Managing post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder

Prevalence, management, and new treatment modalities of EBV-DNA-emia and EBV-PTLD after allo-HCT: survey of Infectious Diseases Working Party EBMT

The aim of this study was to determine the current approach of EBV-driven post-transplant complications in context of monitoring, diagnosis, prevalence and treatment in EBMT transplant centers. Routine serology testing in patient and donor before HCT is performed in 95.5% centers. Pretransplant EBV-DNA is routinely tested in all patients in 32.7% centers. Monitoring for EBV infection is feasible in 98.2% centers: including 66.7% centers using standardized PCR. Post-HCT regular monitoring is performed in all patients in 80.5% centers. Anti-EBV prophylaxis with rituximab is used in 12.4% centers. Frequency of csEBV-DNA-emia was 7.4% (adults: 6.2%, children: 12.6%). The PCR threshold used to start preemptive treatment was differentiated among centers. Frequency of EBV-PTLD was 1.6% (adults: 1.3%; children: 3.5%). First-line therapy of EBV-driven complications was rituximab and reduction of immunosuppressive therapy. The rate of failure of first-line preemptive treatment was 12.0%. EBV-specific viral-specific T-lymphocytes were available in 46.0% centers. A number of new experimental therapies were given in 28 patients with resistant/refractory PTLD. In conclusion, the prevalence of EBV-DNA-emia and EBV-PTLD over the period 2020-2021 decreased in comparison to historical data. New trends (routine pretransplant screening for EBV-DNA, wider access to VST, new experimental therapies) are being observed in management of EBV infection after allo-HCT.

Who is the patient at risk for EBV reactivation and disease: expert opinion focused on post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) represent a diverse group of diseases. They develop as a consequence of uncontrolled proliferation of lymphoid or plasmacytic cells resulting from T-cell immunosuppression after transplantation of either hematopoietic cells (HCT) or solid organs (SOT), caused mainly by latent Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). The risk for EBV recurrence is dependent on the level of incompetency of the immune system, presented as an impairment of T-cell immunity.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the data on incidence and risk factors of EBV infection in patients after HCT. The median rate of EBV infection in HCT recipients was estimated at 30% after allogeneic and<1% after autologous transplant; 5% in non-transplant hematological malignancies; 30% in SOT recipients. The median rate of PTLD after HCT is estimated at 3%. The most frequently reported risk factors for EBV infection and disease include: donor EBV-seropositivity, use of T-cell depletion, especially with ATG; reduced-intensity conditioning; mismatched family or unrelated donor transplants; and acute or chronic graft-versus-host-disease.

EXPERT OPINION

The major risk factors for EBV infection and EBV-PTLD can be easily identified: EBV-seropositive donor, depletion of T-cells, and the use of immunosuppressive therapy. Strategies for avoiding risk factors include elimination EBV from the graft and improving T-cell function.

Impact of donor and recipient Epstein-Barr Virus serostatus on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) is a potentially curative therapeutic strategy that showed encouraging long-term outcomes in hematological diseases. A number of factors can influence post-transplant clinical outcomes. While Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) constitutes a trigger for development of various adverse conditions, no clinical study yet has been powered to assess the effect of EBV serostatus on the clinical outcomes in allo-HCT population. To systematically summarize and analyze the impact of donor and recipient EBV serostatus on transplant outcomes in allo-HCT recipients, meta-analyses were conducted. Selected endpoints were overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), relapse incidence (RI), non-relapse mortality (NRM), acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), and de novo cGVHD. Three studies with 26,650 patients, transplanted for acute leukemias, lymphomas, chronic hematological malignancies, or non-malignant hematological diseases were included in the meta-analysis. In the whole population, with a total of 53,300 donors and recipients, the rate of EBV seropositivity was 85.1%, including 86.6% and 83.6% among transplant recipients and healthy donors, respectively. Donor EBV seropositivity increased the risk of cGVHD by 17%, de novo cGVHD by 14%, and aGHVD by 5%. Recipient EBV seropositivity increased the risk of cGVHD by 12%, de novo cGVHD by 17%; increased NRM by 11%, increased RI by 11%, decreased OS by 14%, and decreased RFS by 11%. In performed meta-analyses, donor and recipient EBV seropositivity was found to have a significant impact on transplant outcomes in patients after allo-HCT.

Who Is the Patient at Risk of CMV Recurrence: A Review of the Current Scientific Evidence with a Focus on Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an agent of global infection, and its acquisition in a population is characterized by an age-dependent rise in seropositivity. After primary infection, CMV remains in the host cells in latent form, and it can reactivate in the case of immune suppression. The risk of CMV recurrence is dependent on the level of incompetency of the immune system, manifested as an impairment of T-cell immunity, including the presence and function of CMV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. This article presents data on the incidence of CMV recurrence in groups of immunocompromised patients, including allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients and other groups of patients, based on a summary of reported data. The median rate of CMV recurrence in HSCT recipients was estimated as 37% after allogeneic transplant and 12% after autologous transplant, 5% in patients with nontransplant hematological malignancies, 14% in recipients of anti-CD52 therapy, 30% in solid organ transplant recipients, 21% in patients with primary immunodeficiencies, 20% during active replication in HIV-positive patients and 3.3% during antiretroviral therapy, 7% in patients with chronic kidney disease, 0.6% in patients with congenital infection, and 0.6% in neonates with primary infection. The highest risk of CMV recurrence and CMV disease is reported for HSCT CMV-seropositive recipients, regardless of donor serostatus. The odds ratio (OR) for CMV recurrence is higher for recipient-positive versus recipient-negative CMV serostatus transplants (OR 8.0), donor-negative/recipient-positive versus donor-positive/recipient-positive CMV serostatus transplants (OR 1.2), unrelated/mismatched versus matched-family donor transplants (OR 1.6), and acute graft-versus-host-disease versus other diseases (OR 3.2). Other risk factors have minor significance.