1
|
Klose K, Packeiser EM, Granados-Soler JL, Hewicker-Trautwein M, Murua Escobar H, Nolte I. Evaluation of the therapeutic potential of masitinib and expression of its specific targets c-Kit, PDGFR-α, PDGFR-β, and Lyn in canine prostate cancer cell lines. Vet Comp Oncol 2022; 20:641-652. [PMID: 35384248 DOI: 10.1111/vco.12817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2021] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Canine prostate cancer is classified into adenocarcinoma, transitional cell carcinoma with prostatic involvement, and mixed forms. Early metastatic spread leads to poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Masitinib is approved for the treatment of canine mast cell tumours and inhibits tyrosine kinase c-Kit, tyrosine-protein kinase Lyn (Lyn), and platelet-derived growth factor receptors alpha and beta (PDGFR-α, PDGFR-β), which are known to be expressed in canine prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate masitinib in an in vitro model consisting of cell lines from primary prostate adenocarcinoma, the associated lymph node metastasis of the same patient, and transitional cell carcinoma. To assess the suitability of the model system, the targets of masitinib were investigated by immunocytochemistry in the cell lines and by immunohistochemistry in the respective formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) original neoplastic tissue. After exposure to masitinib, cell viability, cell count, apoptosis induction, and protein expression of c-Kit, Lyn, PDGFR-α, and PDGFR-β were assessed. To hedge the efficacy, two application protocols of masitinib (single application or 12-h double-dose regimen) were compared. Immunocytochemical and immunohistochemical analysis revealed increased Lyn, PDGFR-α, and PDGFR-β expression in cell lines and FFPE original neoplastic tissue compared to healthy prostate tissue. Masitinib exposure increased apoptosis, while the cell counts and cell viability decreased in a dose- and application interval-dependent manner, with increased impact in the 12-h double-dose regimen. These in vitro effects of masitinib in canine prostate cancer and associated metastasis support further in vivo research and modifications of the clinical treatment protocol in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Klose
- Small Animal Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany
| | - Eva-Maria Packeiser
- Small Animal Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany
| | | | | | - Hugo Murua Escobar
- Division of Medicine Clinic III, Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Ingo Nolte
- Small Animal Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dual protein kinase and nucleoside kinase modulators for rationally designed polypharmacology. Nat Commun 2017; 8:1420. [PMID: 29127277 PMCID: PMC5681654 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01582-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2017] [Accepted: 09/27/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Masitinib, a highly selective protein kinase inhibitor, can sensitise gemcitabine-refractory cancer cell lines when used in combination with gemcitabine. Here we report a reverse proteomic approach that identifies the target responsible for this sensitisation: the deoxycytidine kinase (dCK). Masitinib, as well as other protein kinase inhibitors, such as imatinib, interact with dCK and provoke an unforeseen conformational-dependent activation of this nucleoside kinase, modulating phosphorylation of nucleoside analogue drugs. This phenomenon leads to an increase of prodrug phosphorylation of most of the chemotherapeutic drugs activated by this nucleoside kinase. The unforeseen dual activity of protein kinase inhibition/nucleoside kinase activation could be of great therapeutic benefit, through either reducing toxicity of therapeutic agents by maintaining effectiveness at lower doses or by counteracting drug resistance initiated via down modulation of dCK target. Masitinib is a protein kinase inhibitor that sensitises refractory pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells to treatment with the nucleoside analog gemcitabine. Here the authors show that Masitinib activates deoxycytidine kinase to enhance phosphorylation of nucleoside analogue pro-drugs, increasing their potency.
Collapse
|
3
|
Neuzillet C, de Mestier L, Rousseau B, Mir O, Hebbar M, Kocher HM, Ruszniewski P, Tournigand C. Unravelling the pharmacologic opportunities and future directions for targeted therapies in gastro-intestinal cancers part 2: Neuroendocrine tumours, hepatocellular carcinoma, and gastro-intestinal stromal tumours. Pharmacol Ther 2017; 181:49-75. [PMID: 28723416 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Until the 1990s, cytotoxic chemotherapy has been the cornerstone of medical therapy for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Better understanding of the cancer cell molecular biology has led to the therapeutic revolution of targeted therapies, i.e. monoclonal antibodies or small molecule inhibitors directed against proteins that are specifically overexpressed or mutated in cancer cells. These agents, being more specific to cancer cells, were expected to be less toxic than conventional cytotoxic agents. However, their effects have sometimes been disappointing, due to intrinsic or acquired resistance mechanisms, or to an activity restricted to some tumour settings, illustrating the importance of patient selection and early identification of predictive biomarkers of response to these therapies. Targeted agents have provided clinical benefit in many GI cancer types. Particularly, some GI tumours are considered chemoresistant and targeted therapies have offered a new therapeutic base for their management. Hence, somatostatin receptor-directed strategies, sorafenib, and imatinib have revolutioned the management of neuroendocrine tumours (NET), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST), respectively, and are now used as first-line treatment in many patients affected by these tumours. However, these agents face problems of resistances and identification of predictive biomarkers from imaging and/or biology. We propose a comprehensive two-part review providing a panoramic approach of the successes and failures of targeted agents in GI cancers to unravel the pharmacologic opportunities and future directions for these agents in GI oncology. In this second part, we will focus on NET, HCC, and GIST, whose treatment relies primarily on targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy Neuzillet
- INSERM UMR1149, Beaujon University Hospital (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, AP-HP), Paris 7 Diderot University, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France; Department of Medical Oncology, Henri Mondor University Hospital (AP-HP), Paris Est Créteil University (UPEC), 51 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France; Tumour Biology Laboratory, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, United Kingdom; Barts and The London HPB Centre, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London E1 1BB, United Kingdom.
| | - Louis de Mestier
- INSERM UMR1149, Beaujon University Hospital (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, AP-HP), Paris 7 Diderot University, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France; Department of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology, Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP), Paris 7 Diderot University, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France
| | - Benoît Rousseau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Henri Mondor University Hospital (AP-HP), Paris Est Créteil University (UPEC), 51 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France; Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, INSERM UMR955 Team 18, Paris Est Créteil University (UPEC), 51 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - Olivier Mir
- Department of Cancer Medicine - Sarcoma Group, Department of Early Drug Development (DITEP) - Phase 1 Unit, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, University of Paris Sud, 114, Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France
| | - Mohamed Hebbar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Lille University Hospital, 1, Rue Polonovski, 59037 Lille, France
| | - Hemant M Kocher
- Tumour Biology Laboratory, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, United Kingdom; Barts and The London HPB Centre, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London E1 1BB, United Kingdom
| | - Philippe Ruszniewski
- INSERM UMR1149, Beaujon University Hospital (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, AP-HP), Paris 7 Diderot University, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France
| | - Christophe Tournigand
- Department of Medical Oncology, Henri Mondor University Hospital (AP-HP), Paris Est Créteil University (UPEC), 51 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|