Health and economic costs of an import-initiated measles outbreak in an international border area of Yunnan Province

The methodological quality of economic evaluations of measles outbreaks: A systematic review of cost-of-illness studies

OBJECTIVES

To identify the main cost components included in the economic evaluations of measles outbreaks, their items and cost drivers, and evaluate the quality of costing methodology, analyzing the key features that may affect the validity of these studies in countries with different income levels.

METHODS

We systematically searched multiple databases EMBASE, MEDLINE (via PubMed), Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde do Ministério da Saúde (BVS MS), NHS Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED) and NHS Health Technology Assessment (NHS HTA) (via The Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Library - CRD), and EconLit, SCOPUS, and Web of Science, selecting cost analysis and cost of illness studies (COI) of measles outbreaks. Two independent reviewers screened articles for relevance and extracted the data. The quality of costing methods was assessed using a guide to critical evaluation of COI studies. We performed a qualitative narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were reviewed. Most studies evaluated outbreaks that occurred from 2011 to 2013 and 2017 to 2019. Total costs varied from $40,147 to $39.3 million. Per case cost varied from $168 to $49,439. The main drivers of measles outbreak costs were outbreak response, personnel, and productivity losses. Most studies (20/22) did not report the costing methodology adopted, the degree of disaggregation used in the identification and measurement of resource and costs components and the method for the valuation of resource and cost components.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of the costing methodology, its transparency and accuracy are essential to the validity of these studies results and their potential use to allocate public health resources in the most efficient manner and to inform measles outbreak control strategies, with rapid and effective response.

Evaluation of measles vaccination coverage in Lincang City, Yunnan Province, China

Background: Lincang City in Yunnan Province on the China-Myanmar border, has reached the World Health Organization recommended coverage (95%) for measles-containing vaccine (MCV), but measles outbreaks still occur. We conducted a survey in Lincang City to determine the measles vaccination status of children on the China-Myanmar border.Methods: We used multistage sampling among children aged 8-83 months. Information on measles vaccination status was obtained from the child's vaccination certificate, and serum samples were tested using commercially available ELISA kits.Results: A total of 938 children were surveyed. The vaccination coverage rate was 98.9% (95% CI: 98.2-99.6%) for measles-containing vaccine dose 1 (MCV1), and 95.8% (95% CI:94.9-96.7%) for measles-containing vaccine dose 2 (MCV2). The timely vaccination coverage rate was 52.0% (95% CI:48.8-55.2%) for MCV1, and 74.1% (95% CI: 82.9-89.0%) for MCV2. The timely-and-complete vaccination coverage rate was 41.0% (95% CI: 36.7-45.3%). The median delay period was 33 (95% CI: 27-39) days for MCV1, and 196 (95% CI: 146-246) days for MCV2. The seropositivity rate in children aged less than 7 years was 94.0% (95% CI: 92.5-95.5%) with a geometric mean titer of 1210.1 mIU/mL.Conclusions: The MCV coverage was high, but timely and timely-and-complete vaccination coverage were low and insufficient to prevent measles outbreaks. It is necessary to add the timely and timely-and-complete vaccination coverage as indicators of vaccination to provide a more complete picture of measles immunization status.