1
|
Soputro NA, Chavali JS, Ramos-Carpinteyro R, Mikesell C, Pedraza AM, Kaouk JH. Perioperative Complications of Single-Port and Multiport Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Single Institutional Comparison Analysis. J Endourol 2024; 38:450-457. [PMID: 38420656 DOI: 10.1089/end.2023.0652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Following its introduction in 2018, the Single-Port (SP) robotic platform has been increasingly utilized for various approaches of robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP). Despite the demonstrable benefits in enhancing postoperative outcomes, there has been limited evidence on its perioperative morbidity, especially when compared to the gold-standard multiport (MP). This study sought to compare the perioperative morbidity between SP and MP-RARP. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on 911 patients who underwent RARP between January 2015 and May 2023. At our institution, SP-RARP has been performed since October 2018 with Extraperitoneal and Transvesical (TV) techniques. To reduce the risk of selection bias, only MP-RARP cases performed before October 2018 were included. Baseline clinicodemographic and perioperative parameters were collected. Perioperative complications were classified in accordance to the Clavien-Dindo system with postoperative complications and readmission reported within 90 days of surgery. Statistical analysis was performed with R Packages for Statistical Computing with descriptive statistics as presented. Results: Of the 484 SP and 322 MP-RARP cases included in our analysis, one intraoperative complication was reported, which pertained to a small enterotomy during TV SP-RARP. Postoperative complications were identified in 14.5% and 14.6% of SP and MP-RARP cases (p = 0.989), respectively. Major complication represents 4.1% of the SP and 3.4% of MP cohorts. The 90-day rates of hospital readmission following SP and MP-RARP were 5.6% and 4.9%, respectively (p = 0.717). Limitations of this study included the retrospective single surgeon, single institution nature of our series that also included the early learning curve experience associated with the novel SP platform. Conclusion: This comparative study provided evidence highlighting the low rates of perioperative complication and readmission following SP-RARP that were comparable to the Transperitoneal MP approach. The low morbidity associated with SP-RARP supports its wider application as an addition to the contemporary minimally invasive surgical armamentariums for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas A Soputro
- Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Jaya S Chavali
- Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Roxana Ramos-Carpinteyro
- Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Carter Mikesell
- Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Adriana M Pedraza
- Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Jihad H Kaouk
- Department of Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhu W, Wu L, Xie W, Zhang G, Gu Y, Hou Y, He Y. Wound infection in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with retropubic radical prostate surgery: A meta-analysis. Int Wound J 2023; 20:3550-3557. [PMID: 37675805 PMCID: PMC10588328 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2023] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
A meta-analysis investigation was executed to measure the wound infection (WI) in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RRP) compared with retropubic radical prostate surgery (RRPS). A comprehensive literature investigation till February 2023 was applied, and 1197 interrelated investigations were reviewed. The 19 chosen investigations enclosed 107 153 individuals with prostate cancer (PC) at the starting point. 72 008 of them were utilising RRP, and 35 145 were utilising RRPS. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was utilised to compute the value of the WI in RRP compared with RRPS by the dichotomous approaches and a fixed or random model. RRP had significantly lower surgical site wound infection (SSWI) (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.21-0.52, P < .001) and infected lymphoceles (ILs) (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.22-0.92, P = .03) compared with RRPS in individuals with PC. RRP had significantly lower SSWI and ILs compared with RRPS in individuals with PC. However, care must be exercised when dealing with its values because of the low sample size of some of the nominated investigations for the meta-analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Zhu
- The Department of Urologythe First Hospital of Jiaxing & The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing UniversityZhejiangChina
| | - Lingfeng Wu
- The Department of Urologythe First Hospital of Jiaxing & The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing UniversityZhejiangChina
| | - Wenhua Xie
- The Department of Urologythe First Hospital of Jiaxing & The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing UniversityZhejiangChina
| | - Gaoyue Zhang
- The Department of Urologythe First Hospital of Jiaxing & The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing UniversityZhejiangChina
| | - Yanqin Gu
- The Department of Urologythe First Hospital of Jiaxing & The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing UniversityZhejiangChina
| | - Yansong Hou
- The Department of Urologythe First Hospital of Jiaxing & The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing UniversityZhejiangChina
| | - Yi He
- The Department of Urologythe First Hospital of Jiaxing & The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing UniversityZhejiangChina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Farzat M, Elsherif M, Wagenlehner FM. How May Longer Console Times Influence Outcomes after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP)? J Clin Med 2023; 12:4022. [PMID: 37373715 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12124022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Longer operating time in radical prostatectomy may increase the risk of perioperative complications. Various factors such as cancer extent, the procedure's level of difficulty, habitus and previous surgeries may lengthen robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and therefore compromise outcomes. OBJECTIVE this study investigates the influence of operating time on outcomes after RARP in real life settings in a monocentric single surgeon study. METHODS a total of 500 sequential patients who were operated on between April 2019 and August 2022 were involved. Men were allocated to three groups short (n = 157; 31.4%), under or equal to 120 min; average (n = 255; 51%), between 121 and 180 min; long (n = 88; 17.6%), above 180 min console time. Demographic, baseline and perioperative data were analyzed and compared between groups. Univariate logistic regression was completed to investigate the association between console time and outcomes and to predict factors which may prolong surgery. RESULTS hospital stay and catheter days were significantly longer in group 3 with medians of 6 and 7 days (p < 0.001 and <0.001, respectively). Those findings were confirmed in univariate analysis, with p = 0.012 for catheter days and p < 0.001 for hospital stay. Moreover, major complications were higher in patients with longer procedures, at p = 0.008. Prostate volume was the only predictor of a prolonged console time (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION RARP is a safe procedure and most patients will be discharged uneventfully. Yet, a longer console time is associated with a longer hospital stay, longer catheter days and major complications. Caution has to be taken in the large prostate to avoid longer procedures, which may prevent postoperative adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoud Farzat
- Department of Urology and Robotic Urology, Diakonie Klinikum Siegen, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Andrology, Justus-Liebig University of Giessen, 35390 Giessen, Germany
| | - Mohamed Elsherif
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut 2020, Lebanon
| | - Florian M Wagenlehner
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Andrology, Justus-Liebig University of Giessen, 35390 Giessen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Farzat M, Sharabaty I, Tanislav C, Alsaid Y, Wagenlehner FM. BMI Impact on Readmissions for Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Monocentric, Single-Surgeon Serial Analysis of 500 Cases. J Clin Med 2023; 12:3908. [PMID: 37373603 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12123908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Due to more difficult intraoperative courses, elevated rates of case abortion and unfavored postoperative outcomes in obese patients, urologists tend to consider other therapeutic modalities than prostate removal in very obese patients. With the surge in robotic surgery in the last two decades, more obese patients have undergone robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). OBJECTIVE This current, monocentric, retrospective serial study investigates primarily the impact of obesity on readmissions and secondarily the major complications of RARP. METHODS Five hundred patients from one referral center who underwent RARP between April 2019 and August 2022 were included in this retrospective study. To investigate the impact of patient BMI on postoperative outcomes, we divided our cohort into two groups with a cut-off of 30 kg/m2 (according to the WHO definition). Demographic and perioperative data were analyzed. Postoperative complications and readmission rates were compared between standard, normal patients (NOBMI-BMI under 30; n = 336, 67.2%) and overweight patients (OBMI-BMI equal to/more than 30; n = 164, 32.8%). RESULTS OBMI patients had bigger prostates on TRUS, more comorbidities and worse baseline erectile function scores. They also received fewer nerve-sparing procedures than their counterparts (p = 0.005). Analysis showed no statistically significant differences in readmission rates or in minor or major complications (p = 0.336, 0.464 and 0.316, respectively). In a univariate analysis, BMI could predict positive surgical margins (p = 0.021). CONCLUSION Performing RARP in obese patients seems to be safe and feasible, without major adverse events or elevated readmission rates. Obese patients should be informed preoperatively about the elevated risk of higher PSMs and technically more difficult nerve-sparing procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoud Farzat
- Department of Robotic Urology, Diakonie Klinikum Siegen, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Andrology, Justus-Liebig University of Giessen, 35390 Giessen, Germany
| | - Ismail Sharabaty
- Department of Robotic Urology, Diakonie Klinikum Siegen, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Christian Tanislav
- Department of Geriatric and Neurology, Diakonie Klinkum Siegen, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Yaman Alsaid
- Department of Urology, St. Josef Hospital Engelskirchen, 51766 Engelskirchen, Germany
| | - Florian M Wagenlehner
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Andrology, Justus-Liebig University of Giessen, 35390 Giessen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Farzat M, Rosenbauer J, Tanislav C, Wagenlehner FM. Prostate Volume Influence on Postoperative Outcomes for Patients Undergoing RARP: A Monocentric Serial Analysis of 500 Cases. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12072491. [PMID: 37048575 PMCID: PMC10095532 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12072491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Elevated prostate volume is considered to negatively influence postoperative outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). We aim to investigate the influence of prostate volume on readmissions and complications after RARP. Methods: A total of 500 consecutive patients who underwent RARP between April 2019 and August 2022 were included. Patients were dichotomized into two groups using a prostate volume cut-off of 50 mL (small and normal prostate (SNP) n = 314, 62.8%; large prostate n = 186, 37.2%). Demographic, baseline, and perioperative data were analyzed. The postoperative complications and readmission rates within 90 days after RARP were compared between groups. A univariate linear analysis was performed to investigate the association between prostate volume and other relevant outcomes. Results: Patients with larger prostates had a higher IPSS score, and therefore, more relevant LUTS at the baseline. They had higher ASA scores (p = 0.015). They also had more catheter days (mean 6.6 days for SNP vs. 7.5 days for LP) (p = 0.041). All oncological outcomes were similar between the groups. Although statistical analysis showed no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.062), a trend for minor complications in patients with larger prostates, n = 37/186 (19.8%) for the LP group vs. n = 37/314 (11.7%) in the SNP group, was observed. Namely, acute urinary retention and secondary anastomosis insufficiency. Major complications with an SNP (4.4%) and LP (3.7%) (p = 0.708) and readmissions with an SNP (6.25%) and LP (4.2%) (p = 0.814) were infrequent and distributed equally between the groups. In univariate analysis, prostate volume could solely predict a longer console time (p = 0.005). Conclusions: A higher prostate volume appears to have minimal influence on the perioperative course after RARP. It can prolong catheter days and increase the incidence of minor complications such as acute urinary retention. However, it might predict minor changes in operating time. Yet, prostate volume has less influence on major complications, readmissions, or oncological results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoud Farzat
- Department of Urology and Robotic Urology, Diakonie Klinikum Siegen, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Andrology, Justus-Liebig University of Giessen, 35390 Giessen, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-1737506737
| | - Josef Rosenbauer
- Department of Geriatric and Neurology, Diakonie Klinkum Siegen, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Christian Tanislav
- Department of Geriatric and Neurology, Diakonie Klinkum Siegen, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Florian M. Wagenlehner
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Andrology, Justus-Liebig University of Giessen, 35390 Giessen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Radical prostatectomy readmissions: Causes, risk factors, national rates, & costs. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:106.e1-106.e8. [PMID: 36402714 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.10.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Readmissions have substantial clinical and financial impacts on the healthcare system. Radical prostatectomy (RP) is considered a standard treatment in the management of clinically localized prostate cancer. Yet, there is a paucity of research evaluating readmissions for RP in a national dataset. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer managed with RP were identified within the 2016 to 2018 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patient factors, facility factors, and surgical characteristics were evaluated for associations with readmission using univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS A total of 133,727 patients receiving RP were identified. Early (30-day) and late (31-90-day) readmission rates were 4.2% and 1.8% respectively. The most common cause of early readmission was postoperative digestive system complication (10%) and the most common cause of late readmission was septicemia (13%). On multivariable logistic regression, factors associated with both early and late readmission include nonroutine discharge at index (early: OR 1.877, 95% CI 1.667-2.113; late: OR 1.801, 95% CI 1.490-2.183), and circulatory system comorbidity (early: OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.082-1.538); late: OR 1.515, 95% CI 1.157-1.984). CONCLUSIONS Our findings regarding factors associated with readmission provide insight for RP counseling and may inform postoperative care pathways. Elucidation of readmission trends may allow the identification and proactive management of patients at higher risk for readmission.
Collapse
|
7
|
Porcaro AB, Rizzetto R, Amigoni N, Tafuri A, Bianchi A, Gallina S, Orlando R, Serafin E, Gozzo A, Cerrato C, Di Filippo G, Migliorini F, Antoniolli SZ, Novella G, De Marco V, Brunelli M, Cerruto MA, Polati E, Antonelli A. American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) Physical Status System and Risk of Major Clavien-Dindo Complications After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy at Hospital Discharge: Analysis of 1143 Consecutive Prostate Cancer Patients. Indian J Surg Oncol 2022; 13:848-857. [PMID: 36687253 PMCID: PMC9845474 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-022-01577-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To test the hypothesis of associations of preoperative physical status system with major postoperative complications at hospital discharge in prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Materials and Methods In a period ranging from January 2013 to October 2020, 1143 patients were evaluated. The physical status was assessed by the American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) system, which was computed trained anesthesiologists. The Clavien-Dindo system was used to classify postoperative complications, which were coded as major if greater than 1. Results ASA physical status system included class I in 102 patients (8.9%), class II in 934 subjects (81.7%), and class III in 107 cases (9.4%). Clavien-Dindo complications were distributed as follows: grade 1: 141 cases (12.3%), grade 2: 108 patients (9.4%), grade 3a: 5 subjects (0.4%), grade 3b: 9 patients (0.8%), and grade 4a: 3 cases (0.3%). Overall, major complications were detected in 125 cases (10.9%). On multivariate analysis, major Clavien-Dindo complications were predicted by ASA score grade II (adjusted odds ratio, OR = 2.538; 95%CI 1.007-6.397; p = 0.048) and grade III (adjusted OR 3.468; 95%CI 1.215-9.896; p = 0.020) independently by pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) and/or blood lost. Conclusion In RARP surgery, the risk of major postoperative Clavien-Dindo complications increased as the physical status system deteriorated independently by performing or not a PLND and/or large intraoperative blood lost. The ASA score system was an effective predictor of major Clavien-Dindo complications, which delayed LOHS in RARP surgery. Confirmatory studies are required. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13193-022-01577-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Present Address: Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Present Address: Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Nelia Amigoni
- Present Address: Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Tafuri
- Present Address: Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Present Address: Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Present Address: Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Rossella Orlando
- Present Address: Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Emanuele Serafin
- Present Address: Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandra Gozzo
- Present Address: Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Clara Cerrato
- Present Address: Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Giacomo Di Filippo
- Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Present Address: Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Zecchini Antoniolli
- Present Address: Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Novella
- Present Address: Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo De Marco
- Present Address: Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Present Address: Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Enrico Polati
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Present Address: Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Porcaro AB, Rizzetto R, Bianchi A, Gallina S, Serafin E, Panunzio A, Tafuri A, Cerrato C, Migliorini F, Zecchini Antoniolli S, Novella G, De Marco V, Brunelli M, Siracusano S, Cerruto MA, Polati E, Antonelli A. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status system predicts the risk of postoperative Clavien–Dindo complications greater than one at 90 days after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: final results of a tertiary referral center. J Robot Surg 2022; 17:987-993. [DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01505-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
9
|
Bratt O, Carlsson S, Fransson P, Thellenberg Karlsson C, Stranne J, Kindblom J. The Swedish national guidelines on prostate cancer, part 1: early detection, diagnostics, staging, patient support and primary management of non-metastatic disease. Scand J Urol 2022; 56:265-273. [PMID: 35811480 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2022.2094462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is now an unprecedented amount of evidence to consider when revising prostate cancer guidelines. We believe that there is a value in publishing summaries of national clinical guidelines in English for others to read and comment on. METHODS This is part 1 of a summary of the Swedish prostate cancer guidelines that were published in June 2022. It covers the early detection, diagnostics, staging, patient support and management of the non-metastatic disease. Part 2 covers recurrence after local treatment and management of the metastatic disease. RESULTS The 2022 Swedish guidelines include several new recommendations: rectal iodine-povidone to reduce post-biopsy infections, external beam radiation with focal boost to the tumour, use of a pre-rectal spacer to reduce rectal side effects after external beam radiotherapy in some expert centres, 6 months' concomitant and adjuvant rather than neoadjuvant and concomitant hormonal treatment together with radiotherapy for unfavourable intermediate and high-risk disease, and adjuvant abiraterone plus prednisolone together with a GnRH agonist for a subgroup of men with very high-risk disease. The Swedish guidelines differ from the European by having more restrictive recommendations regarding genetic testing and pelvic lymph node dissection, the risk group classification, recommending ultra-hypofractionated (7 fractions) external radiotherapy for intermediate and selected high-risk cancers, by not recommending any hormonal treatment together with radiotherapy for favourable intermediate-risk disease, and by recommending bicalutamide monotherapy instead of a GnRH agonist for some patient groups. CONCLUSIONS The 2022 Swedish prostate cancer guidelines include several new recommendations and some that differ from the European guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ola Bratt
- Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.,Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Göteborg, Sweden
| | - Stefan Carlsson
- Section of Urology, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per Fransson
- Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | | | - Johan Stranne
- Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.,Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Göteborg, Sweden
| | - Jon Kindblom
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ploussard G, Grabia A, Barret E, Beauval JB, Brureau L, Créhange G, Dariane C, Fiard G, Fromont G, Gauthé M, Mathieu R, Renard-Penna R, Roubaud G, Ruffion A, Sargos P, Rouprêt M, Lequeu CE. Annual nationwide analysis of costs and post-operative outcomes after radical prostatectomy according to the surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, and robotic). World J Urol 2021; 40:419-425. [PMID: 34773475 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03878-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Annual countrywide data are scarce when comparing surgical approaches in terms of hospital stay outcomes and costs for radical prostatectomy (RP). We aimed to assess the impact of surgical approach on post-operative outcomes and costs after RP by comparing open (ORP), laparoscopic (LRP), and robot-assisted (RARP) RP in the French healthcare system. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data from all patients undergoing RP in France in 2020 were extracted from the central database of the national healthcare system. Primary endpoints were length of hospital stay (LOS including intensive care unit (ICU) stay if present), complications (estimated by severity index), hospital readmission rates (at 30 and 90 days), and direct costs of initial stay. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 19,018 RPs were performed consisting in ORP in 21.1%, LRP in 27.6%, and RARP in 51.3% of cases. RARP was associated with higher center volume (p < 0.001), lower complication rates (p < 0.001), shorter LOS (p < 0.001), and lower readmission rates (p = 0.004). RARP was associated with reduced direct stay costs (2286 euros) compared with ORP (4298 euros) and LRP (3101 euros). The main cost driver was length of stay. The main limitations were the lack of mid-term data, readmission details, and cost variations due to surgery system. CONCLUSIONS This nationwide analysis demonstrates the benefits of RARP in terms of post-operative short-term outcomes. Higher costs related to the robotic system appear to be balanced by patient care improvements and reduced direct costs due to shorter LOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Ploussard
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hôpital, 52, Chemin de Ribaute, 31130, Quint Fonsegrives, France.
- IUCT-O, Toulouse, France.
| | | | - Eric Barret
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Baptiste Beauval
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hôpital, 52, Chemin de Ribaute, 31130, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Laurent Brureau
- Department of Urology, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, University of Antilles, 97110, Pointe-à-Pitre, France
- Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en SantéEnvironnement et Travail)-UMR_S 1085, University of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | | | - Charles Dariane
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, APHP, Paris University-U1151 Inserm-INEM, Necker, Paris, France
| | - Gaëlle Fiard
- Department of Urology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC-IMAG, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Mathieu Gauthé
- UMR 1153, Unité de Recherche Clinique en Économie de la Santé, CRESS METHODS INSERM, Paris, France
| | | | - Raphaële Renard-Penna
- AP-HP, Radiology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, F-75013, Paris, France
| | - Guilhem Roubaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Alain Ruffion
- Service d'urologie Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Equipe 2-Centre d'Innovation en cancérologie de Lyon (EA 3738 CICLY), Faculté de Médecine Lyon Sud, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- AP-HP, Urology, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Porcaro AB, Rizzetto R, Amigoni N, Tafuri A, Shakir A, Tiso L, Cerrato C, Antoniolli SZ, Lacola V, Gozzo A, Odorizzi K, Orlando R, Di Filippo G, Brunelli M, Migliorini F, De Marco V, Artibani W, Cerruto MA, Antonelli A. Severe intraoperative bleeding predicts the risk of perioperative blood transfusion after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Robot Surg 2021; 16:463-471. [PMID: 34131882 PMCID: PMC8960588 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01262-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
To evaluate potential factors associated with the risk of perioperative blood transfusion (PBT) with implications on length of hospital stay (LOHS) and major post-operative complications in patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) as a primary treatment for prostate cancer (PCa). In a period ranging from January 2013 to August 2019, 980 consecutive patients who underwent RARP were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical factors such as intraoperative blood loss were evaluated. The association of factors with the risk of PBT was investigated by statistical methods. Overall, PBT was necessary in 39 patients (4%) in whom four were intraoperatively. Positive surgical margins, operating time and intraoperative blood loss were associated with perioperative blood transfusion on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, the risk of PBT was predicted by intraoperative blood loss (odds ratio, OR 1.002; 95% CI 1.001-1.002; p < 0.0001), which was associated with prolonged operating time and elevated body mass index (BMI). PBT was associated with delayed LOHS and Clavien-Dindo complications > 2. In patients undergoing RARP as a primary treatment for PCa, the risk of PBT represented a rare event that was predicted by severe intraoperative bleeding, which was associated with increased BMI as well as with prolonged operating time. In patients who received a PBT, prolonged LOHS as well as an elevated risk of major Clavien-Dindo complications were seen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, Piazzale Stefani, 137126, Verona, Italy.
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, Piazzale Stefani, 137126, Verona, Italy
| | - Nelia Amigoni
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, Piazzale Stefani, 137126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Tafuri
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, Piazzale Stefani, 137126, Verona, Italy. .,Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, G. D'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy.
| | - Aliasger Shakir
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Leone Tiso
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, Piazzale Stefani, 137126, Verona, Italy
| | - Clara Cerrato
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, Piazzale Stefani, 137126, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Zecchini Antoniolli
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, Piazzale Stefani, 137126, Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Lacola
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, Piazzale Stefani, 137126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandra Gozzo
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, Piazzale Stefani, 137126, Verona, Italy
| | - Katia Odorizzi
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, Piazzale Stefani, 137126, Verona, Italy
| | - Rossella Orlando
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, Piazzale Stefani, 137126, Verona, Italy
| | - Giacomo Di Filippo
- Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, Piazzale Stefani, 137126, Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo De Marco
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, Piazzale Stefani, 137126, Verona, Italy
| | - Walter Artibani
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, Piazzale Stefani, 137126, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, Piazzale Stefani, 137126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, Piazzale Stefani, 137126, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Latest Comprehensive Medical Resource Consumption in Robot-Assisted versus Laparoscopic and Traditional Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13071564. [PMID: 33805354 PMCID: PMC8037789 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have evaluated long-term medical monetary cost in patients with prostate cancer (PC) receiving open radical prostatectomy (ORP), laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP), or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest and longest follow-up study to examine medical monetary cost in patients with PC undergoing ORP, LRP, or RARP. After adjustment for confounders, the medical monetary cost in the RARP group was the least compared with that in the ORP and LRP groups. PURPOSE To estimate long-term medical resource consumption among patients with prostate cancer (PC) receiving open radical prostatectomy (ORP), laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP), or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). PATIENTS AND METHODS Participants were men enrolled in the Taiwan Cancer Registry with localized PC diagnosis who received radical prostatectomy. After adjustment for confounders, a generalized linear mixed model was used to determine significant differences in the number of urology outpatient clinic visits required, proportion of patients being hospitalized for urinary diseases or surgical complications, and medical reimbursement for urinary diseases or surgical complications following ORP, LRP, or RARP in the first, second, and third years. Results: No differences were observed in the median number of urology outpatient clinic visits between the three types of surgical modalities up to the second year after ORP, LRP, and RARP (median: 15, 10, and seven visits, respectively; p < 0.001), but significant differences were observed in the third year. Similarly, with RARP (10.9% versus 18.7% in ORP and 9.8% in LRP; p = 0.0014), the rate of hospitalization for urinary diseases or surgical complications decreased in the third year. Medical reimbursement for urinary diseases or surgical complications reduced after RARP compared with that for ORP and LRP, with approximately 22% reduction in the first year (p = 0.0052) and 20-40% reduction in the third year (p value = 0.0024). CONCLUSIONS Medical resource consumption in the RARP group was less compared with those in the ORP and LRP groups.
Collapse
|
13
|
Porcaro AB, Tafuri A, Rizzetto R, Amigoni N, Sebben M, Shakir A, Odorizzi K, Gozzo A, Gallina S, Bianchi A, Ornaghi PI, Antoniolli SZ, Lacola V, Brunelli M, Migliorini F, Cerruto MA, Siracusano S, Artibani W, Antonelli A. Predictors of complications occurring after open and robot-assisted prostate cancer surgery: a retrospective evaluation of 1062 consecutive patients treated in a tertiary referral high volume center. J Robot Surg 2021; 16:45-52. [PMID: 33559802 PMCID: PMC8863696 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01192-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
To investigate factors associated with the risk of major complications after radical prostatectomy (RP) by the open (ORP) or robot-assisted (RARP) approach for prostate cancer (PCa) in a tertiary referral center. 1062 consecutive patients submitted to RP were prospectively collected. The following outcomes were addressed: (1) overall postoperative complications: subjects with Clavien-Dindo System (CD) one through five versus cases without any complication; (2) moderate to major postoperative complications: cases with CD < 2 vs. ≥ 2, and 3) major post-operative complications: subjects with CDS CD ≥ 3 vs. < 3. The association of pre-operative and intra-operative factors with the risk of postoperative complications was assessed by the logistic regression model. Overall, complications occurred in 310 out of 1062 subjects (29.2%). Major complications occurred in 58 cases (5.5%). On multivariate analysis, major complications were predicted by PCa surgery and intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL). ORP compared to RARP increased the risk of major CD complications from 2.8 to 19.3% (OR = 8283; p < 0.0001). Performing ePLND increased the risk of major complications from 2.4 to 7.4% (OR = 3090; p < 0.0001). Assessing intraoperative blood loss, the risk of major postoperative complications was increased by BL above the third quartile when compared to subjects with intraoperative blood loss up to the third quartile (10.2% vs. 4.6%; OR = 2239; 95%CI: 1233-4064). In the present cohort, radical prostatectomy showed major postoperative complications that were independently predicted by the open approach, extended lymph-node dissection, and excessive intraoperative blood loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Tafuri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy. .,Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. D'Annunzio" University, Chieti-Pescara, Italy.
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Nelia Amigoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Sebben
- Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, IRCCS, Negrar, Italy
| | - Aliasger Shakir
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Katia Odorizzi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandra Gozzo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Paola Irene Ornaghi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Zecchini Antoniolli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Lacola
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Walter Artibani
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Simsir A, Kizilay F, Aliyev B, Kalemci S. Comparison of robotic and open radical prostatectomy: Initial experience of a single surgeon. Pak J Med Sci 2020; 37:167-174. [PMID: 33437271 PMCID: PMC7794139 DOI: 10.12669/pjms.37.1.2719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: In this study, we aimed to make a comprehensive comparison of the first hundred robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) cases of a single surgeon in a high-volume center. Methods: Preoperative, perioperative and postoperative data were collected retrospectively. Perioperative, oncological data and functional results in the first year were compared between the two groups. There were 204 RARPs between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2019, and 755 RRPs between April 1, 2007 and December 31, 2019. Results: While the operation time was in favor of the open group (117 vs 188 min, p<0.001), the estimated blood loss (328 vs 150 ml, p<0.001), blood transfusion rate (12 vs 2, p=0.021), and re-operation rate (6 vs 0, p=0.001) were in favor of the robotic group. Mean length of hospital stay (5.4 vs 3.1, p<0.001), urine leak rate (11 vs 2, p=0.033), complication rate (37 vs 16, p=0.018), and the 12th month continence rate (67 vs 85, p=0.002) were better in the robotic group. Conclusions: RARP may provide better perioperative outcomes and lower complication rates after the surgeon factor is eliminated in the early period. Since our case group includes the initial 100 patients, studies with larger patient groups with longer follow-up are needed to adapt these early results to general outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adnan Simsir
- Dr. Adnan Simsir, Department of Urology, Ege University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Fuat Kizilay
- Dr. Fuat Kizilay, Department of Urology, Ege University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Bayram Aliyev
- Dr. Bayram Aliyev, Department of Urology, Ege University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Serdar Kalemci
- Dr. Serdar Kalemci, Department of Urology, Ege University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
The impact of extended pelvic lymph node dissection on the risk of hospital readmission within 180 days after robot assisted radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 2020; 38:2799-2809. [PMID: 31980875 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03094-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the factors associated with the risk of hospital readmission after robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with or without extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) for prostate cancer (PCA) over a long term. MATERIALS AND METHODS The risk of readmission was evaluated by clinical, pathological, and perioperative factors. Skilled and experienced surgeons performed the procedures. Patients were followed for complications and hospital readmission for a period of six months. The logistic regression model and Cox's proportional hazards assessed the association of factors with the risk of readmission. RESULTS From January 2013 to December 2018, 890 patients underwent RARP; ePLND was performed in 495 of these patients. Hospital readmission was detected in 25 cases (2.8%); moreover, it was more frequent when RARP was performed with ePLND (4.4% of cases) than without (0.8% of patients). On the final multivariate model, ePLND was the only independent factor that was positively associated with the risk of hospital readmission (hazard ratio, HR = 5935; 95%CI 1777-19,831; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS Over the long term after RARP for PCA, the risk of hospital readmission is associated with ePLND. In patients who underwent RARP and ePLND, 4.4% of them had a readmission, compared to RARP alone, in which only 0.8% of cases had a readmission. When ePLND is planned for staging pelvic lymph nodes, patients should be informed of the increased risk of hospital readmission.
Collapse
|
16
|
|
17
|
Kostakis ID, Sran H, Uwechue R, Chandak P, Olsburgh J, Mamode N, Loukopoulos I, Kessaris N. Comparison Between Robotic and Laparoscopic or Open Anastomoses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. ROBOTIC SURGERY (AUCKLAND) 2019; 6:27-40. [PMID: 31921934 PMCID: PMC6934120 DOI: 10.2147/rsrr.s186768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2019] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Robotic surgery has been increasingly used in fashioning various surgical anastomoses. Our aim was to collect and analyze outcomes related to anastomoses performed using a robotic approach and compare them with those done using laparoscopic or open approaches through meta-analysis. METHODS A systematic review was conducted for articles comparing robotic with laparoscopic and/or open operations (colectomy, low anterior resection, gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), pancreaticoduodenectomy, radical cystectomy, pyeloplasty, radical prostatectomy, renal transplant) published up to June 2019 searching Medline, Scopus, Google Scholar, Clinical Trials and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies containing information about outcomes related to hand-sewn anastomoses were included for meta-analysis. Studies with stapled anastomoses or without relevant information about the anastomotic technique were excluded. We also excluded studies in which the anastomoses were performed extracorporeally in laparoscopic or robotic operations. RESULTS We included 83 studies referring to the aforementioned operations (4 randomized controlled and 79 non-randomized, 10 prospective and 69 retrospective) apart from colectomy and low anterior resection. Anastomoses done using robotic instruments provided similar results to those done using laparoscopic or open approach in regards to anastomotic leak or stricture. However, there were lower rates of stenosis in robotic than in laparoscopic RYGB (p=0.01) and in robotic than in open radical prostatectomy (p<0.00001). Moreover, all anastomoses needed more time to be performed using the robotic rather than the open approach in renal transplant (p≤0.001). CONCLUSION Robotic anastomoses provide equal outcomes with laparoscopic and open ones in most operations, with a few notable exceptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis D Kostakis
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy’s Hospital, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Harkiran Sran
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy’s Hospital, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Raphael Uwechue
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy’s Hospital, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Pankaj Chandak
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy’s Hospital, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jonathon Olsburgh
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy’s Hospital, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Nizam Mamode
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy’s Hospital, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ioannis Loukopoulos
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy’s Hospital, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Nicos Kessaris
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy’s Hospital, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sebben M, Tafuri A, Pirozzi M, Processali T, Rizzetto R, Amigoni N, Shakir A, De Michele M, Panunzio A, Cerrato C, Tiso L, Novella G, Brunelli M, Migliorini F, De Marco V, Siracusano S, Artibani W, Porcaro AB. Open approach, extended pelvic lymph node dissection, and seminal vesicle invasion are independent predictors of hospital readmission after prostate cancer surgery: a large retrospective study. MINERVA UROL NEFROL 2019; 72:72-81. [PMID: 31833722 DOI: 10.23736/s0393-2249.19.03586-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study is to evaluate factors (clinical, pathological and perioperative) associated with the risk of hospital readmission after radical prostatectomy (RP) over the long term in a single tertiary referral center where both open RP (ORP) and robot assisted RP (RARP) are performed. METHODS From January 2013 to December 2018 patients older than 18 years, who provided signed consent and underwent open or robot assisted radical prostatectomy were enrolled and retrospectively evaluated. Patients who underwent any previous prostate cancer (PCA) treatments were excluded. Specifically, skilled and experienced surgeons performed the two surgical approaches. Patients were followed for complications and hospital readmission (RAD) for a period of six months. The association of factors with the risk of readmission was assessed by Cox's multivariate proportional hazards. RESULTS A total of 1062 patients underwent RP. RARP was performed in 891 cases and ORP in 171 subjects. Extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) was performed in 651 patients. Hospital readmission occurred in 53 cases (5%). Based on the final multivariate model, independent factors associated with the risk of hospital readmission were seminal vesicle invasion (HR=2.093; 95% CI: 1.177-3.722), ORP (HR=4.393; 95% CI: 2.516-7.672) and ePLND (HR=4.418; 95% CI: 1.544-12.639). CONCLUSIONS ORP, ePLND and seminal vesicle invasion are independent predictors of the risk of hospital readmission over the long term at a large single tertiary referral center. When surgery is chosen as a primary treatment of PCA, patients should be informed of the risk of hospital readmission and related risk factors. Assessing seminal vesicle invasion by preoperative clinical staging identifies locally advanced disease, which is associated with an increased risk of hospital readmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Sebben
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Tafuri
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.,Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Marco Pirozzi
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Tania Processali
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Nelia Amigoni
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Aliasger Shakir
- Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mario De Michele
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Panunzio
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Clara Cerrato
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Leone Tiso
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Novella
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo De Marco
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Walter Artibani
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio B Porcaro
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy -
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Beech B, Follett G, Ghosh S, Rudzinski JK, McLarty R, Haines T, Dean N, Tong S, Fairey AS. Are urologic surgeons performing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at the University of Alberta meeting surgical quality performance benchmarks? The PROCURE-02 quality assurance study. Can Urol Assoc J 2019; 14:E369-E372. [PMID: 32209214 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a standard of care primary treatment for men with clinically localized prostate cancer (CLPC). The 2010 Canadian Urological Association (CUA) consensus guideline examining surgical quality performance for radical prostatectomy suggested benchmarks for surgical performance. To date, no study has examined whether Canadian surgeons are achieving these benchmarks. We determined the proportion of University of Alberta (UA) urologic surgeons achieving the CUA surgical quality performance outcome (SQPO) benchmarks. METHODS A retrospective quality assurance analysis of prospectively collected data from the PROstate Cancer Urosurgery Repository of Edmonton (PROCURE) was performed. Men who underwent RARP for CLPC between September 2007 and May 2018 by one of seven surgeons were analyzed. SQPO were an unadjusted pT2-R1 resection rate <25%, blood transfusion rate <10%, rectal injury rate <1%, and 90-day mortality rate <1%. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the proportion of surgeons achieving the benchmarks. RESULTS Data were evaluable for 2821 men. Seven of seven (100%) surgeons achieved a blood transfusion rate <10%, rectal injury rate <1%, and 90-day mortality rate <1%. However, only six of seven surgeons achieved an unadjusted pT2-R1 resection rate <25%; one surgeon had an unadjusted pT2-R1 resection rate of 27.9%. Limitations include the lack of centralized pathology review for surgical margin status by a dedicated genitourinary pathologist. CONCLUSIONS UA surgeons are achieving the CUA SQPO benchmarks for blood transfusion, rectal injury, and perioperative mortality. However, not all UA urologists are achieving a pT2-R1 resection rate <25%. Surgical quality performance initiatives designed to improve cancer control may be warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Beech
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Graeme Follett
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Sunita Ghosh
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Jan K Rudzinski
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Ryan McLarty
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Trevor Haines
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Nick Dean
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Steve Tong
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Adrian S Fairey
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tyritzis SI, Wilderäng U, Lantz ΑW, Steineck G, Hugosson J, Bjartell A, Stranne J, Haglind E, Wiklund NP. Hospital readmissions after limited vs. extended lymph node dissection during open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol 2019; 38:5.e1-5.e8. [PMID: 31445896 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2019] [Revised: 07/17/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Differences exist concerning when and how to perform lymph node dissection (LND) during radical prostatectomy due to lack of high-grade evidence to its safety and efficacy. We aimed to compare readmission rates between limited and extended LND during open radical prostatectomy (ORP) and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a prospective trial of 3,706 eligible patients comparing ORP vs. RARP (LAPPRO). Six hundred and twenty-seven underwent concomitant LND. Data were retrieved for readmissions within 90 days from surgery from the Swedish Patient Registry. Causes for readmissions were classified according to the modified Clavien-Dindo classification system. We estimated risks for readmission stratified by type of LND and surgical approach. RESULTS We recorded 107 readmissions in 90 patients. The overall readmission rate was 14% (90/627). In the open group, extended LND had a higher, but not statistically significant readmission rate of 18% compared to 11% after limited LND (95%CI 0.87-3.01). In the robot-assisted group, readmissions after extended LND did not differ from limited LND (15% vs. 18%, 95%CI 0.49-1.61). RARP with limited LND showed a higher risk for any (RR 1.98, 95%CI [1.02-3.81]) as well as Clavien-Dindo grade 1 to 2 readmissions (RR 2.49, 95%CI [1.10-5.63]) compared to open approach with limited LND. Robot-assisted extended LND reduced the risk for Clavien-Dindo grade 3 to 5 complications leading to readmissions compared to the open approach by 59% (RR 0.41, 95%CI [0.19-0.87]). CONCLUSIONS The risk for hospital readmission was similar when performing limited or extended LND during a radical prostatectomy. Robot-assisted technique for performing extended LND may decrease the risk for severe complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stavros I Tyritzis
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Urology, Karolinska Institute; Department of Urology, HYGEIA Hospital, Athens, Greece.
| | - Ulrica Wilderäng
- Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg
| | | | - Gunnar Steineck
- Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg; Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet
| | - Jonas Hugosson
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg
| | - Anders Bjartell
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital; Dept of Translational Medicine, Medical Faculty, Lund University, Sweden
| | - Johan Stranne
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg; Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Urology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Eva Haglind
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg
| | - Nils Peter Wiklund
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Urology, Karolinska Institute; Department of Urology, ICAHN School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Agreement between patient reported outcomes and clinical reports after radical prostatectomy - a prospective longitudinal study. BMC Urol 2019; 19:35. [PMID: 31068176 PMCID: PMC6505270 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-019-0467-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In clinical research information can be retrieved through various sources. The aim is to evaluate the agreement between answers in patient questionnaires and clinical reports in a study of patients after radical prostatectomy and patient characteristics associated with agreement between these two data sources. METHODS In the prospective non-randomized longitudinal trial LAParoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open (LAPPRO) 4003 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy at 14 centers in Sweden were followed. Analysis of agreement is made using a variety of methods, including the recently proposed Gwet's AC1, which enables us to handle the limitations of Cohen's Kappa where agreement depends on the underlying prevalence. RESULTS The incidence of postoperative events was consistently reported higher by the patient compared with the clinical reports for all outcomes. Agreement regarding the absence of events (negative agreement) was consistently higher than agreement regarding events (positive agreement) for all outcome variables. Overall impression of agreement depends on which measure used for the assessment. The previously reported desirable properties of Gwet's AC1 as well as the patient characteristics associated with agreement were confirmed. CONCLUSION The differences in incidence and agreement across the different variables and time points highlight the importance of carefully assessing which source of information to use in clinical research. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN06393679 ( www.isrctn.com ). Date of registration: 07/02/2008. Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
|