B cell targeted therapy for immunoglobulin G4-related disease

Therapeutic Uses of Rituximab and Clinical Features in Immunoglobulin G4-Related Disease: A Systematic Review

This research presents a systematic review focusing on rituximab's therapeutic applications in immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related disease (IgG4-RD), a rare condition characterized by immune-mediated systemic inflammation and tissue fibrosis, as well as the clinical features of IgG4-RD. While the disease commonly affects organs such as the bile ducts, lymph nodes, retroperitoneum, pancreas, and salivary glands, it can potentially involve other organs. This intricacy often leads to diagnostic challenges due to clinical overlaps with cancer, infections, and other autoimmune disorders. The diagnosis of IgG4-RD necessitates a comprehensive approach involving laboratory tests, imaging studies, and clinical assessments. Symptoms can vary, ranging from lymphadenopathy to jaundice, affecting multiple organs. Although elevated blood IgG4 levels and findings of tissue involvement and fibrosis on imaging can be suggestive, they lack the specificity for a definitive diagnosis. Early diagnosis is crucial for initiating corticosteroids and immunosuppressive to prevent further damage from IgG4-RD. This study highlights the therapeutic role of rituximab in managing this condition. Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria, the research identifies and evaluates relevant literature across various electronic databases, including PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. This review includes 14 selected publications, comprising three systematic reviews, three observational studies, four narrative reviews, and four case reports. The study design ensures a comprehensive evaluation of rituximab's potential efficacy in treating IgG4-RD and its associated clinical characteristics. Based on this study, it can be concluded that IgG4-RD can potentially be treated with rituximab, particularly in cases of relapse and maintaining remission.

Perspectives on current and emerging therapies for immunoglobulin G4-related disease

Understanding of the pathophysiology of immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) over the last dozen years has opened the door to a variety of targeted treatment approaches. Glucocorticoids are an effective treatment for IgG4-RD if used at a sufficiently high dose, but disease flares are common during or after glucocorticoid tapers and these medications seldom lead to long-term, treatment-free remissions. Moreover, their long-term use in a disease that frequently affects middle-aged to elderly individuals and often causes major pancreatic damage leads to a narrow therapeutic index. Biological therapies offer the possibility of effective disease control with fewer treatment-associated side effects. Promising avenues of investigation include B-cell depletion, immunomodulation of B-cell subsets, interference with co-stimulation, Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibition, and Signaling lymphocytic activation molecule F7-directed treatment.

IgG4 related disease and aortitis: an up-to-date review

Aortic involvement in immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is extremely rare and is often overlooked during the aortitis work-up. IgG4-related aortitis differs from non-IgG4-related aortitis in its histopathological features, site of involvement, laboratory markers, and treatment options. The histopathological examination of the vessel walls characteristically reveals adventitial thickening with intimal sparing, typically affecting the infrarenal abdominal aorta. In addition, inadequate knowledge about the disease often leads to delayed or missed diagnosis and undermanagement of a potentially treatable condition. Hence, in this paper, we review the unique clinical manifestations, laboratory markers, diagnostic features, current treatment strategies, and novel experimental therapeutic options in the management of IgG4-related aortitis.

Effect of low-dose rituximab treatment on autoimmune nodopathy with anti-contactin 1 antibody

Background

Autoimmune nodopathy with anti-contactin-1 (CNTN1) responds well to rituximab instead of traditional therapies. Although a low-dose rituximab regimen was administered to patients with other autoimmune diseases, such as myasthenia gravis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, and satisfactory outcomes were obtained, this low-dose rituximab regimen has not been trialed in anti-CNTN1-positive patients.

Methods

Anti–CNTN1 nodopathy patients were enrolled in this prospective, open-label, self-controlled pilot study. A cell-based assay was used to detect anti-CNTN1 antibodies and their subclasses in both serum and cerebrospinal fluid. Clinical features were evaluated at baseline, 2 days, 14 days, and 6 months after single low-dose rituximab treatment (600 mg). The titers of the subclasses of anti-CNTN1 antibody and peripheral B cells were also evaluated at baseline, 2 days, and 6 months after the rituximab regimen.

Results

Two patients with anti–CNTN1 antibodies were enrolled. Both patients had neurological symptoms including muscle weakness, tremor, sensory ataxia, numbness and mild nephrotic symptoms. In the field of neurological symptoms, sensory ataxia markedly improved, and the titer of anti-CNTN1 antibody as well as CD19+ B cells decreased only two days following low-dose rituximab treatment. Other neurological symptoms improved within two weeks of rituximab treatment. At the 6-month follow-up, all neurological symptoms steadily improved with steroid reduction, and both the anti-CNTN1 antibody titer and CD19+ B cells steadily decreased. No adverse events were observed after this single low-dose rituximab treatment.

Conclusions

We confirmed the clinical efficacy of low-dose rituximab by B cell depletion in autoimmune nodopathy with anti-CNTN1 antibody. This rapid and long-lasting response suggests that low-dose rituximab is a promising option for anti-CNTN1 nodopathy.

Zanubrutinib in lymphoproliferative disorders: a comprehensive review

The availability of Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors has brought about a paradigm shift in the treatment of patients with B-cell lymphomas and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. BTK was clinically validated as a target by the efficacy of the first-in-class inhibitor ibrutinib. The extended survival conferred by BTK inhibitors has brought long-term tolerability to the foreground. To minimize toxicities thought to be attributable to off-target kinase inhibition, a next generation of BTK inhibitors with greater selectivity was developed. In the United States, zanubrutinib, a next-generation BTK inhibitor, has been approved for treating adults with mantle cell lymphoma who have received at least one prior therapy, for adults with Waldenström macroglobulinemia, and for adults with relapsed or refractory marginal zone lymphoma who have received at least one anti-CD20-based therapy. Because few head-to-head comparative trials of BTK inhibitors have so far been reported, no BTK 'inhibitor of choice' can be identified. Zanubrutinib has promising efficacy in its approved indications and appears to have reduced cardiac toxicities, particularly atrial fibrillation, which may influence the choice of BTK inhibitor treatment by prescribers. Further studies are needed to inform on optimal treatment sequencing of zanubrutinib and its combination with other agents. Here, we summarize existing clinical evidence for its efficacy and safety in mantle cell lymphoma, Waldenström macroglobulinemia, marginal zone lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, and other B-lymphoproliferative indications.

Plain Language Summary

Zanubrutinib is a drug that was shown to effectively treat cancer of B cells without causing excessive serious side effects Patients with certain B-cell malignancies (cancers of white blood cells) benefit from treatment with Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, drugs that block the BTK protein and keep cancer from growing and spreading. Patients experience extended survival with ibrutinib, the first-generation BTK inhibitor approved by US Food and Drug Administration (FDA); however, one in five patients quit treatment because of harmful side effects. Ibrutinib-related side effects such as increased risk of bleeding, atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm), and high blood pressure are thought to be caused by ibrutinib blocking other proteins besides the intended target protein BTK. To reduce these side effects, zanubrutinib, a next-generation BTK inhibitor, was designed to block BTK more specifically than ibrutinib. Results of clinical studies on zanubrutinib treatment appear promising in patients with several types of B-cell malignancies, including mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and small lymphocytic lymphoma. There are not yet enough clinical data to determine which BTK inhibitor is most effective in treating B-cell malignancies without causing harmful side effects. Early data from the phase 3 ALPINE clinical study suggest that zanubrutinib works better than ibrutinib, and fewer patients experience side effects and quit treatment. Zanubrutinib is currently approved for use for treatment of adult patients with MCL who have received at least one prior therapy, for adults with WM, and for adults with MZL who have received at least one anti-CD20-based therapy.

Bruton's Kinase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Immunological Diseases: Current Status and Perspectives

The use of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors has changed the management of patients with B-cell lymphoid malignancies. BTK is an important molecule that interconnects B-cell antigen receptor (BCR) signaling. BTK inhibitors (BTKis) are classified into three categories, namely covalent irreversible inhibitors, covalent reversible inhibitors, and non-covalent reversible inhibitors. Ibrutinib is the first covalent, irreversible BTK inhibitor approved in 2013 as a breakthrough therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients. Subsequently, two other covalent, irreversible, second-generation BTKis, acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib, have been developed for lymphoid malignancies to reduce the ibrutinib-mediated adverse effects. More recently, irreversible and reversible BTKis have been under development for immune-mediated diseases, including autoimmune hemolytic anemia, immune thrombocytopenia, multiple sclerosis, pemphigus vulgaris, atopic dermatitis, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren’s disease, and chronic spontaneous urticaria, among others. This review article summarizes the preclinical and clinical evidence supporting the role of BTKis in various autoimmune, allergic, and inflammatory conditions.

Autoimmune Neurological Disorders with IgG4 Antibodies: a Distinct Disease Spectrum with Unique IgG4 Functions Responding to Anti-B Cell Therapies

The main IgG4 antibody-mediated neurological disorders (IgG4-ND) include MuSK myasthenia; CIDP with nodal/paranodal antibodies to Neurofascin-155, contactin-1/caspr-1, or pan-neurofascins; anti-LGI1 and CASPR2-associated limbic encephalitis, Morvan syndrome, or neuromyotonia; and several cases of the anti-IgLON5 and anti-DPPX-spectrum CNS diseases. The paper is centered on the clinical spectrum of IgG4-ND and their immunopathogenesis highlighting the unique functional effects of the IgG4 subclass compared to IgG1-3 antibody subclasses. The IgG4 antibodies exert pathogenic effects on their targeted antigens by blocking enzymatic activity or disrupting protein-protein interactions affecting signal transduction pathways, but not by activating complement, binding to inhibitory FcγRIIb receptor or engaging in cross-linking of the targeted antigen with immune complex formation as the IgG1-IgG3 antibody subclasses do. IgG4 can even inhibit the classical complement pathway by affecting the affinity of IgG1-2 subclasses to C1q binding. Because the IgG4 antibodies do not trigger inflammatory processes or complement-mediated immune responses, the conventional anti-inflammatory therapies, especially with IVIg, immunosuppressants, and plasmapheresis, are ineffective or not sufficiently effective in inducing long-term remissions. In contrast, aiming at the activated plasmablasts connected with IgG4 antibody production is a meaningful therapeutic target in IgG4-ND. Indeed, data from large series of patients with MuSK myasthenia, CIDP with nodal/paranodal antibodies, and anti-LGI1 and CASPR2-associated syndromes indicate that B cell depletion therapy with rituximab exerts long-lasting clinical remissions by targeting memory B cells and IgG4-producing CD20-positive short-lived plasma cells. Because IgG4 antibody titers seem reduced in remissions and increased in exacerbation, they may serve as potential biomarkers of treatment response supporting further the pathogenic role of self-reacting B cells. Controlled trials are needed in IgG4-ND not only with rituximab but also with the other anti-B cell agents that target CD19/20, especially those like obexelimab and obinutuzumab, that concurrently activate the inhibitory FcγRIIb receptors which have low binding affinity to IgG4, exerting a more prolonged anti-B cell action affecting also antigen presentation and cytotoxic T cells. Antibody therapies targeting FcRn, testing those anti-FcRn inhibitors that effectively catabolize the IgG4 antibody subclass, may be especially promising.

Orchestration of Immune Cells Contributes to Fibrosis in IgG4-Related Disease

This review summarizes recent progress in understanding the pathogenesis of IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD), with a focus on fibrosis. Several studies reported that CD4+ T cells with cytotoxic activity promoted by the secretion of granzyme and perforin, cytotoxic CD4+ T cells (CD4+CTLs), and disease-specific activated B cells, infiltrated inflamed tissues and cooperated to induce tissue fibrosis in autoimmune fibrotic diseases such as IgG4-RD, systemic sclerosis, and fibrosing mediastinitis. An accumulation of cells undergoing apoptotic cell death induced by CD4+CTLs and CD8+CTLs followed by macrophage-mediated clearing and finally tissue remodeling driven by cytokines released by CD4+CTLs, activated B cells, and M2 macrophages may contribute to the activation of fibroblasts and collagen production. In IgG4-RD, this process likely involves the apoptosis of non-immune, non-endothelial cells of mesenchymal origin and subsequent tissue remodeling. In summary, CD4+CTLs infiltrate affected tissues where they may cooperate with activated B cells, CD8+CTLs, and M2 macrophages, to induce apoptosis by secreting cytotoxic cytokines. These immune cells also drive fibrosis by secreting pro-fibrotic molecules in IgG4-RD.

IgG4-Mediated Neurologic Autoimmunities: Understanding the Pathogenicity of IgG4, Ineffectiveness of IVIg, and Long-Lasting Benefits of Anti-B Cell Therapies

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Describe the unique functions of immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) in IgG4-neurologic disorders (IgG4-ND) and explain why, in contrast to their IgG1-counterparts, they respond poorly to intravenous immune globulin (IVIg) but effectively to anti-B cell therapies.

METHODS

The IgG4 structure and isotype switch, B cells and plasmablasts relevant to IgG4 production, and IgG4-induced disruption of the targeted antigens are reviewed and compared with IgG1-mediated autoimmune ND, where IVIg inhibits IgG1-triggered inflammatory effects.

RESULTS

The main IgG4-ND include muscle-specific kinase myasthenia; nodal/paranodal chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy with antibodies to neurofascin-155, contactin-1/caspr-1, or pan-neurofascins; antileucine-rich, glioma-inactivated-1 and contactin-associated protein-like 2 associated-limbic encephalitis, Morvan syndrome, or neuromyotonia; and anti-IgLON5 disorder. The IgG4, because of its unique structural features in the hinge region, has noninflammatory properties being functionally monovalent and bispecific, unable to engage in cross-linking and internalization of the targeted antigen. In contrast to IgG1 subclass which is bivalent and monospecific, IgG4 does not activate complement and cannot bind to inhibitory Fcγ receptor (FcγRIIb) to activate cellular and complement-mediated immune responses, the key functions inhibited by IVIg. Because IVIg contains only 0.7%-2.6% IgG4, its idiotypes are of IgG1 subclass and cannot effectively neutralize IgG4 or sufficiently enhance IgG4 catabolism by saturating FcRn. In contrast, rituximab, by targeting memory B cells and IgG4-producing CD20-positive short-lived plasma cells, induces long-lasting clinical benefits.

DISCUSSION

Rituximab is the preferred treatment in IgG4-ND patients with severe disease by effectively targeting the production of pathogenic IgG-4 antibodies. In contrast, IVIG is ineffective because it inhibits immunoinflammatory functions irrelevant to the mechanistic effects of IgG4 and contains IgG-1 idiotypes that cannot sufficiently neutralize or possibly catabolize IgG4. Controlled studies with anti-CD19/20 monoclonals that also activate FcγRIIb may be more promising in treating IgG4-ND.

Therapy of immunoglonuline IgG4 related disease (IgG4-RD)

Immunoglobulin IgG4 related disease (IgG4-RD) is a heterogeneous disorder with multi-organ involvement recognised as a separate entity at the beginning of this century only. Evolving therapy is reviewed in this paper. Glucocorticoids are first choice drug but long administration of glucocorticoids is connected with many adverse effects. In case of combination glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive agents lower doses of glucocorticoids are needed, the response rate is higher and therapy is better tolerated. Rituximab is drug, that is possible use as monotherapy or in combination with glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive drugs. Only one study compared two immunosuporessive drugs, mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide. The response rated was similar but remissions were longer after glucocorticoids with cyclophosphamide then glucocorticoids with mycofenolat mofetil. No other comparative study of combination of various imunossupressive drugs with glucocorticoids was published. Rituximab has high number (90 %) of response rate in monotherapy, but can be used in combination with glucocorticoids and immunosuppressives. Rituximab is now preferred and recommended for maintenance therapy administered in 6-month interval. In case of advanced disease, we prefer therefore combination of rituximab, cyclofosphamide and dexamethasone for initial therapy followed by maintenance with rituximab in 6 months interval. There are two new drugs under investigation abatacept and dupilimab with promising results. Although we have very intensive therapies for good results of therapy early diagnosis before irreversible fibrotic changes in IgG4-RD involved organs is still needed.