Parents' management of adolescent patients' postoperative pain after discharge: A qualitative study

Paediatric post-discharge pain and parent perceptions of support from an Australian nurse practitioner led acute pain service

Poorly managed post-operative pain remains an issue for paediatric patients. Post-discharge telephone follow-up is used by an Australian Nurse Practitioner Acute Pain Service (NpAPS) to provide access to effective pain management post-discharge from hospital. This cross-sectional survey design study aimed to determine the pain levels of children following discharge and parent views on participation in their child's pain management and perceptions of support from the NpAPS. Parents completed the Parents' Postoperative Pain Measure-Short Form (PPPM-SF) and factors affecting parents' participation in children's pain management questionnaire (FPMQ). Results indicated that pain score was high, especially on the day of discharge and 24 hours post-discharge. Parents, despite feeling supported by the NpAPS, experienced uncertainty, emotional responses and expressed concerns about communication and coordination of care. The clinically significant pain levels of the majority of children on the day of discharge and day post-discharge from hospital are a concern. Worry and uncertainty among parents, particularly on the day and first night of discharge, suggest this transition period where responsibility of clinical management of pain is handed over to parents may require greater focus for parental support.

Erratum: Notice of duplicate publication: Qualitative research and pain: Current controversies and future directions

Much of what we know about the meaning and experience of pain has been facilitated through qualitative research. However, qualitative inquiry continues to be underrepresented in the pain literature relative to quantitative approaches. In this Commentary and Introduction to the Special Issue on Qualitative Research and Pain, we present a collection of high-quality, cutting-edge qualitative studies in pain that highlight theoretical and methodological advancements in the field. The articles included in this Special Issue feature a range of designs (e.g., grounded theory, phenomenology, qualitative description), methods of data collection (e.g., interviews, object elicitation, photovoice), and populations (e.g., immigrant women, individuals with heart disease). Throughout this Commentary we also address three common controversies regarding the quality of qualitative research and the stance we took on them for the Issue. These primarily deal with the procedure-related issues of sample size, generalizability, and saturation. We discuss how a more substantive-centered approach to evaluation—that is, an approach that considers the methodological and theoretical significance of the work—is crucial for advancing qualitative research in pain.