How do the attitudes, confidence, knowledge and understanding differ in pre-registration healthcare students towards treating people with chronic pain: an observational, cross-sectional study

A scoping review to explore the use of the Health Care Providers' Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale

OBJECTIVES

Patients' interactions with health care providers influence back pain-related outcomes. The Health Care Providers' Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS) is an instrument that assesses providers' attitudes and beliefs about patients with persistent back pain, with lower scores implying that persistent pain does not indicate disability or limitation of activities. This scoping review aims to explore the extent of research involving the HC-PAIRS.

LITERATURE SURVEY

PubMed, Embase, and PEDro databases were searched from inception to April 2022.

METHODS

Extracted HC-PAIRS scores were standardized to 15-item scores and categorized by profession, student or professional status, and pre/post-educational intervention to evaluate scores. Psychometric properties and educational interventions of the HC-PAIRS were described.

RESULTS

After screening, 51 studies representing 10,416 participants were included. Student and professional scores were investigated in 24 and 29 studies, respectively. Twenty-one studies included educational interventions, with heterogenous follow-up. Psychometric properties of the HC-PAIRS were assessed in 10 studies and demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity. The overall baseline mean score among all participants was 55.34 (95% CI: 53.54-57.14) (students: 56.54 [56.54-60.87]; professionals: 51.67 [49.08-54.27]). Nurses (61.99 [55.66-68.31]) and non-health care professionals (65.30 [57.33-73.28]) had the highest overall baseline mean scores, whereas chiropractors (51.69 [33.73-69.66]), MDs/PAs (52.64 [47.27-58.00]), physical therapists (53.42 [50.67-56.17]), and exercise professionals (57.36 [49.39-65.33]) had lower scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The HC-PAIRS has been used across many disciplines in both students and professionals and demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity. Professionals commonly treating back pain had lower HC-PAIRS scores. Future research could benefit from standardization of interventions and timing of follow-up assessments.

Validity and reliability study in undergraduate healthcare students towards the solution of a neglected problem in working life: Attitude scale towards patients with chronic pain

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain is the type of pain that healthcare professionals frequently encounter. Health care students' attitudes towards pain management are not sufficient and this negatively affects their chronic pain management. When students cannot manage the chronic pain they will experience professional burnout, depersonalization, and a decrease in compassion and empathy in patient care. Therefore, the first step in improving health care students' attitudes towards patients with chronic pain is to determine their attitudes.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to test the validity and reliability of the Scale for Healthcare Professionals' Attitudes towards Patients with Chronic Pain (HCPAPCP Scale) in healthcare students.

METHOD

This quantitative study was conducted with 205 health care students in January-February 2022. Data were collected online with Personal Information Form and the HCPAPCP Scale. To determine the reliability of the scale, internal consistency and test-retest, and for construct validity, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were performed.

RESULTS

The results of the exploratory factor analysis showed that the two-factor scale consisting of 18 items, the factor structure, and the distribution of factors in items were the same as the findings of the original scale. The Cronbach's Alpha coefficient was 0.88 for the first factor and 0.74 for the second factor. Test-retest reliability was 0.60. In confirmatory factor analysis, the model had a good and acceptable fit.

CONCLUSION

We found that the HCPAPCP Scale was valid and reliable in healthcare students.

Attitudes, beliefs, and recommendations for persistent low back pain patients: cross-sectional surveys of students and faculty at a chiropractic college

BACKGROUND

While the use of chiropractic care for persistent low back pain (PLBP) is prevalent, chiropractors' attitudes and beliefs related to PLBP patients are not fully understood. The purpose of this study was to assess the attitudes, beliefs and activity/work recommendations of students and faculty at a chiropractic college regarding PLBP patients.

METHODS

The Health Care Providers Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS) and clinical vignettes were requested to be completed by chiropractic students and faculty at Parker University in April 2018. Higher HC-PAIRS scores indicate stronger beliefs that PLBP justifies disability and limitation of activities. Activity and work recommendations from clinical vignettes were rated as "adequate", "neutral", or "inadequate", as defined in previous literature. Descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, and logistic regression were used to analyze results.

RESULTS

Student and faculty response rates were 63.6% and 25.9%, respectively. Faculty mean HC-PAIRS scores (3.66 [SD:0.88]) were significantly lower than students' (4.41 [SD:0.71]). The percentage of faculty providing "adequate" activity (62.1%) and work (41.0%) recommendations was significantly greater than the percentage of students (activity: 33.9%, work: 21.2%) (p < 0.05). Higher HC-PAIRS scores in students were associated with decreased odds of providing "adequate" activity and work recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Student and faculty attitudes and beliefs, and students' activity/work recommendations were found to be dissimilar to those from similar studies and less congruent with CPG recommendations. Lower HC-PAIRS scores increased the odds of students providing "adequate" activity and work recommendations to patients with PLBP. Results from this study may help guide future research and training opportunities.

Comparing physical therapy students' attitudes and beliefs regarding chronic low back pain and knee osteoarthritis: an international multi-institutional comparison between 2013 and 2020 academic years

BACKGROUND

In 2013, physical therapy students demonstrated low guideline-adherent recommendations regarding chronic low back pain (CLBP) for spinal pathology, activity, and work.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the differences in physical therapy students' attitudes, beliefs, and adherence to guideline recommendations regarding CLBP and knee osteoarthritis between 2013 and 2020.

METHODS

In 2013 and 2020, second and fourth-year physical therapy students were recruited from 6 Belgian and 2 Dutch institutions. Attitudes and beliefs regarding CLBP and knee OA were evaluated using the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists (PABS-PT), the Health Care Providers' Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS), and a questionnaire regarding therapeutic exercise and knee osteoarthritis. A clinical vignette was used to measure guideline-adherent recommendations regarding spinal pathology, activity, and work.

RESULTS

In 2013, 927 second-year and 695 fourth-year students; in 2020, 695 second-year and 489 fourth-year students; were recruited to participate in the study. Compared to 2013, students had less biomedical and stronger biopsychosocial attitudes and beliefs regarding CLBP, more guideline-adherent recommendations for activity, and more biopsychosocial beliefs regarding the benefits of exercise for patients with knee osteoarthritis in both the second and fourth year. Only fourth-year students in 2020 scored significantly better on HC-PAIRS and guideline-adherent recommendation relating to spinal pathology. No differences were found regarding work recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Between 2013 and 2020, physical therapy students made a positive shift towards a more biopsychosocial approach to CLBP and knee osteoarthritis management. Guideline-adherent recommendations for CLBP concerning activity improved, however, concerning work and spinal pathology, it remained low.

Cross-cultural adaptation of the pain understanding and confidence questionnaire into Japanese

[Purpose] This study aimed to develop a culturally adapted Japanese version of the Pain Understanding and Confidence Questionnaire (PUnCQ). The first-factor structure describes management from 12 perspectives for a case vignette of chronic pain and determines whether the management is based on a biomedical or biopsychosocial perspective. The second-factor structure evaluates the confidence level in management skills for the same case from 21 perspectives. [Participants and Methods] We conducted a cross-cultural adaptation based on five stages according to Beaton's guidelines (two forward translations, creation of an integrated forward translation version, two backward translations, creation of a provisional Japanese version, and a pilot test). In the pilot test, we asked 40 Japanese physical therapists to rate their understanding of the PUnCQ descriptions on a five-point Likert scale (1, not at all understandable; 5, completely understandable) and provide comments when they rated 1 to 3. We repeated revisions and pilot tests until less than 10% of the respondents rated 1 for all descriptions. [Results] By conducting two rounds of the pilot test, all items of descriptions satisfied the preestablished criteria. [Conclusion] A Japanese version of the PUnCQ was developed.

International, multi-disciplinary, cross-section study of pain knowledge and attitudes in nursing, midwifery and allied health professions students

BACKGROUND

Persistent pain is a highly prevalent, global cause of disability. Research suggests that many healthcare professionals are not well equipped to manage pain, and this may be attributable at least in part to undergraduate education. The primary aim of this study was to quantify and compare first and final year nursing, midwifery and allied health professional (NMAHP) students' pain related knowledge and attitudes. The secondary aim was to explore what factors influence students' pain related knowledge and attitudes.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 1154 first and final year healthcare students, from 12 universities in five different countries completed the Revised Neurophysiology of Pain Quiz (RNPQ) [knowledge] and the Health Care Providers Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS) [attitudes].

RESULTS

Physiotherapy was the only student group with statistically and clinically improved pain related knowledge [mean difference, 95% CI] (3.4, 3.0 to 3.9, p = 0.01) and attitudes (-17.2, -19.2 to 15.2, p = 0.01) between first and final year. Pain education teaching varied considerably from course to course (0 to 40 h), with greater levels of pain related knowledge and attitudes associated with higher volumes of pain specific teaching.

CONCLUSIONS

There was little difference in pain knowledge and attitudes between all first and final year NMAHP students other than physiotherapy. This suggests that for most NMAHP disciplines, undergraduate teaching has little or no impact on students' understanding of pain. There is an urgent need to enhance pain education provision at the undergraduate level in NMAHPs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study protocol was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT03522857 .

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Biopsychosocial Pain Education upon Health Care Professional Pain Attitudes, Knowledge, Behavior and Patient Outcomes

Pain is a significant health burden globally and its management frequently fails to comply with evidence based, biopsychosocial guidelines. This may be partly attributable to inadequate biopsychosocial focussed pain education for students and clinicians. We aimed to undertake a systematic review, using Cochrane methodology, of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis to quantify the effects of biopsychosocial education strategies in changing student/qualified health care professionals (HCPs) pain related attitudes, knowledge, clinical behaviour or patient outcomes. A systematic search of the literature was undertaken using CINAHL, AMED, PEDro, Cochrane Central Library, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Rehabdata, SportDiscus, EMBASE, ASSIA, Dentistry and Oral Science, Psycinfo, Education Research Complete and OpenGrey from 1977 to November 2020. Pooled effect sizes were quantified in random effects meta-analyses for attitudes, knowledge, and clinical behaviors. From a sample of 1812 records, 6 were narratively analysed and 15 were included in the meta-analyses. These studies represented 3022 patients and 3163 HCPs and students. Education improved attitudes by 11.3% (95% confidence interval: 2.2-20.4%, P = .02), and knowledge by 18.8% (12.4-25.3%, P = .01). The effects of education on clinical behavior favoured a clinically relevant improvement (OR = 2.4, 0.9-5.9, P = .06). Narrative analysis of the effect of biopsychosocial education for student HCPs/HCPs upon patient outcomes was inconclusive. These findings demonstrate that biopsychosocial focussed pain education strategies can improve student/qualified HCPs' pain related knowledge and attitudes and increase the likelihood that they will behave more in keeping with evidence-based practice. This should result in improved patient outcomes, however, evidence to support or refute this is lacking. PROSPERO systematic review record number, CRD42018082251. Perspective: We outline the effectiveness of biopsychosocial pain education for health care professionals and students in improving pain knowledge, attitudes, and evidence-based behaviors. These improvements should enhance clinical outcomes in patients with pain but further evidence is needed to confirm this.

The effect of pain neurophysiology education on healthcare students' knowledge, attitudes and behaviours towards pain: A mixed-methods randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

1) To investigate the effects of a brief pain neuroscience education (PNE) lecture on multi-disciplinary healthcare students' knowledge, attitudes and behaviours towards people with pain post intervention and at 6-months follow-up, 2) To explore students' perceptions of PNE.

DESIGN

Mixed-methods randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

UK university.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-seven students (30♀, mean age 30 years) from six healthcare disciplines.

INTERVENTION

70-min PNE lecture (intervention group) or a 70-min control education.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

1) Knowledge: The Revised Pain Neurophysiology Quiz (RPNQ); 2) Attitudes: Health Care Providers' Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS); 3) Behaviours: A case vignette to assess clinical recommendations; and 4) Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews (n = 12).

RESULTS

The intervention group increased knowledge compared to the control, post-intervention [mean difference 3.7 (95% CI, 2.4, 5.0), P < 0.001] but not at 6-months (0.1 (-1.1, 1.3), P = 0.860). Greater improvements in attitudes for the intervention group were seen post-intervention [-10.4 (-16.3, -4.6), P < 0.001] and at 6-months [-5.8 (-11.5, -0.2), P < 0.044]. There was no difference in behaviours between groups. Thematic analysis identified increased patient empathy, partial and patchy reconceptualisation of pain and increased confidence in recommending an active management programme following PNE.

CONCLUSION

This study adds to existing knowledge by demonstrating that a 70-min PNE lecture can have a short-term effect on knowledge and positively shift attitudes towards people with pain in the short and medium-term. It also resulted in some students' reconceptualisation of pain, increased empathy, and confidence to recommend activity. The effect of PNE on clinical behaviours was unclear.