Intellectual efficiency in children and adolescents with spina bifida myelomeningocele and shunted hydrocephalus

Prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and intellectual disability among children with hydrocephalus

OBJECTIVE

Little is known about the prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children with hydrocephalus. In this study, the authors assessed the prevalence of ADHD and its association with clinical and demographic factors, including intellectual disability (ID), a potential factor that can confound the diagnosis of ADHD.

METHODS

The authors conducted a cross-sectional study of children 6-12 years of age with hydrocephalus using parent telephone surveys. The Child and Adolescent Intellectual Disability Screening Questionnaire (CAIDS-Q) and the National Institute for Children's Health Quality (NICHQ) Vanderbilt Assessment Scale were used to screen for ID and ADHD, respectively. Among children without ID, the authors identified those with ADHD and calculated a prevalence estimate and 95% confidence interval (Wald method). Logistic regression analysis was conducted to compare children with ADHD with those without ADHD based on demographics, family income, parental educational, etiology of hydrocephalus, and primary treatment. As a secondary analysis, the authors compared subjects with ID with those without using the same variables. Multivariable analysis was used to identify factors with independent association with ADHD and ID.

RESULTS

A total of 147 primary caregivers responded to the telephone questionnaire. Seventy-two children (49%) met the cutoff score for ID (CAIDS-Q). The presence of ID was significantly associated with lower family income (p < 0.001). Hydrocephalus etiology (p = 0.051) and initial treatment (p = 0.06) approached significance. Of children without ID (n = 75), 25 demonstrated a likely diagnosis of ADHD on the NICHQ, yielding a prevalence estimate of 0.33 (95% CI 0.22-0.44). No clinical or demographic variable showed significant association with ADHD.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that the prevalence of ADHD among children with hydrocephalus (33%) is higher than among the general population (estimated prevalence in Alabama is 12.5%). ID is also common (49%). Routine screening for ADHD and ID in children with hydrocephalus may help to ensure that adequate resources are provided to optimize functional outcomes across development.

Psychosocial problems and cognitive functions in children with spina bifida

Objectives

This study aims to assess psychosocial functioning in relation to lesion level and ambulatory status in children with spina bifida (SB) and compare them to their peers.

Patients and methods

Between March 2013 and May 2013, a total of 31 patients with SB (11 males, 20 females; mean age: 9.4 years; range, 6 to 14.7 years) and 36 typically developing peers (16 males, 20 females; mean age: 9.8 years; range, 6.5 to 14.8 years) were included in the study. All participants were assessed using a semi-structured psychiatric diagnostic interview via the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL), Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R), Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Functions (BRIEF) parent form, Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), and Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC).

Results

In the SB group, the rate of psychiatric disorders was significantly higher (p=0.001) and the SRS scores and the planning and organizational components of the executive function were higher than their peers (p=0.02 and p=0.007, respectively). The psychiatric diagnosis rate, BRIEF, and SRS total scores did not significantly differ according to lesion level and ambulatory status. The BRIEF initiate and organization of materials subtest scores and ABC scores were significantly lower at high lesion levels (p=0.02, p=0.02, and p=0.02, respectively) and non-community walkers (p=0.002, p=0.03, and p=0.003, respectively).

Conclusion

Psychiatric disorders, impairment in social responsiveness, and planning and organization components of the executive function are prevalent in children with SB with no intellectual disabilities, compared to their peers. Therefore, psychosocial counseling and multidisciplinary follow-up for SB patients seem to be beneficial.

Brain malformations and cognitive performance in spina bifida

AIM

To systematically characterize radiological features of patients with spina bifida, their relationship to cognitive function, and differences between spina bifida aperta (SBA) and spina bifida occulta (SBO).

METHOD

In a retrospective study of 265 patients (117 females, 148 males; median age at imaging 11y, range 1-47y; SBA n=206, SBO n=59), the radiological phenotype was assessed through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (SBA n=171, SBO n=59). In 126 patients (SBA n=116, SBO n=10) Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (KABC) or Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fourth Edition (WISC-IV) and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) were performed.

RESULTS

Patients with spina bifida show numerous brain malformations, always present for SBA but rarely for SBO. The most frequent brain malformations in SBA included abnormal corpus callosum (69%), hypoplastic pons (50%), and hypoplastic mesencephalon (20%). Cognitive total IQ scores were below average in 44% (KABC) to 49% (WISC-IV) of children with SBA, while almost all children with SBO scored at least average. Stenogyria (p=0.006), pons (p=0.003), and mesencephalon hypoplasia (p=0.01) correlated with lower total IQ score and verbal comprehension. Various brain malformations correlate significantly with several cognitive domains, while lesion level only correlates with processing speed.

INTERPRETATION

IQ scores were significantly lower in patients with SBA than in patients with SBO. Verbal competence, perceptual reasoning, and working memory were significantly impaired for SBA and correlated with stenogyria and abnormalities of the midbrain and corpus callosum.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

Brain malformations occur more frequently in spina bifida aperta (SBA) than in spina bifida occulta (SBO). Cognitive impairment is less frequent in SBO. Hydrocephalus, stenogyria, midbrain, and corpus callosum abnormalities are associated with lower cognitive function. Difference in prognosis in SBO versus SBA can alter prenatal counselling.

Neuropsychological profiles in children and young adults with spina bifida

PURPOSE

A total of 43 Italian children, aged between 6 and 16 years, diagnosed with spina bifida, myelomeningocele, and shunted hydrocephalus have been described clinically and completed a neuropsychological battery in order to evaluate their cognitive, personality, and behavior profile.

METHODS

Enrolled children underwent cognitive assessment by means of the Weschler WISC-IV cognitive test and assessment of the attention sustained through the LEITER test. In addition, parents were asked, in order to obtain a personality and behavior profile of the children, to fill in a "CBCL 6-18 years" questionnaire and to fill in a Barthel Index questionnaire.

RESULTS

Processing Speed Index of the WISC-IV QI scale was statistically significant (p = 0.027), with the highest value presented by autonomous patients (95.8 ± 12.8) and the lowest by patients using a wheelchair (75.5 ± 19). WISC-IV QI mean value is 98 (±15.7) for lipoma patients and 78.7 (±17.6) for LMMC and MMC patients (p = 0.001). In more detail, Perceptual Reasoning (p < 0.0005), Working Memory (p = 0.01), and Processing Speed Index (p = 0.001) highlighted a significant difference between the groups. The attention sustained subscale of the LEITER presented a mean of 6.9 (±3.1) for lipoma patients and a men value of 4.6 (±3.1) for LMMC and MMC patients (p = 0.024). Patients with hydrocephalus had statistically significant worse cognition and autonomy (Barthel Index) score (p < 0.001) compared with those without hydrocephalus, and normal scores regarding attention and depression scales.

CONCLUSION

These results can be useful in planning dedicated therapeutic protocols such as suitable rehabilitation treatments, speech therapy, psychomotor skills, and cognitive enhancement and to develop prevention protocols particularly tailored for children with hydrocephalus who appear to have the more deficient skills.

The impact of cerebral anomalies on cognitive outcome in patients with spina bifida: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Spina bifida is the most common congenital birth defect affecting the central nervous system. Given the frequent association of cerebral anomalies, spina bifida is not a single developmental abnormality of the central nervous system. Patients with spina bifida typically perform below average on cognitive tasks. It has been hypothesized that associated cerebral anomalies as well negatively affect cognition in spina bifida patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to review the impact of cerebral anomalies on cognitive outcome in patients with spina bifida.

METHODS

A systematic search of multiple databases, including Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, was performed. All relevant primary research articles were included. All included articles were methodologically evaluated using a critical appraisal checklist.

RESULTS

In total 27 articles were included in this systematic review. A significant impact of different cerebral anomalies on cognition was found. More specifically, hydrocephalus, Chiari malformation type II and anomalies of the corpus callosum, central executive network, default mode network, cortical thickness and gyrification, fornix, grey matter volume and total brain volume were found to have a significant impact on cognitive outcome. The presence of a CSF shunt was also negatively associated with cognition. The results on Chiari malformation type II decompression and CSF shunt complications are inconsistent.

CONCLUSION

Associated cerebral anomalies have a significant impact on cognitive outcome in patients with spina bifida. The interrelatedness of the different cerebral anomalies makes it difficult to distinguish their individual impact on cognition.