Stress Aortic Valve Index (SAVI) with Dobutamine for Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: A Pilot Study

Biomechanical Evaluation of Aortic Valve Stenosis by Means of a Virtual Stress Test: A Fluid-Structure Interaction Study

The impact of aortic valve stenosis (AS) extends beyond the vicinity of the narrowed leaflets into the left ventricle (LV) and into the systemic vasculature because of highly unpredictable valve behavior and complex blood flow in the ascending aorta that can be attributed to the strong interaction between the narrowed cusps and the ejected blood. These effects can become exacerbated during exercise and may have implications for disease progression, accurate diagnosis, and timing of intervention. In this 3-D patient-specific study, we employ strongly coupled fluid-structure interaction (FSI) modeling to perform a comprehensive biomechanical evaluation of systolic ejection dynamics in a stenosed aortic valve (AV) during increasing LV contraction. Our model predictions reveal that the heterogeneous ∆P vs. Q relationship that was observed in our previous clinical study can be attributed to a non-linear increase (by ~ 1.5-fold) in aortic valve area as LV heart rate increases from 70 to 115 bpm. Furthermore, our results show that even for a moderately stenotic valve, increased LV contraction during exercise can lead to high-velocity flow turbulence (Re = 11,700) in the aorta similar to that encountered with a severely stenotic valve (Re ~ 10,000), with concomitant greater viscous loss (~3-fold increase) and elevated wall stress in the ascending aorta. Our FSI predictions also reveal that individual valve cusps undergo distinct and highly non-linear increases (>100%) in stress during exercise, potentially contributing to progressive calcification. Such quantitative biomechanical evaluations from realistic FSI workflows provide insights into disease progression and can be integrated with current stress testing for AS patients to comprehensively predict hemodynamics and valve function under both baseline and exercise conditions.

Sigmoid isostiffness-lines: An in-vitro model for the assessment of aortic stenosis severity

Introduction

The aortic valve opening area (AVA), used to quantify aortic stenosis severity, depends on the transvalvular flow rate (Q). The currently accepted clinical echocardiographic method assumes a linear relation between AVA and Q. We studied whether a sigmoid model better describes this relation and determined "isostiffness-lines" across a wide flow spectrum, thus allowing building a nomogram for the non-invasive estimation of valve stiffness.

Methods

Both AVA and instantaneous Q (Qinst) were measured at 10 different mean cardiac outputs of porcine aortic valves mounted in a pulsatile flow loop. The valves' cusps were chemically stiffened to obtain three stiffness grades and the procedure was repeated for each grade. The relative stiffness was defined as the ratio between LV work at grade with the added stiffness and at native stiffness grade.AVA peak ¯ corresponding to the selectedQ peak ¯ of the highest 3 and 5 cardiac output values was predicted in K-fold cross-validation using sequentially a linear and a sigmoid model. The accuracy of each model was assessed with the Akaike information criterion (AIC).

Results

The sigmoid model predicted more accuratelyAVA peak ¯ (AIC for prediction of AVA withQ peak ¯ of the 3 highest cardiac output values: -1,743 vs. -1,048; 5 highest cardiac output values: -1,471 vs. -878) than the linear model.

Conclusion

This study suggests that the relation between AVA and Q can be better described by a sigmoid than a linear model. This construction of "isostiffness-lines" may be a useful method for the assessment of aortic stenosis in clinical echocardiography.

Rationale and design of SAVI-AoS: A physiologic study of patients with symptomatic moderate aortic valve stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

Background

Moderate aortic valve stenosis occurs twice as often as severe aortic stenosis (AS) and carries a similarly poor prognosis. Current European and American guidelines offer limited insight into moderate AS (MAS) patients with unexplained symptoms. Measuring valve physiology at rest while most patients experience symptoms during exertion might represent a conceptual limitation in the current grading of AS severity. The stress aortic valve index (SAVI) may delineate hemodynamically significant AS among patients with MAS.

Objectives

To investigate the diagnostic value of SAVI in symptomatic MAS patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥ 50%): aortic valve area (AVA) > 1 cm² plus either mean valve gradient (MG) 15–39 mmHg or maximal aortic valve velocity (AOV max) 2.5–3.9 m/s. Short-term objectives include associations with symptom burden, functional capacity, and cardiac biomarkers. Long-term objectives include clinical outcomes.

Methods and results

Multicenter, non-blinded, observational cohort. AS severity will be graded invasively (aortic valve pressure measurements with dobutamine stress testing for SAVI) and non-invasively (echocardiography during dobutamine and exercise stress). Computed tomography (CT) of the aortic valve will be scored for calcium, and hemodynamics simulated using computational fluid dynamics. Cardiac biomarkers and functional parameters will be serially monitored. The primary objective is to see how SAVI and conventional measures (MG, AVA and Vmax) correlate with clinical parameters (quality of life survey, 6-minute walk test [6MWT], and biomarkers).

Conclusions

The SAVI-AoS study will extensively evaluate patients with unexplained, symptomatic MAS to determine any added value of SAVI versus traditional, resting valve parameters.

Improving transcatheter aortic valve interventional predictability via fluid-structure interaction modelling using patient-specific anatomy

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is now a standard treatment for high-surgical-risk patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. TAVR is being explored for broader indications including degenerated bioprosthetic valves, bicuspid valves and for aortic valve (AV) insufficiency. It is, however, challenging to predict whether the chosen valve size, design or its orientation would produce the most-optimal haemodynamics in the patient. Here, we present a novel patient-specific evaluation framework to realistically predict the patient's AV performance with a high-fidelity fluid-structure interaction analysis that included the patient's left ventricle and ascending aorta (AAo). We retrospectively evaluated the pre- and post-TAVR dynamics of a patient who underwent a 23 mm TAVR and evaluated against the patient's virtually de-calcified AV serving as a hypothetical benchmark. Our model predictions were consistent with clinical data. Stenosed AV produced a turbulent flow during peak-systole, while aortic flow with TAVR and de-calcified AV were both in the laminar-to-turbulent transitional regime with an estimated fivefold reduction in viscous dissipation. For TAVR, dissipation was highest during early systole when valve deformation was the greatest, suggesting that an efficient valve opening may reduce energy loss. Our study demonstrates that such patient-specific modelling frameworks can be used to improve predictability and in the planning of AV interventions.

Model-based aortic power transfer: A potential measure for quantifying aortic stenosis severity based on measured data

Current aortic stenosis severity grading is based mainly on the local properties of the stenotic valve, such as pressure gradient or jet velocity. Success rates of valve replacement therapy are still suboptimal, so alternative grading of AS should be investigated. We suggest the efficiency of power transfer from the left ventricle to the aorta, as it takes into account heart, valve and circulatory system. Left ventricular and circulatory power were estimated using a 0D model, which was optimised to patient data: left ventricular and aortic pressure, aortic flow and diastolic left ventricular volume. Optimisation was performed using a data assimilation method. These data were available in rest as well as chemically induced exercise for twelve patients. Using this limited data set, we showed that aortic valve efficiency is highly heterogeneous between patients, but also often dependent on the haemodynamic load. This indicates that power transfer efficiency is a highly interesting metric for further research in aortic stenosis.