The Impact of Preoperative Patient Education on Postoperative Pain, Opioid Use, and Psychological Outcomes: A Narrative Review

Mitigating and preventing perioperative opioid-related harm

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although necessary for treatment of acute pain, opioids are associated with significant harm in the perioperative period and further intervention is necessary perioperatively to mitigate opioid-related harm.

RECENT FINDINGS

Opioid-naive patients are often first exposed to opioids when undergoing surgery, which can result in significant harm. Despite their benefits in reducing acute postsurgical pain, they are also associated with risks ranging from mild (e.g., pruritis, constipation, nausea) to potentially catastrophic (e.g. opioid-induced ventilatory impairment, respiratory depression, death). Overprescribing of opioids can lead to opioid diversion and drug driving. In this review, we will discuss opioid-related harm and what strategies can be used perioperatively to mitigate this harm. Interventions such as optimizing nonopioid analgesia, implementing Enhanced Recovery after Surgery programs, effective respiratory monitoring, patient education and opioid stewardship programs will be discussed.

SUMMARY

We will review policy and guidelines regarding perioperative opioid management and identify challenges and future directions to mitigate opioid-related harm.

The Impact of Marijuana Use on Postoperative Outcomes in Abdominal-based Free Flap Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

 There is an increasing prevalence of marijuana use in the general population yet clinical studies on marijuana's effect on surgical outcomes remain limited. Marijuana's effect on wound healing, venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to endothelial inflammation, and bleeding due to inhibited platelet function have been cited based on animal models but have not been evaluated clinically in patients undergoing microsurgical reconstruction.

METHODS

 Retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction in a single institute from August 2018 to December 2022. Patient self-reported marijuana use, demographics, total narcotic use during hospitalization converted to oral morphine milligram equivalent (MME), and 90-day complications were collected and compared.

RESULTS

 A total of 162 patients were included and 13 patients (8.5%) had reported marijuana use on presurgical history. Marijuana users are more likely to be younger and report concurrent nicotine smoking. Marijuana users were also at a significantly elevated risk of developing symptomatic VTE (15 vs. 1%; odds ratio (OR) 13.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.71-104.2]; p = 0.01) and marijuana use remained a significant risk factor with multivariate analysis. On postoperative 90-day complications, there was no increased risk of flap loss, reoperation, postoperative transfusion, or hematoma associated with marijuana use, and no significantly increased risk for overall donor or recipient site complications. Marijuana users required significantly more narcotics for pain control during hospitalization (100 ± 77 vs. 49 ± 45 MME; p = 0.0003), although they had similar lengths of stay, achievement of mobilization on post operative day (POD)1, and maximal pain scores.

CONCLUSION

 Marijuana use increases the risks of postoperative VTE and increased postoperative narcotic requirements in patients who underwent abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction. Future prospective cohort study is required to further understand marijuana-associated risks in microsurgical procedures.

Patient perspectives on health care models in cardiac surgery: a qualitative evaluation

BACKGROUND

The implementation of ERAS represents a promising solution to improve treatment efficiency and facilitate patient involvement. This innovative care model aims to optimize recovery processes following surgeries by adopting a holistic, interprofessional approach. At our hospital, ERAS was implemented in minimally invasive heart valve surgery, offering two distinct ERAS models. Additionally, there is also the standard of care without ERAS. The objective of the study is to gain insight into patient satisfaction and perceived differences across these various care models.

METHODS

Patients were interviewed using semi-structured interviews approximately two to three months after undergoing surgery. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis in accordance with the methodology proposed by Kuckartz. Four main categories were established: Preoperative care, postoperative care and communication, patient participation and involvement, and rehabilitation and post-clinical course.

RESULTS

Comprehensive preoperative education and seamless communication throughout the perioperative care journey were identified as fundamental to patient satisfaction and optimal care processes. Patients in the ERAS + model reported higher overall satisfaction with their care compared to patients in the standard of care and ERAS groups.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative education establishes the foundation for patients' subsequent behaviours and expectations regarding their treatment. Physical activity, nutrition, and mental health are significant aspects. The active involvement and participation of patients and their families in the treatment process facilitated superior postoperative care, intensive physiotherapy, mental support, and faster recovery. A functional flow of information throughout the entire care process is vital. Moreover, having a dedicated point of contact had a beneficial impact on patients´ well-being. The integration of innovative ERAS concepts, which encompass interprofessional preoperative patient education and psychosomatic support, represents a promising approach from a patient perspective, offering benefits to a broad spectrum of cardiac surgical patients.

Prolonged opioid use after single-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery in a Belgian population: a multicentric observational study

PURPOSE

Lumbar spinal fusion surgeries are increasingly being performed in spinal degenerative disease, often accompanied by perioperative opioid prescriptions. The aim of this study is to analyze prolonged postoperative opioid use following a standardized opioid prescription after single-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery in a Belgian population.

METHODS

This prospective, multicentric observational study included patients undergoing single-level lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative disease. A standardized postoperative opioid protocol (Targinact 2 × 10 mg/5 mg, Paracetamol 4 × 1 g and Ibuprofen 3 × 600 mg) was applied uniformly. Prolonged opioid use was defined as continued opioid use six months after surgery. Patient data were collected using the Back-App®.

RESULTS

Among 198 participants, 32.8% continued opioid use six months post-surgery, with 8% utilizing strong opioids. Prolonged opioid use correlated with lower pre-operative back pain. Patients with prolonged opioid use and strong opioid use at six months show less improvement in disability compared to patients without prolonged opioid use. Moreover, patients with prolonged strong opioid use tend to have lesser improvement of the low back pain. The odds for prolonged opioid use decrease with the increase of the improvement in ODI.

CONCLUSION

1 in 3 patients undergoing single-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery is at risk for prolonged opioid use. The study underscores the importance of tailored pain management strategies, particularly given the rising prevalence of spinal fusion surgeries. The association between pre-operative low back pain, post-operative improvement in functionality (ODI), and prolonged opioid use emphasizes the need for judicious opioid prescribing practices and highlights the role of functional outcomes in treatment goals.

Patient Fear of Pain: The Pre-Operative Period in the Neurosurgery Clinic

PURPOSE

This study was conducted as a descriptive study to determine the pain fears of patients undergoing surgery in the neurosurgery clinic.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The study was conducted with 151 patients hospitalized in the neurosurgery clinic who met the inclusion criteria. Data were collected with the patient information form and the fear of pain scale-III. Ethics committee approval, institutional permission, and written consent from individuals were obtained before the study.

RESULTS

It was determined that the mean fear of pain score was 64.59 ± 18.43, 41.7% of the patient were fear of surgical incisional pain. Fear of surgical incisional pain is responsible for 22.0% and female gender is responsible for 29% of the change in fear of pain scores.

CONCLUSION

As a result, it was determined that the pain fear level of the patients in the pre-operative period was moderate. Increasing the practices to reduce the patients' fear of pain should be recommended.

An Applied Study of Ulinastatin in Pain Management After Hip Replacement: Impact on Opioid Use

Background

Due to the global prevalence of opioid drugs, postsurgical prescriptions can lead to substantial opioid consumption, highlighting the increasing need for alternative medications. Alternative medicines can markedly lessen the usage of opioids after surgery, but the variety and notable side effects of these alternatives require meticulous experimental support.

Objective

This study explored the efficacy and safety of ulinastatin for alleviating postsurgical pain, for reducing the need for opioids, and for inclusion in conventional treatment methods.

Methods

A total of 108 patients undergoing elective hip replacement were randomly allocated into either the experimental group (56 cases, standard pain relief treatment plus 60 IU ulinastatin) or the control group (40 cases, standard pain relief treatment). The main outcomes measured were the total consumption of opioids at 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes comprised patient-reported pain indices and levels of satisfaction with pain control. The frequency of adverse events evaluated medication safety.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, or underlying diseases between the two groups. Over 24 hours, opioid consumption was higher in the standard treatment group (66.6 mg; mean difference [MD]: 4.43 mg; 95% CI: 57.6-75.5) than in the intervention group (54.5 mg; MD: 1.91 mg; 95% CI: 50.7-58.3). The standard treatment group exhibited a notably higher incidence of adverse reactions. However, there was no disparity in post-discharge satisfaction between the groups, with an odds ratio of 1.058 (95% CI: 0.62-1.82; P > 0.05). Additionally, significant differences in C-reactive protein levels were observed immediately and 6 h after surgery between the two groups.

Conclusion

Within 72 h post-surgery, ulinastatin was effective in substantially reducing the use of opioids while maintaining adequate pain control. Ulinastatin may be beneficial for postoperative pain management and for reducing the risks associated with opioid use.

Registered

ClinicalTrials.gov ChiCTR2300072126.

Role of Preoperative Information and Education of Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review of the Literature

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common and highly effective surgical procedure used to relieve pain and improve function in patients with severe hip arthritis and other hip disorders. While the surgical techniques and implants used in THA have advanced significantly, the importance of preoperative information and education cannot be overstated. The aim of this narrative review is to explore the effect of preoperative information and education on the outcome of THA. Key components of preoperative education and information include detailed information about the operation itself, the preoperative preparation, the postoperative pain management and rehabilitation, the possibility of postoperative complications, psychosocial support, and answers to frequently asked questions. The results of the study have confirmed the contradictory findings found in the literature concerning the impact of preoperative education on THA clinical outcomes, including pain, anxiety, functionality, postoperative rehabilitation, duration of hospitalization, and rate of complications. While, theoretically, preoperative education should have a positive effect on clinical outcomes, a plethora of studies have failed to support this hypothesis. Thus, there is a great need for properly designed, prospective, randomized, and controlled studies that have sufficient power in order to fully elucidate the role of preoperative education and information on THA outcomes.

Developing and Implementing Postoperative Pain Management Guidelines for Breast Cancer Surgery: A Leadership Perspective

Introduction Persistent postoperative pain significantly diminishes the quality of life in breast cancer patients. Effective pain management post-surgery is critical for patient satisfaction, reducing complications, and facilitating quick recovery and hospital discharge. This study addresses the lack of patient-centered postoperative pain management guidelines for breast cancer patients. Aim The primary goal of this study was to develop tailored postoperative pain management guidelines for the local community in the United Arab Emirates, integrating these into a broader network of oncology facilities. Methods and Materials Employing a mixed-methods approach with a qualitative emphasis, the study gathered data from 10 female breast cancer patients (aged 39-65 years) with postoperative satisfaction surveys. Additionally, semi-structured interviews with six healthcare professionals involved in guideline development were conducted. Results A significant 90% of patients reported experiencing moderate-to-extreme pain post-surgery, indicating a need for improved pain management. Key factors identified included the need for enhanced nurse training and patient education on pain management preoperatively. The study team unanimously recognized the necessity for dedicated postoperative guidelines. Conclusion The study underscores the critical need for adequate postoperative pain management in breast cancer care. The findings advocate for creating multidisciplinary, evidence-based guidelines focused on patient-centered care. Furthermore, the study highlights the importance of international collaboration and continuous quality improvement measures, such as the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle, for developing and refining these guidelines.