Are the Predictions of the Dynamic Dominance Model of Laterality Applicable to Children?

Prosthetic home intervention induces cortical plasticity in paediatrics with congenital limb reduction

Paediatrics with congenital upper-limb reduction deficiency often face difficulties with normal development such as motor skills, needing assistance with daily activities such as self-care limitations with certain movements, sports, or activities. The purpose of this non-randomized longitudinal controlled trial was to assess, using intent-to-treat analysis, the effects of an 8-week home intervention of prosthetic use on the sensorimotor cortex in paediatrics with congenital upper-limb reduction deficiency. A paediatric population with congenital upper-limb reduction deficiency (n = 14) who were aged 6-18 years and who had a 20° or greater range of motion in the appropriate joint of the affected arm to move the body-powered prosthesis were enrolled. An age- and sex-matched control group (n = 14) was also enrolled. Participants were non-randomized and fitted with a custom low-cost 3D printed prosthesis and participated in 8 weeks of prosthetic use training at home. Control participants utilized a prosthetic simulator. The home intervention incorporated daily use training and exercises utilizing the prosthesis in direct use and assistive tasks explained by the researchers. After the home intervention, both groups displayed significant improvements in gross manual dexterity. During prosthetic use with the affected limb, significant increases in oxygenated hemodynamic responses were only displayed in the left premotor cortex of the upper-limb reduction deficiency group. The novel findings of this non-randomized longitudinal controlled trial suggest that the intervention may have improved the functional role of the left hemisphere which translated to the improvement of learning direction during adaptation to visuomotor control. The prosthetic home intervention was assumed to provide closed-loop training which could provide a direct benefit to the motor development of paediatrics with upper-limb reduction deficiency.

A task-dependent analysis of closed vs. open and fine vs. gross motor skills in handedness

The traditional classifications of motor skills nature (open vs closed; fine vs gross) have not been considered in handedness investigations. Instead, previous research focused on comparing complex vs less complex motor behaviour, leaving a gap in the literature. We compared manual preference between different motor skill characteristics, namely: fine and closed (FC), gross and closed (GC) and gross and open (GO) tasks. The hand preference was assessed with the Global Lateral Preference Inventory in four hundred and forty participants (244 women) aged from 18 to 59 years old. By assessing the degree and direction of handedness in different motor skills, our results showed a stronger lateralization pattern for FC motor skills as compared to GC and GO, with GO also being less lateralized than GC. Our results expand those of previous investigations that used the motor skill complexity definitions by showing how handedness can also be modulated by the interaction between classic motor skills classifications. Future research should consider fine vs. gross and open vs. closed classifications when selecting tasks for analysis of asymmetries of preference.

Inventories of Human Lateral Preference: A Systematic Review

There are a variety of inventories available to evaluate human lateral preference, but no previous review has systematically analyzed and compared them. We conducted a systematic literature review to identify these inventories and describe their characteristics (e.g., dimensions, scales, tasks, psychometric properties). We included 26 articles, each presenting a different inventory to assess lateral preference, published between 1900 and 2022, selected from the following databases: PubMed, SportDiscus, APA PsycNET, and Web of Science. These inventories analyzed tasks performed in everyday life (domestic, work-related, sports, and leisure/recreation activities), covering hand, foot, hearing, visual and other non-usual lateral preference dimensions, such as trunk and head. Most inventories classified individuals based on the direction (left, indifferent or right preference) and degree (consistent or moderate) of laterality. However, many of the reviewed inventories lack established psychometric verification in their original publication, such as validity, reliability, responsiveness, and practical applicability. Inventories also presented tasks that may be specific to a given cultural setting, limiting their application across different countries. Based on these findings, we provide a comprehensive guide for researchers to select a lateral preference assessment tool, but also advocate for a new inventory with a broader approach, containing more than one dimension of lateral preference (i.e., not only handedness) and tasks that are common to different cultures to enhance practical applicability worldwide.

The development of hand, foot, trunk, hearing, and visual lateral preference throughout the lifespan

This research investigated the developmental process of five lateral preference dimensions (hand, foot, trunk, hearing, and visual preference). A total of 1236 volunteers participated in this study, divided into five age groups: 07-12 (n = 247); 13-17 (n = 234); 18-30 (n = 227); 31-60 (n = 225); and 61-90 years old (n = 303). Lateral preference was assessed via questionnaire with the Global Lateral Preference Inventory. By assessing the degree and direction of lateral preference in different ages, our results revealed a pattern of lateralization strengthening with aging in all the analyzed dimensions. We also verified significant correlation between hand preference and the other dimensions for all age groups, but correlation was stronger in the 7-12 group for all correlation pairs. Our results lead to the suggestion of an underlying general lateralization process in early ages (7-12 years old) followed by specific developmental trajectories of each preference dimension (13 years forward), likely startled by hemisphere and functional specialization related to innate developmental patterns of neural structures and social/environmental influences.

Cultural and environmental aspects influence lateral preferences

Transcultural approaches comparing the distribution of lateral preference between countries focused primarily on handedness. However, other laterality dimensions may also be susceptible to cultural variations. The present study compared lateral preference in five dimensions (hand, foot, trunk, hearing, and visual) of young adults from Brazil and Mozambique. Two hundred and two undergraduate students participated in the study, of which 101 were Brazilian (21.7 ± 1.66 years old) and 101 Mozambican (25.6 ± 6.2 years old). The participants' lateral preference direction and degree were assessed using the global lateral preference inventory. Most Brazilians were classified in the moderate preference category, while Mozambicans had a higher frequency of individuals with strong preferences. Hence, Mozambicans presented a higher lateralization degree for all dimensions. A subsequent analysis considering only preference direction (right, left or indifferent), and not degree, did not show the same outcomes, revealing similarities in preference distribution between the two groups. This finding highlights the necessity to incorporate preference degrees in future analysis to not overlook potential differences. We also conclude lateral preference investigations with transcultural approaches should analyse beyond handedness, as other dimensions can also be modulated by cultural characteristics.