Growth mechanisms and cancer progression

Spontaneous regression of neoplasms: new possibilities for immunotherapy

In mammalian cells, neoplastic transformation is directly associated with the expression of oncogenes, loss or simple inactivation of the function of tumour suppressor genes and the production of certain growth factors. Genes for suppression of the development of the neoplastic cellular immunophenotype, as well as inhibitory growth factors, have regulatory functions within the normal processes of cell division and differentiation. Telomerase (a ribonucleoprotein polymerase) activation is frequently detected in various neoplasms. Telomerase activation is regarded as essential for cell immortalisation and its inhibition may result in spontaneous regression of neoplasms. This phenomenon of neoplasms occurs when the malignant tissue mass partially or completely disappears without any treatment or as a result of a therapy considered inadequate to influence systemic neoplastic growth. This definition makes it clear that the term 'spontaneous regression' applies to neoplasms in which the overall malignant disease is not necessarily cured and to cases where the regression may not be complete or permanent. A number of possible mechanisms of spontaneous regression are reviewed, with the understanding that no single mechanism can completely account for this phenomenon. The application of the newest immunological, molecular biological and genetic insights for more individualised and adequate antineoplastic immunotherapy (alternative biotherapy) is also discussed.

Metastasis: the deadly part of cancer

The most malignant characteristic of any cancer cell is the cell's ability to metastasize. The movement of the malignant cell from the primary neoplasm to a distant site, and the cell's subsequent growth there, is the most dangerous characteristic of any tumour cell. Metastatic development occurs via a series of complicated events. This article explores the stepwise process of metastatic spread, known as the 'metastatic cascade', highlights the organs commonly involved in metastatic spread, and debates the seed and soil hypothesis of metastasis. The nurse is introduced to the importance of recent medical research which highlights the genetic links identified in metastatic cell formation. Tumour suppressor genes and oncogenes, which are genes known to induce or promote cancer, and their implications for prognosis, are explained. Finally, the nurse's responsibility in maintaining his/her knowledge and understanding of metastasis in order that he/she may provide appropriate care and support for the patient and family is discussed.

Transferrin receptor expression in nonsmall cell lung cancer. Histopathologic and clinical correlates

BACKGROUND

In the search for tumor-related antigens with survival-predictive value, previous studies have yielded varied conclusions regarding the expression of one such antigen, the transferrin receptor in lung cancer. The goal of this study was to define the frequency of expression of transferrin receptor in lung cancer specimens and gather preliminary data regarding the prognostic value of this tumor-related antigen.

METHODS

Tissue immunoreactivity was studied with a murine monoclonal antibody to transferrin receptor in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer who underwent surgical resection at the Medical Center Hospital of Vermont during the period from January, 1988, to May, 1991.

RESULTS

The study group consisted of 32 patients (21 males and 11 females) with an average follow-up length of 27 months (standard deviation of 16 months). There were 17 patients with adenocarcinoma, 14 with squamous cell carcinoma, and 1 with large cell carcinoma. At the end of data accumulation, a total of 16 deaths had been recorded (8 with squamous cell, 8 with adenocarcinoma). Normal lung tissue did not stain for transferrin receptor; however, 13 of 17 (76%) adenocarcinomas, 13 of 14 (93%) squamous cell carcinomas, and the 1 large cell carcinoma stained positively for transferrin receptor. Staining for transferrin receptor was graded according to pattern and intensity and categorized as absent-weak or strong. Survival analysis was performed to evaluate patient outcome based on a variety of clinical and experimentally determined characteristics. Groups based on N-status (N0 vs. N1 + N2, P = 0.08), stage (Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 + 3 P = 0.13), age (younger than 60 vs. 60 years or older, P = 0.09), and transferrin receptor staining (absent-weak vs. strong, P = 0.14) achieved nearly significant differences in survival. Further analysis of the differences in survival for groupings based on transferrin receptor staining found that these differences in survival reached significance for patients with larger tumors (T2 or T3, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Transferrin receptor is expressed in the majority of lung cancers and the presence of transferrin receptor in nonsmall cell lung cancers may be an indicator of poorer prognosis in certain groups of patients.