

The understanding and treatment of dyspnea in the cancer patient are where the science of pain management was 15 or 20 years ago. Very few studies have examined the pathophysiologic mechanisms that cause dyspnea in cancer patients, and few investigators have evaluated therapeutic strategies to control dyspnea in this patient group. The optimal therapy for dyspnea is treatment of the underlying cause. When this is not possible, opioids and phenothiazines provide effective symptomatic relief in most cases, but many unanswered questions remain. Are these the optimal drugs, and what are their optimal doses? What are the effects of chronic dosing? Which is the best route of administration? How serious are the risks of respiratory depression? A clear consensus supports the aggressive treatment of pain in terminally ill cancer patients, even if death is hastened as an unintended consequence. No such position has yet been reached in the management of dyspnea in the same population. As a result, dyspnea is addressed only very late in the course of the disease, perhaps reducing the patient's quality of life and function at earlier stages and resulting in a very small "therapeutic window" in the terminal phase. Clearly, a need exists for more research to determine the most effective management of this common and very distressing symptom.

Subxiphoid pericardiotomy in the diagnosis and management of large pericardial effusions associated with malignancy

To determine the safety, diagnostic value, and clinical outcome of patients with malignancy undergoing subxiphoid pericardiotomy for large pericardial effusions, we prospectively studied 25 consecutive patients with malignancy and new, large pericardial effusions diagnosed by echocardiography. Twenty-two of the 25 operations were done under local anesthesia, and no patient died at surgery. Pericardial fluid cytology revealed malignant cells in 11 patients (44 percent), while tumor was seen in only five (45 percent) of these 11 patients on pathologic examination. The remaining 14 patients showed no evidence of pericardial invasion with tumor. Evidence of intrathoracic disease by CT or MRI scanning, tamponade, a sanguineous pericardial fluid character, and an elevated serum and pericardial fluid lactate dehydrogenase level all were suggestive of malignant invasion of the pericardium. All 25 patients were followed at least 12 months postoperatively. Effusions recurred in three patients (12 percent), and one patient required reoperation. Overall mortality was 72 percent with a 91 percent (10 of 11) mortality for those with malignant effusions and a 57 percent (8 of 14) mortality for those with nonmalignant effusions. Diagnostically, subxiphoid pericardiotomy has little advantage over examination of pericardial fluid alone in this group of patients. Therapeutically, however, it is a low morbidity procedure which is safe and effective in treating patients with malignancy and large pericardial effusions.

Morphologic aspects of pericardial heart disease: Part II

Pericardial heart disease is a common entity at necropsy. Frequently, focal areas of fibrin deposits or parietal-visceral pericardial adhesion are observed at necropsy without previous clinical evidence of pericardial dysfunction. Some of these instances are related to clinically silent acute or healed myocardial infarction but the vast majority of cases are incidental (idiopathic) findings. The purpose of this review is to summarize various morphologic responses of the pericardium and to provide an etiologic framework for these responses. Part II will review specific morphologic responses of pericardial layers to selected diseases.