ALSUntangled 46: penicillin G/hydrocortisone

ALSUntangled #65: glucocorticoid corticosteroids

ALSUntangled reviews alternative and off-label treatments for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (PALS). Here we review glucocorticoids. Neuroinflammation plays a prominent role in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) pathogenesis, so some hypothesize that glucocorticoids might be an effective ALS therapy through their immunosuppressive effects. In this paper, we review the available evidence for glucocorticoids in ALS, including one pre-clinical study with a genetic mouse model of ALS, nine case reports (ranging from 1 to 26 patients each), and four clinical trials. We also review the possible side effects (including steroid myopathy) and the costs of therapy. We graded the level of evidence as follows: Mechanism, D; Pre-Clinical, F; Cases, B; Trials, F; Risks, C. Our review of the current evidence concludes that glucocorticoids do not offer clinical benefit in ALS and confer serious risks. Thus, ALSUntangled does not recommend glucocorticoids as a treatment for ALS.

A placebo-controlled trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of Penicillin G/Hydrocortisone in patients with ALS (PHALS trial)

OBJECTIVE

A recent case-series described patients with ALS to improve and/or stabilize after treatment with intravenous high-dose Penicillin G/Hydrocortisone (PenGH). In this study, we determine the safety and efficacy of intravenous PenGH versus placebo in combination with riluzole in patients with ALS.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with ALS according to the El Escorial criteria were randomized double-blind to four quarterly cycles of 21 d of intravenous PenGH or placebo in a 5:3 ratio. The primary outcome was change from baseline to week 48 in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R). Secondary outcomes were lung function, muscle strength, plasma creatinine, clinical stage, gastrostomy placement, quality of life and occurrence of adverse of events.

RESULTS

In total, 16 patients were randomized (10 PenGH and 6 placebo), of which 6 (40%) completed the study. Patients treated with PenGH progressed with 2.2 (95% CI 1.1-3.3) ALSFRS-R points per month and PenGH treatment did not halt disease progression (p = 0.002). No significant differences were found between PenGH or placebo (mean difference 0.5, 95% CI -1.01 to ∞, p = 0.28). Although PenGH was well-tolerated, 6 patients (38%, 3 in each arm) had thrombotic complications due to the intravenous administration method.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with PenGH does not halt disease or reverse progression in patients with ALS and showed no statistical difference with those who received placebo. Prolonged intravenous administration therapies may inflate thrombosis risk.