Homologous genes, aggression, and animal models

Causes and management of aggression and violence in a forensic mental health service: perspectives of nurses and patients

Nurses' attitudes about the causes and management of aggression affects their choice of intervention. We aimed to compare the attitudes held by patients and staff in a forensic mental health service with the Management of Aggression and Violence Attitudes Scale, and examine the factor validity of the tool in this setting by conducting a prospective comparative questionnaire survey. Staff (n = 72) and patient (n = 98) attitudes differed to a limited extent. Confirmatory factor analysis refuted the previously reported structure of the tool. Exploratory factor analysis suggested three underlying factors related to modifiability of aggression, hands on management, and hands off management. Patients were more optimistic than nurses about the modifiability of aggressive behaviour. Male patients and those with diagnoses other than personality disorder were significantly more likely to agree about modifiability than controls. Forensic inpatients recognize the need for the use of a range of techniques to prevent and manage aggression and violence, but selected groups are most likely to believe that aggression is modifiable. Prevention and management of aggression training should emphasize the modifiability of aggressive behaviour. The development of measures of modifiability and management style would assist in the evaluation of training and would offer new avenues for research.

Genetics of testosterone and the aggression-hostility-anger (AHA) syndrome: a study of middle-aged male twins

The aim of this study was to determine the genetic contribution to the variation in testosterone and the aggression-hostility-anger (AHA) syndrome in middle-aged twins. Moreover, the relation between testosterone and this syndrome, and possible common genetic mechanisms were investigated. Towards this end, blood samples were collected at two time points; the AHA syndrome was measured using three questionnaires: the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory with seven subscales, the Jenkins Activity Survey and the Spielberger State-Trait Anger Scale. The results showed substantial heritabilities for testosterone (approximately 60%) and moderate to fair heritabilities for the nine measures of the AHA syndrome (23–53%). The best fitting model for testosterone at two time points included a small age component and additive genetic and unique environmental factors, while a multivariate analysis of the nine AHA subscales resulted in an independent pathway model with two common additive genetic and two common unique environmental factors. No correlation between the common genetic factor influencing testosterone and the AHA subscales was found. We did, however, detect a negative correlation between the common environmental factor underlying testosterone and both common environmental factors influencing the nine AHA subscales, which may reflect a tendency for testosterone levels to rise and hostility to drop (or vice versa) after repeatedly experiencing success (or failure). Twin Research (2000) 3, 266–276.

Attack behaviors in mice: From factorial structure to quantitative trait loci mapping

The emergence or non-emergence of attack behavior results from interaction between the genotype and the conditions under which the mice are tested. Inbred mice of the same strain reared or housed under conditions do not react the same way; reactions also vary according to the place selected for testing and the different opponents. A factor analysis showed that the attack behavior in non-isolated males, tested in neutral area covaried with high testosterone and steroid sulfatase and low brain 5-hydroxytriptamine (5-HT), beta-endorphin and Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH) concentration, whereas, for isolated males tested in their own housing cage, it covaried with high testosterone activity and low brain 5-HT concentration. A wide genome scan was performed with two independent populations derived from C57BL/6J and NZB/BlNJ, each being reared, housed and tested under highly contrasting conditions, as described above, and confronted with A/J standard males. Common Quantitative Trait Loci emerged for two rearing/testing conditions. For rattling latency we detected Quantitative Trait Loci on Mus musculus chromosome 8 (MMU8) (at 44, LOD score=3.51 and 47 cM, LOD score=6.22, for the first and the second conditions) and on MMU12 (at 39 cM, LOD score=3.69 and at 41 cM, LOD score=2.99, respectively). For the number of attacks, Quantitative Trait Loci were common: on MMU11 at 39 cM LOD score=4.51 and 45 cM, LOD score=3.05, respectively, and on MMU12 (17 cM, LOD score=2.71 and 24 cM, LOD score=3.10). The steroid sulfatase gene (Sts), located on the X-Y pairing region, was linked, but only in non-isolated males, tested in neutral area for rattling latency, first attack latency, and number of attacks (LOD scores=4.9, 4.79 and 3.57, respectively). We found also that the Quantitative Trait Locus encompassing Sts region interacted with other Quantitative Trait Loci. These results indicate that attack behavior measured in different rearing and testing conditions have different biological and genetic correlates. This suggests that further explorations should be done with standardized tests and, in addition, with a wide range of tests, so as to gain an understanding of the true impact of genes or pharmacological treatments on specific categories of aggressive behavior.

Conceptual and methodological issues in the genetics of mouse agonistic behavior

Currently, 36 genes have been reported to affect offensive behavior in male mice. Potentially, these genes could be used to analyze the mechanism of this behavior. But there are methodological flies in this conceptual ointment. The studies with these genes varied in the genetic background, the maternal environments, the postweaning housing, the strain or type of opponent, and the type of test. The effects of each of these on the genetics of offense are reviewed with examples. It is concluded that between-study variation in these environmental or experiential circumstances may make it difficult to impossible to relate the effect of one genetic variant to another and to use these to identify and relate the pathways for gene effects on offensive behaviors. For this reason, standardization of these conditions is recommended.

Single-gene influences on brain and behavior

As traditional behavioral genetics analysis merges with neurogenetics, the field of neurobehavioral genetics, focusing on single-gene effects, comes into being. New biotechnology has greatly accelerated gene discovery and the study of gene function in relation to brain and behavior. More than 7,000 genes in mice and 10,000 in humans have now been documented, and extensive information about the genetics of several species is readily available on the World Wide Web. Based on knowledge of the DNA sequence of a gene, a targeted mutation with the capacity to disable it can be created. These knockouts--also called null mutants--are employed in the study of a wide range of phenotypes, including learning and memory, appetite and obesity, and circadian rhythms. The era of examining single-gene effects from a reductionistic perspective is waning, and research with interacting arrays of genes in various environmental contexts is demonstrating a need for systems-oriented theory.