1
|
Thomsen FF, Petersson RD, Schou-Jensen KS, Rashu BS, Niebuhr MH, Azawi NH. Transperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a comparison of operative and oncological outcomes between posterior and anterolateral tumours. Int Urol Nephrol 2025:10.1007/s11255-025-04372-x. [PMID: 39808377 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-025-04372-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2024] [Accepted: 01/07/2025] [Indexed: 01/16/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare operative and oncological outcomes, as well as the risk of postoperative complications in patients who underwent transperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for renal tumours located either posteriorly or anterolaterally. METHODS Retrospective, consecutive study including 451 patients who underwent transperitoneal RAPN for non-metastatic, localised renal tumours from May 2016 to April 2023. Operative data included duration of the procedure, warm ischaemia time, and blood loss; oncological data included surgical margins and recurrence; and 90-day postoperative complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS In total, 140 (31%) patients had tumours with a posterior location. The median follow-up was 3.3 (IQR 1.8-5.0) years. There were no differences in operative outcomes or length of hospital stay between the two groups. Positive surgical margins were recorded in 9% of the patients with posterior tumours compared to 7% of patients with anterolateral tumours, p = 0.60. The estimated probability of recurrence-free survival at 5 years was 95.2% (95% CI 87.4-98.2) for patients with posterior tumours and 96.7% (95% CI 92.3-98.6) for patients with anterolateral tumours, p = 0.4. Patients with posterior tumours had a similar risk of any complication (OR 1.24 [95% CI 0.80-1.91]) and CD ≥ III (OR 0.73 [95% CI 0.28-1.67]) compared to patients with anterolateral tumours. CONCLUSION This study found that patients with posterior tumours had longer operating times and hospital stays following transperitoneal RAPN compared to those with anterolateral tumours but without increased complications or poorer oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik F Thomsen
- Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
| | | | - Katrine S Schou-Jensen
- Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Badal S Rashu
- Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Malene H Niebuhr
- Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Nessn H Azawi
- Department of Urology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tsuboi I, Matsukawa A, Kardoust Parizi M, Klemm J, Schulz RJ, Cadenar A, Mancon S, Chiujdea S, Fazekas T, Miszczyk M, Laukhtina E, Kawada T, Katayama S, Iwata T, Bekku K, Wada K, Gontero P, Rouprêt M, Teoh J, Singla N, Araki M, Shariat SF. Differential effect of surgical technique on intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper tract urothelial cancer: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. World J Urol 2024; 42:488. [PMID: 39162743 PMCID: PMC11335797 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05185-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff resection is the standard treatment in patients with high-risk upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). However, it is unclear which specific surgical technique may lead to improve oncological outcomes in term of intravesical recurrence (IVR) in patients with UTUC. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of surgical techniques and approaches of RNU in reducing IVR in UTUC patients. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Three databases were queried in January 2024 for studies analyzing UTUC patients who underwent RNU. The primary outcome of interest was the rate of IVR among various types of surgical techniques and approaches of RNU. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Thirty-one studies, comprising 1 randomized controlled trial and 1 prospective study, were included for a systematic review and meta-analysis. The rate of IVR was significantly lower in RNU patients who had an early ligation (EL) of the ureter compared to those who did not (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44-0.94, p = 0.02). Laparoscopic RNU significantly increased the IVR compared to open RNU (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.06-1.54, p < 0.001). Intravesical bladder cuff removal significantly reduced the IVR compared to both extravesical and transurethral bladder cuff removal (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.51-0.83, p = 0.02 and HR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.15-2.34, p = 0.006, respectively). CONCLUSIONS EL of the affected upper tract system, ureteral management, open RNU, and intravesical bladder cuff removal seem to yield the lowest IVR rate in patients with UTUC. Well-designed prospective studies are needed to conclusively elucidate the optimal surgical technique in the setting of single post-operative intravesical chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ichiro Tsuboi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mehdi Kardoust Parizi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Jakob Klemm
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Robert J Schulz
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anna Cadenar
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Stefano Mancon
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Sever Chiujdea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Spitalul Clinic Judetean Murures, University of Medicine, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Pharmacy, Mures, Romania
| | - Tamás Fazekas
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Marcin Miszczyk
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Collegium Medicum - Faculty of Medicine, WSB University, Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takehiro Iwata
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Kensuke Bekku
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Koichiro Wada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Urology, PARIS, F- 75013, France
| | - Jeremy Teoh
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Department of Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Park 213, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Motoo Araki
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia, Czechia.
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
- Research Center for Evidence Medicine, Urology Department Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ye J, Wu Q, Liao X, Zheng L, Wei Q, Bao Y. Advanced Age May Not Be an Absolute Contraindication for Radical Nephroureterectomy in Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Single-Center Case Series and a Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses. J Clin Med 2023; 12:7273. [PMID: 38068325 PMCID: PMC10707095 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12237273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 10/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2025] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to investigate whether advanced age is an absolute contraindication for radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) through a single-center case series and a systematic review with meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS In the single-center case series, 588 UTUC patients who underwent RNU between May 2003 and June 2019 in West China Hospital were enrolled, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was the primary outcome of interest. In the systematic review with meta-analysis, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for related articles for further analysis. The endpoints for meta-analyses were overall survival (OS) and CSS. RESULTS The single-center case series included 57 (9.7%) octogenarians. The CSS of octogenarians after RNU was comparable to that of younger people. Advanced age (≥80) was not an independent risk factor for poor CSS (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.48, 2.40). In a systematic review with meta-analysis, the cut-off value of advanced age is 70, and the results showed that advanced age was associated with inferior OS (pooled HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.29, 2.01) and CSS (pooled HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.08, 1.65). However, the subgroup analysis of countries found no positive correlation between advanced age and CSS (pooled HR, 1.33; 95% CI 0.92, 1.74) in Chinese. CONCLUSIONS Advanced age may no longer be an absolute contraindication for RNU. RNU can be safely and effectively performed on UTUC patients of advanced age after a comprehensive presurgical evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianjun Ye
- Department of Urology and Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; (J.Y.); (Q.W.); (X.L.); (L.Z.)
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Qiyou Wu
- Department of Urology and Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; (J.Y.); (Q.W.); (X.L.); (L.Z.)
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Xinyang Liao
- Department of Urology and Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; (J.Y.); (Q.W.); (X.L.); (L.Z.)
| | - Lei Zheng
- Department of Urology and Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; (J.Y.); (Q.W.); (X.L.); (L.Z.)
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Qiang Wei
- Department of Urology and Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; (J.Y.); (Q.W.); (X.L.); (L.Z.)
| | - Yige Bao
- Department of Urology and Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; (J.Y.); (Q.W.); (X.L.); (L.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang Z, Shi H, Xu Y, Fang Y, Song J, Jiang W, Xia D, Wu Z, Wang L. Intravesical Therapy for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5020. [PMID: 37894387 PMCID: PMC10605447 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15205020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) poses unique challenges in diagnosis and treatment. This comprehensive review focuses on prophylactic intravesical therapy for UTUC, summarizing key aspects of intravesical therapy in various clinical scenarios, including concurrent with or following radical nephroureterectomy, kidney-sparing surgery, ureteroscopy-guided biopsy. The incidence of intravesical recurrence in UTUC after surgical treatment is significant, necessitating effective preventive measures. Intravesical therapy plays a vital role in reducing the risk of bladder recurrence following UTUC surgery. Tailoring timing, drug selection, dosage, and frequency is vital in optimizing treatment outcomes and reducing intravesical recurrence risk in UTUC. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the history, clinical trials, guideline recommendations, and clinical applications of intravesical therapy for UTUC. It also discusses the future directions based on current clinical needs and ongoing trials. Future directions entail optimizing dosage, treatment duration, and drug selection, as well as exploring novel agents and combination therapies. Intravesical therapy holds tremendous potential in improving outcomes for UTUC patients and reducing the risk of bladder recurrence. Although advancements have been made in UTUC treatment research, further refinements are necessary to enhance efficacy and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng Wang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; (Z.W.); (H.S.); (Y.X.); (Y.F.); (J.S.); (W.J.)
| | - Haoqing Shi
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; (Z.W.); (H.S.); (Y.X.); (Y.F.); (J.S.); (W.J.)
| | - Yifan Xu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; (Z.W.); (H.S.); (Y.X.); (Y.F.); (J.S.); (W.J.)
| | - Yu Fang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; (Z.W.); (H.S.); (Y.X.); (Y.F.); (J.S.); (W.J.)
| | - Jiaao Song
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; (Z.W.); (H.S.); (Y.X.); (Y.F.); (J.S.); (W.J.)
| | - Wentao Jiang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; (Z.W.); (H.S.); (Y.X.); (Y.F.); (J.S.); (W.J.)
| | - Demeng Xia
- Department of Pharmacy, Seventh People’s Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200137, China;
| | - Zhenjie Wu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; (Z.W.); (H.S.); (Y.X.); (Y.F.); (J.S.); (W.J.)
| | - Linhui Wang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; (Z.W.); (H.S.); (Y.X.); (Y.F.); (J.S.); (W.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
A 6-month maintenance schedule of mitomycin C after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma for the prevention of intravesical recurrence: a retrospective, single center study. World J Urol 2023; 41:1077-1083. [PMID: 36790518 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04316-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To show the effect of a 6-month (4 times weekly followed by 5 times monthly) maintenance mitomycin C regimen on the prevention of intravesical recurrence (IVR) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS A total of 119 patients undergoing a RNU between 2007 and 2021 in a single center hospital were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 66 patients were eligible for further analysis. 27 patients received no post-operative MMC (median follow-up: 110 months) and 39 patients received a 6-month (4 times weekly, 5 times monthly) maintenance regimen of MMC (median follow up: 48 months). The primary outcome was the 1-, 2- and 5-year bladder recurrence free survival (BRFS). RESULTS There was a significant difference (p = 0.001) in BRFS between the two groups. The 1-, 2, and 5-year BRFS for the MMC- group was 67%, 63% and 43%, respectively. The 1-, 2- and 5-year BRFS for the MMC + group was 95%, 86% and 86%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed no other potential prognostic factors that had a significant effect on the BRFS. CONCLUSION A 6-month maintenance schedule of MMC is effective at significantly reducing the risk of IVR after RNU for UTUC. We could not find any other significant prognostic factors to predict IVR.
Collapse
|
6
|
Nadler N, Oedorf K, Jensen JB, Azawi N. Intraoperative Mitomycin C Bladder Instillation During Radical Nephroureterectomy Is Feasible and Safe. EUR UROL SUPPL 2021; 34:41-46. [PMID: 34934966 PMCID: PMC8655381 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Bladder recurrence after radical treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) is frequent, and patients are required to undergo surveillance cystoscopies following surgery. The use of intravesical adjuvant chemotherapy is an accepted method to prevent bladder recurrence, but the timing of this method is not standardized and the concept of intraoperative use is unexplored. Objective The objective of the study is to examine the feasibility and safety of intraoperative intravesical mitomycin C (MMC) instillation using a closed-circuit system following bladder cuff excision and bladder closure. Design setting and participants All patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for UTUC at the Department of Urology of Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark from 2017 to 2020 were identified. Patient complications within 30 d and data regarding oncological outcome were registered. Outcome measurements and statistical ana lysis Clavien-Dindo grade for complications and descriptive statistics were used. Results During the study period, 64 patients underwent RNU. Of these patients, 49 received bladder instillation of MMC during RNU. Complications were observed in 11 patients (21.4%), where four patients (8.2%) had Clavien-Dindo complication grade (CD) I, four patients (8.2%) had CD II, one patient (2%) had CD III, and one patient (2%) had CD IIIa. None of the complications were suspected to be related to MMC. Five of the 15 patients (33%) who did not receive MMC experienced complications. There were no significant differences in complication rates between patients who received MMC and those who did not. Study limitations include a small sample size and a single-center study. Conclusions Intraoperative vesical instillation of MMC is feasible and was, in the present study, not associated with an increased complication rate. Patient summary Bladder recurrence after radical treatment of upper urinary tract cancer is frequent. The present study findings indicate that intraoperative bladder irrigation with the chemotherapeutic mitomycin C during surgery does not lead to excessive complications and could be a method to reduce the risk of bladder recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi Nadler
- Department of Urology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kimie Oedorf
- Department of Urology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen
- Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Nessn Azawi
- Department of Urology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liu G, Yao Z, Chen G, Li Y, Liang B. Laparoscopic compared with open nephroureterectomy in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A systemic review and a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Pract 2021; 75:e14639. [PMID: 34309982 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.14639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy on postoperative results in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma subjects. METHODS A systematic literature search up to January 2021 was done and 36 studies included 23 013 subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma at the start of the study; 8178 of them were laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and 14 835 of them were open nephroureterectomy. They were reporting relationships between the efficacy and safety of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) or the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the efficacy and safety of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma using the dichotomous or continuous method with a random or fixed-effect model. RESULTS Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma was significantly related to longer operation time (MD, 43.90; 95% CI, 20.91-66.90, P < .001), shorter hospital stay (MD, -1.71; 95% CI, -2.42 to -1.00, P < .001), lower blood loss (MD, -133.82; 95% CI, -220.92 to -46.73, P = .003), lower transfusion need (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.47-0.67, P < .001) and lower overall complication (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.90, P < .001) compared with open nephroureterectomy. However, no significant difference was found between laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and open nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in 2-5-years recurrence-free survival (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.69-1.18, P = .46), 2-5-years cancer-specific survival (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.69-1.28, P = .68) and 2-5-years overall survival (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.91-1.87, P = .15). CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma may have a longer operation time, shorter hospital stay, lower blood loss, transfusion need and overall complication compared with open nephroureterectomy. Further studies are required to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guihong Liu
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| | - Zeqin Yao
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| | - Guoqiang Chen
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| | - Yalang Li
- Department of Urology, Yuzhou People's Hospital, Xuchang, China
| | - Bing Liang
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liu G, Yao Z, Chen G, Li Y, Liang B. Open Nephroureterectomy Compared to Laparoscopic in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis. Front Surg 2021; 8:729686. [PMID: 34485377 PMCID: PMC8414582 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.729686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: In this meta-analysis, we will focus on evaluating the effects of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy on postoperative results in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma subjects. Methods: A systematic literature search up to January 2021 was performed, and 36 studies included 23,013 subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma at the start of the study; of them, 8,178 were laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and 14,835 of them were open nephroureterectomy. They were reporting relationships between the efficacy and safety of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) or the mean difference (MD) with 95% CIs to evaluate the efficacy and safety of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma using the dichotomous or continuous method with a random or fixed-effect model. Results: Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma was significantly related to longer operation time (MD, 43.90; 95% CI, 20.91–66.90, p < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (MD, −1.71; 95% CI, −2.42 to −1.00, p < 0.001), lower blood loss (MD, −133.82; 95% CI, −220.92 to −46.73, p = 0.003), lower transfusion need (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.47–0.67, p < 0.001), and lower overall complication (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70–0.90, p < 0.001) compared with open nephroureterectomy. However, no significant difference was found between laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and open nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in 2–5 years recurrence-free survival (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.69–1.18, p = 0.46), 2–5 years cancer-specific survival (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.69–1.28, p = 0.68), and 2–5 years overall survival (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.91–1.87, p = 0.15). Conclusion: Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma may have a longer operation time, shorter hospital stay, and lower blood loss, transfusion need, and overall complication compared to open nephroureterectomy. Further studies are required to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guihong Liu
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| | - Zeqin Yao
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| | - Guoqiang Chen
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| | - Yalang Li
- Department of Urology, Yuzhou People's Hospital, Xuchang, China
| | - Bing Liang
- Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Björnsson O, Jónsson E, Guðmundsson EO, Marteinsson VÞ, Nikulásson SÞ, Guðjónsson S. Operative management in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma in Iceland: a population-based study. Scand J Urol 2021; 55:197-202. [PMID: 33913379 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2021.1916073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Radical nephroureterectomy is the standard treatment of organ-confined upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The objective of this study was to investigate survival and bladder recurrence rate in Icelandic patients with UTUC who underwent radical nephroureterctomy (RNU) or other procedures with curative intent. MATERIAL AND METHODS All patients who were diagnosed with UTUC in Iceland from 2003 to 2016 and treated with curative intent were included in the study. Information on patients was obtained retrospectively from patients' medical records and from the Icelandic Cause of Death Registry. RESULTS Overall 63 patients underwent a procedure for UTUC with curative intent in Iceland during the study period. The median age was 71 years and the majority were male (65%). In 50 patients (79%), the tumor was a primary UTUC. The most common procedure was RNU (78%) and eight patients (13%) underwent a kidney-sparing procedure. No patient died within 90 d of surgery. Twenty-eight patients (44%) had pathological stage T2 or higher, whereas 35 patients (56%) had pathological stage T1 or lower. The median follow-up time was 98.8 months . During the follow-up time 25 patients (40%) were diagnosed with recurrence in the bladder. Five-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 67%. CONCLUSIONS This population-based study shows that the oncologic outcome in Icelandic patients with UTUC is similar to what has been reported in other countries. Bladder recurrence rate is high and can hopefully be reduced by improvements in surgical and intravesical instillation treatment. Possibly more kidney-sparing surgeries could have been done during the study period; however, careful selection for those procedures is mandatory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oddur Björnsson
- Department of Urology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Eiríkur Jónsson
- Department of Urology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Piszczek R, Nowak Ł, Krajewski W, Chorbińska J, Poletajew S, Moschini M, Kaliszewski K, Zdrojowy R. Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2021; 19:129. [PMID: 33882936 PMCID: PMC8061074 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-021-02236-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background During the past two decades, laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LRNU) has been proposed as an alternative technique to open radical nephroureterectomy (ORNU) and has become increasingly accepted for the treatment of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Nevertheless, the oncologic efficacy of LRNU remains controversial, especially for the treatment of locally advanced (T3/T4 and/or N+) UTUC. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to cumulatively compare the oncological outcomes of LRNU versus ORNU. Materials and methods The present meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. A search was conducted of three electronic databases, namely, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Outcome measurements of cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS), including hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were extracted and pooled. Results Eighteen articles published from 2007 to 2020 were included in the final quantitative analysis. One study was a randomized controlled trial (RCT), and the remaining articles had a retrospective design. Among a total of 10,730 participants in the selected papers, 5959 (55.5%) and 4771 (44.5%) underwent ORNU and LRNU, respectively. The results of pooled analyses revealed no significant differences in CSS (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.60–1.19, p = 0.33), OS (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.62–1.13, p = 0.25), IVRFS (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.85–1.39, p = 0.52), and RFS (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.94–1.25, p = 0.26) between LRNU and ORNU groups. Furthermore, the results of subgroup analyses for pT3/T4 and pTany N+ populations did not confirm any statistically significant differences between LRNU and ORNU in terms of any survival parameter. Conclusions Our present meta-analysis of current evidence suggests that LRNU and ORNU have comparable oncological outcomes in patients with UTUC, even in those with locally advanced disease. Further multicenter RCTs with large sample sizes and uniform data regarding specific surgical procedures, such as bladder cuff excision, are required to establish definitive conclusions. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02236-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radosław Piszczek
- Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Lower Silesian Specialist Hospital, Fieldorfa 2 Street, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Łukasz Nowak
- Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 213 Street, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland.
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 213 Street, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Joanna Chorbińska
- Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 213 Street, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Sławomir Poletajew
- Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Marymonecka 99/813 Street, 01-813, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Marco Moschini
- Klinik für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Spitalstrasse, 6004, 16, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Krzysztof Kaliszewski
- Department of General, Minimally Invasive and Endocrine Surgery, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 213 Street, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Romuald Zdrojowy
- Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 213 Street, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|