Evaluation of laparoscopic forceps jaw contact pressure and distribution using pressure sensitive film

Experimental and histological evaluation of different clamp technique for pulmonary artery

OBJECTIVES

The double-loop technique has been used in our clinical settings for pulmonary arterioplasty and/or injured artery repair during thoracoscopic anatomical lung resection. We evaluated the pressure resistance capacity and intimal load to determine the effectiveness and safety of the double-loop technique.

METHODS

The double-loop technique, DeBakey clamp, Fogarty clamp, endovascular clips and vessel loop technique were evaluated. During an experimental study, a polyvinyl alcohol main pulmonary artery model, manometer and in-deflation device were used to measure the burst pressure. The maximum clamp pressure was measured using a pressure-measuring film. Each measurement was performed 10 times. During the histological study, we measured the burst pressure and evaluated the intimal damage of the human pulmonary artery associated with the double-loop technique and DeBakey clamp.

RESULTS

The experimental burst pressure (mmHg) and maximum clamp pressure (MPa) between the double-loop technique and DeBakey at the third notch were not significantly different (24.6 ± 2.8 and 21.8 ± 2.8, P = 0.094; 1.54 ± 0.12 and 1.49 ± 0.12, P = 0.954). During the histological study, the burst pressures of the double-loop technique and DeBakey at the third notch were also not significantly different (P = 0.754). Furthermore, the double-loop technique resulted in only intimal deformation in each five samples.

CONCLUSIONS

The double-loop technique is feasible for thoracoscopic anatomical lung resection because it has similar pressure resistance capacity and intimal load as DeBakey at the 3rd notch.

Output force and ratio of laparoscopic graspers: an evaluation of operating room ergonomics

BACKGROUND

"Laparoscopist's thumb," or thenar paresthesia, can result from prolonged or excessive grip force during laparoscopy, as can more general syndromes, such as carpal tunnel syndrome. This is particularly relevant in gynecology, where laparoscopic procedures are standard. Although this method of injury is well known, there is a paucity of data to guide surgeons in selecting more efficient, ergonomic instruments.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the ratio of applied tissue force and required surgeon input in a sample of common ratcheting laparoscopic graspers in a small-handed surgeon, to provide potential metrics applicable to surgical ergonomics and surgeon instrument choice.

STUDY DESIGN

Laparoscopic graspers with varied ratcheting mechanisms and tip shapes were evaluated. Brands included Snowden-Pencer, Covidien, Aesculap, and Ethicon. A Kocher was used as an open instrument comparison. Flexiforce A401 thin-film force sensors were used to measure applied forces. Data were collected and calibrated using an Arduino Uno microcontroller board with Arduino and MATLAB software. Single-handed, complete closure of each device's ratcheting mechanism was performed 3 times. The maximum required input force in Newtons was recorded and averaged. The average output force was measured with a bare sensor and the same sensor between 2 different thicknesses of LifeLike BioTissue.

RESULTS

The most ergonomic ratcheting grasper for a small-handed surgeon was identified by the output ratio: the highest output force relative to the required surgeon input (the most force for the least amount of effort). The Kocher required an average input force of 33.66 N, with its highest output ratio of 3.46 (112 N output). The Covidien Endo Grasp was the most ergonomic, with an output ratio of 0.96 on the bare force sensor (31.4 N output). The Snowden-Pencer Wavy grasper was the least ergonomic, with an output ratio of 0.06 when applied to the bare force sensor (5.9 N output). All graspers except for the Endo Grasp had improving output ratios as tissue thickness and subsequent grasper contact area increased. Input force above that provided by the ratcheting mechanisms did not increase output force in a clinically relevant amount for any of the instruments evaluated.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic graspers vary widely in their ability to provide reliable tissue force without requiring excessive input by the surgeon, and a point of diminishing returns often exists with increased surgeon input over designed ratcheting mechanisms. Output force and output ratio are potential quantitative measures of the efficiency of laparoscopic instruments. Providing users with this type of data could assist in optimizing instrument ergonomics.

A Fully 3D-Printed Steerable Instrument for Minimally Invasive Surgery

In the field of medical instruments, additive manufacturing allows for a drastic reduction in the number of components while improving the functionalities of the final design. In addition, modifications for users’ needs or specific procedures become possible by enabling the production of single customized items. In this work, we present the design of a new fully 3D-printed handheld steerable instrument for laparoscopic surgery, which was mechanically actuated using cables. The pistol-grip handle is based on ergonomic principles and allows for single-hand control of both grasping and omnidirectional steering, while compliant joints and snap-fit connectors enable fast assembly and minimal part count. Additive manufacturing allows for personalization of the handle to each surgeon’s needs by adjusting specific dimensions in the CAD model, which increases the user’s comfort during surgery. Testing showed that the forces on the instrument handle required for steering and grasping were below 15 N, while the grasping force efficiency was calculated to be 10–30%. The instrument combines the advantages of additive manufacturing with regard to personalization and simplified assembly, illustrating a new approach to the design of advanced surgical instruments where the customization for a single procedure or user’s need is a central aspect.