The Effects of the COMMASH-E Intervention on the Fatigue, Sleep Quality and Functional Status of Children with Cancer in Indonesia

Sleep interventions in pediatric oncology: A systematic review of the evidence

Sleep concerns are common during pediatric cancer treatment and can last into survivorship. The current systematic review sought to identify intervention studies that addressed sleep as a primary or secondary outcome during pediatric cancer treatment up to 5 years after completing treatment. Quality assessment was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The review identified 16 studies with a total of 943 participants that tested a wide range of interventions including psycho-educational, stress management techniques, medications, and physical activity. Most studies included tested interventions in small samples. None of the included studies had a high risk of bias for all domains, but all included studies had a high risk of bias for at least two risk domains. Several feasible pilot studies were identified that warrant further research to test efficacy. Implications for future research and clinical practice to manage sleep concerns are discussed.

Clinician perspectives on nutritional impairment in children undergoing cancer chemotherapy in Thailand: A qualitative descriptive study

Objective

This study aimed to explore the perspectives of pediatric oncology clinicians in Thailand on children's gastrointestinal ​symptoms, eating habits, and nutrition during cancer chemotherapy. Additionally, it sought to identify factors influencing children's nutritional status, including the characteristics of the children, clinician-related factors, and hospital-level factors.

Methods

The study involved pediatric oncology clinicians working at a tertiary hospital in Bangkok. Data were collected through interviews, focusing on three key areas: (1) children's gastrointestinal symptoms, eating behaviors, and nutrition, (2) clinicians' cognitions and behaviors that impact children's nutrition, and (3) environmental factors. Each participating clinician also identified a colleague who could offer additional perspectives. Interviews were conducted in the Thai language and analyzed using directed content analysis.

Results

A total of 22 participants were enrolled in the study, comprising sixteen nurses, four physicians, one child life specialist, and one Hospital Nutrition Service staff member. The majority of participants were female (95.4%), with an average age of 37.77 years and an average of 15.55 years of experience in caring for children with cancer. Factors influencing children's nutritional status included the children's cancer diagnosis, treatment exposures, and symptoms. Clinicians attributed changes in children's weight and eating patterns to these symptoms. Influential clinician-related factors included current practices that impacted children's symptoms and food intake. Hospital-level factors included both direct influences on children and those arising from clinical practices.

Conclusions

To optimize the nutritional status of Thai children undergoing chemotherapy, multi-level interventions are needed. These interventions should target children's symptoms, clinician knowledge, role norms, and address issues related to the hospital environment, specifically those elements that contribute to unpleasant experiences.

Does Creative Arts Therapy Improve Distressing Symptoms in Children with Cancer? A Synthesis of Extant Literature

Introduction: Children with cancer experience symptom distress which has been correlated with decreased quality of life (QOL). Creative arts therapy (CAT) encompasses the therapeutic use of creative arts which may improve QOL among children with cancer by affecting symptoms. Therefore, the research question was asked: Does CAT affect symptoms of pain, nausea, fatigue, anxiety, and mood in children with cancer? Methods: Based on the study question, a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Embase was completed. Inclusion criteria limited articles to specific symptom outcomes in two-group intervention studies in the English language. Selected articles were confirmed for inclusion by the study team, followed by group discussion to develop matrices with levels of evidence based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (Grade) guidelines. Results: Initial searches revealed 1,391 articles, screened to 44 for systematic review. Based on the inclusion criteria, 11 articles remained. Four studies had evidence levels graded as low, three were low to moderate, and four were moderate. Outcomes of mood and anxiety were measured in five studies, pain in four, fatigue in two, and nausea in one study. Discussion: Psychological outcomes were measured more commonly than physical outcomes. Evidence reached a moderate grade in four studies. Summary: Through this synthesis of intervention studies with CAT in children with cancer, improvement in distressing symptoms has potential, but the state of the science for symptom management with CAT could be strengthened for nurses to promote CAT to improve QOL among children with cancer.

Music interventions for improving psychological and physical outcomes in people with cancer

BACKGROUND

This is an update of the review published on the Cochrane Library in 2016, Issue 8. Having cancer may result in extensive emotional, physical and social suffering. Music interventions have been used to alleviate symptoms and treatment side effects in people with cancer. This review includes music interventions defined as music therapy offered by trained music therapists, as well as music medicine, which was defined as listening to pre-recorded music offered by medical staff.

OBJECTIVES

To assess and compare the effects of music therapy and music medicine interventions for psychological and physical outcomes in people with cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2020, Issue 3) in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE via Ovid, Embase via Ovid, CINAHL, PsycINFO, LILACS, Science Citation Index, CancerLit, CAIRSS, Proquest Digital Dissertations, ClinicalTrials.gov, Current Controlled Trials, the RILM Abstracts of Music Literature, http://www.wfmt.info/Musictherapyworld/ and the National Research Register. We searched all databases, except for the last two, from their inception to April 2020; the other two are no longer functional, so we searched them until their termination date. We handsearched music therapy journals, reviewed reference lists and contacted experts. There was no language restriction.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials of music interventions for improving psychological and physical outcomes in adults and pediatric patients with cancer. We excluded patients undergoing biopsy and aspiration for diagnostic purposes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias. Where possible, we presented results in meta-analyses using mean differences and standardized mean differences. We used post-test scores. In cases of significant baseline difference, we used change scores. We conducted separate meta-analyses for studies with adult participants and those with pediatric participants. Primary outcomes of interest included psychological outcomes and physical symptoms and secondary outcomes included physiological responses, physical functioning, anesthetic and analgesic intake, length of hospitalization, social and spiritual support, communication, and quality of life (QoL) . We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 29 new trials for inclusion in this update. In total, the evidence of this review rests on 81 trials with a total of 5576 participants. Of the 81 trials, 74 trials included adult (N = 5306) and seven trials included pediatric (N = 270) oncology patients. We categorized 38 trials as music therapy trials and 43 as music medicine trials. The interventions were compared to standard care. Psychological outcomes The results suggest that music interventions may have a large anxiety-reducing effect in adults with cancer, with a reported average anxiety reduction of 7.73 units (17 studies, 1381 participants; 95% confidence interval (CI) -10.02 to -5.44; very low-certainty evidence) on the Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory scale (range 20 to 80; lower values reflect lower anxiety). Results also suggested a moderately strong, positive impact of music interventions on depression in adults (12 studies, 1021 participants; standardized mean difference (SMD): -0.41, 95% CI -0.67 to -0.15; very low-certainty evidence). We found no support for an effect of music interventions on mood (SMD 0.47, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.97; 5 studies, 236 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Music interventions may increase hope in adults with cancer, with a reported average increase of 3.19 units (95% CI 0.12 to 6.25) on the Herth Hope Index (range 12 to 48; higher scores reflect greater hope), but this finding was based on only two studies (N = 53 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Physical outcomes We found a moderate pain-reducing effect of music interventions (SMD -0.67, 95% CI -1.07 to -0.26; 12 studies, 632 adult participants; very low-certainty evidence). In addition, music interventions had a small treatment effect on fatigue (SMD -0.28, 95% CI -0.46 to -0.10; 10 studies, 498 adult participants; low-certainty evidence). The results suggest a large effect of music interventions on adult participants' QoL, but the results were highly inconsistent across studies, and the pooled effect size was accompanied by a large confidence interval (SMD 0.88, 95% CI -0.31 to 2.08; 7 studies, 573 participants; evidence is very uncertain). Removal of studies that used improper randomization methods resulted in a moderate effect size that was less heterogeneous (SMD 0.47, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.88, P = 0.02, I² = 56%). A small number of trials included pediatric oncology participants. The findings suggest that music interventions may reduce anxiety but this finding was based on only two studies (SMD -0.94, 95% CI -1.9 to 0.03; very low-certainty evidence). Due to the small number of studies, we could not draw conclusions regarding the effects of music interventions on mood, depression, QoL, fatigue or pain in pediatric participants with cancer. The majority of studies included in this review update presented a high risk of bias, and therefore the overall certainty of the evidence is low. For several outcomes (i.e. anxiety, depression, pain, fatigue, and QoL) the beneficial treatment effects were consistent across studies for music therapy interventions delivered by music therapists. In contrast, music medicine interventions resulted in inconsistent treatment effects across studies for these outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review indicates that music interventions compared to standard care may have beneficial effects on anxiety, depression, hope, pain, and fatigue in adults with cancer. The results of two trials suggest that music interventions may have a beneficial effect on anxiety in children with cancer. Too few trials with pediatric participants were included to draw conclusions about the treatment benefits of music for other outcomes. For several outcomes, music therapy interventions delivered by a trained music therapist led to consistent results across studies and this was not the case for music medicine interventions. Moreover, evidence of effect was found for music therapy interventions for QoL and fatigue but not for music medicine interventions. Most trials were at high risk of bias and low or very low certainty of evidence; therefore, these results need to be interpreted with caution.

MUSIC INTERVENTIONS IN PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pain is a disagreeable and distressing feeling that affects human beings in multi-dimensional ways. A number of non-pharmacological interventions have had varying degrees of success in treating cancer-related pain, such as breathing and relaxation techniques, and music therapy, which have been identified as beneficial therapies for alleviating pain and anxiety.

OBJECTIVE

Identify the therapeutic effects of music interventions in psychological and physiological terms and on the quality of life of children undergoing cancer treatment.

METHOD

Systematic review of effectiveness based on the methodology of the Joanna Briggs Institute.

RESULTS

Eleven articles were included with a total of 429 children, whose ages ranged from 0 to 18 years. The mean duration of the music intervention was 30.6 (±SD 9.8) min. In a combined estimate of five studies for pain and anxiety outcomes, there were benefits to using music when compared with the control group (SMD -1.05; CI 95 % -1.70 - 0.40 N = 453 I² = 90 %). A combined analysis of five studies to assess quality of life showed that the use of music was favorable when compared with the control (SMD -0.80; CI 95 % -1.17-0.43 N = 457= I² = 71 %).

CONCLUSION

After completing this review, it was determined that there is evidence to support the use of music to reduce pain and anxiety and improve the quality of life of children undergoing cancer treatment.