Hymenoptera venom allergy in outdoor workers: Occupational exposure, clinical features and effects of allergen immunotherapy

Occupational anaphylaxis-Data from the anaphylaxis registry

BACKGROUND

Epidemiologic data on occupational anaphylaxis is scarce, and there is a need of more knowledge about work-related anaphylactic episodes.

METHODS

Based on the data of the Anaphylaxis Registry, we identified cases related to occupational exposure and analyzed the elicitors, demographics, severity of clinical reaction and management.

RESULTS

Since 2017, 5851 cases with an information about the occupational relation of the anaphylactic episode were registered whereby 225 (3.8%) were assigned to be caused by an occupational allergen. The vast majority of these occupational anaphylaxis cases were caused by insects (n = 186, 82.7%) followed by food (n = 27, 12.0%) and drugs (n = 8, 3.6%). Latex elicited occupational anaphylaxis in only two cases. Beekeepers, gardeners, farmers, and individuals working in professions associated with food handling, for example, employees in restaurants, bakery, pastry, and cooks were most frequently affected. The comparison of the occupational insect venom-induced anaphylaxis to a group of non-occupational insect anaphylaxis in adults (n = 1842) revealed a significant younger age in occupational anaphylaxis (46 vs. 53 years), a predominance of bee-induced cases (38% vs. 17%), and a higher rate of venom immunotherapy in a primary care setting (3.3% vs. 1.3%, p = .044). In the occupational- versus non-occupational adults with food-induced anaphylaxis atopic dermatitis as concomitant atopic disease was observed more frequently (n = 486; 20% vs. 10%), although this was not significant.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate the impact of venom allergy in work-related anaphylaxis. Foods and drugs are less frequently elicitors, and latex-induced occupational anaphylaxis was rare. More data are needed to determine risk factors associated with occupational anaphylaxis.

Reported Cases and Diagnostics of Occupational Insect Allergy: A Systematic Review

A significant part of adult-onset asthma is caused by occupational exposure to both high- and low-molecular-mass agents. Insects are occasionally described to cause occupational allergy in professions including anglers and fishers, laboratory workers, employees of aquaculture companies, farmers, bakers, sericulture workers and pet shop workers. Occupational insect allergies are often respiratory, causing asthma or rhinoconjunctivitis, but can be cutaneous as well. The European Union recently approved three insect species for human consumption, enabling an industry to develop where more employees could be exposed to insect products. This review overviews knowledge on occupational insect allergy risks and the tools used to diagnose employees. Despite the limited availability of commercial occupational insect allergy diagnostics, 60.9% of 164 included reports used skin prick tests and 63.4% of reports used specific IgE tests. In 21.9% of reports, a more elaborate diagnosis of occupational asthma was made by specific inhalation challenges or peak expiratory flow measurements at the workplace. In some work environments, 57% of employees were sensitized, and no less than 60% of employees reported work-related symptoms. Further development and optimization of specific diagnostics, together with strong primary prevention, may be vital to the health conditions of workers in the developing insect industry.

Long-term impact of hymenoptera venom immunotherapy on clinical course, immune parameters, and psychosocial aspects

BACKGROUND

Venom immunotherapy (VIT) is highly efficient in subjects suffering from IgE-mediated allergy to hymenoptera venom (HV), and VIT results in substantial improvement of quality of life (QoL). However, VIT-induced tolerance may be lost over time after cessation of treatment, putting patients at risk of re-sting anaphylaxis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To study the effect of VIT on maintenance of HV tolerance we evaluated the natural history of 54 patients who were treated with VIT up to 29 years ago, with a special focus on re-stings and their subsequent course. Furthermore, we analyzed HV-specific IgE, IgG, and IgG4 antibody titers. Finally, we assessed the long-term impact of VIT on various psychosocial aspects like dealing with hymenoptera exposures, daily life activities, self-assurance, and personal environment.

RESULTS

29 (53.7%) subjects experienced at least one re-sting after stopping VIT, with 23 (79%) showing no systemic reaction (SR). Eleven of these (37.9%) took emergency drugs as a safety measurement. Six individuals (21%) showed loss of tolerance experiencing an anaphylactic reaction. No difference in HV-specific IgE, IgG4, or IgG antibody concentrations was noticed among the different patients. Subjects who tolerated a re-sting without applying emergency drugs felt least affected in their social-behavioral leisure activities when hymenoptera were around or by anxiety for new stings.

CONCLUSION

VIT leads to long-term tolerance in the majority of HV-allergic patients, however, ~ 1/5 may lose protection over time, arguing for continued follow-up on VIT-treated subjects and keeping them equipped with an emergency kit. Notably, VIT also results in a lasting, strong impact on self-assurance and sense of well-being in individuals who tolerated a re-sting without employing emergency drugs, which emphasizes the need to use them only in case of systemic symptoms after stopping successful VIT.

Allergy and sensitization to Hymenoptera venoms in unreferred adults with a high risk of sting exposure

Background

Hymenoptera venom sensitization in highly exposed individuals frequently requires risk assessment for future severe sting reactions. In this study, we determined the prevalence of Hymenoptera venom sensitization in individuals who hunt and fish and analyzed possible correlations between the severity of sting reactions and the IgE sensitization profile.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, paper-based, self-filled questionnaires about previous insect stings and sting reactions were obtained from individuals who hunt and fish in Bavaria, Germany. Blood samples were taken and analyzed for the levels of tryptase, total IgE and IgE to honey bee (i1) and wasp (13) venom, the recombinant allergens rApi m 1, rApi m 2, rApi m 3, rApi m 5, rApi m 10, rVes v 1, rVes v 5, and the CCD marker molecule MUXF3. Odd ratios (ORs) for sensitization and anaphylaxis and Pearson's correlations for the different allergens were calculated.

Results

Of 257 participants, 50.2% showed a sensitization to honey bee venom (i1), and 58.4% showed sensitization to wasp venom (i3). A total of 98.4% of participants claimed to have been stung at least once. Anaphylaxis was reported in 18.7%, and a local sting reaction was reported in 18.3%. The highest sensitization rates were found for whole venom extracts, sensitization to any of the available recombinant allergens exceeded sIgE levels to honeybee venom (i1) in 28.5% and to wasp venom (i3) in 52.9% of participants. Participants with a history of more than 5 stings showed a higher risk for anaphylaxis.

Conclusions

Sensitization to Hymenoptera venom and their recombinant allergens are present in the majority of individuals who hunt and fish. Sensitization to distinct recombinant allergens does not necessarily affect the severity of sting reactions including anaphylaxis. A meticulous medical history of the number of previous stings as well as systemic reactions remains essential.