1
|
Ecke TH, Meisl CJ, Schlomm T, Rabien A, Labonté F, Rong D, Hofbauer S, Friedersdorff F, Sommerfeldt L, Gagel N, Gössl A, Barski D, Otto T, Grunewald CM, Niegisch G, Hennig MJP, Kramer MW, Koch S, Roggisch J, Hallmann S, Weiß S, Waldner M, Graff J, Veltrup E, Linden F, Hake R, Eidt S, Wirtz RM. BTA stat®, NMP22® BladderChek®, UBC® Rapid Test, and CancerCheck® UBC® rapid VISUAL as urinary marker for bladder cancer: Final results of a German multicenter study. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:484.e17-484.e26. [PMID: 37407421 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE BTA stat®, NMP22® BladderChek®, UBC® Rapid Test, and CancerCheck® UBC® rapid VISUAL are urinary-based rapid tests. This multicenter study is the first study comparing all available rapid tests on a large cohort of bladder cancer patients and healthy controls in one setting. METHODS In total 732 urine samples (second morning urine) in a real-world assessment have been analyzed. We evaluated clinical samples from 464 patients with histologically confirmed urothelial tumors of the urinary bladder (17 solitary CIS, 189 low-grade, 187 high-grade nonmuscle invasive, 71 high-grade muscle invasive), 77 patients with No Evidence of Disease (NED), and from 191 healthy controls. Urine samples were analyzed by the BTA stat®, NMP22® BladderChek®, UBC® Rapid Test point-of-care (POC) system using the concile Omega 100 POC reader, and CancerCheck® UBC® rapid VISUAL. Sensitivities and specificities were calculated by contingency analyses. RESULTS All investigated urinary markers detected more pathological concentrations in urine of bladder cancer patients compared to tumor-free patients. The calculated diagnostic sensitivities for BTA stat®, NMP22® BladderChek®, UBC® Rapid Test, CancerCheck® UBC® rapid VISUAL, and cytology were 62.4%, 13.4%, 58.2%, 28.6%, 36.2% for low-grade, 83.4%, 49.5%, 84.5%, 63.1%, 71.2% for high-grade nonmuscle invasive, and 95.8%, 35.2%, 76.1%, 50.7%, 67.7% for high-grade muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The specificity was 67.9%, 95.5%, 79.4%, 94.4%, and 83.7%, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) after receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis for high-grade non-muscle-invasive tumors was 0.757, 0.725, 0.819, 0.787, and 0.774, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The analysis of more than 700 urine samples offers an objective view on urine-based rapid diagnostics. Elevated pathological concentrations of markers in urine of bladder cancer patients were detected in all investigated tests. The highest sensitivities for high-grade non-muscle-invasive tumors were calculated for BTA stat® and UBC® Rapid Test, whereas NMP22® BladderChek®, and cytology showed the highest specificities. BTA stat® and UBC® Rapid Test have the potential to be used as a clinical valuable urinary protein biomarker for the detection of high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients and could be included in the management of these tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thorsten H Ecke
- Department of Urology, Helios Hospital, Bad Saarow, Germany; Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Christina J Meisl
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thorsten Schlomm
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anja Rabien
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Flora Labonté
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dezhi Rong
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Hofbauer
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Friedersdorff
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Königin Elisabeth Herzberge, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lilli Sommerfeldt
- Department of Urology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Königin Elisabeth Herzberge, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nella Gagel
- Department of Urology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Königin Elisabeth Herzberge, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Gössl
- Department of Urology, Rheinland Klinikum Neuss, Neuss, Germany
| | - Dimitri Barski
- Department of Urology, Rheinland Klinikum Neuss, Neuss, Germany
| | - Thomas Otto
- Department of Urology, Rheinland Klinikum Neuss, Neuss, Germany; University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Camilla M Grunewald
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Günter Niegisch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Mario W Kramer
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Stefan Koch
- Helios Hospital, Institute of Pathology, Bad Saarow, Germany; Brandenburg Medical School, Brandenburg, Germany
| | - Jenny Roggisch
- Helios Hospital, Institute of Pathology, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | | | - Sarah Weiß
- Department of Urology, Helios Hospital, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | - Michael Waldner
- Department of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Cologne, Germany
| | - Johannes Graff
- Department of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Cologne, Germany
| | - Elke Veltrup
- STRATIFYER Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Roland Hake
- Institute of Pathology, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sebastian Eidt
- Institute of Pathology, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ralph M Wirtz
- STRATIFYER Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Malinaric R, Mantica G, Lo Monaco L, Mariano F, Leonardi R, Simonato A, Van der Merwe A, Terrone C. The Role of Novel Bladder Cancer Diagnostic and Surveillance Biomarkers-What Should a Urologist Really Know? INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19159648. [PMID: 35955004 PMCID: PMC9368399 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this review is to analyze and describe the current landscape of bladder cancer diagnostic and surveillance biomarkers. We researched the literature from 2016 to November 2021 to find the most promising new molecules and divided them into seven different subgroups based on their function and location in the cell. Although cystoscopy and cytology are still the gold standard for diagnosis and surveillance when it comes to bladder cancer (BCa), their cost is quite a burden for national health systems worldwide. Currently, the research is focused on finding a biomarker that has high negative predictive value (NPV) and can exclude with a certainty the presence of the tumor, considering missing it could be disastrous for the patient. Every subgroup has its own advantages and disadvantages; for example, protein biomarkers cost less than genomic ones, but on the other hand, they seem to be less precise. We tried to simplify this complicated topic as much as possible in order to make it comprehensible to doctors and urologists that are not as familiar with it, as well as encourage them to actively participate in ongoing research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafaela Malinaric
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinic Hospital San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche Integrate (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Guglielmo Mantica
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinic Hospital San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Lo Monaco
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinic Hospital San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche Integrate (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Federico Mariano
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinic Hospital San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche Integrate (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Rosario Leonardi
- Department of Urology, Casa di Cura Musumeci GECAS, 95030 Gravina di Catania, Italy
| | - Alchiede Simonato
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Stomatological Sciences, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy
| | - André Van der Merwe
- Department of Urology, Tygerberg Academic Hospital, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town 7600, South Africa
| | - Carlo Terrone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinic Hospital San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche Integrate (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Crocetto F, Barone B, Ferro M, Busetto GM, La Civita E, Buonerba C, Di Lorenzo G, Terracciano D, Schalken JA. Liquid biopsy in bladder cancer: State of the art and future perspectives. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2022; 170:103577. [PMID: 34999017 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Revised: 01/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Bladder cancer is the most common malignancy of the urinary tract. Cystoscopy represents the gold standard in the diagnosis of suspicious bladder lesions. However, the procedure is invasive and burdened by pain, discomfort and infective complications. Cytology, which represents an alternative diagnostic possibility is limited by poor sensitivity. Considering the limitations of both procedures, and the necessity to perform multiple evaluations in patients who are in follow-up for bladder cancer, an improved non-invasive methodology is required in the clinical management of this disease. Liquid biopsy, e.g. the detection of clinical biomarkers in urine, represent a promising novel and non-invasive approach that could overcome those limitations and be integrated into the current clinical practice. The aim of this review is to summarize the state of the art of this approach and the latest novelties regarding detection, prognosis and surveillance of bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Biagio Barone
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Gian Maria Busetto
- Urology and Renal Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Evelina La Civita
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Carlo Buonerba
- Oncology Unit, Hospital "Andrea Tortora", ASL Salerno, Pagani, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Di Lorenzo
- Oncology Unit, Hospital "Andrea Tortora", ASL Salerno, Pagani, Italy; Department of Medicine and Health Science, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Daniela Terracciano
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Jack A Schalken
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Meisl CJ, Karakiewicz PI, Einarsson R, Koch S, Hallmann S, Weiß S, Hemdan T, Malmström P, Styrke J, Sherif A, Hasan MN, Pichler R, Tulchiner G, Palou J, Rodríguez Faba Ó, Hennenlotter J, Stenzl A, Ritter R, Niegisch G, Grunewald CM, Schlomm T, Friedersdorff F, Barski D, Otto T, Gössl A, Arndt C, Esuvaranathan K, Kesavan NR, Zhijiang Z, Kramer MW, Hennig MJ, Ecke TH. Nomograms including UBC® Rapid Test to detect primary bladder cancer based on a multicenter data set. BJU Int 2021; 130:754-763. [DOI: 10.1111/bju.15677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Christina J. Meisl
- Dept. of Urology Charité ‐ Universitätsmedizin Berlin Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin Humbold‐Universität zu Berlin Berlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
| | | | | | - Stefan Koch
- Dept. of Pathology HELIOS Hospital Bad Saarow Bad Saarow Germany
- Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane Neuruppin Germany
| | | | - Sarah Weiß
- Dept. of Urology HELIOS Hospital Bad Saarow Bad Saarow Germany
| | - Tammer Hemdan
- Dept. of Surgical Sciences Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden
| | | | - Johan Styrke
- Dept. of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology Umeå University Umeå Sweden
| | - Amir Sherif
- Dept. of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology Umeå University Umeå Sweden
| | | | - Renate Pichler
- Dept. of Urology Medical University Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria
| | | | - Joan Palou
- Dept. of Urology Fundació Puigvert Autonomous University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain
| | - Óscar Rodríguez Faba
- Dept. of Urology Fundació Puigvert Autonomous University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain
| | - Jörg Hennenlotter
- Dept. of Urology University Hospital Faculty of Medicine Tübingen Tübingen Germany
| | - Arnulf Stenzl
- Dept. of Urology University Hospital Faculty of Medicine Tübingen Tübingen Germany
| | - René Ritter
- Dept. of Urology Diakonie‐Klinikum Stuttgart Stuttgart Germany
| | - Günter Niegisch
- Dept. of Urology Medical Faculty Heinrich‐Heine University Düsseldorf Düsseldorf Germany
| | - Camilla M. Grunewald
- Dept. of Urology Medical Faculty Heinrich‐Heine University Düsseldorf Düsseldorf Germany
| | - Thorsten Schlomm
- Dept. of Urology Charité ‐ Universitätsmedizin Berlin Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin Humbold‐Universität zu Berlin Berlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
| | - Frank Friedersdorff
- Dept. of Urology Charité ‐ Universitätsmedizin Berlin Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin Humbold‐Universität zu Berlin Berlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
- Dept. of Urology Evangelisches Krankenhaus Königin Elisabeth Herzberge Berlin Germany
| | | | - Thomas Otto
- Dept. of Urology Rheinland Klinikum Neuss Neuss Germany
- Medical Faculty University of Duisburg‐Essen Essen Germany
| | - Andreas Gössl
- Dept. of Urology HELIOS Hospital Krefeld Krefeld Germany
| | | | | | - Nisha R. Kesavan
- Dept. of Urology National University Hospital Singapore City Singapore
| | - Zang Zhijiang
- Dept. of Urology National University Hospital Singapore City Singapore
| | - Mario W. Kramer
- Dept. of Urology University Hospital Schleswig‐Holstein Campus Lübeck Lübeck Germany
| | - Martin J.P. Hennig
- Dept. of Urology University Hospital Schleswig‐Holstein Campus Lübeck Lübeck Germany
| | - Thorsten H. Ecke
- Dept. of Urology Charité ‐ Universitätsmedizin Berlin Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin Humbold‐Universität zu Berlin Berlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
- Dept. of Urology HELIOS Hospital Bad Saarow Bad Saarow Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hemdan T, Einarsson R, Malmström PU. The new classification of urinary cytology - is it an improvement? Scand J Urol 2020; 55:98-99. [PMID: 33377408 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2020.1866660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tammer Hemdan
- Department of Surgery, Enköping Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.,Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Per-Uno Malmström
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Department of Urology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Oehr P, Ecke T. Establishment and Characterization of an Empirical Biomarker SS/PV-ROC Plot Using Results of the UBC ® Rapid Test in Bladder Cancer. ENTROPY (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2020; 22:e22070729. [PMID: 33286501 PMCID: PMC7517270 DOI: 10.3390/e22070729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This investigation included both a study of potential non-invasive diagnostic approaches for the bladder cancer biomarker UBC® Rapid Test and a study including comparative methods about sensitivity-specificity characteristic (SS-ROC) and predictive receiver operating characteristic (PV-ROC) curves that used bladder cancer as a useful example. METHODS The study included 289 urine samples from patients with tumors of the urinary bladder, patients with non-evidence of disease (NED) and healthy controls. The UBC® Rapid Test is a qualitative point of care assay. Using a photometric reader, quantitative data can also be obtained. Data for pairs of sensitivity/specificity as well as positive/negative predictive values were created by variation of threshold values for the whole patient cohort, as well as for the tumor-free control group. Based on these data, sensitivity-specificity and predictive value threshold distribution curves were constructed and transformed into SS-ROC and PV-ROC curves, which were included in a single SS/PV-ROC plot. RESULTS The curves revealed TPP-asymmetric improper curves which cross the diagonal from above. Evaluation of the PV-ROC curve showed that two or more distinct positive predictive values (PPV) can correspond to the same value of a negative predictive value (NPV) and vice versa, indicating a complexity in PV-ROC curves which did not exist in SS-ROC curves. In contrast to the SS-ROC curve, the PV-ROC curve had neither an area under the curve (AUC) nor a range from 0% to 100%. Sensitivity of the qualitative assay was 58.5% and specificity 88.2%, PPV was 75.6% and NPV 77.3%, at a threshold value of approximately 12.5 µg/L. CONCLUSIONS The SS/PV-ROC plot is a new diagnostic approach which can be used for direct judgement of gain and loss of predictive values, sensitivity and specificity according to varied threshold value changes, enabling characterization, comparison and evaluation of qualitative and quantitative bioassays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Oehr
- Faculty of Medicine, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 53113 Bonn, Germany
| | - Thorsten Ecke
- Department of Urology, HELIOS Hospital, 15526 Bad Saarow, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Assessing the Clinical Benefit of UBC Rapid in the Surveillance and Initial Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2020; 18:230-235. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Revised: 11/01/2019] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|
8
|
de Oliveira MC, Caires HR, Oliveira MJ, Fraga A, Vasconcelos MH, Ribeiro R. Urinary Biomarkers in Bladder Cancer: Where Do We Stand and Potential Role of Extracellular Vesicles. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12061400. [PMID: 32485907 PMCID: PMC7352974 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12061400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Revised: 05/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are small membrane vesicles released by all cells and involved in intercellular communication. Importantly, EVs cargo includes nucleic acids, lipids, and proteins constantly transferred between different cell types, contributing to autocrine and paracrine signaling. In recent years, they have been shown to play vital roles, not only in normal biological functions, but also in pathological conditions, such as cancer. In the multistep process of cancer progression, EVs act at different levels, from stimulation of neoplastic transformation, proliferation, promotion of angiogenesis, migration, invasion, and formation of metastatic niches in distant organs, to immune escape and therapy resistance. Moreover, as products of their parental cells, reflecting their genetic signatures and phenotypes, EVs hold great promise as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Importantly, their potential to overcome the current limitations or the present diagnostic procedures has created interest in bladder cancer (BCa). Indeed, cystoscopy is an invasive and costly technique, whereas cytology has poor sensitivity for early staged and low-grade disease. Several urine-based biomarkers for BCa were found to overcome these limitations. Here, we review their potential advantages and downfalls. In addition, recent literature on the potential of EVs to improve BCa management was reviewed and discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Castanheira de Oliveira
- i3S—Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; (H.R.C.); (M.J.O.); (A.F.); (M.H.V.)
- Tumor & Microenvironment Interactions Group, INEB - Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- Department of Urology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Porto, 4099-001 Porto, Portugal
- ICBAS-Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, University of Porto, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
- Correspondence: (M.C.d.O.); (R.R.); Tel.: +351-222-077-502 (M.C.d.O.); +351-912-157-736 (R.R.)
| | - Hugo R. Caires
- i3S—Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; (H.R.C.); (M.J.O.); (A.F.); (M.H.V.)
- Cancer Drug Resistance Group, IPATIMUP - Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
| | - Maria J. Oliveira
- i3S—Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; (H.R.C.); (M.J.O.); (A.F.); (M.H.V.)
- Tumor & Microenvironment Interactions Group, INEB - Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
| | - Avelino Fraga
- i3S—Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; (H.R.C.); (M.J.O.); (A.F.); (M.H.V.)
- Tumor & Microenvironment Interactions Group, INEB - Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- Department of Urology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Porto, 4099-001 Porto, Portugal
- ICBAS-Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, University of Porto, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
| | - M. Helena Vasconcelos
- i3S—Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; (H.R.C.); (M.J.O.); (A.F.); (M.H.V.)
- Cancer Drug Resistance Group, IPATIMUP - Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- Department of Biological Sciences, FFUP—Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
| | - Ricardo Ribeiro
- i3S—Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; (H.R.C.); (M.J.O.); (A.F.); (M.H.V.)
- Tumor & Microenvironment Interactions Group, INEB - Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- Laboratory of Genetics and Instituto de Saúde Ambiental, Faculdade de Medicina, University of Lisbon, 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, 3004-561 Coimbra, Portugal
- Correspondence: (M.C.d.O.); (R.R.); Tel.: +351-222-077-502 (M.C.d.O.); +351-912-157-736 (R.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Agreda Castañeda F, Raventós Busquets C, Morote Robles J. Urinary markers in the surveillance of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. A literature review. Actas Urol Esp 2019; 43:404-413. [PMID: 31097210 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2019.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The surveillance of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is usually performed by cystoscopy and cytology. Until today, no effective urinary biomarker has been used to reduce the morbidity and cost associated with these procedures. OBJECTIVE To describe the performance of urinary biomarkers in the surveillance of NMIBC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION on August 1, 2018, a bibliographic search was carried out in Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library, limited to the last 10 years, with the terms: bladder cancer, recurrence, detection and urine marker.973 registers were obtained, and 27 publications were selected following the PRISMA recommendations. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The negative predictive values (NPV) of several assays could reduce the number of cystoscopies in NMIBC surveillance. Six transcription-factor trials had an NPV rate greater than 90%, and one of them can be performed at the control point. Six transcription-factors evaluations describe anticipated diagnosis between 68% and 83% of their "false positives". Two transcription factors and one protein assays proved reduction between 23% and 35% of surveillance cystoscopies. Nowadays, cell-based assays are restricted to reflex test after doubtful cytologies. CONCLUSION There are few studies analysing the improvement of the NMIBC surveillance protocols. Several transcription factor assays are more precise and allow anticipatory diagnosis. Currently, there are no comparative studies between alternative surveillance protocols and classic ones.
Collapse
|
10
|
UBC ® Rapid Test-A Urinary Point-of-Care (POC) Assay for Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer with a focus on Non-Muscle Invasive High-Grade Tumors: Results of a Multicenter-Study. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19:ijms19123841. [PMID: 30513851 PMCID: PMC6321532 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19123841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2018] [Revised: 10/30/2018] [Accepted: 11/29/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives: UBC®Rapid Test measures soluble fragments of cytokeratins 8 and 18 in urine. We present results of a multicenter study using an updated version of UBC®Rapid Test in bladder cancer patients, patients with urinary bladder cancer positive history, and healthy controls. Material and Methods: In total 530 urine samples have been included in this study. Clinical urine samples were used from 242 patients with tumors of the urinary bladder (134 non-muscle-invasive low-grade tumors (NMI-LG), 48 non-muscle-invasive high-grade tumors (NMI-HG), and 60 muscle-invasive high-grade tumors (MI-HG)), 62 patients with non-evidence of disease (NED), and 226 healthy controls. Urine samples were analyzed by the UBC® Rapid point-of-care (POC) assay and evaluated by Concile Omega 100 POC Reader. All statistical analyses have been performed using R version 3.2.3. Results: Elevated levels of UBC® Rapid Test in urine are higher in patients with bladder cancer in comparison to the control group (p < 0.001). The sensitivity for the whole bladder cancer cohort was 53.3% (positive predictive value (PPV) 90.2%, negative predictive value (NPV) 65.2%) and was 38.8% (PPV 78.8%, NPV 72.1%) for non-muscle-invasive low-grade bladder cancer; 75.0% (PPV 72.0%, NPV 94.7%) for non-muscle-invasive high-grade bladder cancer and 68.3% (PPV 74.6%, NPV 91.8%) for muscle-invasive high-grade bladder cancer. The specificity for the statistical calculations was 93.8%. The cut-off value (10 µg/L) was evaluated for the whole patient cohort. The area under the curve of the quantitative UBC® Rapid Test using the optimal threshold obtained by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was 0.774. Elevated values of UBC®Rapid Test in urine are higher in patients with high-grade bladder cancer in comparison to low-grade tumors and the healthy control group. Conclusions: UBC®Rapid Test has potential to be a clinically valuable urinary protein biomarker for detection of high-grade bladder cancer patients and could be added in the management of NMI-HG tumors. UBC®Rapid results generated in both study centers in the present multicenter study are very similar and reproducible. Furthermore UBC®Rapid Test is standardized and calibrated and thus independent of used batch of test as well as study site.
Collapse
|
11
|
Lu P, Cui J, Chen K, Lu Q, Zhang J, Tao J, Han Z, Zhang W, Song R, Gu M. Diagnostic accuracy of the UBC ® Rapid Test for bladder cancer: A meta-analysis. Oncol Lett 2018; 16:3770-3778. [PMID: 30127987 PMCID: PMC6096060 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.9089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2017] [Accepted: 05/30/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Bladder cancer is one of the most common cancer types globally. The UBC® Rapid Test is a potential novel diagnostic method for bladder cancer, but studies into its accuracy have produced inconsistent results. Thus, the present meta-analysis was conducted in order to determine the overall accuracy of the UBC® Rapid Test in detecting bladder cancer. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Chinese WanFang and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases for relevant studies. Quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies 2 was used to assess the quality of each included study. The diagnostic accuracy of the UBC® Rapid Test was evaluated by pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and the area under the curve (AUC). In addition, Deeks' funnel plot was used to evaluate potential publication bias. Eight studies were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. The results were as follows: Sensitivity 0.59 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.55–0.62], specificity 0.76 (95% CI, 0.72–0.80), PLR 2.55 (95% CI, 1.75–3.70), NLR 0.56 (95% CI, 0.46–0.67), DOR 4.88 (95% CI, 2.82–8.45) and AUC 0.70 (95% CI, 0.67–0.74). According to the present results, the UBC® rapid test is highly accurate in the diagnosis of bladder cancer, however, further studies with better-designed and larger samples are required in order to support the results of the present study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei Lu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, P.R. China
| | - Jianchun Cui
- Department of Urology, The Jianhu County Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Jianhu, Jiangsu 224700, P.R. China
| | - Keliang Chen
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, P.R. China
| | - Qiang Lu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, P.R. China
| | - Jiexiu Zhang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, P.R. China
| | - Jun Tao
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, P.R. China
| | - Zhijian Han
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, P.R. China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, P.R. China
| | - Rijin Song
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, P.R. China
| | - Min Gu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tan WS, Tan WP, Tan MY, Khetrapal P, Dong L, deWinter P, Feber A, Kelly JD. Novel urinary biomarkers for the detection of bladder cancer: A systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev 2018; 69:39-52. [PMID: 29902678 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2018] [Revised: 05/24/2018] [Accepted: 05/27/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urinary biomarkers for the diagnosis of bladder cancer represents an area of considerable research which has been tested in both patients presenting with haematuria and non-muscle invasive bladder cancer patients requiring surveillance cystoscopy. In this systematic review, we identify and appraise the diagnostic sensitive and specificity of reported novel biomarkers of different 'omic' class and highlight promising biomarkers investigated to date. METHODS A MEDLINE/Pubmed systematic search was performed between January 2013 and July 2017 using the following keywords: (bladder cancer OR transitional cell carcinoma OR urothelial cell carcinoma) AND (detection OR diagnosis) AND urine AND (biomarker OR assay). All studies had a minimum of 20 patients in both bladder cancer and control arms and reported sensitivity and/or specificity and/or receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess risk of bias and applicability of studies. The search protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42016049918). RESULTS Systematic search yielded 115 reports were included for analysis. In single target biomarkers had a sensitivity of 2-94%, specificity of 46-100%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 47-100% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 21-94%. Multi-target biomarkers achieved a sensitivity of 24-100%, specificity of 48-100%, PPV of 42-95% and NPV of 32-100%. 50 studies achieved a sensitivity and specificity of ≥80%. Protein (n = 59) and transcriptomic (n = 21) biomarkers represents the most studied biomarkers. Multi-target biomarker panels had a better diagnostic accuracy compared to single biomarker targets. Urinary cytology with urinary biomarkers improved the diagnostic ability of the biomarker. The sensitivity and specificity of biomarkers were higher for primary diagnosis compared to patients in the surveillance setting. Most studies were case control studies and did not have a predefined threshold to determine a positive test result indicating a possible risk of bias. CONCLUSION This comprehensive systematic review provides an update on urinary biomarkers of different 'omic' class and highlights promising biomarkers. Few biomarkers achieve a high sensitivity and negative predictive value. Such biomarkers will require external validation in a prospective observational setting before adoption in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Shen Tan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, 3rd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital at Westmoreland Street, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London W1G 8PH, UK.
| | - Wei Phin Tan
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, 1653 W Congress Pkwy, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | - Mae-Yen Tan
- School of Public Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Pramit Khetrapal
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, 3rd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital at Westmoreland Street, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London W1G 8PH, UK
| | - Liqin Dong
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Patricia deWinter
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, 3rd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK
| | - Andrew Feber
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, Paul O'Gorman Building, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - John D Kelly
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, 3rd Floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital at Westmoreland Street, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London W1G 8PH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dhondt B, Van Deun J, Vermaerke S, de Marco A, Lumen N, De Wever O, Hendrix A. Urinary extracellular vesicle biomarkers in urological cancers: From discovery towards clinical implementation. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2018; 99:236-256. [PMID: 29654900 DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2018.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2017] [Revised: 04/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Urine contains cellular elements, biochemicals, and proteins derived from glomerular filtration of plasma, renal tubule excretion, and urogenital tract secretions that reflect an individual's metabolic and pathophysiologic state. Despite intensive research into the discovery of urinary biomarkers to facilitate early diagnosis, accurate prognosis and prediction of therapy response in urological cancers, none of these markers has reached widespread use. Their implementation into daily clinical practice is hampered by a substantial degree of heterogeneity in performance characteristics and uncertainty about reliability, clinical utility and cost-effectiveness, in addition to several technical limitations. Extracellular vesicles (EV) have raised interest as a potential source of biomarker discovery because of their role in intercellular communication and the resemblance of their molecular content to that of the releasing cells. We review currently used urinary biomarkers in the clinic and attempts that have been made to identify EV-derived biomarkers for urological cancers. In addition, we discuss technical and methodological considerations towards their clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bert Dhondt
- Laboratory of Experimental Cancer Research, Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jan Van Deun
- Laboratory of Experimental Cancer Research, Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Silke Vermaerke
- Laboratory of Experimental Cancer Research, Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ario de Marco
- Laboratory for Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Nova Gorica, Vipava, Slovenia
| | - Nicolaas Lumen
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Olivier De Wever
- Laboratory of Experimental Cancer Research, Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - An Hendrix
- Laboratory of Experimental Cancer Research, Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gleichenhagen J, Arndt C, Casjens S, Meinig C, Gerullis H, Raiko I, Brüning T, Ecke T, Johnen G. Evaluation of a New Survivin ELISA and UBC ® Rapid for the Detection of Bladder Cancer in Urine. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19:ijms19010226. [PMID: 29324722 PMCID: PMC5796175 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19010226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2017] [Revised: 12/20/2017] [Accepted: 01/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Urine-based biomarkers for non-invasive diagnosis of bladder cancer are urgently needed. No single marker with sufficient sensitivity and specificity has been described so far. Thus, a combination of markers appears to be a promising approach. The aim of this case-control study was to evaluate the performance of an in-house developed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for survivin, the UBC®Rapid test, and the combination of both assays. A total of 290 patients were recruited. Due to prior bladder cancer, 46 patients were excluded. Urine samples were available from 111 patients with bladder cancer and 133 clinical controls without urologic diseases. Antibodies generated from recombinant survivin were utilized to develop a sandwich ELISA. The ELISA and the UBC®Rapid test were applied to all urine samples. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate marker performance. The survivin ELISA exhibited a sensitivity of 35% with a specificity of 98%. The UBC®Rapid test showed a sensitivity of 56% and a specificity of 96%. Combination of both assays increased the sensitivity to 66% with a specificity of 95%. For high-grade tumors, the combination showed a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 95%. The new survivin ELISA and the UBC®Rapid test are both able to detect bladder cancer, especially high-grade tumors. However, the performance of each individual marker is moderate and efforts to improve the survivin assay should be pursued. A combination of both assays confirmed the benefit of using marker panels. The results need further testing in a prospective study and with a high-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Gleichenhagen
- Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr-University Bochum (IPA), 44789 Bochum, Germany.
| | - Christian Arndt
- Department of Urology, Lukaskrankenhaus Neuss, 41464 Neuss, Germany.
| | - Swaantje Casjens
- Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr-University Bochum (IPA), 44789 Bochum, Germany.
| | - Carmen Meinig
- Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr-University Bochum (IPA), 44789 Bochum, Germany.
| | - Holger Gerullis
- University Hospital for Urology, Klinikum Oldenburg, 26133 Oldenburg, Germany.
| | - Irina Raiko
- Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr-University Bochum (IPA), 44789 Bochum, Germany.
| | - Thomas Brüning
- Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr-University Bochum (IPA), 44789 Bochum, Germany.
| | - Thorsten Ecke
- Department of Urology, HELIOS Hospital, 15526 Bad Saarow, Germany.
| | - Georg Johnen
- Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr-University Bochum (IPA), 44789 Bochum, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|