Visual MRI T-category versus VI-RADS evaluation from multiparametric MRI in the detection of muscle-invasion in patients with suspected bladder cancer: single centre registered clinical trial (MIB-trial)

Can magnetic resonance imaging differentiate muscle invasion (T2) and lamina propria invasion (T1) urothelial carcinoma of the bladder? A systematic review and meta-analysis of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System accuracy

Background

Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) was developed as a structured reporting tool to anticipate the possibility of muscle invasion. This study is aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of VI-RADS for discriminating T2 from T1 bladder cancer.

Materials and methods

Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase were searched on October 4, 2021, for studies with the following characteristics: (1) bladder cancer patient population, (2) VI-RADS as an index test, (3) retransurethral resection of bladder tumor/cystectomy as a reference, and (4) adequate VI-RADS score data for T1 and T2 lesions. The analyses were performed using the binary regression model of MIDAS in Stata.

Results

Six studies with 624 magnetic resonance imaging reports were included. The receiver operating characteristics curve for differentiation of T2 from T1 bladder cancer showed an area under the curve of 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.95) for a VI-RADS ≥3 and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.71-0.79) for a VI-RADS ≥4. A VI-RADS ≥3 showed high sensitivity of 93% (95% CI, 85%-97%), specificity of 61% (95% CI, 30%-86%), positive likelihood ratio of 2.4 (95% CI, 1.1-5.3), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.11 (95% CI, 0.05-0.24). A total of 10.4% of T2 lesions were scored as VI-RADS 2, while 10% of T1 lesions were scored as VI-RADS 4 or 5.

Conclusions

The VI-RADS ≥3 has high accuracy and sensitivity for detecting muscle invasion in borderline populations of T1 or T2 bladder cancer. Thus, the VI-RADS could be a good non-invasive screening test for the detection of T2 urothelial lesions.

Diagnostic validity of the vesical imaging-reporting and data system (VI-RADS): a real-world study

OBJECTIVES

Preoperative Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) becomes widespread. We aimed to validate the diagnostic performance of VI-RADS in differentiating muscle-invasive (MIBC) from non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Between December 2019 and February 2022 suspected primary bladder cancer patients were reviewed. Those with proper multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) protocol for VI-RADS before any invasive treatment were included. Patients were locally staged according to transurethral resection, second resection, or radical cystectomy as the reference standard. Two experienced genitourinary radiologists who were blinded to clinical and histopathological data evaluated the mpMRI images independently and retrospectively. The diagnostic performance of both radiologists and the interreader agreement were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 96 patients, 20 (20.8%) had MIBC, and 76 (79.2%) had NMIBC. Both radiologists had great diagnostic performance in diagnosing MIBC. The first radiologist had an area under curve (AUC) of 0.83 and 0.84, the sensitivity of 85% and 80%, and the specificity of 80.3% and 88.2% for VI-RADS ≥3 and ≥4, respectively. The second radiologist had an area under curve (AUC) of 0.79 and 0.77, the sensitivity of 85% and 65%, and the specificity of 73.7% and 89.5% for VI-RADS ≥3 and ≥4, respectively. The overall VI-RADS score agreement between the two radiologists was moderate (κ = 0.45).

CONCLUSION

VI-RADS is diagnostically powerful in differentiating MIBC from NMBIC prior to transurethral resection. The agreement between radiologists is moderate.

Inter-reader reliability of the vesical imaging-reporting and data system (VI-RADS) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To evaluate the diagnostic agreement between readers in VI-RADS interpretation to detect muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) preoperatively, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available data. Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases were systematically searched up to November 13, 2021. Case reports, review articles, editorials, and studies with insufficient data were eliminated. The Quality Appraisal of the Diagnostic Reliability Checklist was used to assess the risk of bias. The degree of agreement was determined by Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) for comparison of data. The heterogeneity of these studies was explored using subgroup analysis and meta-regression analysis. The level of confidence was set at 0.05. All analyses were conducted in STATA 16.0. Overall, 19 eligible studies, consisting of 2439 participants, were included in this meta-analysis. The inter-reader agreement for VI-RADS in MIBC detection ranged from κ of 0.45 to 0.96 among included studies. The pooled inter-reader reliability was calculated as 0.76 [95% CI 0.73-0.80; I² = 92.13%, Q(50) = 635.08, p < 0.01]. Sources of heterogeneity included magnetic strength, T2WI slice thickness, number of readers, sample size, study design, number of centers, year of publication, proportion of male patients, and mean age. There is substantial reliability in VI-RADS interpretation for MIBC among radiologists with various levels of expertise. The high degree of inter-reader agreement for MIBC detection supports the implementation of VI-RADS in routine clinical practice for the staging paradigm of bladder cancer.