The relationship between ventilatory function and cognitive and behavioral impairment in ALS

Prevalence and motor-functional correlates of frontotemporal-spectrum disorders in a large cohort of non-demented ALS patients

BACKGROUND

This study aimed at (1) delivering generalizable estimates of the prevalence of frontotemporal-spectrum disorders (FTSDs) in non-demented ALS patients and (2) exploring their motor-functional correlates.

METHODS

N = 808 ALS patients without FTD were assessed for motor-functional outcomes-i.e., disease duration, severity (ALSFRS-R), progression rate (ΔFS), and stage (King's and Milano-Torino-MiToS-systems)-cognition-via the cognitive section of the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen (ECAS)-and behaviour-via the ECAS-Carer Interview. Neuropsychological phenotypes were retrieved via Strong's revised criteria-i.e., ALS cognitively and behaviourally normal (ALScbn) or cognitively and/or behaviourally impaired (ALSci/bi/cbi).

RESULTS

Defective ECAS-Total performances were detected in ~ 29% of patients, with the ECAS-Executive being failed by the highest number of patients (~ 30%), followed by the ECAS-Language, -Fluency, and -Memory (~ 15-17%) and -Visuospatial (~ %8). Apathy was the most frequent behavioural change (~ 28%), followed by loss of sympathy/empathy (~ 13%); remaining symptoms were reported in < 4% of patients. The distribution of Strong's classifications was as follows: ALScbn: 46.7%; ALSci/bi/cbi: 22.9%/20.0%/10.4%. Multinomial regressions on Strong's classifications revealed that lower ALSFRS-R scores were associated with a higher probability of ALSbi and ALScbi classifications (p ≤ .008). Higher King's and MiToS stages were associated with a higher probability of ALSbi classification (p ≤ .031).

CONCLUSIONS

FTSDs affect ~ 50% of non-demented ALS patients, with cognitive deficits being as frequent as behavioural changes. A higher degree of motor-functional involvement is associated with worse behavioural outcomes-with this link being weaker for cognitive deficits.

Calculated Maximal Volume Ventilation (cMVV) as a Marker of Early Respiratory Failure in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

Respiratory failure assessment is among the most debatable research topics in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) clinical research due to the wide heterogeneity of its presentation. Among the different pulmonary function tests (PFTs), maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) has shown potential utility as a diagnostic and monitoring marker, able to capture early respiratory modification in neuromuscular disorders. In the present study, we explored calculated MVV (cMVV) as a prognostic biomarker in a center-based, retrospective ALS population belonging to the Piemonte and Valle d'Aosta registry for ALS (PARALS). A Spearman's correlation analysis with clinical data and PFTs showed a good correlation of cMVV with forced vital capacity (FVC) and a moderate correlation with some other features such as bulbar involvement, ALSFRS-R total score, blood oxygen (pO2), carbonate (HCO3-), and base excess (BE), measured with arterial blood gas analysis. Both the Cox proportional hazard models for survival and the time to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) measurement highlighted that cMVV at diagnosis (considering cMVV(40) ≥ 80) is able to stratify patients across different risk levels for death/tracheostomy and NIV indication, especially considering patients with FVC% ≥ 80. In conclusion, cMVV is a useful marker of early respiratory failure in ALS, and is easily derivable from standard PFTs, especially in asymptomatic ALS patients with normal FVC measures.

Bulbar involvement and cognitive features in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a retrospective study on 347 patients

Background

This study aimed at clarifying the role of bulbar involvement (BI) as a risk factor for cognitive impairment (CI) in non-demented amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients.

Methods

Data on N = 347 patients were retrospectively collected. Cognition was assessed via the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS Screen (ECAS). On the basis of clinical records and ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) scores, BI was characterized as follows: (1) BI at onset-from medical history; (2) BI at testing (an ALSFRS-R-Bulbar score ≤11); (3) dysarthria (a score ≤3 on item 1 of the ALSFRS-R); (4) severity of BI (the total score on the ALSFRS-R-Bulbar); and (5) progression rate of BI (computed as 12-ALSFRS-R-Bulbar/disease duration in months). Logistic regressions were run to predict a below- vs. above-cutoff performance on each ECAS measure based on BI-related features while accounting for sex, disease duration, severity and progression rate of respiratory and spinal involvement and ECAS response modality.

Results

No predictors yielded significance either on the ECAS-Total and -ALS-non-specific or on ECAS-Language/-Fluency or -Visuospatial subscales. BI at testing predicted a higher probability of an abnormal performance on the ECAS-ALS-specific (p = 0.035) and ECAS-Executive Functioning (p = 0.018). Lower ALSFRS-R-Bulbar scores were associated with a defective performance on the ECAS-Memory (p = 0.025). No other BI-related features affected other ECAS performances.

Discussion

In ALS, the occurrence of BI itself, while neither its specific features nor its presence at onset, might selectively represent a risk factor for executive impairment, whilst its severity might be associated with memory deficits.