Frontal assessment battery (FAB) performance following traumatic brain injury hospitalized in an acute care setting

Irreversible postoperative cognitive impairment after unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment in the elderly

PURPOSE

Postoperative cognitive dysfunction and recovery remain unclear in older patients undergoing interventional therapies for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs). This study aimed to compare changes in postoperative cognitive function between younger and older patients and to detect factors associated with non-recovery from postoperative cognitive dysfunction.

METHODS

This study reviewed 59 consecutive patients with UIAs who underwent interventional therapies, including microsurgical clipping or endovascular treatment, from 2021 to 2022. All patients were divided into the older (aged ≥ 70 years) and younger (aged < 70 years) groups. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) were performed within 2 months before interventions, at 1 week postoperatively (POW1), and 3-6 months postoperatively (POM3-6).

RESULTS

MMSE and FAB scores decreased more frequently in the older group than in the younger group at POW1 (older vs. younger: MMSE: 48% vs. 21%, p < 0.05; FAB: 56% vs. 18%, p < 0.01). In the older group, the FAB Z-score decreased in POW1 and recovered by POM3-6 (p < 0.01), while the MMSE Z-score continued to decrease (p = 0.04). Age and the preoperative MSME Z-score were significantly associated with non-recovery from decreased MMSE score at POM3-6 (recovery vs. non-recovery, age: 62 years old vs. 72 years old, p = 0.03, preoperative MMSE Z-score: 0.16 vs. - 0.90, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study found that older patients were more likely to have a postoperative cognitive decline after UIA treatment and implicated that global cognitive function tended to decline more than executive function in the long term. In addition, this study demonstrated that lower preoperative cognitive function was associated with inadequate postoperative cognitive recovery. The findings potentially contribute to the establishment of indications for treating UIAs in older patients.

Sensitivity and specificity of the INECO frontal screening (IFS) in the detection of patients with traumatic brain injury presenting executive deficits

Executive dysfunction (EF) is a common feature of adult traumatic brain injury (TBI), especially in moderate to severe cases. Assessing EF usually requires the administration of an extensive neuropsychological battery, which is time consuming and expensive. The INECO frontal screening (IFS) is a brief, easy-to-administer screening test which has previously shown to be useful in the detection of executive deficits in different psychiatric and neurological populations. The aim of the present study was to assess the usefulness of the IFS in the detection of executive dysfunction in TBI patients. Twenty-eight TBI patients and thirty-two healthy controls were assessed with a battery that included classical executive tests and the IFS. Our results indicated that with a cutoff score of 26.25 points, the IFS showed good sensitivity and specificity in the detection of executive impairments in TBI patients. It also showed good positive and negative predicted values. Our results suggest that the IFS can be considered a useful tool for identifying executive dysfunction in patients with TBI.

Cognitive Impairment Following Acute Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) may present cognitive deficits within the first 24 h after trauma, herein called "acute phase," which in turn may lead to long-term functional impairment and decrease in quality of life. Few studies investigated cognition in mTBI patients during the acute phase. The objectives of this study were to investigate the cognitive profile of patients with mTBI during the acute phase, compared to controls and normative data, and whether loss of consciousness (LOC), previous TBI and level of education influence cognition at this stage. Fifty-three patients with mTBI (aged 19-64 years) and 28 healthy controls participated in the study. All patients were evaluated at bedside within 24 h post-injury. Demographic and clinical data were registered. Cognitive function was assessed with the Mini-mental state examination (MMSE), the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), Digit Span (working memory), and the Visual Memory Test/Brief Cognitive Battery (for episodic memory). The clinical sample was composed mainly by men (58.5%). The mean age was 39 years-old and 64.3% of the patients had more than 8 years of education. The most common causes of mTBI were fall from own height (28.3%), aggression (24.5%), and fall from variable heights (24.5%). Compared to controls, mTBI patients exhibited significantly worse performance on MMSE, FAB, naming, incidental memory, immediate memory, learning, and delayed recall. Compared to normative data, 26.4% of patients had reduced global cognition as measured by the MMSE. Episodic memory impairment (13.2%) was more frequent than executive dysfunction (9.4%). No significant differences were found in cognitive performance when comparing patients with or without LOC or those with or without history of previous TBI. Patients with lower educational level had higher rates of cognitive impairment (VMT naming-28.6 vs. 4.2%; VMT immediate memory-32 vs. 4.2%; VMT learning-39.3 vs. 4.2%, all p < 0.05). In sum, we found significant cognitive impairment in the acute phase of mTBI, which was not associated with LOC or history of TBI, but appeared more frequently in patients with lower educational level.