Need for hepatitis A prevention in patients with chronic liver disease in the changing epidemiological setting of India

Vaccination in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: A Neglected Topic

Patients with liver cirrhosis, due to their weakened innate and adaptive immunity, are more prone to frequent and severe vaccine-preventable infections. Moreover, impaired adaptive immunity results in a limited antibody response to vaccines. Despite this suboptimal antibody response, vaccines have proven to be very effective in reducing severe outcomes and deaths in these patients. In the Western world, regulatory authorities and scientific liver societies (e.g., AASLD and EASL) have recommended vaccinations for cirrhotic patients. However, despite these strong recommendations, vaccine coverage remains suboptimal. Improving vaccine effectiveness and safety information, providing comprehensive counseling to patients, fact-checking to combat fake news and disinformation and removing barriers to vaccination for disadvantaged individuals may help overcome the low coverage rate. In view of this, vaccines should be administered early in the course of chronic liver diseases, as their efficacy declines with the increasing severity of the disease.

Rising trend of symptomatic infections due to Hepatitis A virus infection in adolescent and adult age group: An observational study from a tertiary care liver institute in India

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis A Virus (HAV) is the most common cause of Acute Viral Hepatitis (AVH) in children. It causes self-limiting illness and rarely acute liver failure. The shifting pattern in HAV endemicity is rendering adolescents and adults vulnerable to infection.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, samples received from 14,807 patients with acute onset icteric illness from January 2014-December 2022 were analyzed. HAV infection was detected by anti-HAV IgM positivity. The cases were divided into 3 age groups, pediatric, adolescents and adults, and clinical presentations were compared.

RESULTS

Overall, 7.72%(1144) were positive for anti-HAV IgM. Of these, 60%(690) were finally included in the study. The positive cases were divided into adults, ≥18 years (44%, 304); pediatric, <12 years (31%, 212) and adolescents (25%,174) age groups. Overall males were predominant [72.4%(500)], with a median age of 16 (IQR:9-21) years. Cases were characterised into AVH (68.1%, 470/690), Acute Liver Failure (ALF) (31.4%, 217/690) and Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (0.43%, 3/690). AVH in the pediatric age group was 69%(146/212), adolescents was 67%(117/174), and adults was 68%(207/304). ALF cases among the 3 groups were 30%(65/212), 33%(57/174), and 31%(95/304) respectively. Overall mortality was seen in 6.52%(45/690), maximum in adolescents with ALF presentation [10.3%(18/174)]. On molecular characterization of infection, viremia was seen in 28.9%(200/690) and all the isolates were Genotype IIIA.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of adults experiencing symptomatic HAV infection was seen to increase over the years in the present study. Infection in adolescents was associated with higher mortality and ALF as the clinical presentation.

Vaccination in Chronic Liver Disease: An Update

Patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) with or without cirrhosis remain at risk of developing hepatic decompensation when infected with viral or bacterial pathogens. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) currently recommends vaccination in CLD against hepatitis A virus (HAV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), influenza, pneumococcus, herpes zoster, tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis, and SARS-CoV-2. Inactivated vaccines are preferred over live attenuated ones, especially in transplant recipients where live vaccines are contraindicated. As the severity of the liver disease progresses, vaccine efficacy declines, and therefore, vaccines should be ideally administered early in the disease course for optimal immune response. Despite the strong recommendations, overall vaccination coverage in CLD remains poor; however, it is encouraging to note that in recent years coverage against influenza and pneumococcus has shown some improvement. Inadequate access to healthcare, lack of information on vaccine safety, poor financial reimbursement for healthcare providers, and vaccine misinformation are often responsible for low immunization rates. This review summarizes the impact of vaccine-preventable illness in those with CLD, updated vaccine guidelines, seroconversion rates in the vaccinated, and barriers faced by healthcare professionals in immunizing those with liver disease.

A Modern Perspective on Vaccinating Healthcare Service Providers in India: A Narrative Review

Healthcare providers (HCPs) are at increased risk of acquisition and transmission of infectious disease. Vaccinating HCPs is an essential preventive measure to protect them and their patients against communicable diseases, while positively and directly impacting the functioning of the healthcare system. In India, healthcare represents one of the largest employment sectors with 3.8 million HCPs; however, there is limited awareness of national immunisation guidelines for the Indian HCP population. Data from communicable disease outbreaks across India suggest inadequate vaccination rates amongst HCPs; studies have reported influenza and varicella vaccination rates as low as 4.4% and 16%, respectively. In this review, we discuss data highlighting the impact of insufficient vaccination coverage, barriers to vaccination, and the lack of immunisation guidelines amongst HCPs in India. COVID-19 vaccination programmes for HCPs have been critical in slowing the pandemic in India. This provides an opportunity to raise awareness about the importance of vaccines amongst HCPs in India.