Development and application of cognitive-pragmatic language ability assessment protocol for traumatic brain injury

Association of cognitive-linguistic deficits to diffusion tensor imaging parameters in moderate to severe traumatic diffuse axonal injury

Cognitive-linguistic functions are an essential part of adequate communication competence. Cognitive-linguistic deficits are common after traumatic diffuse axonal injury (DAI). We aimed to examine the integrity of perisylvian white matter tracts known to be associated with linguistic functions in individuals with DAI and their eventual association with poor cognitive-linguistic outcomes. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) results of 44 adults with moderate-to-severe DAI were compared with those of 67 controls. Fractional anisotropy (FA) values of the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF), arcuate fasciculus (AF), SLF with frontal connections to the lower parietal cortex, and AF with temporal connections to the lower parietal cortex were measured using tractography. The associations between white matter integrity FA values and cognitive-linguistic deficits were studied in the DAI group. Cognitive-linguistic deficits were determined based on our earlier study using the novel KAT test. No previous studies have examined the associations between white matter integrity and cognitive-linguistic deficits determined using the KAT test. Patients with DAI showed lower FA values in all left-side tracts than the controls. Unexpectedly, the poor cognitive-linguistic outcome in the language comprehension and production domains was associated with high FA values of several tracts. After excluding five cases with the poorest cognitive-linguistic performance, but with the highest values in the DTI variables, no significant associations with DTI metrics were found. The association between white matter integrity and cognitive-linguistic functioning is complex in patients with DAI of traumatic origin, probably reflecting the heterogeneity of TBI.

Cognitive-Linguistic outcome in moderate to severe diffuse axonal injury and association with fatigue

PURPOSE

Individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) often have persistent cognitive-linguistic deficits that negatively influence their life. Our objective was to examine the cognitive-linguistic outcome in individuals with moderate to severe diffuse axonal injury (DAI) with a novel test battery. As fatigue is a common symptom affecting the lives of individuals with DAI, we also wanted to assess whether the self-reported fatigue was associated with cognitive-linguistic abilities.

METHODS

Selected cognitive-linguistic subtests of the Finnish KAT test and The Mental Fatigue Scale (MFS) were applied to 48 adults with moderate to severe DAI and 27 healthy controls. The majority of the participants with DAI were in the chronic stage. The groups were compared using ANCOVA. Linear regressions were used to analyze the association between MFS and cognitive-linguistic outcomes.

RESULTS

The participants with DAI had significantly poorer scores than the controls in most cognitive-linguistic variables and reported significantly more fatigue. Two of the four cognitive-linguistic composite variables were associated with the degree of self-reported fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS

Cognitive-linguistic deficits are common in individuals with moderate to severe DAI, and The Finnish KAT test is a valuable tool to detect those. Fatigue was associated with linguistic working memory and language production.

Discourse Measures to Differentiate Between Mild Cognitive Impairment and Healthy Aging

Although subtle discourse declines in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) have been reported, heterogeneous measures and tasks among the MCI discourse studies have yielded widely varying outcomes. The present study aimed to first, identify discourse measures that aid the differentiation among people with amnestic MCI (aMCI), people with non-amnestic MCI (naMCI), and cognitively healthy control (HC) participants, and second, delineate the cognitive functions related to such discourse measures. Three discourse tasks (an episodic narrative, a planning task, and a picture description) were performed by 30 aMCI, 22 naMCI, and 21 HC participants. Samples were analyzed using six categories of 15 measures, namely coherence, cohesion, proposition, grammaticality, lexicality, and fluency. The statistical analyses included (1) a multivariate analysis of variance for group comparison; (2) binary simple logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for differentiation between two groups; (3) binary multiple logistic regression for being diagnosed with naMCI or aMCI with the minimum number of predictors; and (4) Pearson correlation analysis for identifying the cognitive functions associated with the discourse measures. The proportion of cohesive words and propositional density in aMCI participants were worse than those in naMCI participants. Global coherence, the proportion of cohesive words, and the proportion of dysfluencies and pauses in naMCI participants were lower than those in the HC participants. Global and local coherence and the proportion of cohesive words, cohesive ties per utterances, propositional density, and dysfluencies and pauses in aMCI participants were worse than those in the HC participants. The aforementioned measures were demonstrated to be effective predictors for classifying groups by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. In addition, the proportions of cohesive words and pauses were common discourse measures for differentiation between naMCI and HC participants or between aMCI and HC participants using binary multiple logistic regression. According to the correlation analysis, memory and executive functions are needed for coherent, cohesive, and efficient discourse productions in MCI. The detailed description of discourse performances in this study will aid the characterization of the declined language abilities of MCI participants and also the understanding of the cognitive functions involved in discourse performance in MCI.