A hospitalist's role in preventing patient falls

Nursing care for hospitalized older adults - fall accidents versus safe mobility: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

to map the constituent elements of the safe mobility concept present in hospital care for older adults.

METHODS

a scoping review of 35 articles searched in databases and gray literature - BDENF/VHL, Scopus, CINAHL/EBSCO, Embase, Web of Science, PEDro, MEDLINE/PubMed and CAPES Theses and Dissertations Catalog. No time or language cut-off was established.

RESULTS

none of the studies presented a clear safe mobility concept, however its constituent elements involve factors related to patient (behavioral factors, conditions, diseases, signs and symptoms, nutritional status, age, balance, strength, gait quality, sleep), the institution (environment, treatment devices, guidelines, medications and polypharmacy, material and human resources and clothing/shoes) and the nature of the interventions (related to the patient, institution and family).

FINAL CONSIDERATIONS

the constituent elements of safe mobility express hospital units' capacity to guarantee care and protection from fall accidents for hospitalized older adults.

Retrospective Investigation and Research on Fall Events Among Hospitalized Patients in the Rehabilitation Department

Objective

We investigated the clinical characteristics, fall outcomes, and related factors of falls in patients who were hospitalized in the rehabilitation department, and explored strategies to reduce the incidence of falls and prevent falls in patients.

Methods

Data from 60 patients who fell in the rehabilitation department between 2016 and 2021 were analyzed for clinical characteristics, associated factors, incidence of falls, injuries, and patient demographics. Under the random stratified sampling method, 60 patients who did not fall during the same period were selected as the control group, and relevant data was collected. Measurement data were compared using an independent sample t-test. Enumeration data were compared using chi-squared (χ2) test was employed to compare these data between the two groups. Non-parametric data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Factors potentially influencing falls were scrutinized through both univariate and binary logistic regression analyses.

Results

The median annual incidence of falls among patients who were hospitalized in the rehabilitation department was 0.04%, while the overall fall injury rate was 60%. Falls were most prevalent within 30 days of hospitalization (71.67%). The most common fall-related condition was craniocerebral disease (83.33%). The incidents of falls location of fall were mainly reported in nearby areas of rehabilitation ward (70%). Most accidents occurred between 7:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. and 3:01 p.m.-6:00 p.m. (63.33%), and dyskinesia was the most common cause of falls (71.67%). There were 39 patients (65.00%) with Barthel Index (BI) scores ranging between 40-60.

Conclusion

Patients in the rehabilitation department had a greater incidence of falls and fall injuries. Within 30 days of admission, patients with moderately dependent craniocerebral disorders and dyskinesia frequently experienced falls during typical daytime shifts in areas characterized by endemic conditions.

Exploring attitudinal barriers to participation in inpatient fall risk assessment using the Theoretical Domains Framework: A survey of providers

Background and Aims

Lack of provider (physicians and advanced practice providers) participation in fall risk assessment was theorized to be contributing to rising rates of falls with injury at our institution. This project sought to identify if attitudinal barriers to inpatient provider participation in fall risk assessment were similar to those identified in other clinical settings.

Methods

Barriers to provider participation in fall risk assessment were identified in the literature. These were mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) domains to assist with interpretation of the data. A 10-item survey using a 5-point Likert scale (strongly agree to strongly disagree) with two open-ended questions was developed using these barriers. The survey was distributed via email to all providers on the Medical Staff in July 2021.

Results

The response rate was 9.1% (188/2062). 72.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 65.6, 78.5) of providers at our institution did agree that fall risk assessment was within their role and 72% (95% CI: 66.1, 78.5) agreed that assessment can prevent falls. Nearly half felt that they lacked formal training in fall risk assessment (48.1% [95% CI: 41.1, 55.1]) and 52.2% (95% CI: 44.6, 58.6) agreed that other aspects of patient care took priority over falls assessment. These barriers correlated best with the TDF domains of Beliefs about Capabilities and Beliefs about Consequences.

Conclusions

Survey results indicate that interventions focused on increasing provider motivation and capability regarding fall risk assessment and helping providers prioritize fall risk assessment are potential targets for future quality improvement projects.

Patterns of Antipsychotic Dispensation to Long-Term Care Residents

OBJECTIVES

To describe dispensing patterns of antipsychotic medications to long-term care (LTC) residents and assess factors associated with continuation of an antipsychotic after a fall-related hospitalization.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Nova Scotia Seniors Pharmacare Program (NSSPP) beneficiaries age 66 years and older who resided in LTC and received at least 1 dispensation of an antipsychotic within the study period of April 1, 2009, to March 31, 2017.

METHODS

Linkage of administrative claims data from the NSSPP and the Canadian Institute of Health Information Discharge Abstract Database identified LTC residents with an antipsychotic dispensation and from the subgroup of those dispensed antipsychotic medications who experienced a fall-related hospitalization. Antipsychotic dispensing patterns were reported with counts and means. Predictors of continuation of an antipsychotic after a fall-related hospitalization (sex, length of stay, days supplied, age, year of admission, rural/urban) were reported and analyzed with multiple logistic regression.

RESULTS

There were 19,164 unique NSSPP beneficiaries who were dispensed at least 1 prescription for an antipsychotic medication. Of those who received at least 1 antipsychotic dispensation 90% (n = 17,201) resided in LTC. A mean of 40% (n = 2637) of LTC residents received at least 1 antipsychotic dispensation in each year. Risperidone and quetiapine were dispensed most frequently. Of the 544 beneficiaries residing in LTC who survived a fall-related hospitalization, 439 (80.7%) continued an antipsychotic after hospital discharge. Female sex [OR 1.7, 95% CI (1.013‒2.943)], age 66‒69 [OR 4.587, 95% CI (1.4‒20.8)], 75-79 [OR 2.8, 95% CI (1.3‒6.3)], and 80‒84 years [OR 3.1, 95% CI (1.6‒6.4)] (compared with age 90+ years) were associated with increased risk of antipsychotic continuation.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

With 90% of antipsychotic dispensations in Nova Scotia being to LTC residents and 40% of LTC residents being dispensed antipsychotics in any year there is a need to address this level of antipsychotic dispensation to older adults.

Cross-Validation of a Screening Tool to Distinguish Between Fallers and Nonfallers in Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to cross-validate a previously developed knee osteoarthritis falls (KOAF) screening tool to distinguish between fallers and nonfallers among community-dwelling older adults with knee osteoarthritis (OA).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey study.

SETTING

Three independent orthopedic clinics.

PARTICIPANTS

Older outpatients with knee OA (N=86; 71 women, 15 men; mean age, 75.2±6.2y).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was to identify fallers and nonfallers among outpatients with OA based on their history of falls within the past year. We investigated factors including sex, age, body mass index, Kellgren-Lawrence grade, affected side (bilateral or unilateral knee OA), number of comorbidities, pharmacotherapy, physical therapy, pain, and activity as individual predictors of falls. Participants performed the one-leg standing test and the 5 times sit-to-stand test to determine motor function. Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, and post-test probability of the KOAF screening tool were calculated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

The results of the one-leg standing test and 5 times sit-to-stand test differed significantly between the 2 groups (P<.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve was 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.96; P<.001). The post-test probability of falls was 83.3% (positive likelihood ratio, 11.54) when the total score of KOAF screening tool was 2 points and 2.6% (negative likelihood ratio, 0.06) when the total score of KOAF screening tool was less than 1 point.

CONCLUSIONS

Cross-validation results for the KOAF screening tool were better, confirming that the screening tool could distinguish between fallers and nonfallers with high accuracy. Our findings suggest that this simple screening tool could be readily used in clinical practice and could aid in clinical decision-making through providing choices for physical therapy evaluation and recommendations for physical therapy programs.