Outcomes of patients with ureteral obstruction who achieved stent-free state following balloon dilatation

Self-expanding metal ureteral stent for ureteral stricture: Experience of a large-scale prospective study from a high-volume center - Cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The management of ureteral stricture is still a challenge for urologists. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of self-expanding metal ureteral stents (URS) in ureteral strictures.

METHODS

We performed URS placement procedures for ureteral stricture from Jan 2019 to July 2020, and prospectively collect various data before and after the operation. A paired T test was used to compare continuous variables before and after surgery, binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify the independent risk predictors of surgical failure.

RESULTS

A total of 147 patients with 157 renal units received successful placement of URS. The mean operative time was 70.0 min. After a median follow-up time of 15 months, 73.2% (115/157) of stents were kept in situ. The most common complication was hematuria (13, 8.8%), followed by urinary tract infection (11, 7.5%) and pain (8, 5.4%). The volume of hydronephrosis (67.9 ± 34.9 VS 34.9 ± 51.1 cm³, P = 0.0001), serum creatinine level (103.0 ± 54.5 VS 93.8 ± 45.1 μmol/L, P = 0.034) and blood urea nitrogen level (6.6 ± 6.7 VS 5.4 ± 2.4 mmol/L, P = 0.032) decreased significantly at last follow up when compared with baseline. Stricture of the distal ureter was an independent risk factor for stent failure (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.15, 2.73, P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

URS was found to be safe and effective for ureteral strictures with a limited complications and good long-term results. For those who are not suitable for surgical reconstruction, the URS is an alternative management.

Step-by-step technique for the endoscopic treatment of ureteric stricture

OBJECTIVE

To outline our step-by-step technique for the endoscopic treatment of ureteric stricture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2019 and June 2020, 25 patients with ureteric strictures underwent ureteric bypass and were included in this study. The ureteric bypass surgery included three key steps. First, holmium laser endoureterotomy was used to establish a small channel. Then, balloon dilatation was performed to create a large channel. Finally, an Allium stent was inserted.

RESULTS

Over a median follow-up time of 12 months, the success rate of ureteric bypass surgery was 92.0% (23/25). The median operating time was 78 min. The incidence of pain was 16% (4/25), and the incidence of fever was 4.0% (1/25). The preoperative hydronephrosis volume and urea nitrogen levels decreased significantly after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

We performed ureteric bypass for patients with ureteric strictures. This technique was found to be safe and effective over a short follow-up time. For patients who are not suitable for surgical reconstruction, the ureteric bypass technique is a good choice.

Endoscopic Balloon Dilatation in the Treatment of Benign Ureteral Strictures: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Although balloon dilatation is one of the main endoscopic procedures used to treat benign ureteral strictures, its precise efficacy remains controversial. We aimed to identify, combine, and analyze existing published data to ascertain the efficacy of endoscopic balloon dilatation for benign ureteral strictures.

METHODS

In December 2018, a literature search was performed using Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. We included reports in which the study population consisted of patients who underwent endoscopic balloon dilatation for the treatment of benign ureteral strictures. Technical, short-term, and long-term success rates (expressed as mean ± standard error) were adopted as the outcome measures.

RESULTS

Using our search strategy, a total of 19 studies (all series reports) were included for analysis. Using a random-effects model, the pooled technical success rate of endoscopic balloon dilatation for benign ureteral strictures was found to be 89% ± 4%. Furthermore, the short-term success rate (i.e., 3 months after surgery) was 60% ± 10%, and the long-term success rate (i.e., 6-12 months after surgery) was 54% ± 14%. In the subgroup analysis, the success rate of endoscopic balloon dilatation for ≤2-cm benign ureteral strictures was significantly higher than that for >2-cm ones (odds ratio [OR]: 0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05-0.35). In addition, the success rate in cases with strictures of onset timing ≤3 months was relatively higher than that in cases with strictures of onset timing >3 months (OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.15-1.43).

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that endoscopic balloon dilatation has a high success rate in the treatment of benign ureteral strictures with length ≤2 cm and onset timing ≤3 months. However, there is still no consensus on balloon type, dilatation pressure, expansion number, postoperative ureteral stent type, and stent retention time for the balloon dilatation technique.