1
|
Abitbol V, Sohn WY, Horn M, Safadi MAP. Safety and immunogenicity of co-administered meningococcal serogroup B (4CMenB) vaccine: A literature review. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2245705. [PMID: 37642229 PMCID: PMC10467517 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2245705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
The four-component meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB) is indicated for the prevention of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) caused by Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B. Co-administering 4CMenB with other vaccines may improve vaccine uptake provided that the safety and immunogenicity of either are not affected. Published literature on the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of 4CMenB co-administered with other routine childhood and adulthood vaccines was reviewed. From 282 publications identified, data were collated from 10 clinical studies, 3 real-world studies, and 3 reviews. The evidence showed that 4CMenB co-administration is not associated with significant safety concerns or clinically relevant immunological interferences. The increased reactogenicity (e.g., fever) associated with 4CMenB co-administration can be adequately managed with prophylactic paracetamol in children. Thus, 4CMenB co-administration has the potential to maximize vaccine coverage and improve protection against IMD globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Marco Aurelio P. Safadi
- Department of Pediatrics, Santa Casa de Sao Paulo School of Medical Sciences, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pizzutilo EG, Romanò R, Roazzi L, Agostara AG, Oresti S, Zeppellini A, Giannetta L, Cerea G, Signorelli D, Siena S, Sartore-Bianchi A. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and the Exposome: Host-Extrinsic Factors Determine Response, Survival, and Toxicity. Cancer Res 2023; 83:2283-2296. [PMID: 37205627 PMCID: PMC10345966 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-23-0161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Cancer immunotherapy, largely represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), has led to substantial changes in preclinical cancer research and clinical oncology practice over the past decade. However, the efficacy and toxicity profiles of ICIs remain highly variable among patients, with only a fraction achieving a significant benefit. New combination therapeutic strategies are being investigated, and the search for novel predictive biomarkers is ongoing, mainly focusing on tumor- and host-intrinsic components. Less attention has been directed to all the external, potentially modifiable factors that compose the exposome, including diet and lifestyle, infections, vaccinations, and concomitant medications, that could affect the immune system response and its activity against cancer cells. We hereby provide a review of the available clinical evidence elucidating the impact of host-extrinsic factors on ICI response and toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elio Gregory Pizzutilo
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Rebecca Romanò
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Roazzi
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto G. Agostara
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Oresti
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Annalisa Zeppellini
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Giannetta
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulio Cerea
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Diego Signorelli
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siena
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Sartore-Bianchi
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zempsky W, Bell J, Mossali VM, Kachroo P, Siddiqui K. Common Selfcare Indications of Pain Medications in Children. Paediatr Drugs 2023; 25:321-341. [PMID: 36928608 PMCID: PMC10019440 DOI: 10.1007/s40272-023-00562-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023]
Abstract
Pain has a multifaceted impact on individuals worldwide, affecting their physical functioning, emotional well-being, and quality of life. Children (age < 18 years) have a high prevalence of conditions associated with pain, such as toothache, headache, earache, sore throat, and respiratory tract infections, many of which may be accompanied by fever. Globally, the pharmacologic treatment of pain in pediatric patients is limited largely to nonopioid analgesics, and dosing must account for differences in age, weight, metabolism, and risk of adverse effects. This narrative review summarizes the findings of a literature search on the pediatric indications, dosing approaches, dosing guidelines, and pharmacokinetics of paracetamol and ibuprofen, which are common pain medications available globally for self-care use in children. The review also discusses the risks and benefits associated with these agents. The current roles of paracetamol and ibuprofen in the symptomatic management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and in the management of post-COVID-19 immunization symptoms in children are also discussed. Therefore, while a very large amount of data over several decades is available for paracetamol and ibuprofen, an urgent need exists for well-designed studies of these medications for the management of pain and fever in pediatric patients with COVID-19 to ensure optimal relief with minimal toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Zempsky
- Department of Pediatrics, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, CT, 06106, USA. .,University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
| | - John Bell
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tani N, Ikematsu H, Goto T, Gondo K, Yanagihara Y, Kurata Y, Oishi R, Minami J, Onozawa K, Nagano S, Kuwano H, Akashi K, Shimono N, Chong Y. No significant influence of pre-vaccination antipyretic use on specific antibody response to a BNT162b2 vaccine booster against COVID-19. Vaccine X 2022; 12:100224. [PMID: 36213591 PMCID: PMC9528015 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2022.100224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Revised: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
The relation between pre-vaccination antipyretic use and antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination has been unclear. We measured the pre- and post-BNT162b2 booster spike-specific IgG titers and recorded antipyretic use and adverse reactions for SARS-CoV-2-naive hospital healthcare workers. The data of 20 cases who used antipyretics within 24 h before vaccination were compared to that of 281 controls. The post-booster geometric mean IgG titers were 15,559 AU/mL (95 % CI, 11,474-21,203) for the cases and 16,850 AU/mL (95 % CI, 15,563-18,243) for the controls (p = 0.622). No significant reduction in the frequency or severity of any of the solicited adverse reactions was found for the cases. Similar results were obtained after adjustment with propensity-score matching for demographic characteristics, baseline IgG titer, and post-vaccination antipyretic use. Antipyretic use within 24 h before vaccination would not affect mRNA COVID-19 vaccine-induced specific antibody responses and that postponement of vaccination due to pre-vaccination antipyretic use would be unnecessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoki Tani
- Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan
| | | | - Takeyuki Goto
- Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kei Gondo
- Clinical Laboratory, Fukuoka City Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | | | | | - Ryo Oishi
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Fukuoka City Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Junya Minami
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Fukuoka City Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kyoko Onozawa
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Fukuoka City Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Sukehisa Nagano
- Department of Neurology, Fukuoka City Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | | | - Koichi Akashi
- Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Shimono
- Center for the Study of Global Infection, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yong Chong
- Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ziesenitz VC, Welzel T, van Dyk M, Saur P, Gorenflo M, van den Anker JN. Efficacy and Safety of NSAIDs in Infants: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature of the Past 20 Years. Paediatr Drugs 2022; 24:603-655. [PMID: 36053397 PMCID: PMC9592650 DOI: 10.1007/s40272-022-00514-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used in infants, children, and adolescents worldwide; however, despite sufficient evidence of the beneficial effects of NSAIDs in children and adolescents, there is a lack of comprehensive data in infants. The present review summarizes the current knowledge on the safety and efficacy of various NSAIDs used in infants for which data are available, and includes ibuprofen, dexibuprofen, ketoprofen, flurbiprofen, naproxen, diclofenac, ketorolac, indomethacin, niflumic acid, meloxicam, celecoxib, parecoxib, rofecoxib, acetylsalicylic acid, and nimesulide. The efficacy of NSAIDs has been documented for a variety of conditions, such as fever and pain. NSAIDs are also the main pillars of anti-inflammatory treatment, such as in pediatric inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Limited data are available on the safety of most NSAIDs in infants. Adverse drug reactions may be renal, gastrointestinal, hematological, or immunologic. Since NSAIDs are among the most frequently used drugs in the pediatric population, safety and efficacy studies can be performed as part of normal clinical routine, even in young infants. Available data sources, such as (electronic) medical records, should be used for safety and efficacy analyses. On a larger scale, existing data sources, e.g. adverse drug reaction programs/networks, spontaneous national reporting systems, and electronic medical records should be assessed with child-specific methods in order to detect safety signals pertinent to certain pediatric age groups or disease entities. To improve the safety of NSAIDs in infants, treatment needs to be initiated with the lowest age-appropriate or weight-based dose. Duration of treatment and amount of drug used should be regularly evaluated and maximum dose limits and other recommendations by the manufacturer or expert committees should be followed. Treatment for non-chronic conditions such as fever and acute (postoperative) pain should be kept as short as possible. Patients with chronic conditions should be regularly monitored for possible adverse effects of NSAIDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria C Ziesenitz
- Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Diseases, Centre for Child and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 430, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Pediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, University Children's Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Tatjana Welzel
- Pediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, University Children's Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Pediatric Rheumatology and Autoinflammatory Reference Center, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Madelé van Dyk
- Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Patrick Saur
- Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Diseases, Centre for Child and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 430, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Gorenflo
- Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Diseases, Centre for Child and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 430, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johannes N van den Anker
- Pediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, University Children's Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Children's National Hospital, Washington DC, USA
- Intensive Care and Department of Pediatric Surgery, Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bessede A, Marabelle A, Guégan JP, Danlos FX, Cousin S, Peyraud F, Chaput N, Spalato M, Roubaud G, Cabart M, Khettab M, Chaibi A, Rey C, Nafia I, Mahon FX, Soria JC, Italiano A. Impact of acetaminophen on the efficacy of immunotherapy in cancer patients. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:909-915. [PMID: 35654248 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acetaminophen (APAP) use has been associated with blunted vaccine immune responses. This study aimed to assess APAP impact on immunotherapy efficacy in patients with cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Exposure to APAP was assessed by plasma analysis and was correlated with clinical outcome in three independent cohorts of patients with advanced cancer who were treated with immune checkpoint blockers (ICB). APAP immunomodulatory effects were evaluated on a pre-clinical tumor model and on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy donors. RESULTS Detectable plasma APAP levels at treatment onset was associated with a significantly worse clinical outcome in ICB-treated cancer patients, independently of other prognostic factors. APAP significantly reduced ICB efficacy in the pre-clinical MC38 model, as well as the production of PD1 blockade-related interferon-γ secretion by human PBMCs. Moreover, reduction of ICB efficacy in vivo was associated with significantly increased tumor infiltration by regulatory T cells (Tregs). Administration of APAP over 24 h induced a significant expansion of peripheral Tregs in healthy individuals. In addition, interleukin-10, a crucial mediator of Treg-induced immune suppression, was significantly upregulated upon treatment with ICB in cancer patients taking APAP. CONCLUSION This study provides strong pre-clinical and clinical evidence of the role of APAP as a potential suppressor of antitumor immunity. Hence, APAP should be used with caution in patients treated with ICB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Bessede
- Explicyte, 229 cours de l'Argonne, Bordeaux, France
| | - A Marabelle
- Département d'Innovation Précoce et d'Essais Thérapeutiques (DITEP), INSERM U1015 & CIC1428, Université Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - J P Guégan
- Explicyte, 229 cours de l'Argonne, Bordeaux, France
| | - F X Danlos
- Département d'Innovation Précoce et d'Essais Thérapeutiques (DITEP), INSERM U1015 & CIC1428, Université Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - S Cousin
- Department of Medicine, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - F Peyraud
- Department of Medicine, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - N Chaput
- Laboratory of Immunomonitoring in Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, CNRS-UMS 3655 and INSERM-US23, Villejuif, France; Faculty of Pharmacy, University Paris-Saclay, Chatenay-Malabry, France; Laboratory of Genetic Instability and Oncogenesis, UMR CNRS 8200, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - M Spalato
- Department of Medicine, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - G Roubaud
- Department of Medicine, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - M Cabart
- Department of Medicine, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - M Khettab
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - A Chaibi
- Department of Medicine, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - C Rey
- Department of Medicine, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - I Nafia
- Explicyte, 229 cours de l'Argonne, Bordeaux, France
| | - F X Mahon
- Department of Medicine, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Faculty of Medicine, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - J C Soria
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - A Italiano
- Département d'Innovation Précoce et d'Essais Thérapeutiques (DITEP), INSERM U1015 & CIC1428, Université Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Department of Medicine, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Faculty of Medicine, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Use of analgesics/antipyretics in the management of symptoms associated with COVID-19 vaccination. NPJ Vaccines 2022; 7:31. [PMID: 35236842 PMCID: PMC8891349 DOI: 10.1038/s41541-022-00453-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
COVID-19 vaccines are effective and important to control the ongoing pandemic, but vaccine reactogenicity may contribute to poor uptake. Analgesics or antipyretic medications are often used to alleviate vaccine side effects, but their effect on immunogenicity remains uncertain. Few studies have assessed the effect of analgesics/antipyretics on vaccine immunogenicity and reactogenicity. Some studies revealed changes in certain immune response parameters post-vaccination when analgesics/antipyretics were used either prophylactically or therapeutically. Still, there is no evidence that these changes impact vaccine efficacy. Specific data on the impact of analgesic/antipyretic medications on immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines are limited. However, available data from clinical trials of licensed vaccines, along with recommendations from public health bodies around the world, should provide reassurance to both healthcare professionals and vaccine recipients that short-term use of analgesics/antipyretics at non-prescription doses is unlikely to affect vaccine-induced immunity.
Collapse
|
8
|
Effect of prophylactic administration of antipyretics on the immune response to pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in children: a systematic review. Pneumonia (Nathan) 2021; 13:7. [PMID: 33894782 PMCID: PMC8070291 DOI: 10.1186/s41479-021-00085-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Prophylactic administration of antipyretics at the time of immunization seems to decrease some side effects, however reduced immune responses have been reported in some studies. This systematic review aimed to investigate the effect of prophylactic use of antipyretics on the immune response following administration of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs). Methods A systematic review of randomized controlled trials and observational studies concerning the immune response to PCVs after antipyretic administration was performed up to November 2020 in the electronic databases of Pubmed and Scopus. Results Of the 3956 citations retrieved, a total of 5 randomized control trials including 2775 children were included in the review. Included studies were referred to PCV10 (3 studies), PCV7 and PCV13 (one study each). The prophylactic administration of paracetamol decreased the immune response to certain pneumococcal serotypes in all included studies. The effect was more evident following primary vaccination and with immediate administration of paracetamol. Despite the reductions in antibody geometric mean concentrations, a robust memory response was observed following the booster dose. Besides, antibody titers remained above protective levels in 88–100% of participants. The use of ibuprofen, that was evaluated in two studies, did not seem to affect the immunogenicity of PCVs . Conclusion Although the reviewed studies had significant heterogeneity in design, paracetamol administration seems to affect the immune response for certain serotypes. The clinical significance of reduced immunogenicity especially before booster dose needs further investigation.
Collapse
|
9
|
Dolhain J, Janssens W, Dindore V, Mihalyi A. Infant vaccine co-administration: review of 18 years of experience with GSK's hexavalent vaccine co-administered with routine childhood vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccines 2020; 19:419-443. [PMID: 32419537 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2020.1758560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The benefits of vaccine co-administration include improved vaccine acceptance and uptake resulting in an increased coverage and protection against multiple childhood diseases, with minimal medical visits. The diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B-poliomyelitis-Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (DTaP-HBV-IPV/Hib) has been available for more than 19 years and is recommended for co-administration with several other infant vaccines. AREAS COVERED This is a comprehensive review (34 studies, 21,000 participants) describing the immunogenicity and safety of DTaP-HBV-IPV/Hib when co-administered with 12 different vaccines in infants including pneumococcal, meningococcal, rotavirus or measles-mumps-rubella-varicella. EXPERT OPINION Interactions among co-administered vaccines are complex. Therefore, co-administration data are critical before a vaccination regimen can be recommended. Co-administration of DTaP-HBV-IPV/Hib with other routinely administered vaccines was associated with high percentages of children achieving seroprotection/vaccine response against DTaP-HBV-IPV/Hib antigens. In addition, co-administration was not associated with clinically significant interference in immune responses to co-administered vaccines and was well tolerated. Increased systemic reactions observed with some combinations (DTaP-HBV-IPV/Hib + pneumococcal conjugate or meningococcal serogroup B vaccines) were mitigated by prophylactic paracetamol administration. The data reported here, which represent the most frequently used co-administrations of DTaP-HBV-IPV/Hib worldwide, support the concomitant administration of DTaP-HBV-IPV/Hib with other routinely recommended infant vaccines.
Collapse
|
10
|
Widayanti AW, Norris P, Green JA, Heydon S. Is expanding service through an outreach programme enough to improve immunisation uptake? A qualitative study in Indonesia. Glob Public Health 2020; 15:1168-1181. [PMID: 32290768 DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1751229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
In 1983, the Indonesian government established Pos Pelayanan Terpadu (Integrated Health Post) - commonly known as Posyandu, an outreach programme for improving mothers' and children's health, including immunisation. However, child immunisation coverage is still far below national and world targets. There is also wide variation among regions, with low rates found in areas outside Java. This study aimed to explore mothers' experiences in immunising their children through Posyandu in East Nusa Tenggara, and West Sumatera, two provinces located outside Java Island. Fifty-three mothers were involved in six Focus Group Discussion (FGDs). The discussions were recorded and transcribed verbatim in the original language. The transcripts were translated into English, coded with Nvivo, and analysed for common themes. This study showed that the success of the immunisation programme through Posyandu relied on the role of community-based health workers. Their ability to integrate with the community increased people's trust. This trust encouraged mothers to immunise their children, despite their limited knowledge about immunisation. The other barrier often encountered by the mothers in immunising their children was that the fathers did not allow them to do so. Therefore, collaborative work with the whole community is needed to improve the performance of an outreach programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Wahyuni Widayanti
- School of Pharmacy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.,Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Pauline Norris
- School of Pharmacy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - James A Green
- School of Pharmacy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.,School of Allied Health and Physical Activity for Health Cluster, Health Research Institute (HRI), University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Susan Heydon
- School of Pharmacy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hervé C, Laupèze B, Del Giudice G, Didierlaurent AM, Tavares Da Silva F. The how's and what's of vaccine reactogenicity. NPJ Vaccines 2019; 4:39. [PMID: 31583123 PMCID: PMC6760227 DOI: 10.1038/s41541-019-0132-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 298] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 08/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Reactogenicity represents the physical manifestation of the inflammatory response to vaccination, and can include injection-site pain, redness, swelling or induration at the injection site, as well as systemic symptoms, such as fever, myalgia, or headache. The experience of symptoms following vaccination can lead to needle fear, long-term negative attitudes and non-compliant behaviours, which undermine the public health impact of vaccination. This review presents current knowledge on the potential causes of reactogenicity, and how host characteristics, vaccine administration and composition factors can influence the development and perception of reactogenicity. The intent is to provide an overview of reactogenicity after vaccination to help the vaccine community, including healthcare professionals, in maintaining confidence in vaccines by promoting vaccination, setting expectations for vaccinees about what might occur after vaccination and reducing anxiety by managing the vaccination setting.
Collapse
|
12
|
Lombardi N, Crescioli G, Bettiol A, Tuccori M, Rossi M, Bonaiuti R, Ravaldi C, Levi M, Mugelli A, Ricci S, Lippi F, Azzari C, Bonanni P, Vannacci A. Vaccines Safety in Children and in General Population: A Pharmacovigilance Study on Adverse Events Following Anti-Infective Vaccination in Italy. Front Pharmacol 2019; 10:948. [PMID: 31543816 PMCID: PMC6728926 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2019] [Accepted: 07/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The concern for adverse events following immunization (AEFI) and anti-vaccination movements that lacked scientific evidence-based supports may reduce vaccine uptake in the general population. Thus, the aims of the present study were to characterize AEFI in general population (all age groups), in terms of frequency, preventability, and seriousness and to define predictors of their seriousness in children. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on suspected AEFI reports for children and adults who received any form of vaccinations, collected in Tuscany, Italy, between 1 January and 31 December 2017. Patients’ characteristics, suspected vaccines, and AEFI description were collected. Causality and preventability were assessed using WHO and Schumock and Thornton algorithms, respectively. Logistic regression was used to estimate the reporting odds ratios of potential predictors of AEFI seriousness in children. Results: A total of 223 suspected AEFI reports were collected, and the majority of them were defined as non-serious (76.7%). Reports were mostly related to one vaccine, and to a median of two to five strains/toxoids. The total number of simultaneously administered strains/toxoids and the presence of allergens did not correlate with AEFI seriousness. Considering vaccines with a high number of administered doses (≥60,000 doses), the rates estimated for serious AEFI reports were always very low, ranging between 0.01 and 0.2/1,000 doses. Twenty-four vaccines (8,993 doses) were not related to any AEFI. Conclusion: Results of present study showed that AEFI were very rare; the vast majority of them was non-serious and, despite the claims of anti-vaccination movements, the simultaneous administration of vaccines was safe and did not influence the risk of reporting a serious AEFI, particularly in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niccolò Lombardi
- Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, Section of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Giada Crescioli
- Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, Section of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Alessandra Bettiol
- Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, Section of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Tuccori
- Tuscan Regional Centre of Pharmacovigilance, Florence, Italy.,Unit of Adverse Drug Reactions Monitoring, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Marco Rossi
- Tuscan Regional Centre of Pharmacovigilance, Florence, Italy.,Centre of Pharmacovigilance, University Hospital of Siena, Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Roberto Bonaiuti
- Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, Section of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Claudia Ravaldi
- CiaoLapo, Charity for Healthy Pregnancy, Stillbirth and Perinatal Grief Support, Prato, Italy.,Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Miriam Levi
- Epidemiology Unit, Department of Prevention, Local Health Unit Tuscany Centre, Florence, Italy
| | - Alessandro Mugelli
- Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, Section of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Silvia Ricci
- Department of Pediatric Immunology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesca Lippi
- Department of Pediatric Immunology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Chiara Azzari
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Department of Pediatric Immunology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Paolo Bonanni
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Alfredo Vannacci
- Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, Section of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Tuscan Regional Centre of Pharmacovigilance, Florence, Italy.,CiaoLapo, Charity for Healthy Pregnancy, Stillbirth and Perinatal Grief Support, Prato, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ahn SH, Zhiang J, Kim H, Chang S, Shin J, Kim M, Lee Y, Lee JH, Park YR. Postvaccination Fever Response Rates in Children Derived Using the Fever Coach Mobile App: A Retrospective Observational Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019; 7:e12223. [PMID: 31008712 PMCID: PMC6658305 DOI: 10.2196/12223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2018] [Revised: 01/05/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postvaccination fever is a mild adverse event that naturally improves without complications, but is highly prevalent and can be accompanied by febrile convulsions in some cases. These adverse effects may cause parents to delay or avoid vaccinating their children. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to identify postvaccination fever patterns and the ability of antipyretics to affect changes in these patterns from data collected from a mobile app named Fever Coach. METHODS Data provided by parents of feverish children derived from a mobile app, Fever Coach, were used to identify postvaccination fever patterns according to vaccinations and the use of antipyretic drugs. We selected single vaccination records that contained five or more body temperature readings performed within 48 hours of vaccination, and we analyzed postvaccination fever onset, offset, duration, and maximum body temperature. Through observing the postvaccination fever response to vaccination, we identified the effects of antipyretic drugs on postvaccination fever onset, offset, and duration times; the extent of fever; and the rate of decline. We also performed logistic regression analysis to determine demographic variables (age, weight, and sex) involved in relatively high fevers (body temperature ≥39°C). RESULTS The total number of Fever Coach users was 25,037, with 3834 users having entered single vaccination records, including 4448 vaccinations and 55,783 body temperature records. Most records were obtained from children receiving the following vaccinations: pneumococcus (n=2069); Japanese encephalitis (n=911); influenza (n=669); diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (n=403); and hepatitis A (n=252). According to the 4448 vaccination records, 3427 (77.05%) children had taken antipyretic drugs, and 3238 (89.15%) children took antibiotics at body temperatures above 38°C. The number of children taking antipyretics at a body temperature of 38°C was more than four times that of those taking antipyretics at 37.9°C (307 vs 67 cases). The number of instances in which this temperature threshold was reached was more than four times greater than the number when the temperature was 37.9°C. A comparative analysis of antipyretic and nonantipyretic cases showed there was no difference in onset time; however, offset and duration times were significantly shorter in nonantipyretic cases than in antipyretic cases (P<.001). In nonantipyretic cases, offset times and duration times were 9.9 and 10.1 hours shorter, respectively, than in antipyretic cases. Body temperatures also decreased faster in nonantipyretic cases. Influenza vaccine-associated fevers lasted relatively longer, whereas pneumococcus vaccine-associated fevers were relatively short-lived. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that postvaccination fever has its own fever pattern, which is dependent on vaccine type and the presence of antipyretic drugs, and that postvaccination temperature monitoring may ease fever phobia and reduce the unnecessary use of antipyretics in medical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Hyun Ahn
- Korea Human Resource Development Institute for Health and Welfare, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
| | - Jooho Zhiang
- Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyery Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seyun Chang
- Mobile Doctor Co, Ltd, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jaewon Shin
- Mobile Doctor Co, Ltd, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Yura Lee
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae-Ho Lee
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Department of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yu Rang Park
- Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Ibuprofen is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug frequently administered to children of various ages for relief of fever and pain and is approved as an over-the-counter medication in many countries worldwide. Although there are extensive data on its efficacy and safety in children and adults, there are divergent dosing recommendations for analgesia and treatment of fever in infants, especially in the age group between 3 and 6 months of age. In this article, we have assessed the safety and efficacy of ibuprofen use in infants in an attempt to find the optimal method of pain and fever management in this specific age group. Based on the current evidence, short-term use of ibuprofen is considered safe in infants older than 3 months of age having a body weight above 5-6 kg when special attention is given to the hydration of the patient. Ibuprofen should be prescribed based on body weight using a dose of 5-10 mg/kg. This dose can be administered 3-4 times a day resulting in a maximum total daily dose of 30-40 mg/kg. The rectal route has been shown to be less reliable because of erratic absorption, especially in young infants. Since most efficacy and safety data have been derived from trials in infants with fever, future studies should focus on the efficacy of ibuprofen in young infants with pain.
Collapse
|