Inflammatory response markers and survival prediction in patients with renal cell carcinoma

Combined Charlson comorbidity/C-Reactive Protein Index Is a Novel Predictor in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Analysis of the International Marker Consortium for Renal Cancer (INMARC) Registry

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate predictive ability of a novel combined index, Charlson comorbidity index and C-reactive protein (CCI-CRP), for outcomes in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and compare predictive outcomes with of CCI-CRP to its separate components and to the UCLA integrated staging system (UISS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed INMARC registry of RCC patients. Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC) analysis was fitted to identify threshold defining low-CRP (LCRP) and high-CRP (HCRP). Patients were stratified according to CCI [low-CCI ≤ 3 (LCCI); intermediate-CCI 4-6 (ICCI); high-CCI > 6 (HCCI)] and CRP level. Kaplan-Meier analysis (KMA) was conducted for overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Based on survival analysis distribution we proposed a new stratification: CCI-CRP. Model performance was assessed with ROC/area under the curve (AUC) analysis and compared to CCI and CRP alone, and UISS.

RESULTS

We analyzed 2,890 patients (median follow-up 30 months). ROC identified maximum product sensitivity and specificity for CRP at 3.5 mg/L. KMA revealed 5-year OS of 95.6% for LCRP/LCCI, 83% LCRP/ICCI, 73.3% LCRP/HCCI, 62.6% HCRP/LCCI, 51.6% HCRP/ICCI and 40.5% HCRP/HCCI (P < .001). From this distribution, new CCI-CRP is proposed: low CCI-CRP (LCRP/LCCI and LCRP/ICCI), intermediate CCI-CRP (LCRP/HCCI and HCRP/LCCI), and high CCI-CRP (HCRP/ICCI and HCRP/HCCI). AUC for CCI-CRP showed improved performance for predicting OS/CSS vs. CCI alone (0.73 vs. 0.63/0.77 vs. 0.60), CRP alone (0.73 vs. 0.71/0.77 vs. 0.74) and UISS (0.73 vs 0.67/0.77 vs 0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

CCI-CRP, exhibits increased prognostic performance for survival outcomes in RCC compared to CCI and CRP alone, and UISS. Further investigation is requisite.

Imaging Techniques to Determine Degree of Sarcopenia and Systemic Inflammation in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to provide an up-to-date understanding regarding the literature on sarcopenia and inflammation as prognostic factors in the context of renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

RECENT FINDINGS

Sarcopenia is increasingly recognized as a prognostic factor in RCC. Emerging literature suggests monitoring quantity of muscle on successive imaging and examining muscle density may be additionally informative. Inflammation has prognostic ability in RCC and is also considered a key contributor to development and progression of both RCC and sarcopenia. Recent studies suggest these two prognostic factors together may provide additional prognostic ability when used in combination. Ongoing developments include quality control regarding sarcopenia research and imaging, improving understanding of muscle loss mechanisms, and enhancing clinical incorporation of sarcopenia via improving imaging analysis practicality (i.e., artificial intelligence) and feasible biomarkers. Sarcopenia and systemic inflammation are complementary prognostic factors for adverse outcomes in patients with RCC. Further study on high-quality sarcopenia assessment standardization and expedited sarcopenia assessment is desired for eventual routine clinical incorporation of these prognostic factors.

Serum C-NLR score, a new inflammatory marker, predicts tumor histopathology and oncological outcomes of localized clear cell renal carcinoma after nephrectomy: A single center retrospective analysis

Background/Aim: Several blood and serum-based parameters have been described as prognostic markers of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). But most of these markers have inconsistent results and are not used in routine clinical practice. Therefore, novel potential predictor biomarkers are needed for the management of ccRCC patients in clinical practice. Here, we investigate the predictive value of a novel marker, serum C-NLR score, for pathological characteristics and oncological outcomes of ccRCC. Methods: A total of 162 RCC patients who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy between January 2015 and January 2021 were evaluated in a retrospective cohort study setting. The serum C-NLR score was compared according to the tumor histopathology-associated parameters. The predictive role of those parameters and C-NLR score on the oncological outcomes of ccRCC was also investigated. Results: The median serum C-NLR scores exhibited statistically significant increases in ccRCC patients with pathological necrosis, lymphovascular invasion, and variant differentiation. Among histopathological characteristics, only tumor necrosis and variant differentiation were associated with overall survival (OS) and tumor grade with metastasis-free survival (MFS) (no metastasis detected in grade 1–2 tumors) in Kaplan Meier analyses. Serum C-NLR score was also associated with OS but not MFS. In the univariate analyses, tumor necrosis, variant differentiation, and C-NLR score were associated with OS of localized RCC patients who underwent nephrectomy (HR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.08–1.01; P=0.04, HR: 6.01; 95% CI: 1.66–21.82; P=0.006 and, HR: 1.21; 95% CI: 0.20–5.16; P=0.04). However, in the multivariate analysis, only variant differentiation and C-NLR score were associated with OS (HR: 1.43; 95% CI: 0.82–2.98; P=0.03 and HR: 1.21; 95% CI: 0.20–5.16; P=0.04). Tumor grade was directly associated with MFS because grade 1–2 tumors did not exhibit any metastasis. Conclusion: Serum C-NLR score was higher in worse histopathological entities. Moreover, it predicts the OS for patients with ccRCC as an independent factor.

Modified geriatric nutritional risk index in patients with pancreatic cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

Background

The modified nutritional geriatric risk index (mGNRI) was developed as a novel index and provides a more appropriate prognostic index than the original GNRI, which was reported to be a useful index for predicting prognoses for various malignancies. This study investigated the prognostic significance of the mGNRI compared with that of the GNRI in patients with pancreatic cancer and the association with psoas muscle volume (PMV) for survival outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective study included 137 patients who had undergone pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. The enrolled patients were grouped as high mGNRI (≥ 85.3) or low mGNRI (< 85.3), and high GNRI (≥ 92) or low GNRI (< 92) for prognostic analysis based on cutoff values. A propensity-matched analysis was performed in this study.

Results

The 5-year overall survival of patients in the high mGNRI group or high GNRI group was significantly longer than those in the low mGNRI group or low GNRI group. Statistically significant differences for the 5-year OS were observed in the three groups with respect to the combination of mGNRI and PMV. Patients with low mGNRI/low PMV had a worse 5-year OS rate compared with patients with high GNRI/high PMV or those with high GNRI or high PMV, but not both. The concordance index of the mGNRI to predict the 5-year overall survival was greater than that of the GNRI or the combination of the GNRI and PMV, but lower than that of the combination of the mGNRI and PMV. Multivariate analysis revealed that the mGNRI was an independent prognostic factor for patients with pancreatic cancer (P = 0.005).

Conclusions

The mGNRI might be a more useful prognostic factor than the GNRI for patients with pancreatic cancer, and might predict prognostic outcomes more accurately when combined with PMV.