1
|
Bobjer J, Gerdtsson A, Abrahamsson J, Baseckas G, Bergkvist M, Bläckberg M, Brändstedt J, Jancke G, Hagberg O, Kollberg P, Lundström KJ, Löfgren A, Nyberg M, Rian Mårtensson L, Saemundsson Y, Ståhl E, Sörenby A, Warnolf Å, Liedberg F. Location of Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Metastases in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Results from a Prospective Lymph Node Mapping Study. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 57:37-44. [PMID: 38020529 PMCID: PMC10658412 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background There is limited information on the distribution of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases (LNMs) in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Objective To investigate the location of LNMs in UTUC of the renal pelvis or proximal ureter and short-term complications after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with lymph node dissection (LND). Design setting and participants This was a prospective Nordic multicenter study (four university hospitals, two county hospitals). Patients with clinically suspected locally advanced UTUC (stage >T1) and/or clinical lymph node-positive (cN+) disease were invited to participate. Participants underwent RNU and fractionated retroperitoneal LND using predefined side-specific templates. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The location of LNMs in the LND specimen and retroperitoneal lymph node recurrences during follow-up was recorded. Postoperative complications within 90 d of surgery were ascertained from patient charts. Descriptive statistics were used. Results and limitations LNMs were present in the LND specimen in 23/100 patients, and nine of 100 patients experienced a retroperitoneal recurrence. Distribution per side revealed LNMs in the LND specimen in 11/38 (29%) patients with right-sided tumors, for whom the anatomically larger, right-sided template was used, in comparison to 12/62 (19%) patients with left-sided tumors, for whom a more limited template was used. High-grade complications (Clavien grade ≥3) within 90 d of surgery were registered for 13/100 patients. The study is limited in size and not powered to assess survival estimates. Conclusions The suggested templates that we prospectively applied for right-sided and left-sided LND in patients with advanced UTUC included the majority of LNMs. High-grade complications directly related to the LND part of the surgery were limited. Patient summary This study describes the location of lymph node metastases in patients with cancer in the upper urinary tract who underwent surgery to remove the affected kidney and ureter. The results show that most metastases occur within the template maps for lymph node surgery that we investigated, and that this surgery can be performed with few severe complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Bobjer
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Axel Gerdtsson
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Johan Abrahamsson
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - Mats Bergkvist
- Pelvic Cancer Medical Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mats Bläckberg
- Department of Urology, Helsingborg County Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden
| | - Johan Brändstedt
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Georg Jancke
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Urology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Oskar Hagberg
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Petter Kollberg
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Karl-Johan Lundström
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Östersund County Hospital, Östersund, Sweden
| | - Annica Löfgren
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Martin Nyberg
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - Ymir Saemundsson
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Elin Ståhl
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Anne Sörenby
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Åsa Warnolf
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Liedberg
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liedberg F, Abrahamsson J, Bobjer J, Gudjonsson S, Löfgren A, Nyberg M, Sörenby A. Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma-feasibility and complications: a single center experience. Scand J Urol 2022; 56:301-307. [PMID: 35736556 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2022.2091018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy (RANU) is the primary treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) at our hospital for patients with clinical stage less than T2, and for patients with invasive tumours, but unfit for major surgery. OBJECTIVE To assess peri-operative conditions and outcomes of RANU at our unit, and to evaluate the safety of the procedure. METHODS The medical records of all 166 patients undergoing RANU for suspected UTUC and followed for more than three months in a large university hospital in Sweden were reviewed retrospectively. After the exclusion of twenty patients because of previous cystectomy, simultaneous surgical procedure, or other tumour types than UTUC in the pathological report, 146 patients remained for the analyses. The primary endpoint was complication rate according to Clavien-Dindo at 90 days. Secondary endpoints were perioperative bleeding, violation of oncological surgical principles, hospital stay, and re-admission within 90 days. RESULTS The median age was 75 [(Inter Quartile Range) IQR 70-80] years and 57% of the patients had an ASA score above 2. According to Clavien-Dindo, one patient had a grade 3 complication, and no patient had a grade 4-5 complication. The median blood loss was 50 (IQR 20-100) ml and the median hospital stay was 6 (IQR 5-7) days. Twelve patients were re-admitted to the hospital within 90 days (eight with urinary tract infection/haematuria, one with hematoma, and three with other diseases). CONCLUSION Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy is a safe procedure for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma, with a low risk of major surgical complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Liedberg
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - J Abrahamsson
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - J Bobjer
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - S Gudjonsson
- Department of Urology, Landspitali University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - A Löfgren
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - M Nyberg
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - A Sörenby
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|