Occurrence and determinants of enterococcal bloodstream infections: a population-based study

Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium: impact of ending screening and isolation in a Danish University hospital

BACKGROUND

Substantial resources are used in hospitals worldwide to counteract the ever-increasing incidence of vancomycin-resistant and vancomycin-variable Enterococcus faecium (VREfm and VVEfm), but it is important to balance patient safety, infection prevention, and hospital costs.

AIM

To investigate the impact of ending VREfm/VVEfm screening and isolation at Odense University Hospital (OUH), Denmark, on patient and clinical characteristics, risk of bacteraemia, and mortality of VREfm/VVEfm disease at OUH. The burden of VREfm/VVEfm bacteraemia at OUH and the three collaborative hospitals in the Region of Southern Denmark (RSD) was also investigated.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted including first-time VREfm/VVEfm clinical isolates (index isolates) detected at OUH and collaborative hospitals in the period 2015-2022. The intervention period with screening and isolation was from 2015 to 2021, and the post-intervention period was 2022. Information about clinical isolates was retrieved from microbiological databases. Patient data were obtained from hospital records.

FINDINGS

At OUH, 436 patients were included in the study, with 285 in the intervention period and 151 in the post-intervention period. Ending screening and isolation was followed by an increased number of index isolates. Besides a change in van genes, only minor non-significant changes were detected in all the other investigated parameters. Mortality within 30 days did not reflect the VREfm/VVEfm-attributable deaths, and in only four cases was VREfm/VVEfm infection the likely cause of death.

CONCLUSION

Despite an increasing number of index isolates, nothing in the short follow-up period supported a reintroduction of screening and isolation.

Are enterococcal bloodstream infections an independent risk factor for a poorer 5-year survival or just a marker for severity of illness?-The Munich multicentric enterococci cohort

IMPORTANCE

The present study provides a substantial contribution to literature, showing that patients with enterococcal bloodstream infections (BSI) have a lower survival rate than those with Escherichia coli (E. coli) bloodstream infections after adjusting for 17 limiting prognostic factors and excluding patients with a limited life expectancy [metastatic tumor disease, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (greater than or equal to) 5]. This difference in the 5-year long-term survival was mainly driven by Enterococcus faecium (ECFM) bloodstream infections, with vancomycin resistance not being a significant contributing factor. Our findings imply that E. faecium bloodstream infections seem to be an independent risk factor for poor long-term outcomes. As such, future research should confirm this relationship and prioritize investigating its causality through prospective studies.

Aerobic Bacterial Profile of Sepsis and Its Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern Among Patients in a Rural Tertiary Care Center

Background Bloodstream infections (BSI) are one of the most life-threatening infections associated with high morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis with appropriate and timely treatment improves the patient outcome. The recent surge in multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains is a matter of concern. This study aims to determine the bacterial etiology and antibiotic sensitivity pattern in BSI among different age groups. Materials and methods The microbiological data of blood culture and sensitivity between April 2019 and April 2021 were extracted from the laboratory records and analyzed for the bacterial profile and antibiotic sensitivity pattern. Results Out of the total 3893 blood cultures received during the study period from April 2019 to April 2021, 194 pathogens were isolated, accounting for a prevalence of 4.98%. Among 194 patients with culture-proven BSI, 54.12% (105/194) were adults, and 45.87% (89/194) were children. Of these 194 bacterial isolates, 58.76% (114/194) were gram-negative bacteria, and 41.24% (80/194) were gram-positive bacteria. With regard to the bacteria isolated, Enterococcus species with 23.71% (46/194) and Acinetobacter species with 22.16% (43/194) were the most common bacteria. The prevalence of MDR was 59.27% (115/194). Notable MDR types were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in 15/22 (68.2%) and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producers in 15/48 (31.25%) cases. Conclusion There is a significant geographical diversity of bacteria causing sepsis and their antibiotic susceptibility pattern. Recent trends show that multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli are the predominant isolates causing BSI. Increased antibiotic resistance is leading to treatment failure and poor clinical outcomes. Hence, there is a need to monitor antibiotic resistance among patients with BSI.

Characterization of an Enterococcus faecalis bacteriophage SFQ1 as a potential therapeutic agent

Enterococcus faecalis is a well-established resident of the human gastrointestinal tract and is also a major cause of human infections. Unfortunately, therapeutic options for E. faecalis infections remain limited, particularly with the emergence of vancomycin-resistant strains in hospital settings. Consequently, there has been a renewed interest in phage therapy as an alternative to antibiotics. In this study, we have isolated a bacteriophage, vB_EfaS-SFQ1, from hospital sewage, which effectively infects E. faecalis strain EFS01. Phage SFQ1 is a siphovirus and exhibits a relatively broad host range. Furthermore, it has a short latent period of approximately 10 min and a large burst size of about 110 PFU/cell at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.01, and it could effectively disrupt the biofilms formed by E. faecalis. Thus, this study provides a detailed characterization of E. faecalis phage SFQ1, which has great potential for treating E. faecalis infections.

Clinical and microbiological characteristics of bloodstream infections caused by Enterococcus spp. within internal medicine wards: a two-year single-centre experience

Enterococcal bloodstream infections (E-BSI) constitute the second cause of Gram-positive bacterial BSI in Europe with a high rate of in-hospital mortality. Furthermore, E-BSI treatment is still challenging because of intrinsic and acquired antibiotic resistances. We conducted a retrospective, 2-year, observational, single-centre study to evaluate clinical outcome and risk factors for E-BSI mortality in internal medicine wards. 201patients with E-BSI were included in the analysis. Infection rate was 2.4/1000 days of hospital admission. Most E-BSI were hospital acquired (78.1%). The median age was 68 years. Charlson Comorbidity Index, adjusted for age, was 5 (range 4-6). Patients with E-BSI frequently had at least one invasive device, predominantly a central venous (73%) or a bladder catheter (61.7%). Enterococcus faecium accounted for 47.94% of E-BSI (resistance rate to ampicillin or vancomycin was 22.2 and 23.3%, respectively) and Enterococcus faecalis for 52.08% (resistance rate to ampicillin or vancomycin was 3.1 and 2.2%, respectively). Among all E-BSI, 25% of patients received appropriate therapy. In total, 59% of E-BSI underwent echocardiography. At the multivariate analysis, resistance to vancomycin (OR 2.09, p = 0.025), sepsis (OR 2.57, p = 0.003) and septic shock (OR 3.82, p = 0.004) was a predictor of mortality. No difference in 28-day survival was observed between appropriate or inappropriate treatment, except for endocarditis. However, E-BSI sources in clinical practices are not always properly investigated, including the rule-out of intracardiac vegetations. We did not demonstrate a difference in mortality for inappropriate therapy in the absence of endocarditis in comorbid patients with a long history of medicalization.