1
|
Wagner D, Mason SG, Eastwood JD. The experience of effort in ADHD: a scoping review. Front Psychol 2024; 15:1349440. [PMID: 38895497 PMCID: PMC11184226 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1349440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Mental effort plays a critical role in regulating cognition. However, the experience of mental effort may differ for individuals with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), a disorder for which sustained mental effort 'avoidance' or 'dislike' is a criterion in the DSM. We conducted a scoping review to characterize the literature on the experiences of effort in ADHD. Methods This systematic scoping review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Extension for Scoping Reviews and Joanna Briggs Methodology. PsycINFO (OVID), PsycINFO (ProQuest) and PubMed were searched for studies published in English before February 14, 2023. Studies must have included an ADHD population or a measure of ADHD symptomatology, in addition to a self-report measure of the experience of effort or the use of an effort preference paradigm. Two researchers reviewed all abstracts, and one researcher reviewed full-text articles. Results Only 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. Several gaps and inconsistencies in the research were identified in terms of method, definitions of effort, measurements of ADHD, and sample characteristics. Moreover, the pattern of results on the experience of effort was mixed. Conclusion Despite its diagnostic and conceptual significance, the experience of mental effort in ADHD is not well studied. Critical gaps were identified in the existing literature. A three-facet conceptualization of effort is proposed-specifically, task-elicited effort, volitionally exerted effort, and the affect associated with engaging in effort - to guide future explorations of the experience of effort in ADHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danika Wagner
- The Boredom Lab, Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Samantha G. Mason
- The Boredom Lab, Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - John D. Eastwood
- The Boredom Lab, Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Roor JJ, Peters MJV, Dandachi-FitzGerald B, Ponds RWHM. Performance Validity Test Failure in the Clinical Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence Rates. Neuropsychol Rev 2024; 34:299-319. [PMID: 36872398 PMCID: PMC10920461 DOI: 10.1007/s11065-023-09582-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
Performance validity tests (PVTs) are used to measure the validity of the obtained neuropsychological test data. However, when an individual fails a PVT, the likelihood that failure truly reflects invalid performance (i.e., the positive predictive value) depends on the base rate in the context in which the assessment takes place. Therefore, accurate base rate information is needed to guide interpretation of PVT performance. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the base rate of PVT failure in the clinical population (PROSPERO number: CRD42020164128). PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and PsychINFO were searched to identify articles published up to November 5, 2021. Main eligibility criteria were a clinical evaluation context and utilization of stand-alone and well-validated PVTs. Of the 457 articles scrutinized for eligibility, 47 were selected for systematic review and meta-analyses. Pooled base rate of PVT failure for all included studies was 16%, 95% CI [14, 19]. High heterogeneity existed among these studies (Cochran's Q = 697.97, p < .001; I2 = 91%; τ2 = 0.08). Subgroup analysis indicated that pooled PVT failure rates varied across clinical context, presence of external incentives, clinical diagnosis, and utilized PVT. Our findings can be used for calculating clinically applied statistics (i.e., positive and negative predictive values, and likelihood ratios) to increase the diagnostic accuracy of performance validity determination in clinical evaluation. Future research is necessary with more detailed recruitment procedures and sample descriptions to further improve the accuracy of the base rate of PVT failure in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeroen J Roor
- Department of Medical Psychology, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, The Netherlands.
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Maarten J V Peters
- Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Brechje Dandachi-FitzGerald
- Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Psychology, Open University, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Rudolf W H M Ponds
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dong H, Koerts J, Pijnenborg GHM, Scherbaum N, Müller BW, Fuermaier ABM. Cognitive Underperformance in a Mixed Neuropsychiatric Sample at Diagnostic Evaluation of Adult ADHD. J Clin Med 2023; 12:6926. [PMID: 37959391 PMCID: PMC10647211 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12216926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: The clinical assessment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adulthood is known to show non-trivial base rates of noncredible performance and requires thorough validity assessment. (2) Objectives: The present study estimated base rates of noncredible performance in clinical evaluations of adult ADHD on one or more of 17 embedded validity indicators (EVIs). This study further examines the effect of the order of test administration on EVI failure rates, the association between cognitive underperformance and symptom overreporting, and the prediction of cognitive underperformance by clinical information. (3) Methods: A mixed neuropsychiatric sample (N = 464, ADHD = 227) completed a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment battery on the Vienna Test System (VTS; CFADHD). Test performance allows the computation of 17 embedded performance validity indicators (PVTs) derived from eight different neuropsychological tests. Further, all participants completed several self- and other-report symptom rating scales assessing depressive symptoms and cognitive functioning. The Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory-II were administered to derive embedded symptom validity measures (SVTs). (4) Results and conclusion: Noncredible performance occurs in a sizeable proportion of about 10% up to 30% of individuals throughout the entire battery. Tests for attention and concentration appear to be the most adequate and sensitive for detecting underperformance. Cognitive underperformance represents a coherent construct and seems dissociable from symptom overreporting. These results emphasize the importance of performing multiple PVTs, at different time points, and promote more accurate calculation of the positive and negative predictive values of a given validity measure for noncredible performance during clinical assessments. Future studies should further examine whether and how the present results stand in other clinical populations, by implementing rigorous reference standards of noncredible performance, characterizing those failing PVT assessments, and differentiating between underlying motivations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Dong
- Department of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands; (H.D.); (J.K.); (G.H.M.P.)
| | - Janneke Koerts
- Department of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands; (H.D.); (J.K.); (G.H.M.P.)
| | - Gerdina H. M. Pijnenborg
- Department of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands; (H.D.); (J.K.); (G.H.M.P.)
| | - Norbert Scherbaum
- LVR University Hospital, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (N.S.); (B.W.M.)
| | - Bernhard W. Müller
- LVR University Hospital, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (N.S.); (B.W.M.)
- Department of Psychology, University of Wuppertal, 42119 Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Anselm B. M. Fuermaier
- Department of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands; (H.D.); (J.K.); (G.H.M.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mascarenhas MA, Cocunato JL, Armstrong IT, Harrison AG, Zakzanis KK. Base rates of non-credible performance in a post-secondary student sample seeking accessibility accommodations. Clin Neuropsychol 2023; 37:1608-1628. [PMID: 36646463 DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2023.2167737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Objective: Performance Validity Tests (PVTs) have been used to identify non-credible performance in clinical, medicolegal, forensic, and, more recently, academic settings. The inclusion of PVTs when administering psychoeducational assessments is essential given that specific accommodation such as flexible deadlines and increased writing time can provide an external incentive for students without disabilities to feign symptoms. Method: The present study used archival data to establish base rates of non-credible performance in a sample of post-secondary students (n = 1045) who underwent a comprehensive psychoeducational evaluation for the purposes of obtaining academic accommodations. In accordance with current guidelines, non-credible performance was determined by failure on two or more freestanding or embedded PVTs. Results: 9.4% of participants failed at least two of the PVTs they were administered, of which 8.5% failed two PVTs, and approximately 1% failed three PVTs. Base rates of failure for specific PVTs ranged from 25% (b Test) to 11.2% (TOVA). Conclusions: The present study found a lower base rate of non-credible performance than previously observed in comparable populations. This likely reflects the utilization of conservative criteria in detecting non-credible performance to avoid false positives. By contrast, inconsistent base rates previously found in the literature may reflect inconsistent methodologies. These results further emphasize the importance of administering multiple PVTs during psychoeducational assessments. The implications of these findings can further inform clinicians administering assessments in academic settings and aid in the appropriate utilization of PVTs in psychoeducational evaluation to determine accessibility accommodations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie A Mascarenhas
- Graduate Department of Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jessica L Cocunato
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Canada
| | - Irene T Armstrong
- Regional Assessment and Resource Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Allyson G Harrison
- Regional Assessment and Resource Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Konstantine K Zakzanis
- Graduate Department of Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Becke M, Tucha L, Butzbach M, Aschenbrenner S, Weisbrod M, Tucha O, Fuermaier ABM. Feigning Adult ADHD on a Comprehensive Neuropsychological Test Battery: An Analogue Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:4070. [PMID: 36901080 PMCID: PMC10001580 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20054070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 02/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
The evaluation of performance validity is an essential part of any neuropsychological evaluation. Validity indicators embedded in routine neuropsychological tests offer a time-efficient option for sampling performance validity throughout the assessment while reducing vulnerability to coaching. By administering a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery to 57 adults with ADHD, 60 neurotypical controls, and 151 instructed simulators, we examined each test's utility in detecting noncredible performance. Cut-off scores were derived for all available outcome variables. Although all ensured at least 90% specificity in the ADHD Group, sensitivity differed significantly between tests, ranging from 0% to 64.9%. Tests of selective attention, vigilance, and inhibition were most useful in detecting the instructed simulation of adult ADHD, whereas figural fluency and task switching lacked sensitivity. Five or more test variables demonstrating results in the second to fourth percentile were rare among cases of genuine adult ADHD but identified approximately 58% of instructed simulators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Becke
- Department of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, University of Groningen, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Lara Tucha
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Rostock, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany
| | - Marah Butzbach
- Department of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, University of Groningen, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Steffen Aschenbrenner
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Neuropsychology, SRH Clinic Karlsbad-Langensteinbach, 76307 Karlsbad, Germany
| | - Matthias Weisbrod
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, SRH Clinic Karlsbad-Langensteinbach, 76307 Karlsbad, Germany
- Department of General Psychiatry, Center of Psychosocial Medicine, University of Heidelberg, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Tucha
- Department of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, University of Groningen, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Rostock, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany
- Department of Psychology, National University of Ireland, W23 F2K8 Maynooth, Ireland
| | - Anselm B. M. Fuermaier
- Department of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, University of Groningen, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fuermaier ABM, Dandachi-Fitzgerald B, Lehrner J. Attention Performance as an Embedded Validity Indicator in the Cognitive Assessment of Early Retirement Claimants. PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY & LAW 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s12207-022-09468-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
AbstractThe assessment of performance validity is essential in any neuropsychological evaluation. However, relatively few measures exist that are based on attention performance embedded within routine cognitive tasks. The present study explores the potential value of a computerized attention test, the Cognitrone, as an embedded validity indicator in the neuropsychological assessment of early retirement claimants. Two hundred and sixty-five early retirement claimants were assessed with the Word Memory Test (WMT) and the Cognitrone. WMT scores were used as the independent criterion to determine performance validity. Speed and accuracy measures of the Cognitrone were analyzed in receiver operating characteristics (ROC) to classify group membership. The Cognitrone was sensitive in revealing attention deficits in early retirement claimants. Further, 54% (n = 143) of the individuals showed noncredible cognitive performance, whereas 46% (n = 122) showed credible cognitive performance. Individuals failing the performance validity assessment showed slower (AUC = 79.1%) and more inaccurate (AUC = 79.5%) attention performance than those passing the performance validity assessment. A compound score integrating speed and accuracy revealed incremental value as indicated by AUC = 87.9%. Various cut scores are suggested, resulting in equal rates of 80% sensitivity and specificity (cut score = 1.297) or 69% sensitivity with 90% specificity (cut score = 0.734). The present study supports the sensitivity of the Cognitrone for the assessment of attention deficits in early retirement claimants and its potential value as an embedded validity indicator. Further research on different samples and with multidimensional criteria for determining invalid performance are required before clinical application can be suggested.
Collapse
|
7
|
Hirsch O, Fuermaier ABM, Tucha O, Albrecht B, Chavanon ML, Christiansen H. Symptom and performance validity in samples of adults at clinical evaluation of ADHD: a replication study using machine learning algorithms. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2022; 44:171-184. [PMID: 35906728 DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2022.2105821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Research has shown non-trivial base rates of noncredible symptom report and performance in the clinical evaluation of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adulthood. The goal of this study is to estimate and replicate base rates of symptom and performance validity test failure in the clinical evaluation of adult ADHD and derive prediction models based on routine clinical measures. METHODS This study reuses data of a previous publication of 196 adults seeking ADHD assessment and replicates the findings on an independent sample of 700 adults recruited in the same referral context. Measures of symptom and performance validity (one SVT, two PVTs) were applied to estimate base rates. Prediction models were developed using machine learning. RESULTS Both samples showed substantial rates of noncredible symptom report (one SVT failure: 35.7% - 36.6%), noncredible test performance (one PVT failure: 32.1% - 49.3%; two PVT failures: 18.9% - 27.3%), or both (each one SVT and PVT failure: 13.3% - 22.4%; one SVT and two PVT failures: 9.7% - 13.7%). Machine learning algorithms resulted in generally moderate to weak prediction models, with advantages of the reused sample compared to the independent replication sample. Associations between measures of symptom and performance validity were negligible to small. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the necessity to include measures of symptom and performance validity in the clinical evaluation of adult ADHD. Further, this study demonstrates the difficulty to characterize the group failing symptom or performance validity assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Hirsch
- Department of Psychology, FOM University of Applied Sciences, Siegen, Germany
| | - Anselm B M Fuermaier
- Department of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Oliver Tucha
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.,Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Ireland
| | - Björn Albrecht
- Department of Psychology, Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology/Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Mira-Lynn Chavanon
- Department of Psychology, Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology/Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Hanna Christiansen
- Department of Psychology, Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology/Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Motor Reaction Times as an Embedded Measure of Performance Validity: a Study with a Sample of Austrian Early Retirement Claimants. PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY & LAW 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s12207-021-09431-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
AbstractAmong embedded measures of performance validity, reaction time parameters appear to be less common. However, their potential may be underestimated. In the German-speaking countries, reaction time is often examined using the Alertness subtest of the Test of Attention Performance (TAP). Several previous studies have examined its suitability for validity assessment. The current study was conceived to examine a variety of reaction time parameters of the TAP Alertness subtest with a sample of 266 Austrian civil forensic patients. Classification results from the Word Memory Test (WMT) were used as an external indicator to distinguish between valid and invalid symptom presentations. Results demonstrated that the WMT fail group performed worse in reaction time as well as its intraindividual variation across trials when compared to the WMT pass group. Receiver operating characteristic analyses revealed areas under the curve of .775–.804. Logistic regression models indicated the parameter intraindividual variation of motor reaction time with warning sound as being the best predictor for invalid test performance. Suggested cut scores yielded a sensitivity of .62 and a specificity of .90, or .45 and .95, respectively, when the accepted false-positive rate was set lower. The results encourage the use of the Alertness subtest as an embedded measure of performance validity.
Collapse
|
9
|
Pollock B, Harrison AG, Armstrong IT. What can we learn about performance validity from TOVA response profiles? J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2021; 43:412-425. [PMID: 34088256 DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2021.1932762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Given the functional impairments associated with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (AD/HD), a valid diagnosis is important. However, particularly when carried out in adulthood, the diagnostic process can be challenging and is complicated by conclusive evidence that a proportion of individuals referred for evaluation of AD/HD exaggerate or feign their symptoms. Relatively few methods, however, exist to identify such feigning. While continuous performance tests (CPTs) may provide useful information regarding performance validity, the question remains as to whether there are consistent patterns of exaggeration demonstrated by those feigning AD/HD. Thus, this study used cluster analysis to determine whether valid and reliable performance clusters would emerge based on CPT performance. Using archival data from a university-based AD/HD screening clinic, we investigated the performance of 305 adults on the Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA). Three profiles emerged, including one cluster who demonstrated exceptionally low performance on the TOVA, exceptionally high reports of AD/HD symptomology, and higher rates of failure on symptom and performance validity tests. The implication from our analysis is that this group most likely represents individuals who were exaggerating or magnifying their difficulties. The results reaffirm previous research showing that performance profiles on a continuous performance test can be used as an indicator of credible performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth Pollock
- Regional Assessment & Resource Centre, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Allyson G Harrison
- Regional Assessment & Resource Centre, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Irene T Armstrong
- Regional Assessment & Resource Centre, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Smith JN, Suhr JA. Sluggish Cognitive Tempo Factors in Emerging Adults:Symptomatic and Neuropsychological Correlates. Dev Neuropsychol 2021; 46:169-183. [PMID: 33730951 DOI: 10.1080/87565641.2021.1902528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
We examined whether there are factors of SCT in nonclinical young adults and whether SCT factors show differential relationships with depression, anxiety, ADHD, and executive functioning as assessed by self-report (EF-SR) or neuropsychological performance (EF-NP). Factor analysis revealed Daydreaming/Bored (D/B), Lethargy (L), and Cognitive Complaints (CC) factors. CC was associated with anxiety and D/B with depression. CC and D/B were associated with inattentive ADHD, while D/B was associated with hyperactive/impulsive ADHD. While all factors were associated with EF-SR, there were few relationships with EF-NP. Higher CC was associated with lower intellect, and higher D/B was related to better working memory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica N Smith
- Department of Psychology , Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, USA
| | - Julie A Suhr
- Department of Psychology , Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fuermaier ABM, Tucha O, Koerts J, Tucha L, Thome J, Faltraco F. Feigning ADHD and stimulant misuse among Dutch university students. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2021; 128:1079-1084. [PMID: 33439363 PMCID: PMC8295135 DOI: 10.1007/s00702-020-02296-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
The increasing number of university students seeking diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and findings of an increased stimulant misuse among university students, has raised concerns regarding the credibility of the symptoms of those students. However, most of our current knowledge refers to university students in North America and less is known about this issue on European campuses. The present survey aimed to collect opinions on feigning ADHD and to estimate the prevalence of stimulant misuse among 1071 university students in the Netherlands. The majority of students expressed liberal attitudes towards feigning ADHD. Also, a substantial number of respondents considered feigning ADHD themselves or know someone who feigns ADHD. Furthermore, 68% of students assumed benefits of taking stimulants without prescription and 16% have indeed already taken stimulants without prescription. Feigning ADHD and misuse of prescription medication are prevalent issues among Dutch students. The results underline the need for a careful diagnostic evaluation of individuals for ADHD. Furthermore, efforts are required in order to prevent stimulant drug trafficking and misuse among university students.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anselm B M Fuermaier
- Department of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Oliver Tucha
- Department of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Janneke Koerts
- Department of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Lara Tucha
- Department of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Johannes Thome
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Frank Faltraco
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kosky KM, Lace JW, Austin TA, Seitz DJ, Clark B. The utility of the Wisconsin card sorting test, 64-card version to detect noncredible attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-ADULT 2020; 29:1231-1241. [DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2020.1864633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Karen M. Kosky
- Department of Health Psychology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - John W. Lace
- Department of Neurology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Tara A. Austin
- University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Dylan J. Seitz
- Department of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Brook Clark
- Department of Health Psychology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|