No Further Yield of Ambulatory EEG for Epileptiform Discharges Beyond 13 Hours

Optimizing electroencephalogram duration for efficient detection of epileptiform abnormalities in diverse patient groups: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

There is no standardized EEG duration guideline for detecting epileptiform abnormalities in patients, and research on this topic is scarce. This study aims to determine an optimal EEG duration for efficient detection of epileptiform abnormalities across different patient groups.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed on EEG recordings and clinical data of patients with the first seizure and epilepsy. Patients were categorized based on various factors, including the interval time since the last seizure, use of anti-seizure medication (ASM), and seizure frequency. The detection ratio (DR) of epileptiform abnormalities and latency time for their discovery were calculated. Statistical analyses, including chi-square tests, logistic regression, and survival analysis were utilized to illustrate DR and latency times.

RESULTS

In whole-night EEG recordings, the DR was 37.6% for the first seizure group and 57.4% for the epilepsy group. Although the maximum latency times were 720 min in both two groups, DR in the first seizure group was distinctly decreased beyond 300 min. Significant factors influencing the DR included the use of ASM in the first seizure group (P < 0.05) and seizure frequency in the epilepsy group (P < 0.001). For epilepsy patients who experience a seizure at least once a month or undergo timely EEG recordings (within 24 h after a seizure), the DR significantly increases, and the maximum latency time is reduced to 600 min (P < 0.001). Additionally, the DR was significantly reduced after 240 min in epilepsy patients who had been seizure-free for more than one year.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, we observed a maximum latency of 720 min for detecting epileptiform abnormalities in whole-night EEG recordings. Notably, epilepsy patients with a higher seizure frequency or timely EEG recordings demonstrated both a higher detection ratio and a shorter maximum latency time. For patients exhibiting a low detection ratio, such as those experiencing their first seizure or those with epilepsy who have been seizure-free for more than a year, a shorter EEG duration is recommended. These findings underscore the importance of implementing customized EEG strategies to meet the specific needs of different patient groups.

Neurological Outpatients Prefer EEG Home-Monitoring over Inpatient Monitoring-An Analysis Based on the UTAUT Model

Home monitoring examinations offer diagnostic and economic advantages compared to inpatient monitoring. In addition, these technical solutions support the preservation of health care in rural areas in the absence of local care providers. The acceptance of patients is crucial for the implementation of home monitoring concepts. The present research assesses the preference for a health service that is to be introduced, namely an EEG home-monitoring of neurological outpatients-using a mobile, dry-electrode EEG (electroencephalography) system-in comparison to the traditional long-time EEG examination in a hospital. Results of a representative study for Germany (n = 421) reveal a preference for home monitoring. Importantly, this preference is partially driven by a video explaining the home monitoring system. We subsequently analyzed factors that influence the behavioral intention (BI) to use the new EEG system, drawing on an extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. The strongest positive predictor of BI is the belief that EEG home-monitoring will improve health quality, while computer anxiety and effort expectancy represent the strongest barriers. Furthermore, we find the UTAUT model's behavioral intention construct to predict the patients' decision for or against home monitoring more strongly than any other patient's characteristic such as gender, health condition, or age, underlying the model's usefulness.

Ambulatory EEG: Crossing the divide during a pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic forced temporary closure of epilepsy monitoring units across the globe due to potential hospital-based contagion. As COVID-19 exposures and deaths continues to surge in the United States and around the world, other types of long-term EEG monitoring have risen to fill the gap and minimize hospital exposure. AEEG has high yield compared to standard EEG. Prolonged audio-visual video-EEG capability can record events and epileptiform activity with quality like inpatient video-EEG monitoring. Technological advances in AEEG using miniaturized hardware and wireless secure transmission have evolved to small portable devices that are perfect for people forced to stay at home during the pandemic. Application of seizure detection algorithms and Cloud-based storage with real-time access provides connectivity to AEEG interpreters during prolonged "shut-down". In this article we highlight the benefits of AEEG as an alternative to diagnostic inpatient VEM during the paradigm shift to mobile heath forced by the Coronavirus.

Critically ill benign EEG variants: Is there such a thing?

Despite growing use of critical care electroencephalography (ccEEG) to detect seizures and status epilepticus in the intensive care unit (ICU), integrating ccEEG findings with traditionally described benign EEG variants (BEVs) is a relatively new concept. BEV-like waveforms are now increasingly encountered in the ICU, and have also been explicitly included in proposed definitions of brief potentially ictal rhythmic discharges (BIRDs) in the ICU, bringing to the fore the question of if and which EEG patterns in critically ill patients can be safely deemed "benign". Though well-characterized as benign in healthy outpatients at low pre-test risk for neurologic disease, the significance of BEVs in the ICU remains largely unknown. Simultaneously, there has been mounting evidence to suggest that certain BEVs can arise from heterogeneous intracranial sources, including some pathologic generators. We conducted an extensive literature review on all known BEVs to assess what is known of BEVs in the ICU. Here we discuss critically ill BEVs and how to interpret them.