An Alternative Transcranial Motor Evoked Potential Montage to Minimize Ipsilateral "Crossover" Motor Responses

Cathodal Genesis of Ipsilateral Hand (Crossover) Motor Evoked Potentials: Evidence from a Patient with Previous Stroke

A case is described where baseline transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (TcMEP) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) results were unilaterally absent in a patient with previous hemispheric stroke undergoing a right-sided carotid endarterectomy. SSEP data confirmed right cortical pathology and excluded a technical rationale for absent motor evoked responses. Attempts at generating left-hand (contralateral) TcMEP from right cortical anodal stimulation failed despite high stimulus intensities. However, TcMEP responses from anodal stimulation of the right cortex were recorded from the right-hand (ipsilateral) which were attributed to "crossover." Ipsilateral TcMEP onset latencies derived from the stimulus-response data supports the idea that crossover is a product of cathodal stimulation initially acting on pericortical motor pathways.

"Quadripolar" Transcranial Electrical Stimulation for Motor Evoked Potentials

PURPOSE

To determine if transcranial electrical stimulation (TES)-induced motor evoked potentials (MEPs) are of higher amplitude when using two electrodes as anodes and two as cathodes, known as "quadripolar stimulation."

METHODS

Patients who underwent TES MEP monitoring in which control, bipolar stimulation and four variations of quadripolar stimulation were used were evaluated. The bipolar stimulation montage was C3-C4 (C3 was used as anode for stimulation first, then the polarity was switched to stimulate the contralateral side). Four quadripolar montages were used: C3/C1-C4/C2 (step 1), M3/M1-M4/M2 (step 2), C3/M1-C4/M2 (step 3), and M3/C1-M4/C2 (step 4). The area under the curve for the right foot TES MEP was compared for the various montages using descriptive statistics and Fisher exact test for proportions.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were retrospectively evaluated. The mean age as 51.6 years, range 4 to 80 years; 11 were female. The transcranial electrical stimulation MEP area under the curve for the right foot MEP was highest in the bipolar montage in 1 of 16 patients (6.3%). Meanwhile, it was highest in step 4 (M3/C1-M4/C2) in 9 of 16 patients (56.3%; P = 0.027). The highest right foot MEP area under the curve with one of the quadripolar montages was seen in 15 of 16 patients (93.8%; P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Quadripolar stimulation resulted in higher area under the curve for right foot MEP compared with conventional bipolar stimulation.

Loss of Motor Evoked Potentials Due to Carotid Artery Retraction in an Exoscopic Clipping of a Basilar Tip Aneurysm

The internal carotid artery (ICA) may inhibit visualization of a basilar tip aneurysm during an orbitozygomatic craniotomy. Retraction of the ICA may be warranted for better visualization; however, it may lead to impending neurological sequelae. Impending neurological injury due to ICA retraction may be mitigated if multi-modal neuromonitoring techniques are employed. The authors present a case report showing the contemporaneous loss of transcranial motor evoked potentials and direct cortical motor evoked potentials during an exoscopic clipping of a basilar tip aneurysm due to ICA retraction and subsequent loss of perfusion to the vascular territory supplied by ICA. The motor evoked potentials immediately returned after retraction was removed and the patient awoke neurologically intact.