1
|
Sacco M, Gesualdo M, Staiano MT, Dall'Amico E, Caronna S, Dibitetto S, Canalis C, Caneglias A, Mediati F, Stasio RC, Gaia S, Saracco GM, Bruno M, De Angelis CG. Direct Single-Operator Cholangioscopy and Intraductal Ultrasonography in Patients with Indeterminate Biliary Strictures: A Single Center Experience. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:1316. [PMID: 39001208 PMCID: PMC11240807 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14131316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2024] [Revised: 06/16/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
The evaluation of biliary strictures poses a challenge due to the low sensitivity of standard diagnostic approaches, but the advent of direct single-operator cholangioscopy (DSOC) has revolutionized this paradigm. Our study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of DSOC and DSOC-targeted biopsies, intraductal ultrasound (IDUS), and standard brush cytology in patients with indeterminate biliary strictures (IBS). We reviewed patients who underwent advanced diagnostic evaluation for IBS at our endoscopy unit from January 2018 to December 2022, all of whom had previously undergone at least one endoscopic attempt to characterize the biliary stricture. Final diagnoses were established based on surgical pathology and/or clinical and radiological follow-up spanning at least 12 months. A total of 57 patients, with a mean age of 67.2 ± 10.0 years, were included, with a mean follow-up of 18.2 ± 18.1 months. The majority of IBS were located in the distal common bile duct (45.6%), with malignancy confirmed in 35 patients (61.4%). DSOC and IDUS demonstrated significantly higher accuracies (89.5% and 82.7%, respectively) compared to standard cytology (61.5%, p < 0.05). Both DSOC visualization and IDUS exhibited optimal diagnostic yields in differentiating IBS with an acceptable safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Sacco
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Marcantonio Gesualdo
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Section of Gastroenterology II, National Institute of Research IRCCS "Saverio De Bellis", 70013 Castellana Grotte, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Staiano
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Eleonora Dall'Amico
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Stefania Caronna
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Simone Dibitetto
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Chiara Canalis
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Alessandro Caneglias
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Federica Mediati
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Rosa Claudia Stasio
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Silvia Gaia
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Giorgio Maria Saracco
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Mauro Bruno
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Claudio Giovanni De Angelis
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yoon SB, Yang MJ, Shin DW, Soh JS, Lim H, Kang HS, Moon SH. Endoscopic ultrasound-rendezvous versus percutaneous-endoscopic rendezvous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for bile duct access: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Endosc 2024; 36:129-140. [PMID: 37432952 DOI: 10.1111/den.14636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) or percutaneous-assisted antegrade guidewire insertion can be used to achieve biliary access when standard endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) fails. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and safety of EUS-assisted rendezvous (EUS-RV) and percutaneous rendezvous (PERC-RV) ERCP. METHODS We searched multiple databases from inception to September 2022 to identify studies reporting on EUS-RV and PERC-RV in failed ERCP. A random-effects model was used to summarize the pooled rates of technical success and adverse events with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS In total, 524 patients (19 studies) and 591 patients (12 studies) were managed by EUS-RV and PERC-RV, respectively. The pooled technical successes were 88.7% (95% CI 84.6-92.8%, I2 = 70.5%) for EUS-RV and 94.1% (95% CI 91.1-97.1%, I2 = 59.2%) for PERC-RV (P = 0.088). The technical success rates of EUS-RV and PERC-RV were comparable in subgroups of benign diseases (89.2% vs. 95.8%, P = 0.068), malignant diseases (90.3% vs. 95.5%, P = 0.193), and normal anatomy (90.7% vs. 95.9%, P = 0.240). However, patients with surgically altered anatomy had poorer technical success after EUS-RV than after PERC-RV (58.7% vs. 93.1%, P = 0.036). The pooled rates of overall adverse events were 9.8% for EUS-RV and 13.4% for PERC-RV (P = 0.686). CONCLUSIONS Both EUS-RV and PERC-RV have exhibited high technical success rates. When standard ERCP fails, EUS-RV and PERC-RV are comparably effective rescue techniques if adequate expertise and facilities are feasible. However, in patients with surgically altered anatomy, PERC-RV might be the preferred choice over EUS-RV because of its higher technical success rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Bae Yoon
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Min Jae Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Dong Woo Shin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, South Korea
- Institute for Liver and Digestive Diseases, Hallym University, Chuncheon, South Korea
| | - Jae Seung Soh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, South Korea
- Institute for Liver and Digestive Diseases, Hallym University, Chuncheon, South Korea
| | - Hyun Lim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, South Korea
- Institute for Liver and Digestive Diseases, Hallym University, Chuncheon, South Korea
| | - Ho Suk Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, South Korea
- Institute for Liver and Digestive Diseases, Hallym University, Chuncheon, South Korea
| | - Sung-Hoon Moon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, South Korea
- Institute for Liver and Digestive Diseases, Hallym University, Chuncheon, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ben Abdallah K, Hamzaoui L, Mahmoudi M, Cherif I, Ben Mohamed A, Yakoubi M, Khsiba A, Medhioub M, Azouz M. Predictive factors of difficult biliary cannulation: An experience of a tunisian tertiary center. Heliyon 2022; 8:e12526. [PMID: 36619425 PMCID: PMC9812703 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 12/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Selective biliary cannulation is a prerequisite for a successful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, conventional biliary access can be difficult. The aims of our study were to determine the prevalence of difficult biliary cannulation (DBC) and its associated factors and to describe the efficiency and safety of used standard and advanced cannulation techniques. Methods We conducted a single-center retrospective study including all patients with naïve papilla who had an ERCP procedure in Gastroenterology department of Mohamed Taher Maamouri Hospital from June 2019 to December 2021. Efficiency was defined as successful selective deep biliary cannulation. DBC was defined based on the presence of one or more of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) criteria (5-5-1): more than five cannulation attempts, more than 5 min before cannulation and more than one accidental passage in the wirsung. Prevalence was measured using ESGE 5-5-1 cutoffs and chinese set cutoffs 15-10-2. Predictors of DBC were sought by univariate and multivariate analysis (SPSS software, p significant if < 0.05). Results We included 664 patients (mean age 62 years and sex ratio M/W = 0.8). Main indication for ERCP was choledocholithiasis (67%, n = 442) followed by malignant biliary stenosis (21%, n = 138). Based on ESGE criteria, prevalence of DBC was 42.62% (n = 283). Prevalence was 21.15% when 15-10-2 cutoffs are applied in trainee-involved procedure. Cumulative biliary success rate was 96.46%. Standard cannulation method achieved access in 98.2% while advanced methods permitted success in 92.2% in fistulotomy, 94.1% in papillotomy and 77.3% in transpancreatic sphincterotomy. Independent predictive factors of DBC in multivariate analysis were: Trainee presence OR 1.80 [1.24-2.65], SOD OR 4.71 [1.11-19.88], biliary stenosis found on imaging examinations (OR 2.53 [1.63-3.92], small papilla OR 4.09 [1.82-9.17] and difficult orientation of the papilla OR 14.90 [3.28-67.62]. Conclusion DBC is a frequent endoscopic situation. Predictors of DBC can be related to trainee involvement in the procedure, anatomical and clinical factors. A thorough understanding of these factors can actively contribute to ERCP management plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K. Ben Abdallah
- Gastroenterology Department, Mohamed Taher Maamouri University Hospital, Nabeul, Tunisia,Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia,Corresponding author.
| | - L. Hamzaoui
- Gastroenterology Department, Mohamed Taher Maamouri University Hospital, Nabeul, Tunisia,Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - M. Mahmoudi
- Gastroenterology Department, Mohamed Taher Maamouri University Hospital, Nabeul, Tunisia,Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - I. Cherif
- Laboratory of Medical Epidemiology, Institut Pasteur de Tunis, Tunisia,Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - A. Ben Mohamed
- Gastroenterology Department, Mohamed Taher Maamouri University Hospital, Nabeul, Tunisia,Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - M. Yakoubi
- Gastroenterology Department, Mohamed Taher Maamouri University Hospital, Nabeul, Tunisia,Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - A. Khsiba
- Gastroenterology Department, Mohamed Taher Maamouri University Hospital, Nabeul, Tunisia,Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - M. Medhioub
- Gastroenterology Department, Mohamed Taher Maamouri University Hospital, Nabeul, Tunisia,Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - M.M. Azouz
- Gastroenterology Department, Mohamed Taher Maamouri University Hospital, Nabeul, Tunisia,Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
| |
Collapse
|