A basal heat stress test to detect military operational readiness after a 14-day operational heat acclimatization period

Reliability of a 60-min treadmill running protocol in the heat: The journal Temperature toolbox

We determined the reliability of a 60-min treadmill protocol in the heat when spaced >4 weeks apart, longer than the test-retest duration of 1 week found in the literature. Nine unacclimated, trained males (age: 31 ± 8 y; VO2peak: 60 ± 6 ml∙kg-1∙min-1) undertook a 15 min self-paced time-trial pre-loaded with 45 min of running at 70% of individual ventilatory threshold (11.2 ± 0.3 km∙h-1) in 30 ± 1°C (53 ± 5% relative humidity). They repeated this following 40 ± 14 and 76 ± 26 days, with pre-trial standardization of diet and exercise for 48 h. When considering trial 1 as a familiarization, change in core temperature (∆Tcore) during the first 45 min (∆2.0 ± 0.2°C) between trials 2 and 3 yielded bias and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) of -0.10 ± 0.43°C, standard error of measurement (SEM) of 0.13°C and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.75, more reliable than measures of baseline Tcore (36.9 ± 0.2°C; LoA: -0.23 ± 0.90°C; SEM: 0.22°C; ICC: 0.03) and Tcore at 45 min during exercise (38.9 ± 0.4°C; LoA: 0.32 ± 1.12°C; SEM: 0.28°C; ICC: 0.15). The coefficient of variation (CV) between trials 2 and 3 for distance run during the 15 min time-trial was 2.1 ± 2.0% with LoA of 0.001 ± 0.253 km and SEM of 0.037 km. This protocol is reliable spaced ~5 weeks apart when considering the most commonly accepted limit of <5% CV for performance, reinforced by reliability of the ΔTcore being 0.1 ± 0.4°C.

Effects of Acute Heat and Cold Exposures at Rest or during Exercise on Subsequent Energy Intake: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the effect of acute heat/cold exposure on subsequent energy intake (EI) in adults. We searched the following sources for publications on this topic: PubMed, Ovid Medline, Science Direct and SPORTDiscus. The eligibility criteria for study selection were: randomized controlled trials performed in adults (169 men and 30 women; 20–52 years old) comparing EI at one or more meals taken ad libitum, during and/or after exposure to heat/cold and thermoneutral conditions. One of several exercise sessions could be realized before or during thermal exposures. Two of the thirteen studies included examined the effect of heat (one during exercise and one during exercise and at rest), eight investigated the effect of cold (six during exercise and two at rest), and three the effect of both heat and cold (two during exercise and one at rest). The meta-analysis revealed a small increase in EI in cold conditions (g = 0.44; p = 0.019) and a small decrease in hot conditions (g = −0.39, p = 0.022) for exposure during both rest and exercise. Exposures to heat and cold altered EI in opposite ways, with heat decreasing EI and cold increasing it. The effect of exercise remains unclear.

Four-month operational heat acclimatization positively affects the level of heat tolerance 6 months later

Benefits obtained after heat acclimation/acclimatization should be completely lost after an estimated period of 6 weeks. However, this estimate is still hypothetical. We evaluate the long-term effects of heat acclimatization on the level of heat tolerance. Physiological and subjective markers of heat tolerance were assessed during a heat stress test (HST: 3 × 8-min runs outdoors [~ 40 °C and 20% RH] at 50% of their estimated speed at VO_2max) performed on the 2nd day upon arrival to the desert military base in the United Arab Emirates after a first day of mostly passive exposure to heat. Among the 50 male French soldiers, 25 partook in a 4-month military mission in countries characterized by a hot environment ~ 6 months prior to the study (HA). The other 25 participants were never heat acclimatized (CT). Rectal temperature (p = 0.023), heart rate (p = 0.033), and perceived exertion (p = 0.043) were lower in the HA than CT group at the end of HST. Soldiers who experienced a former 4-month period of natural heat acclimatization very likely had a higher level of heat tolerance during exercise in the heat, even 6 months after returning from the previous desert mission, than that of their non-acclimatized counterparts.