1
|
Adverse Pathology after Radical Prostatectomy of Patients Eligible for Active Surveillance-A Summary 7 Years after Introducing mpMRI-Guided Biopsy in a Real-World Setting. Bioengineering (Basel) 2023; 10:bioengineering10020247. [PMID: 36829741 PMCID: PMC9952076 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10020247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Over the last decade, active surveillance (AS) of low-risk prostate cancer has been increasing. The mpMRI fusion-guided biopsy of the prostate (FBx) is considered to be the gold standard in preoperative risk stratification. However, the role of FBx remains unclear in terms of risk stratification of low-risk prostate cancer outside high-volume centers. The aim of this study was to evaluate adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy (RP) in a real-world setting, focusing on patients diagnosed with Gleason score (GS) 6 prostate cancer (PCa) and eligible for AS by FBx. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Between March 2015 and March 2022, 1297 patients underwent FBx at the Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Germany. MpMRI for FBx was performed by 111 different radiology centers. FBx was performed by 14 urologists from our department with different levels of experience. In total, 997/1297 (77%) patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer; 492/997 (49%) of these patients decided to undergo RP in our clinic and were retrospectively included. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate clinical and histopathological parameters associated with adverse pathology comparing FBx and RP specimens. To compare FBx and systematic randomized biopsies performed in our clinic before introducing FBx (SBx, n = 2309), we performed a propensity score matching on a 1:1 ratio, adjusting for age, number of positive biopsy cores, and initial PSA (iPSA). RESULTS A total of 492 patients undergoing FBx or SBx was matched. In total, 55% of patients diagnosed with GS 6 by FBx were upgraded to clinically significant PCa (defined as GS ≥ 7a) after RP, compared to 52% of patients diagnosed by SBx (p = 0.76). A time delay between FBx and RP was identified as the only correlate associated with upgrading. A total of 5.9% of all FBx patients and 6.1% of all SBx patients would have been eligible for AS (p > 0.99) but decided to undergo RP. The positive predictive value of AS eligibility (diagnosis of low-risk PCa after biopsy and after RP) was 17% for FBx and 6.7% for SBx (p = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS In this study, we show, in a real-world setting, that introducing FBx did not lead to significant change in ratio of adverse pathology for low-risk PCa patients after RP compared to SBx.
Collapse
|
2
|
Clevert DA, Beyer G, Nieß H, Schlenker B. Ultrasound-New Techniques Are Extending the Applications. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2023; 120:41-47. [PMID: 36519209 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sonography is often the first imaging procedure to be used in diagnostic investigation of the abdomen. The aim of this article is to provide a new interdisciplinary overview of recent groundbreaking advances in this modality. METHODS A selective survey of the literature in PubMed was conducted. The literature search was carried out in 2021-2022 and included publications over the period 2004-2022. RESULTS The novel sonographic software techniques can be divided into algorithms that deal with conventional B-scan optimization and new programs that extend the scope of sonographic examination. The latter include elastography, contrast-enhanced sonography, and image fusion in combination with other cross-sectional imaging modalities. Elastography can be used to assess the presence of steatosis, fibrosis, or cirrhosis in patients with liver disease. One study reported diagnostic accuracy of 84-87% for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis (F2), 89-91% for the diagnosis of severe fibrosis (F3), and 92-93% for the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis (F4). Contrast-enhanced sonography is used for evaluation of tumors and trauma. A prospective multicenter study found sensitivity of 95.8% for the characterization of malignant lesions and specificity of 83.1% for benign lesions. Image fusion has the potential to improve the diagnostic assessment of parenchymatous organs, vascular conditions, and the prostate. CONCLUSION With continuous improvement of the B-scan and the development of high-frequency probes and novel investigation techniques, sonography has become established as an increasingly autonomous examination procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk-André Clevert
- Department of Radiology, Interdisciplinary Ultrasound-Center, University Hospital of Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Germany; Medical Department III,Interdisciplinary Ultrasound-Center, University Hospital of Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Germany; Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Germany; University Hospital of Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
The Expression of miR-205 in Prostate Carcinoma and the Relationship with Prognosis in Patients. COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN MEDICINE 2022; 2022:1784791. [PMID: 36081431 PMCID: PMC9448532 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1784791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Purpose. We aimed to investigate the changes of serum and cell exosome miR-205 levels in patients with prostate carcinoma and its clinical significance. Materials and Methods. Firstly, pronouncement of miR-205 in normal and prostate carcinoma tissues was analyzed by using UALCAN database. The relationship between miR-205 in tumor tissues and the pathological and clinical characteristics of patients with prostate carcinoma were analyzed. Consequently, 60 people with prostate carcinoma were collected to the Minhang Hospital from August 2016 to August 2021. Serum of patients in the two groups was collected, and RNA in serum exosomes was extracted, and qRT-PCR was used to analyze the expression of miR-205 mediated by serum exosomes. Meanwhile, the relationship among the clinical as well as pathological aspects and bodement of patients with prostate carcinoma and the pronouncement level of miR-205 mediated by exosome was compared. Next, assays like wound healing and CKK-8 were used to investigate the effects of miR-205 in exosomes extracted from prostate carcinoma on the augmentation and metastasis of prostate carcinoma. Results. The results showed that the pronouncement level of miR-205 in tissues with prostate carcinoma was significantly lower than that in normal prostate tissues. In addition, the pronouncement level of miR-205 in fluid exosome of people with prostate carcinoma and exosomes derived from the lines of prostate carcinoma was considerably less than that in serum exosomes of healthy patients and that of normal cell lines of prostate. The pronouncement level of miR-205 in fluid exosomes of people with prostate carcinoma was negatively associated with cancer phase, uncontrolled cell division in lymph nodes, distant metastasis, and PSA level at initial diagnosis. Analysis (multivariate and univariate) showed that miR-205 pronouncement was a sovereign threat cause for prognosis of prostate cancer patients. Additionally, the pronouncement and metastasis of prostate carcinoma can be restricted by the overexpression of miR-205. Conclusion. The pronouncement of miR-205 in liquid derived exosomes is correlated with the prediction of people with prostate carcinoma and may be a new marker for identification and cure of prostate carcinoma.
Collapse
|
4
|
Wenzel M, Preisser F, Wittler C, Hoeh B, Wild PJ, Tschäbunin A, Bodelle B, Würnschimmel C, Tilki D, Graefen M, Becker A, Karakiewicz PI, Chun FKH, Kluth LA, Köllermann J, Mandel P. Correlation of MRI-Lesion Targeted Biopsy vs. Systematic Biopsy Gleason Score with Final Pathological Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:882. [PMID: 34063557 PMCID: PMC8155831 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11050882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of MRI-lesion targeted (TB) and systematic biopsy (SB) Gleason score (GS) as a predictor for final pathological GS still remains unclear. METHODS All patients with TB + SB, and subsequent radical prostatectomy (RP) between 01/2014-12/2020 were analyzed. Rank correlation coefficient predicted concordance with pathological GS for patients' TB and SB GS, as well as for the combined effect of SB + TB. RESULTS Of 159 eligible patients, 77% were biopsy naïve. For SB taken in addition to TB, a Spearman's correlation of +0.33 was observed regarding final GS. Rates of concordance, upgrading, and downgrading were 37.1, 37.1 and 25.8%, respectively. For TB, a +0.52 correlation was computed regarding final GS. Rates of concordance, upgrading and downgrading for TB biopsy GS were 45.9, 33.3, and 20.8%, respectively. For the combination of SB + TB, a correlation of +0.59 was observed. Rates of concordance, upgrading and downgrading were 49.7, 15.1 and 35.2%, respectively. The combined effect of SB + TB resulted in a lower upgrading rate, relative to TB and SB (both p < 0.001), but a higher downgrading rate, relative to TB (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS GS obtained from TB provided higher concordance and lower upgrading and downgrading rates, relative to SB GS with regard to final pathology. The combined effect of SB + TB led to the highest concordance rate and the lowest upgrading rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Wenzel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany; (F.P.); (C.W.); (B.H.); (A.B.); (F.K.H.C.); (L.A.K.); (P.M.)
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada; (C.W.); (P.I.K.)
| | - Felix Preisser
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany; (F.P.); (C.W.); (B.H.); (A.B.); (F.K.H.C.); (L.A.K.); (P.M.)
| | - Clarissa Wittler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany; (F.P.); (C.W.); (B.H.); (A.B.); (F.K.H.C.); (L.A.K.); (P.M.)
| | - Benedikt Hoeh
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany; (F.P.); (C.W.); (B.H.); (A.B.); (F.K.H.C.); (L.A.K.); (P.M.)
| | - Peter J. Wild
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany; (P.J.W.); (A.T.); (J.K.)
- Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS), 60590 Frankfurt, Germany
- Wildlab, University Hospital Frankfurt MVZ GmbH, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Alexandra Tschäbunin
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany; (P.J.W.); (A.T.); (J.K.)
| | - Boris Bodelle
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany;
| | - Christoph Würnschimmel
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada; (C.W.); (P.I.K.)
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany; (D.T.); (M.G.)
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany; (D.T.); (M.G.)
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany; (D.T.); (M.G.)
| | - Andreas Becker
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany; (F.P.); (C.W.); (B.H.); (A.B.); (F.K.H.C.); (L.A.K.); (P.M.)
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada; (C.W.); (P.I.K.)
| | - Felix K. H. Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany; (F.P.); (C.W.); (B.H.); (A.B.); (F.K.H.C.); (L.A.K.); (P.M.)
| | - Luis A Kluth
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany; (F.P.); (C.W.); (B.H.); (A.B.); (F.K.H.C.); (L.A.K.); (P.M.)
| | - Jens Köllermann
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany; (P.J.W.); (A.T.); (J.K.)
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany; (F.P.); (C.W.); (B.H.); (A.B.); (F.K.H.C.); (L.A.K.); (P.M.)
| |
Collapse
|